Neutrino roadmap in Japan Takashi Kobayashi IPNS, KEK Apr. 27, 2009 GDR 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 J-PARC and T2K 1.Accelerator construction status and commissioning 2.Accelerator upgrade plan in first 5 years 3.Experiments with slow extracted beam.
Advertisements

J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
Status of T2K Tokai to Kamioka Neutrino Project at J-PARC June 21, 2004 Koichiro Nishikawa Kyoto University.
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
J-PARC PAC ‘07 Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Status of the T2K Experiment Dave Wark Imperial/RAL J-PARC PAC KEK July 6, 2007.
T2K – Canada Accelerator & Detector Status D. Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF ACOT meeting, May 12, 2007.
CHIPP 2 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP-K2K-T2K 1. The K2K and T2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5.
Superbeam long baseline experiments Takashi Kobayashi KEK Neutrino Summer
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
J-PARC upgrade T. Nakadaira (KEK / J-PARC). Outline J-PARC overview & on-going program Motivation of future experiment in J-PARC Overview of future experiment.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Future Accelerator Based Neutrino Experiments Takashi Kobayashi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
1 Further Demands on beam Intense, Intense, Intense, ….Intense, Intense, Intense, …. –Very far detector, extremely small cross section, search small osci.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
ESS based neutrino Super Beam for CP Violation discovery Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 1 20 August 2013M. Dracos.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
KEK Plans for J-PARC Particle Physics at J-PARC CERN-KEK Committee March 29, 2010 at KEK Koichiro Nishikawa Institute for Particle and Nuclear Studies,
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
Fermilab, May, 2003 Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U. Tokyo ・ Introduction ・ JHF-Kamioka neutrino project -overview- ・ Physics in phase-I ・ Phase-II ・ Summary Outline.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
JHF-Kamioka Neutrino Oscillation Experiment using JHF 50 GeV PS Y.Itow ICRR,Univ.of Tokyo Jul27,2002 Jul27,2002 ICHEP02 Amsterdam Introduction Facility.
1 The JHF-Kamioka Neutrino experiment 1.Introduction 2.Overview of the experiment 3.Physics sensitivity in Phase-I 4.Physics sensitivity in Phase-II 5.Summary.
Long Baseline Neutrino Beams and Large Detectors Nicholas P. Samios Istanbul, Turkey October 27, 2008.
Asian Test Beam Facilities Satoru Uozumi Kyungpook National University Mar-29 th 2010 Beijing China IHEP Beijing TBF Russia.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
STATUS OF BNL SUPER NEUTRINO BEAM PRORAM W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NBI2003, KEK November 7-11, 2003.
1 Current Status of The Control System for J-PARC Accelerator Complex Hiroshi YOSHIKAWA J-PARC Center at KEK/JAEA October 16, 2007 ICALEPCS2007 at Knoxville.
1 Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment in Japan III International Workshop on “Neutrino Oscillations in Venice” Koichiro Nishikawa Kyoto University February.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
ESS based neutrino Super Beam for CP Violation discovery Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 1 10 September 2013M. Dracos.
Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.
29 September 2006M.Sakuda NuFact06 Asian Regional Outlook (Japan) -by Y.Kuno (Osaka) (1) SuperBeam (T2K) (2) J-PARC current upgrade plan (3) T2HK or T2KK.
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Low Z Detector Simulations
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Water Cherenkov detector - brief status report - Kenji Kaneyuki Research Center for Cosmic Neutrinos, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
COMET Task Force 16/Oct/2008 J-PARC PAC meeting Satoshi MIHARA.
XLVth Rencontres de Moriond Status of the T2K experiment K. Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for the T2K collaboration Contents Physics motivations (neutrino oscillation)
1 J-PARC Status - Conquering the earthquake disaster and a new step forward to MW J-PARC operation - Yujiro Ikeda J-PARC Center JAEA & KEK
After Protons from RCS 1 st DeeMe Collaboration Meeting Dec. 10, 2012 Kazami Yamamoto J-PARC Center Accelerator Division.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Current Status of the T2K Experiment Ryan Terri (for the T2K Collaboration) 31 May – 4 June 2010 Planck 2010, CERN.
Status of Super-Kamiokande, K2K and JHF ACFA LC Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K2K collaboration and JHF collaboration.
J-PARC Site Visit Summary – 03/09 S. Childress (Accelerator, T2K Primary) J. Hylen (T2K Target Hall, Decay, Absorber & Near Detector)
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Université de Strasbourg
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Current Status of the T2K Experiment
J-PARC neutrino experiment (T2K) and future
Presentation transcript:

Neutrino roadmap in Japan Takashi Kobayashi IPNS, KEK Apr. 27, 2009 GDR 1

Contents T2K status and plan Future experiment to find – CPV in neutrino – proton decay with upgraded J-PARC and new huge detector Summary 2

3 Tokai-to-Kamioka (T2K) long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment 1600  CC/yr/22.5kt (2.5deg)  Goal  Discover e app.   disapp. meas.  Intense narrow spectrum  beam from J-PARC MR  Off-axis w/ 2~2.5deg  Tuned at osci. max.  SK: largest, high PID performance

T2K Collaboration ~ 400 members from 12 Countries Japan, US, Canada, France, UK, Switzerland, Poland, Korea, Russia, Spain, Italy, Germany 4

5 Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility Hadron Beam Facility Nuclear Transmutation J-PARC J-PARC = Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex Joint Project between KEK and JAEA Linac 180→400 MeV Neutrino to Kamiokande Slow Extracted Beam Facility Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (3GeV, 25 Hz, 1MW) Main Ring (30 GeV, 0.3 Hz, 0.75 MW→ 1.66 MW)

6 J-PARC Facility (KEK/JAEA ) Bird’s eye photo in January of 2008 South to North Neutrino Beams (to Kamioka) JFY2009 Beams Main ring Hadron Exp. Facility Materials and Life Experimental Facility JFY2008 Beams 3 GeV Synchrotron CY2007 Beams Linac

Neutrino beamline Graphite target Primary proton beam line completed Electromagnetic horn Neutrino monitor build. UA1 magnet donated from CERN installed in Apr-Jun, 2008 on schedule Decay volume completed Beam dump completed 7 Target station completed  5 year construction 2004~2009  Construction completed on schedule!  Start beam commissioning in April 2009!

Beam commissioning in Apr-May  Expected condition  Beam Intensity: ~0.1% (single bunch) of design int.  ~4x10 11 p/pulse (cf: design ~3x10 14 p/pulse)  Target & Horn1 installed (horn2,3 not yet)  Goals of the commissioning  Extract and transport the proton beam to the target  Observe muons which comes from decays of pions produced at the target and focused by the horn1 by muon monitors  Pass government inspection during operation 8

T2K beamline started operation! 9 First shot after turning on SC magnets at 19:09, Apr.23, 2009 Muon monitor signal Silicon detector Scintillator (for commissioning) Ion chamber First observation of muons produced in neutrino beamline Behind 5GeV equiv material (dump)

T2K beamline started operation! 10 After ~10 shots for tuning, proton beam hit around target center Horn Off Horn 250kA MR intensity Proton beam profile monitor along nu beamline OTR detector just in front of target (fluorescence plate) Muon monitor signal Ionization chamber Silicon Scintillator Muon monitor profile

T2K beamline started operation! 11

12 J-PARC Accelerator Status and Commissioning Plan Recent milestones:  December 23, 2008:  30 GeV beam acceleration and fast extraction to the beam abort dump to the beam abort dump  MLF user run (20kW)  January 27, 2009:  Beam extraction to the Hadron Experimental hall using slow beam extraction system using slow beam extraction system  February 19, 2009:  Government inspection for radiation PAC PAC meeting

13 Beam commissioning has been accomplished on schedule, BUT with low intensity. Real challenge toward the power frontier machine just started. 1.Many issues (unreliable components, design etc.) to be solved 2.Beam must be provided to the users 3.Power upgrade should be also accomplished steadily. RFQ discharge problem: RF core long term stability problem: Stability of MR power supply and beam loss No problem for fast extraction with a level of 100kW operation Need more stability for slow extraction Clearly need major improvement for MW operation

14  Beyond 100kW from 2010: 100→500kW Space charge effect and collimator scenario  Long term: toward MW and beyond Enlarging aperture of accelerator Improvement of power supply (high repetition cycle, stability→minimize beam loss) LINAC 400MeV operation and RCS h=1 operation

T2K Mid-term Schedule  April-May, 2009  First beam commissioning w/ target/horn1  Mid. May: Pass governmental inspection  June~Sept, 2009 (during scheduled shutdown)  Horn 2 and 3 installation and operation test  Fall~Winter, 2009  Beam/Detector commissioning w/ full configuration  Target/horn1,2,3  Full 280m detector configuration  Winter JFY2009 ~ Summer 2010  As soon as ~100kW stable acc operation achieved,  Physics run at ~100kW x10 7 s by Summer 2010  First physics results in 2010   Exceed sensitivity of present world record result from Chooz experiment  After Summer 2010 (after RFQ replacement)  Physics data taking with > a few 100kW  Next milestone: 1~2MW.yr = ~300kWx3~6yr= ~500kWx2~4yr  Final goal: 3.75MW.yr (approved by PAC) 15

T.Kobayashi (KEK)Contents T2K status and plan Future experiment to find –CPV in neutrino –proton decay with upgraded J-PARC and new huge detector Summary 16

Neutrino Intensity Upgrade Quest for the Origin of Matter Dominated Universe CPV search Proton decay Intensity Upgrade Detector R&D Huge det. Construction Tech. Choice T2K ( 2009 ~) Neutrino Anti-Neutrino meas. Discover e app. Possible Timeline One of the Main Subject of KEK Roadmap Presented by KEK DG at KEK Roadmap Review Committee 9,10-March 2008 water C v Liq. Ar 17

Technically Feasible MR Power Improvement Scenario ― KEK Roadmap ― Day1 (up to Jul.2010) Next StepKEK RoadmapUltimate Power(MW) ? Energy(GeV)30 Rep Cycle(sec) No. of Bunch688 Particle/Bunch1.2×10 13 <4.1× ×10 13 Particle/Ring7.2×10 13 <3.3× ×10 14 LINAC(MeV) RCSh=2h=2 or 1h=1 After 2010, plan depends on financial situation 18

T.Kobayashi (KEK) Item to be Modified from DAY1 toward High Intensity No. of Bunch in MR(6→8) –Fast Rise Time Extraction Kicker Magnet Increase Repetition Rate (3.5Sec→1.92Sec) –RF and Magnet Power Supply Improvement RCS h=1 Operation (longer beam bunch to decrease space charge effect) –RF Improvement LINAC 400MeV Operation (avoid severe space charge effect at RCS injection) h=2: 2 bunches×4cycle injection to MR h=1:Single bunch with doubled no. of proton×8cycle injection 19

Lepton Sector CP Violation Effect of CP Phase δ appear as – ν e Appearance Energy Spectrum Shape *Peak position and height for 1 st, 2 nd maximum and minimum *Sensitive to all the non-vanishing δ including 180° *Could investigate CP phase with ν run only – Difference between ν e and ν e Behavior 20

Angle and Baseline OA3° OA0° OA2° OA2.5°  flux Off-axis angle – On-Axis: Wide Energy Coverage, ○ Energy Spectrum Measurement ×Control of π 0 Background – Off-Axis: Narrow Energy Coverage, ○ Control of π 0 Background ×Energy Spectrum Measurement → Counting Experiment Baseline – Long: ○ 2 nd Osc. Max. at Measurable Energy × Less Statistics ? Large Matter Effect – Short: ○ High Statistics × 2 nd Osc.Max.Too Low Energy to Measure ? Less Matter Effect (E/L)  CP =90  CP =270  CP =0  m 31 2 = 2.5x10 -3 eV 2 sin 2 2  13 = 0.1 No matter effects ν μ  ν e oscillation probability Oscillation probability 21

Okinoshima 658km 0.8deg. Off-axis Kamioka Korea 1000km 1deg. Off-axis 295km 2.5deg. Off-axis Three Possible Scenario Studied at NP08 Workshop NP08 is The 4th International Workshop on Nuclear and Particle Physics at J-PARC 22

Okinoshima 658km 0.8deg. Off-axis Cover 1 st and 2 nd Maximum Neutrino Run Only 5Years×1.66MW 100kt Liq. Ar TPC -Good Energy Resolution -Good e/π 0 discrimination Keeping Reasonable Statistics Scenario 1 δ=0° ν e Spectrum Beam ν e Background CP Measurement Potential NP08, arXiv: δ=90° δ=180°δ=270° sin 2 2θ 13 =0.03,Normal Hierarchy  23

295km 2.5deg. Off-axis ~0.6GeV Tokai Kamioka Cover 1 st Maximum Only 2.2Years Neutrino+7.8Years anti-Neutrino Run 1.66MW 540kt Water Cherenkov Detector Scenario 2    =0  =  /2 E r ec  +  BG  +  e  e BG signal+BG sin 2 2θ 13 =0.03,Normal Hierarchy sin 2 2  13 Fraction of   CP sensitivity sin 2 2θ 13 deg. 24

1000km 1deg. Off-axis 295km 2.5deg. Off-axis Scenario 3 Cover 2 nd Korea Cover 1 st Kamioka 5Years ν+5Years ν Run 1.66MW 270kt Water Cherenkov Detector Korea, Kamioka (study is initiated by M.Ishitsuka et. al. hep-ph/ ) 25

Comparison of Each Scenario Scenario 1 Okinoshima Scenario 2 Kamioka Scenario 3 Kamioka Korea Baseline(km) & 1000 Off-Axis Angle(°)0.8(almost on-axis) Methodν e Spectrum ShapeRatio between ν e ν e Ratio between 1 st 2 nd Max Ratio between ν e ν e Beam5Years ν μ, then Decide Next 2.2 Years ν μ, 7.8 Years ν μ, 5 Years ν μ, Detector Tech.Liq. Ar TPCWater Cherenkov Detector Mass (kt)1002× Study is continuing to seek for optimum choice 26

Additional requirement for far detector optimization Proton Decay Discovery Performance Realization of the huge detector – Test of the key components – Experimentally prove the detector performance if necessary, good prototyping (able to predict Huge Detector Performance well) is important Test with the beam is important KEK started R&D for Huge Liq. Ar TPC 27

LAr GAr LAr Open Bath Scroll Pump Turbo Pump Oxysorb (O 2 filter) Hydrosorb (H 2 O filter) Test Chamber Liquid Argon TPC R&D (KEK) Anode Cathode Grid Field shaper Inside chamber 10L Liquid Argon teststand was set up at KEK. - Gas Argon is liquefied after purification. - Test chamber is evacuated and baked before lique- faction. 4 channel strip was used for read out. (anode plane) Field shapers and grid plane are pre- pared. Sensitive area is ~ 9x9x5cm 3

First cosmic ray track was seen at KEK Trigger counters was set to measure cosmic ray track. We see the cosmic ray signal using the TPC (oscilloscope signal is shown below). –Signal timing is as expected. –First cosmic ray track at KEK 1234 Anode Cathode Trigger 2 (2cmx20cmx5mm) Trigger 1 (2cmx20cm X5mm(t)) Grid Open Bath trigger2 trigger1

Tracking Analyze oscillo- scope waveform Drift time - > z pos. Ch2 Ch4 Ch1 Ch3 Cathode plane Anode plane Multi-track event Single track event

T.Kobayashi (KEK)Summary Aim to realize an experiment to discover CPV in neutrino and Proton decay with –Upgraded J-PARC 0.75MW  1.66MW (  ??MW) –Huge, high sensitivity detector Studies are continuing –Optimization of physics potential Distance and off-axis angle of detector –Okinoshima(658km), Kamioka (295km), Korea (1000km) Detector technology: ~100kt Liq. Ar TPC/~1Mt Water Cherenkov –Detector R&D. KEK started R&D of Liq Ar TPC To realize the experiment, it is essential to –Commission and improve intensity of J-PARC accelerator immediately –Discover e appearance in T2K First beam on Apr. 23, 2009 First T2K physics result in 2010 w/ 100kWx10 7 s equivalent data –Acquire experience of high intensity beam operation 31

Accelerator Based Neutrino Project in Japan K2KT2K3 rd Generation Exp. (KEK Roadmap) High Power Proton Synchrotron KEK PS 12GeV 0.005MW Existing J-PARC MR 30GeV up to 0.75MW Brand New J-PARC MR 30GeV 1.66MW Technically Feasible Upgrade Neutrino BeamlineK2K Neutrino Beamline Brand New J-PARC Neutrino Beamline Brand New J-PARC Neutrino Beamline Existing Far DetectorSuper Kamiokande Existing at KAMIOKA Super Kamiokande Existing at KAMIOKA Brand New -Detector Technology ? -Place ? (Angle and BaseLine) 1 st Priority Physics Case Neutrino Oscillation ν μ Disappearance Neutrino Oscillation ν μ  ν e Lepton Sector CP Violation + Proton Decay Search Able to concentrate on Far Detector issue toward the 3 rd Generation Experiment after T2K startup 32

International Competition  Severe competition (No award for the second.)  Critical path  Rapid power build up of accelerator  Completion and commissioning of beamline/detectors in time T2K goal (90%) by the end of 2010 (100kWx10 7 s) sin 2 2  13 (90%CL) DoubleChooz Expected limit T2K ultimate goal (90%) (750kWx15000hr) 2010(?) 2011(?) If DoubleChoozstart from 2010 DoubleChoozExposure Year Present Upper Bound T2K sensitivity (90%) by the end of 2010 (100kWx10 7 s) sin 2 2  13 (90%CL) DoubleChooz Expected limit T2K ultimate sensitivity (90%) (750kWx15000hr) If DoubleChoozstart from 2010 DoubleChoozExposure Year Present Upper Bound 33

Neutrino Intensity Upgrade ( MR 8-bunch operation) MR 30 GeV LINAC 181MeV Cycle time 3.52 sec P/bunch 0.27MW !!! RCS h=1 Operation Cycle time P/bunch 1MW 0.91MW MR 30 GeV LINAC 400MeV Cycle time 1.92sec P/bunch 1.66MW MR RF Upgrade Cycle time= MW 5% 8% 17%(MR) LINAC 400MeV 0.45MW

T2K Full Proposal

T.Kobayashi (KEK) Common decay pipe for SK/HK covering 2~3 deg OA angle 36 Beam eye SK ~8km HK Candidate site for HK Decay pipe Cover this region

280m Near detectors 37

On-axis detector: INGRID Assembly of 228 tracking planes completed First module completed and installed. Ready for beam Remaining 15 modules will be installed in summer 38

Off-axis Detectors 39 FGD(Canada) 12-FEM board stack-up before burn-in phase TPC(Canada/Fr) Elec(UK,Fr) ECAL(UK)P0D(US) SMRD(Jp,US,Pol,Rus) Under construction and testing in each country Installation after August To be ready for the beam from Winter