Regulating “Junk Food” Marketing on Public School Property AcademyHealth 2008 June 10, 2008 Marice Ashe, JD, MPH Director, Public Health Law & Policy National Policy & Legal Analysis Network
Junk Food as Early Education
Junk Food in Schools
Advertising is Speech Advertising is speech that is subject to First Amendment protections. It is considered: o Essential to free enterprise in a democracy o More important to some citizens than an urgent political debate Protecting advertising from regulation promotes the free flow of information to consumers
School Regulation of Advertising Must “Make the Grade” One of two First Amendment tests probably apply o Commercial speech test o Covered in previous presentation o Limited application in school setting o Forum test o Usually the correct test for a K-12 school setting
Three Kinds of Forums Public forums: public property traditionally devoted to assembly and debate o e.g., plaza in front of city hall Designated/limited public forums: public property designated for speech and potentially limited to debate on a specific range of subjects o e.g., school board meeting, municipal theater Non-public forums: public property that is not opened to assembly or debate o e.g., military bases, post-offices and schools
Public Forums and Designated Forums Restrictions on speech are subject to rigorous “strict scrutiny” test (or nearly) o Is the restriction for a compelling government interest? o Is the restriction narrowly tailored? Bottom line: Speech must be allowed subject to “time, place and manner” restrictions o e.g., parades and demonstrations need permits, time limits at public meetings can be imposed
Non-public Forums Commercial speech can be restricted K-12 public schools are deemed to be non-public forums because o Children do not enjoy the same rights as adults to receive information o Schools have great leeway to control speech to further their “educational mission”
Non-public Forum Test Two part test Is the restriction o Reasonable? o Viewpoint neutral?
Reasonableness Test A court will ask: o Is the policy wholly consistent with the school’s legitimate interest o i.e., educational mission, non-exploitation of students o in preserving the property o i.e., the school facilities and grounds o for its intended use? o i.e., education of children Very forgiving standard of review
It Is Reasonable to Restrict... All advertising on campus o Rationale: Schools are non-commercial spaces All food and beverage advertising o Rationale: Avoid confusion with classroom nutrition education All food and beverage advertising of products not allowed to be sold o Rationale: Ensure consistency with wellness policy It may be unreasonable to restrict o Advertising for products that are allowed to be sold on campus o (Restricting speech only without restricting the conduct the speech is about is riskier)
Viewpoint Neutrality Test A court will ask: o Does the restriction go to all speech by a third party on a particular subject? o i.e., speech that is both for and against a subject e.g., all ads related to birth control (pro and con) disallowed in school newspaper o Planned Parenthood v. Clark County School District
It is Viewpoint Neutral to Restrict... All advertising on campus o Neutral because it affects all advertisers All food and beverage advertising o Neutral because it affects all food and beverage advertisers All food and beverage advertising of products not allowed to be sold o Neutral because it affects all advertisers who want to promote or oppose certain foods or drinks
Legal Strategies to Regulate Junk Food Advertising Negotiate specific terms in vending contracts that limit/prohibit advertising Refuse to sign vending contracts that require or permit marketing Adopt policies limiting/prohibiting use of school property for: All advertising All food/beverage advertising Advertising of foods/beverages that are not allowed to be sold on campus
Marice Ashe, JD, MPH Director Public Health Law & Policy 2201 Broadway, Suite 502 Oakland, CA (fax)