Protecting Drinking Water: The Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 16.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
12 CHAPTER Monopoly.
Advertisements

The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 By: Allie Hornbuckle Period 5.
Hayward Water System Public Health Goal Report Alex Ameri, Deputy Director of Public Works Utilities Division Department of Public Works.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
Defining Water Quality The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 15 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
Safe Drinking Water Act: Key Components 1.Listing Contaminants: 2.Maximum Containment Level Goal (MCLG): 3.Maximum Containment Levels (MCL): - § 300g-1(b)(1)(A):
Safe Drinking Water Act Overview Environmental Law 2 Spring 2005.
MassDEP Municipal Services
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Professor Bernie Engel ASM 336 September 13, 2004.
Monopoly CHAPTER 12. After studying this chapter you will be able to Explain how monopoly arises and distinguish between single-price monopoly and price-discriminating.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
S afe D rinking W ater A ct Marty Swickard drinking water program EPA Region 8 25 years old in 1999.
Defining Water Quality The Standard-Setting Process
Chapter 4 Conventional Solutions to Environmental Problems: The Command-and-Control Approach © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Managing Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10.
Environmental Economics Class 7. Incentive Based Regulation: Basic Concepts Up to this point, the focus has been on resource allocation. Since the use.
Externalities and Public Goods
Colorado’s Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring and Protecting Groundwater During Oil and Gas Development Natural Resources Law Center Intermountain.
Evaluating Monopoly Comparison with Perfect Competition.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act Presented by Scott Weir, Air Quality Coordinator Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas.
 Drinking-Water Standards  History  Key Definitions  How Standards are Developed  Current Issues Confronting Developers of Standards.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) SAFE 210. Overview Enacted in 1974 to: Enacted in 1974 to: –Protect public health by regulating the nation’s public.
Richard A. Snyder Center for Environmental Diagnostics and Bioremediation January, The Environmental Working.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Monopoly 13 CHAPTER.
The Safe Drinking Water Act and the Arsenic Rule Rajiv Khera, P.E. Arsenic in Drinking Water Discussion Panel - ITRC Fall Meeting October 27, 2004.
Monopoly CHAPTER 12. After studying this chapter you will be able to Explain how monopoly arises and distinguish between single-price monopoly and price-discriminating.
VI. Purpose of Water Treatment
Protecting Drinking Water: The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 16 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Protecting Drinking Water The Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 17 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
The Safe Drinking Water Act Of 1974, 1984, & 1996 Elle Gerleman.
Air pollution. Command and control 27,000 major sources of pollutants in US are subject to control Clean Air Act 1970; EPA created to oversee Describe.
Health & Safety Regulation Costs vs. Benefits Of Risk Reduction.
Chapter 181 Externalities and Public Goods. Chapter 182 Externalities Externalities are the effects of production and consumption activities not directly.
Water Quality Compliance California Water Association.
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Ecology and the Environment Mr. Corsini - NWHS.
Water System Consolidation and Restructuring Scott Torpie Washington State Department of Health Drinking Water Advisory Group November 3, 2014.
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making Chapter 7.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 14 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
PDP SUBMISSION Purpose (1) The purpose of this Act is to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources. (2) In this Act, sustainable.
Purpose of Water Treatment c. Safe Drinking Water Act and SDWA amendments.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Improving Air Quality: Controlling Mobile Sources Chapter 11 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,
Jessica Williams. History/ Basic Information The CWA was formerly known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, which was made in 1948 and was the.
Evaluating Monopoly Comparison with Perfect Competition.
1974, 1984,  Enacted December 16, 1974 ◦ Amended in 1986 and 1996  SWDA regulates all public water systems in the U.S. (national law)  Requires.
Water Prices and Other Inefficiencies in Water Markets Monday, April 3.
ExternalitiesExternalities. Overview Externalities –Negative: Action by one party imposes a cost on another party –Positive: Action by one party benefits.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Drafted in 1974 Amended in 1986 and 1996 Sets national health-based standards for drinking water to protect against.
Draft Year: 1974 Amended: 1984& 1996 National legislation.
Safe Water Drinking Act (SWDA) Originally passed: 1974 Amended: 1986 and 1996 National Act.
Earth at Night. Economics and the Environment Environment and Economics Unfunded Mandates What: Federal requirements imposed on states and local governments.
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 By: Blake Burch. This act was enacted by the 93 rd United States Congress in 1974 and signed into law by Gerald Ford.
SWDA.  The average total home water use for each person in the U.S. is about 50 gallons a day.  The average cost for water supplied to a home in the.
Water Quality Standards
Safe Drinking Water: Yes or No?
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, 1984, and 1996
Copyright © 2013 Jonathan M. Harris
Module 45 Water Pollution Laws
Safe Drinking Water Act
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
Toxicity Testing An additional protection against water pollution not prevented by technology-based limitations or water quality limitations Testing requirements.
8 Government, the Firm and the Market.
Functions and Levels of Government
The Role of Government Chapter 14
Predicting elemental toxicity based on perturbations to natural concentrations Advisor: Sarah Jane White.
Water Prices and Other Inefficiencies in Water Markets
City Council Public Hearing August 16, 2010
Presentation transcript:

Protecting Drinking Water: The Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 16

1. Overview of Policy _________________________(SDWA) of 1974 –Authorized EPA to set standards (shifted responsibility from the Public Health Service) –All contaminants were addressed, not just bacteria SDWA Amendments of 1986 –Accelerated standard-setting; imposed “lead ban”; improved protection of groundwater; listed 83 contaminants SDWA Amendments of 1996 –Adds risk assessment and benefit-cost analysis to standard-setting; establishes a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF); promotes prevention 2

Bottled Water Not directly regulated under SDWA Controlled by ____________________________ (FDA), not EPA – FDA must adopt EPA’s standards for drinking water – FDA has own standards for aesthetics and health 3

2. Setting Standards: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR) Aimed at protecting human health Uniformly applied to all public water systems Each NPDWR has three parts – Maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) level at which no known or expected adverse health effects occur with margin of safety; not enforceable – Maximum contaminant level (MCL) highest level permitted; as close to MCLG as feasible; enforceable – Best available technology (BAT) treatment technology that makes MCL achievable 4

3. Economic Analysis: Standard-Setting MCLGs are __________________ – Before 1996 SDWA, MCLs also were benefit- based, since MCLs link to MCLGs 1996 SWDA amendments requires EPA to conduct an Economic Analysis (EA) for any proposed NPDWR – Must determine whether benefits of a new MCL justify costs – Important because ignoring costs means MCLs could be set to maximize benefits, causing _____________________ 5

Benefit-based MCL (at A B ) $ A TSC TSB 0 AeAe ABAB Maximum TSB overregulation 6

Total social benefits (TSB) are maximized at the abatement level where MSB = 0 Net social benefits (= TSB - TSC) are maximized at the abatement level where MSB = MSC MSB = the slope of TSB = the first derivative of TSB = d(TSB)/dA MSC = the slope of TSC = the first derivative of TSC = d(TSC)/dA 7

4. Pricing Water Does Price Matter? Some evidence suggests that consumption of water is sensitive to ________ Comparing domestic with international data – US water consumption is relatively _______ – US water prices are relatively _______ Suggests that pricing water can influence conservation 8

Local Pricing Practices Survey Data ___________________: (29.3%) – price is independent of use; marginal price = 0 – efficient only if MC = 0 ______________________: (50.6%) – charge increases with higher use at constant rate – efficient only if MC were constant at same rate ____________________: (30.6%) – declining block and increasing block 9 Source: U.S. EPA, Office of Water (December 2002), p. 29. a 200 survey of community water systems

Declining Block Price falls as Q rises Intent is to encourage consumption so that scale economies can be achieved Inefficient because it uses average cost pricing vs. marginal cost pricing 10 Price $ Q of water use

Increasing Block Price rises as Q rises Provides incentive for conservation Efficient since it considers rising MC along with MB of consumption 11 Price $ Q of water use