Setting The Stage: Placemat Activity At your tables, get in groups of four and assign one box per person Take a moment and independently brainstorm important.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Denise Wright, BCPS Elementary Instructional Coach.
Unit 1 Learning Objectives Experience a science lesson that integrates CA CCSS speaking/listening, writing and reading with science content Identify Literacy.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
ELA: Focus on Informational Text FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Lari Miller-Powell & Sara Parenzin March 22, 2012.
Presented by: COMMON CORE Standards Plus ®. A nonprofit group of educators All Learning Plus instructional materials are developed by educators. Our mission.
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
STANDARDS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS & LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES, SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS Taking a Closer Look Inside the Common Core 1.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Pacing Guides Grade 2 - Quarter 1 Students read texts, write about those texts, speak and listen about the texts and use language correctly when writing.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Tuesday 08/12 Grab DOK handouts and put them in your “Units” tab. Warm-up: Look over the Academic Integrity Policy that you researched for homework. Respond.
Standards-Based Instruction Implementation: Badge 4-Analyzing Standards.
How to design better questions!
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
Module 4—Literacy Strands Arts Education. Learning Outcomes Participants will: explore the relationship between the new Essential Standards and the Common.
Recognizing these in the classroom
Content Analysis Workshop John L. Smithson, Director, Measures of the Enacted Curriculum Alissa Minor, Projects Manager, Measures of the Enacted Curriculum.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
The Constructed Response Assessment The Journey Continues.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
Depth of Knowledge Civic Literacy Teacher Network Social Studies.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Unpacking the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Unpacking the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
Preplanning Presentation
Norman L Webb.
Presentation transcript:

Setting The Stage: Placemat Activity At your tables, get in groups of four and assign one box per person Take a moment and independently brainstorm important elements of ELA Standards and write your ideas in your box Share ideas in your group Agree on one interpretation of the ELA’s or something significant that was learned Day 1 and write it in the center circle Be prepared to share

The English Language Arts Alignment Document and Cognitive Demand 2010 Arizona English Language Arts Standards

The English Language Arts Alignment Document Goal: Participants connect and apply The 2010 Arizona English Language Arts Standards to curriculum and instruction through their understanding of the interrelationships between:  AZ Articulated Standards (the ‘old’ standards)  2010 Arizona English Language Arts Standards.

Entering the Crosswalk!

The English Language Arts Alignment Document and Cognitive Demand Questions: Why is the design of the alignment document important? How much has changed? Are some AZ POs more strongly aligned than others to the 2010 Arizona ELA Standards? What is Cognitive Demand and why is it important?

The English Language Arts Alignment Document and Cognitive Demand The alignment document is an integrated document consisting of: The 2010 Arizona English Language Arts Standards Explanations and Examples illustrating the 2010 standards. The Arizona Articulated Standards

Coding 1.RL.1 Grade Level Strand: Reading Literature Standard 1

Grade 2 Alignment Document ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ALIGNMENT OF 2010 STANDARDS TO ARIZONA 1996, 2003 and 2004 STANDARDS Examples and Explanations from ELA Committee and Common Core.org Grade Reading Standards for Informational Text K-5 ClusterExplanation and Examples 1996, 2003, and 2004 Standards Reading, Writing, Listening & Speaking, and Viewing & Presenting Key Ideas and DetailsStrands, Concepts, and Performance Objectives 2.RI.1 Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. Source: ADE/ELA Committee Teacher posts the question words (who, what, where, when, why, and how) and s/he says, “Let’s review what we just read. Turn to your elbow buddy and take turns asking your buddy questions beginning with the words on the board.” Teacher provides opportunities for students to practice formulating questions by providing question stems for students to use with a partner. Connections: SS02.S1C10.02, SS02.S2C9.01 Source: commoncore.org Class Discussion / Informational Text Grade 2 Unit 2 Bill Pickett: Rodeo-Ridin’ Cowboy (Andrea Davis Pinkney) is a true story of an African- American cowboy. After the story is read, display the same kind of chart from the unit one segment on fiction (see below). Again, remind the students that these are only question stems and must be amplified to focus on the story. Ask students to choose two questions to answer and write on their white boards. Share the responses from the students and add to the class chart. (RI.2.1, SL.2.2) R02.S1C6.03 Ask relevant questions in order to comprehend text. R02.S3C1.02 Locate facts in response to questions about expository text. R01.S3C1.02 Answer questions (e.g., who, what, where, when, why, how) about expository text, heard or read.

The First Column: 2010 English Language Arts Standards 2010 Reading Standards for Informational Text Cluster Key Ideas and Details 2.RI.1 Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. Strand: RI Cluster: Relates to CCR Standard: Grade Level Specific

The Middle Column: Explanations and Examples 2010 Reading Standards for Literature Explanation and Examples Source: ADE/ELA Committee Teacher posts the question words (who, what, where, when, why, and how) and s/he says, “Let’s review what we just read. Turn to your elbow buddy and take turns asking your buddy questions beginning with the words on the board.” Teacher provides opportunities for students to practice formulating questions by providing question stems for students to use with a partner. Connections: SS02.S1C10.02, SS02.S2C9.01 Source: commoncore.org Class Discussion / Informational Text Grade 2 Unit 2 Bill Pickett: Rodeo-Ridin’ Cowboy (Andrea Davis Pinkney) is a true story of an African-American cowboy. After the story is read, display the same kind of chart from the unit one segment on fiction (see below). Again, remind the students that these are only question stems and must be amplified to focus on the story. Ask students to choose two questions to answer and write on their white boards. Share the responses from the students and add to the class chart.

2010 Reading Standards for Literature 1996, 2003, and 2004 Standards Reading, Writing, Listening & Speaking, and Viewing & Presenting STRANDS, CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES R02.S1C6.03 Ask relevant questions in order to comprehend text. R02.S3C1.02 Locate facts in response to questions about expository text. R01.S3C1.02 Answer questions (e.g., who, what, where, when, why, how) about expository text, heard or read. Second Grade PO First Grade PO Third Column: 1996 – 2004 Arizona Articulated Standards 2.RI.1 Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text.

Checking Point Using your grade level Alignment Document, highlight and discuss any Aha’s or Oh-oh’s with your grade level group

Food for Thought… 1. What do we mean by rigor? 2. What does it have to do with our expectations for student performance? 3. What should students be able to do under the 2010 English Language Arts Standards? 4.How will teachers design appropriate instruction to match the increased rigor?

Cognitive Demand: Expectations for Student Performance What students should be able to do

Depth of Knowledge Recall Skill & Concept Strategic Thinking Extended Thinking Degree of understanding “Cognitive Demand” Bloom’s Taxonomy Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Evaluate & Create Progression of the development of cognitive skills

What’s In A Verb? The verb does not dictate the level of rigor. It is the context in which the verb is used that dictates the level of rigor.

DOK Level 1 - Recall  Recall of a fact, definition, information, or performance of a simple process or procedure. Example: Solve a linear expression 5(4x+9)

DOK Level 2 – Skill & Concept  Use information or conceptual knowledge; two or more steps; make decisions about how to approach Example: Predict a logical outcome based on information in a reading selection

DOK Level 3 – Strategic Thinking  Requires reasoning, developing plan, some complexity, more than one possible answer; generates discussion; requires student to justify answer Example: Solve a multi-step problem & provide a mathematical explanation to justifying answer

DOK Level 4 – Extended Thinking  Requires an investigation; high cognitive demand; time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem Example: Analyze & explain multiple perspectives across time periods, events, or cultures

LET’S PRACTICE!

DOK Wheel Activity 1.With a partner, read and discuss the descriptor cards in the baggie. Which level does this task represent? 2.Place your cards over the level you think the description might fit best 3.Use your handout as a guide

Depth Of Knowledge DOK 1 – Recall DOK 2 - Skill & Concept DOK 3 - Strategic Thinking DOK 4 - Extended Thinking Recall of a fact, definition, information, or performance of a simple process or procedure. Use information or conceptual knowledge; two or more steps; you do something; make decisions how to approach Requires reasoning, developing plan or a sequence of steps, some complexity, more than one possible answer; generates discussion; requires student to justify answer Requires an investigation; high cognitive demand; time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem

Exploring Cognitive Demand: 1.What do you notice about the placement of the cards? Are some categories “covered” with cards and others have very few? What does this reveal? Talk at your tables. 2.Identify areas of agreement such as 2 cards with the same descriptors on the same category. 3. Is there agreement? Where there is disagreement, talk it through…

LET’S CHECK!

Cognitive Demand Categories For ELA DOK 1DOK 2DOK 3DOK 4 Reproduce sounds or words Provide facts, terms, definitions, conventions Locate literal answers in text Identify relevant information Describe Follow instructions Identify purpose, main ideas, organizational patterns Summarize Gather information Give examples Check consistency Create/develop connections among text, self, world Recognize relationships Order, group, outline, organize ideas Compare and Contrast Categorize/schematize information Distinguish fact and opinion Express new ideas (or express ideas newly) Develop reasonable alternatives Make inferences, draw conclusions Predict probable consequences Generalize Test conclusions, hypothesis Assess adequacy, appropriateness, credibility Identify with another’s point of view Dramatize Determine relevance, coherence, internal consistency, logic Synthesize content and ideas from several sources Integrate with other topics and subjects Critique

Resources Common Core State Standards: Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS Assessment Article Achieve-Information about PARCC Surveys of Enacted Curriculum 28Source: