Arlington Public Schools Whom are we serving? Who is providing the services? What is changing? How are the services provided? October 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definition of Special Education NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
Advertisements

An Overview of Findings from the Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study (SEELS) Dr. Mary Wagner Dr. Jose Blackorby SRI International OSEP Project.
Special Education Annual Report for to the Board of Education Jamesville-DeWitt Central School District November 2, 2009.
English Learners (EL) who are Students with Disabilities (SWD) 2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference August 5, 2010 Supreet Anand Supervisor Title III Student.
Zoomerang Slide Presentation. RTI Pre-Survey: Identify your building/level.
NC Department of Public Instruction Division of Financial Business Services School Allotments Section.
2/16/12 Marilyn Bertolucci Coordinator of Special Education Services.
Anamosa Community Schools Linda Mazunik Katy Kash February, 2012.
Continuity, Consistency, Collaboration, Coherence.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Family Services Department Head Start Division Board of County Commissioners June 22, 2010 Annual Report.
Budget Module 4 (Using FY2011 budget amounts) 1 Office of Local School Council Relations 125 S. Clark Street, 5th Floor Chicago, IL P
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
East Grand Rapids Public Schools Special Services Educating and inspiring each student to navigate successfully in a global community.
Jefferson City Public Schools.  Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE)  Special Education  English for Speakers of Other Languages Services (ESOL)
Arlington Public Schools Whom are we serving? Who is providing the services? What is changing? How are the services provided? October
ALTERNATE ACCESS for ELLs 1 Alternate ACCESS for ELLs ™ Participation Criteria The Alternate ACCESS for ELLs was initially developed by a team led by Craig.
Special Education Summit 2010 Board of Education Presentation on Special Education Within District, Out-of-District, and Performance Levels on Mastery.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arlington Public Schools Whom are we serving? Who is providing the services? What is changing? How are the services provided? October 2006.
Disability and Ability By: Evelyn King, Jill Stephens, & Carrie Werner.
Accommodations in the Elementary Classroom.  Part of me has lost its snap and the other part is draggin’.
WALKING THROUGH CHILD STUDY. What is the Child Study Committee? A committee that enables school personnel, and non school personnel, as appropriate, to.
HEAD START OF GREATER DALLAS SPECIAL SERVICES. Our content area educates staff and parents in understanding child growth development and in appreciating.
Special Education Teacher  This job is to Teach elementary school subjects to educationally and physically handicapped students.  Includes teachers who.
Board Presentation November 26, P.L Education for All Handicapped Children Act IDEIA -- Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
BUDGET HEARING AUGUST 20, Update Since the Hearing AVID ◦Additional staff professional development training ◦Building site plans for AVID.
2007 FCAT Writing+ and Grade 03 FCAT-Sunshine State Standards Results The School District of Osceola County, Florida.
10/15/20151 FY2011 Budget Presentation for Watertown Town Council Watertown Public Schools May 25, 2010.
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2013 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
1 Superintendent’s Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2009 February 11, 2008.
The Transition Process “ BRIDGING THE GAP” ECI Project TYKE to KATY ISD (Revised 12-12)
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
Florida Department of Education Jeanine Blomberg, Commissioner External Factors Review: GRADE 3 FCAT READING 2005, 2006, 2007 Jay Pfeiffer, Deputy Commissioner.
(c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 School District Budgeting.
Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase II: Revised Draft Recommendations Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) April 14, 2009.
Special Education is not a place, it’s a service. Board Presentation November 28, 2011.
1 Presentation to the ACI on the FY 2013 Budget December 14, 2011.
Principal Leadership for Special Education Untangling IDEA, Section 504, and NCLB.
Corvallis School District 509J School Board Presentation October 10, 2011.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) September 10, 2007.
Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education August 12, 2014 The New System of Evaluation, Determination of Eligibility, and Individualized.
K-12 Balanced Literacy Selling it as an Investment.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Drew Meeting October 30, 2007.
Plainville Public Schools Educational Budget Plan Fiscal Year 2012 Public February 15, 2011 Hearing.
FY 2015 Proposed Budget Development 1 Dr. Patrick K. Murphy December 11, 2013.
Lakeview Enrollment Presentation Board of Education Meeting September 16, 2014.
Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase I and Phase II Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) October 2008.
FY17 BUDGET BASICS Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office.
DEMOGRAPHICS REPORT School Year Presented January 15, 2009.
Disability Awareness & Instructional Strategies Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 4.
Dear School District Administrator, This PowerPoint presentation is intended to help initiate and facilitate community engagement in budget planning during.
The Assistive Technology Act The Impact and need.
November 5, 2015 Amosene W. Sledge Director Special Education Services Special Education Services.
Overview of Preschool Program for Children With Disabilities Johnson County Schools 211 North Church Street Mountain City, TN
Lakeview Enrollment Presentation Board of Education Meeting October 13, 2015.
Arlington Public Schools Whom are we serving? Who is providing the services? What is changing? How are the services provided? October 2010.
The Achievement of Students identified with Special Needs in Two-Way Spanish Immersion Schools CARLA 6th International Conference on Immersion & Dual Language.
Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Lakeview Enrollment Presentation
Students with Disabilities
1300+ High School Seats School Board Work Session May 15, 2017
Overview Slides: HB Statewide Training
PRESENTATION GUIDE Dear School District Administrator,
Short- and Long-Term Capacity Needs
Roanoke County Schools Budget Work Session February 8, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Arlington Public Schools Whom are we serving? Who is providing the services? What is changing? How are the services provided? October 2008

Whom are we serving?

: White: 43% Hispanic: 32% Black: 14% Asian: 10% : White: 46% Hispanic: 29% Black: 14% Asian: 10% : White: 48% Hispanic: 29% Black: 13% Asian: 10% : White: 48% Hispanic: 26% Black: 14% Asian: 11% Student Demographics

% % % % % % % Students on Free/Reduced Lunch

Gifted Students 18% of K-12 population (September 2008) identified as Gifted, of that 18%: 11 % Asian11 % Asian 8 % Black8 % Black 14 % Hispanic14 % Hispanic 66 % White66 % White 6 % dually identified Gifted and Special Education

Students with Disabilities 2945 students, (15% of September 2008 student population) receive special education services2945 students, (15% of September 2008 student population) receive special education services All APS schools service students with disabilities including alternative programsAll APS schools service students with disabilities including alternative programs

Students with Disabilities The following is a breakdown of disabilities: 31% Specific Learning Disabilities31% Specific Learning Disabilities 16% Other Health Impairment16% Other Health Impairment 16% Speech or Language Impairment16% Speech or Language Impairment 12% Developmental Delay12% Developmental Delay 8% Emotional Disturbance 8% Emotional Disturbance 9% Autism Spectrum Disorder 9% Autism Spectrum Disorder

Students with Disabilities The following is a breakdown of disabilities: 4% Cognitive Disabilities 1,2,3 4% Cognitive Disabilities 1,2,3 2% Multiple Disabilities 2% Multiple Disabilities <1% Hearing Impairment<1% Hearing Impairment <1% Orthopedic Impairment<1% Orthopedic Impairment <1% Traumatic Brain Injury<1% Traumatic Brain Injury <1% Visual Impairment<1% Visual Impairment

Limited English Proficient Students 3,452 students (19% of September 2008 student population) received ESOL/HILT services3,452 students (19% of September 2008 student population) received ESOL/HILT services 1,234 students in exited Year 1 and Year 21,234 students in exited Year 1 and Year in exited Year 3 and Year 4630 in exited Year 3 and Year in preschool classes501 in preschool classes 197 eligible but not receiving services197 eligible but not receiving services

Who is providing the services?

APS Organizational Chart

APS Department of Instruction

Title I Services 19.0 Title I Reading Teachers19.0 Title I Reading Teachers 4 Mathematics Instructional Resource Teachers (MIRTs)4 Mathematics Instructional Resource Teachers (MIRTs) 0.5 Central Office based Reading Recovery Lead Teacher0.5 Central Office based Reading Recovery Lead Teacher 2,616 students receive Title I services at eleven elementary schools2,616 students receive Title I services at eleven elementary schools – 294 in Targeted Assistance schools (direct services to Title I eligible students) – 2,322 in School-wide schools (Title I teachers provide services to all K-5 students)

Other School-Based Staff 28.5 Reading Teachers across 22 elementary schools providing coaching/modeling for teachers and some direct instruction28.5 Reading Teachers across 22 elementary schools providing coaching/modeling for teachers and some direct instruction 0.5 Mathematics Instructional Resource Teachers (MIRTs) at each elementary school providing coaching/modeling for teachers and some direct instruction0.5 Mathematics Instructional Resource Teachers (MIRTs) at each elementary school providing coaching/modeling for teachers and some direct instruction 0.5 Testing Coordinator at each Title I school0.5 Testing Coordinator at each Title I school 28.5 Instructional Technology Coordinators (ITCs) providing support for teachers in integrating instructional technology throughout the curriculum28.5 Instructional Technology Coordinators (ITCs) providing support for teachers in integrating instructional technology throughout the curriculum 21.5 Resource Teachers of the Gifted (RTGs) providing coaching/modeling for teachers, some direct instruction, and student identification21.5 Resource Teachers of the Gifted (RTGs) providing coaching/modeling for teachers, some direct instruction, and student identification 1.0 (elementary schools >500) or (elementary schools >500) or at each middle and high school1.0 at each middle and high school

Important Links -- Program School Options: Four-Six Year Academic Plan:

Free/Reduced Lunch: Civil Rights Statistics: Enrollment Data: Important Links -- Data

What is changing?

Projections Enrollment projections done 2 times a year in October and February (updates in summer as PreK classes are added)Enrollment projections done 2 times a year in October and February (updates in summer as PreK classes are added) ProcessProcess –Total K-12 system projected using a variety of models Forecast Average Rate of Change Weighting –School level projections calculated separately and then cross-checked to match totals &BCOB=0&c= &BCOB=0&c=54201

Crowding Project Team Pursuant to the School Board’s direction provided on February 14, 2008, a staff group, the Crowding Project Team (CPT), was convened to accomplish the following work and analyses: to identify and analyze options to relieve crowding in March; to meet with interested groups about the options in April and May; to discuss the options with members of the Senior Staff in May; to refine the options after securing feedback; and to assist the Superintendent with preparing a report to the School Board in June.

CPT Membership Meg TuccilloAssistant Superintendent, Administrative Services Alison DentonFacilities Planner Mark MacekuraSpecial Projects Coordinator Mark JohnstonAssistant Superintendent, Instruction Linda ErdosAssistant Superintendent, School & Community Relations Kathleen BragawSpecial Projects Specialist Julie CrawfordDirector, Special Education C.R. LyonsDirector, Maintenance Services

CPT Factors The CPT considered possible issues related to each option to determine its feasibility based on four factors, including: How does the option affect instruction? How does the option reduce crowding? How does the option impact the budget? How does the option move students?

CPT Options 33 elementary school options or variations on an option 7 middle school options or variations on an option

Create Capacity in North Arlington Increase Choice Options Revise Admissions Policies Build NewRelocatables Reclaim Space Language Second ATS Montessori Other Focus Transpor- tation Gunston/ Jefferson ATS Reed Wilson Langston Program remains, Neighbd pref Program moves, Neighbd sch Controlled Choice Choice at Grade 1 Grand- fathering Sibling Transfers Elementary Options Overview

How are the services provided?

School Board provides guidance to the Superintendent Revenue Sources Revenue Sharing Agreement with County Total Budget and Expenditures School Operating Fund Additional Information on the FY 2009 Adopted Budget: dopted_Budget_FINAL.pdf FY 2008 Washington Area Boards of Education (WABE) Guide: ABE_Guide_NOV_2007.pdf How Do We Pay For It?

Where Does the Money Come From?

Where Does the Money Go? (School Operating Fund Only)

Questions and Comments