1 Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) Dr. R. B. Patel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad-Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks By Lei Chen.
Advertisements

Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
Unicast Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks Kumar Viswanath CMPE 293.
Overview of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols. Overview 1.
Ranveer Chandra , Kenneth P. Birman Department of Computer Science
MANETs Routing Dr. Raad S. Al-Qassas Department of Computer Science PSUT
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANET)
1 Spring Semester 2007, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #4 Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks AODV Routing.
Revisiting On Demand Routing On Demand Routing schemes are reactive – a route is found when needed. This precludes the periodic exchange of routing tables.
1 Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks most slides taken with permission from presentation of Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Routing 9th Week Christian.
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
ITIS 6010/8010 Wireless Network Security Dr. Weichao Wang.
Routing Security in Ad Hoc Networks
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) Neil Tang 02/02/2009.
Anonymous Gossip: Improving Multicast Reliability in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Ranveer Chandra (joint work with Venugopalan Ramasubramanian and Ken Birman)
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) Sirisha R. Medidi.
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
Aodv. Distance vector routing Belman principle AODV - overview Similar to DSR –On demand –Route request when needed and route reply when a node knows.
Multicasting Multicasting is the process by which data is set to multiple recipients. Simplest but a very inefficient way is to initiate multiple unicast.
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
8/7/2015 Mobile Ad hoc Networks COE 549 Routing Protocols II Tarek Sheltami KFUPM CCSE COE 1.
Ad Hoc Wireless Routing COS 461: Computer Networks
Routing Two papers: Location-Aided Routing (LAR) in mobile ad hoc networks (2000) Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (1999)
The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP)
ENHANCING AND EVALUATION OF AD-HOC ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN VANET.
Itrat Rasool Quadri ST ID COE-543 Wireless and Mobile Networks
1 Spring Semester 2009, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #3 Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks AODV Routing.
Mobile Routing protocols MANET
Mobile Adhoc Network: Routing Protocol:AODV
Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing Protocol ECE 695 Spring 2006.
Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) and simulation in network simulator.
Ad Hoc Routing: The AODV and DSR Protocols Jonathan Sevy Geometric and Intelligent Computing Lab Drexel University
RFC 3561 AODV Routing Protocol Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Working Group Charles E. Perkins INTERNET DRAFT Nokia Research Center 19 June 2002 Elizabeth M.
Routing Protocols of On- Demand Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) Ad-Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV)
Ad Hoc Routing: The AODV and DSR Protocols Speaker : Wilson Lai “Performance Comparison of Two On-Demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks”, C. Perkins.
Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks By : Neha Durwas For: Professor U.T. Nguyen COSC 6590.
The Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) protocol
Fault-Tolerant Papers Broadband Network & Mobile Communication Lab Course: Computer Fault-Tolerant Speaker: 邱朝螢 Date: 2004/4/20.
Asstt. Professor Adeel Akram. Infrastructure vs. multi-hop Infrastructure networks: One or several Access-Points (AP) connected to the wired network.
AODV: Introduction Reference: C. E. Perkins, E. M. Royer, and S. R. Das, “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing,” Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-08.txt,
DSR: Introduction Reference: D. B. Johnson, D. A. Maltz, Y.-C. Hu, and J. G. Jetcheva, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,”
Traditional Routing A routing protocol sets up a routing table in routers A node makes a local choice depending on global topology.
Ad-hoc On Demand Distance Vector Protocol Hassan Gobjuka.
Intro DSR AODV OLSR TRBPF Comp Concl 4/12/03 Jon KolstadAndreas Lundin CS Ad-Hoc Routing in Wireless Mobile Networks DSR AODV OLSR TBRPF.
a/b/g Networks Routing Herbert Rubens Slides taken from UIUC Wireless Networking Group.
6LoWPAN Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing Introduction Speaker: Wang Song-Ferng Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu Date: 2014/03/31.
Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) ietf
Improving Fault Tolerance in AODV Matthew J. Miller Jungmin So.
Fundamentals of Computer Networks ECE 478/578
Doc.: IEEE /0174r1 Submission Hang Liu, et al. March 2005 Slide 1 A Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh Hang Liu, Jun Li, Saurabh Mathur {hang.liu,
Doc.: IEEE /0174r2 Submission Hang Liu, et al. March 2005 Slide 1 A Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Author:Zarei.M.;Faez.K. ;Nya.J.M.
The Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance-Vector Protocol (AODV)
Routing design goals, challenges,
Mobicom ‘99 Per Johansson, Tony Larsson, Nicklas Hedman
Internet Networking recitation #4
A comparison of Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols
任課教授:陳朝鈞 教授 學生:王志嘉、馬敏修
Mobile and Wireless Networking
Mobile Computing CSE 40814/60814 Spring 2018.
by Saltanat Mashirova & Afshin Mahini
Routing.
Vinay Singh Graduate school of Software Dongseo University
A Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh
Routing in Mobile Wireless Networks Neil Tang 11/14/2008
Presentation transcript:

1 Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) Dr. R. B. Patel

2 Unicasting  The routing we have discussed so far is mainly point-to- point routing.  A source node wants to send a message to a destination node.

3 Multicasting  However, in many situations a node wants to send a message to a group of nodes in the network.  This is called multicasting and the group is called a multicast group.

4 Broadcasting  Broadcasting is a special case of multicasting when all the nodes in the network is in the multicast group.

5 Multicasting Support  DSDV and DSR mainly support unicast routing.  If multicasting is required, a node must establish unicast routes to each node in the multicast group.  A more efficient approach will maintain multicast routing trees for each multicast group.

6 Non-uniform Packet Size in DSR  Though DSR is a reactive or on-demand routing protocol, a major problem with DSR is its non-uniform packet size.  When a source node S sends a packet to a destination node D, S should send the entire route to D along with the packet.  This is necessary for the intermediate nodes to forward the packet.

7 Problem with Non-uniform Packet Size  Usually all media support packets of uniform size. If a packet is large, it has to be split into smaller packets.  This may cause problems in the wireless medium as packets that are split into smaller parts may not arrive in correct order.  Intermediate nodes may not be able to forward packets correctly.

8 Main Features of the AODV Protocol (I)  The Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector protocol is both an on-demand and a table-driven protocol.  The packet size in AODV is uniform unlike DSR. Unlike DSDV, there is no need for system-wide broadcasts due to local changes.  AODV supports multicasting and unicasting within a uniform framework.

9 Main Features of the AODV Protocol (II)  Each route has a lifetime after which the route expires if it is not used.  A route is maintained only when it is used and hence old and expired routes are never used.  Unlike DSR, AODV maintains only one route between a source-destination pair.

10 Continued  DSR includes source routes in packet headers  Resulting large headers can sometimes degrade performance. –particularly when data contents of a packet are small  AODV attempts to improve on DSR by maintaining routing tables at the nodes, so that data packets do not have to contain routes.  AODV retains the desirable feature of DSR that routes are maintained only between nodes which need to communicate.

11 Unicast Route Establishment  Unicast route is a route from a source node to a destination node.  Like DSR, this protocols uses two types of messages, route request (RREQ) and route reply (RREP).  Like DSDV, we use sequence numbers to keep track of recent routes. Every time a node sends a new message, it uses a new sequence number which increases monotonically.

12 Route Request (RREQ) Message  When node S wants to send a message to node D, S searches its route table for a route to D.  If there is no route, S initiates a RREQ message with the following components : –The IP addresses of S and D –The current sequence number of S and the last known sequence number of D –A broadcast ID from S. This broadcast ID is incremented each time S sends a RREQ message.

13 Processing a RREQ Message (I)  The pair of the source S forms a unique identifier for the RREQ.  Suppose a node P receives the RREQ from S. P first checks whether it has received this RREQ before.  Each node stores the pairs for all the recent RREQs it has received.

14 Processing a RREQ Message (II)  If P has seen this RREQ from S already, P discards the RREQ. Otherwise, P processes the RREQ :  P sets up a reverse route entry in its route table for the source S.  This entry contains the IP address and current sequence number of S, number of hops to S and the address of the neighbour from whom P got the RREQ. SD P Q

15 Lifetime of a Route-Table Entry  A lifetime is associated with the entry in the route table.  This is an important feature of AODV. If a route entry is not used within the specified lifetime, it is deleted.  A route is maintained only when it is used. A route that is unused for a long time is assumed to be stale.

16 Route Requests in AODV B A E F H J C G I K Z Y Represents a node that has received RREQ for D from S M N L D S

17 Route Requests in AODV B A E F H J C G I K Represents transmission of RREQ Z Y Broadcast transmission M N L S D

18 Route Requests in AODV B A E F H J C G I K Represents links on Reverse Path Z Y M N L S D

19 Reverse Path Setup in AODV B A E F H J C G I K Node C receives RREQ from G and H, but does not forward it again, because node C has already forwarded RREQ once Z Y M N L S D

20 Reverse Path Setup in AODV B A E F H J C G I K Z Y M N L S D

21 Reverse Path Setup in AODV B A E F H J C G I K Z Y Node D does not forward RREQ, because node D is the intended target of the RREQ M N L S D

22 Forward Path Setup in AODV B A E F H J C G I K Z Y M N L Forward links are setup when RREP travels along the reverse path Represents a link on the forward path S D

23 Handling More than one RREP  An intermediate node P may receive more than one RREP for the same RREQ.  P forwards the first RREP it receives and forwards a second RREP later only if : –The later RREP contains a greater sequence number for the destination, or –The hop-count to the destination is smaller in the later RREP –Otherwise, it does not forward the later RREPs. This reduces the number of RREPs propagating towards the source.

24 Route Maintenance  Once a unicast route has been established between two nodes S and D, it is maintained as long as S (source node) needs the route.  If S moves during an active session, it can reinitiate route discovery to establish a new route to D.  When D or an intermediate node moves, a route error (RERR) message is sent to S.

25 Route Maintenance  The link from node 3 to D is broken as 3 has moved away to a position 3´.  Node 2 sends a RERR message to 1 and 1 sends the message in turn to S.  S initiates a route discovery if it still needs the route to D S D RERR 3´

26 Updating Route Tables  Suppose neighbours 4 and 5 route through 2 to reach D. Node 2 broadcasts RERR to all such neighbours.  Each neighbour marks its route table entry to D as invalid by setting the distance to infinity S D RERR 3´4 5

27 Updating Route Tables  Each neighbour in turn propagates the RERR message.  Route entries with an infinity metric are not rejected immediately as they contain useful routing information for the neighbourhood S D RERR 3´4 5

28 Local Connectivity  Neighbourhood information is obtained through hello messages. Each node broadcasts a hello message to its neighbours at a regular hello-interval.  When a node M receives a hello message from a neighbour N, node M updates the lifetime associated with N in its route table.  Hello messages propagate only for one hop, in the neighbourhood of a node.

29 Multicast Route Establishment  RREQ and RREP messages are used for multicast route establishment.  A multicast tree has two kinds of members.  A group member is a node that is part of the multicast group.  A tree member is not part of the multicast group, but used to connect the multicast tree.

30 An Example Multicast Tree Group member Tree Member Non-tree member

31 Multicast Route Discovery  Multicast route discovery begins when either –A node S wishes to join a multicast group –A node S has data to send to a multicast group and does not have a current route to it  S sends a RREQ with the destination address set to the IP address of the multicast group and the last known sequence number of the group. These could be for any node from the multicast group known to S.

32 Multicast Route Discovery  S also indicates whether it wants to join the multicast group by setting a join flag.  S then broadcasts this RREQ to its neighbours.  If the RREQ is a join request, only a node that is a member of the multicast group may reply.  Otherwise, any node with a current route to the multicast group may reply.

33 Joining a Multicast Group Sending RREQ

34 Joining a Multicast Group RREP back

35 Forward Path for RREP  The forward path for a RREP is set up in the same way as for unicast path set up.  A member of the multicast group may send a RREP for a RREQ if it has a greater sequence number for the multicast group than the sequence number in the RREQ.  The RREP is unicast back to the sender of the RREQ and all route tables along the path are updated.

36 Multicast Route Activation  The node S sending a RREQ will generally receive multiple RREPs. These RREPs set up potential branches for S to join the multicast tree.  S chooses the path with the greatest sequence number and smallest hop count.  S activates this route by sending a multicast activation (MACT) message to the next hop of this route. This message is forwarded by the other nodes along the route.

37 Multicast Tree Deactivation  A leaf node may leave a multicast tree by following a similar procedure, by sending an MACT message and deleting the multicast group information from its route table.  However, a non-leaf node cannot remove itself from a tree as that partitions the tree.  A non-leaf node continues to act as a router for the multicast group even when it leaves the group.

38 Link Breaks  A member or a tree-node in a multicast tree may notice a link break when : –No hello-message has been received from the next hop node for sometime –Or, when the node cannot send a packet to the next hop node (the next hop node has moved away)  It is the responsibility of a node nearer to the source S to repair this link break.  This is done through sending a RREQ message.

39 Repairing Link Breaks MN M N RREQ

40 Repairing Link Breaks  A node discovering the link break broadcasts a RREQ message to its neighbours. This RREQ message requests a route to the multicast group.  Once RREP messages are recieved, the node chooses a new route to the multicast group by sending an MACT message.

41 Performance of AODV  AODV does not retransmit data packets that are lost and hence does not guarantee packet delivery.  However, the packet delivery percentage is close to 100 with relatively small number of nodes.  The packet delivery percentage drops with increased moility.

42 Control Overheads  The overhead packets in AODV are due to RREQ, RREP and RERR messages.  AODV needs much less number of overhead packets compared to DSDV.  The number of overhead packets increases with increased mobility, since this gives rise to frequent link breaks and route discovery.

43 Latency in Route Discovery  The route discovery latency in AODV is low compared to DSR and DSDV.  The latency is almost constant even with increased mobility if the concentration of the nodes remain similar.  The average path length for discovered routes is also quite low.

44 Route Request and Route Reply  Route Request (RREQ) includes the last known sequence number for the destination  An intermediate node may also send a Route Reply (RREP) provided that it knows a more recent path than the one previously known to sender  Intermediate nodes that forward the RREP, also record the next hop to destination  A routing table entry maintaining a reverse path is purged after a timeout interval  A routing table entry maintaining a forward path is purged if not used for a active_route_timeout interval

45 Link Failure  A neighbor of node X is considered active for a routing table entry if the neighbor sent a packet within active_route_timeout interval which was forwarded using that entry  Neighboring nodes periodically exchange hello message  When the next hop link in a routing table entry breaks, all active neighbors are informed  Link failures are propagated by means of Route Error (RERR) messages, which also update destination sequence numbers

46 Route Error  When node X is unable to forward packet P (from node S to node D) on link (X,Y), it generates a RERR message  Node X increments the destination sequence number for D cached at node X  The incremented sequence number N is included in the RERR  When node S receives the RERR, it initiates a new route discovery for D using destination sequence number at least as large as N  When node D receives the route request with destination sequence number N, node D will set its sequence number to N, unless it is already larger than N

47 AODV: Summary  Routes need not be included in packet headers  Nodes maintain routing tables containing entries only for routes that are in active use  At most one next-hop per destination maintained at each node –DSR may maintain several routes for a single destination  Sequence numbers are used to avoid old/broken routes  Sequence numbers prevent formation of routing loops  Unused routes expire even if topology does not change