SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, 2010 1 SHRPII Project C04: Improving Our Understanding of How Congestion & Pricing Affect Travel.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Discrete Choice Models of the Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles Thomas Adler & Mark Fowler, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Aniss Bahreinian, California.

Advertisements

Praxis Assessment Overview Educational Testing Service Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Frankfort, Kentucky January 21, 2007 Copyright 2004.

April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.

Peter Vovsha, Bob Donnelly, Parsons Brinckerhoff,

NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.

Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,

Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.

13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 11, 2011 Risk Assessment & Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Projections for Toll.

San Francisco Bay Area Activity-Based Models Specification & Training Study Chuck Purvis Metropolitan Transportation Commission Oakland, California Workshop.

Making advanced travel forecasting models affordable through model transferability 14th TRB Conference on Transportation Planning Applications May 5-9,

May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.

Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Developing a Regional Express Lane Network Hercules City Council Meeting April 28, 2009 Doug Kimsey MTC Planning Director.

Current Events In Activity-Based Modeling Ken Cervenka, P.E., AICP North Central Texas Council Of Governments For AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group Meeting.

Draft Unified Planning Work Program for SFY April 1, 2015-March 31, 2016 Program Dashboard Released for PFAC Action on January 22, 2015 Program Dashboard.

Versatile Applications of EMME/2 and ENIF: Seattle Experience Madhavi Sanakkayala Heather Purdy & Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff, Seattle.

Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Washington, DC Reducing Congestion Tools of.

11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,

Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.

Problem Statement and Motivation Key Achievements and Future Goals Technical Approach Kouros Mohammadian, PhD and Yongping Zhang (PhD Candidate), CME,

Copyright ©2004 Global Insight, Inc. Analyzing the Home Improvement Market Market Sizing and Forecasting Mike Sweet Senior Consultant, Business Planning.

SHRP2 C10: Jacksonville Partnership to Develop an Integrated Advanced Travel Demand Model and a Fine-grained Time- sensitive Network Key Agency Partners:

1 Emergency Financial Response: Drought Rates May 15, 2014.

Interoperable Intelligent Optical Networking: Key to future network services and applications OIF Carrier Group Interoperability: Key issue for carriers.

Incorporating Management and Operations and the Congestion Management Process into Metropolitan Transportation Planning FHWA/FTA Webinar June 24, 2008.

Extending the R andom- U tility- B ased Multi-Regional Input-Output Model (RUBMRIO) to the National Level Dr. Kara Kockelman Dr. Avinash Unnikrishnan Siva.

A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Kermit Wies, Craig Heither, CMAP Peter Vovsha, Jim Hicks, PB Hani Mahmassani, Ali Zockaie, NU TPAC, May 17-20, An Integrated ABM-DTA Model for the.

Expert Forum on Road Pricing, USDOT, November 14-15, 2005, Alexandria, VA1 Making the State of the Art the State of the Practice: Modeling Tools for Road.

Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.

April 2010 Scott Smith Volpe Center / RITA / U.S. DOT Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Boston, MA An Integrated Regional Planning / Microsimulation.

1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.

MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.

California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.

Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.

Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.

US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.

Status Report on the AMPO Pooled Research Initiative on Travel Modeling Presentation to AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group November 4, 2010 MWCOG / NCRTPB.

A Model for Joint Choice of Airport and Ground Access Mode 11th National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6-10, 2007, Daytona Beach,

High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, SHRPII Project C04: Improving Our Understanding of How Congestion & Pricing Affect Travel.

FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.

SHRP2 C10A Sensitivity Testing of an Integrated Regional Travel Demand and Traffic Microsimulation Model TRB Planning Applications Conference May ,

Dowling Associates, Inc. 19 th International EMME/2 Users’ Conference – 21 October 2005 Derivation of Travel Demand Elasticities from a Tour-Based Microsimulation.

SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.

Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.

Planning Applications Conference, Reno, NV, May Impact of Crowding on Rail Ridership: Sydney Metro Experience and Forecasting Approach William Davidson,

Application of an Activity-based Model for a Toll Road Study in Chicago Matt Stratton Parsons Brinckerhoff May 19, 2015.

Travel Forecasting Resource 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio.

Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, 2010 Results today based primarily on three data sources… Seattle 2006 household travel survey (RP)

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.

Update: NCHRP Synthesis /Topic Advanced Practices in Travel Forecasting Presented to: AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group October 1-2, 2009 Chicago.

A GIS-BASED ACCESSIBILITY APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING NON-MOTORIZED TRAVEL DEMAND Alex Bell, AICP May 18, 2015.

Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.

The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.

The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.

GoCalifornia Strategies to Maximize Mobility Transportation Investments Have More Impact If Built On This Foundation 1.

1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.

1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.

Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.

Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.

Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)

NCHRP Synthesis Topic Extent of HCM Use in Planning Aaron Elias Richard Dowling January 22, 2012 Planning and Preliminary Engineering Subcommittee.

Integrated Dynamic Travel Models: Recent SHRP2 Projects

2018/5/14 QUANTIFYING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY USING AN ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL My topic today is---READ Question try to address is- READ I want to.

Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) Rule Implementation

Presentation transcript:

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, SHRPII Project C04: Improving Our Understanding of How Congestion & Pricing Affect Travel Demand PB / Parsons Brinckerhoff Northwestern University Mark Bradley Research & Consulting Resource System Group University of California at Irvine University of Texas at Austin

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, Project Overview and Objectives Bob Donnelly, Project Manager

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, Research Vision: 3 Domains Data Demand / Choice Supply / Networks Pricing & Congestion

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, Core Research Team: Principal Investigators Mark Bradley Peter Vovsha PB Bob Donnelly (PM) Hani Mahmassani NU

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, Research Team: Other Key Members Tom Adler, RSG Rosella Picado / Surabhi Gupta (PB) Ken Small / David Brownstone (UC-Irvine) Kara Kockelman, UT-Austin Frank Koppelman John Bowman Jean Wolf, GeoStats

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, Primary Objectives and Focus of CO4 Research Assess, select and thoroughly analyze travel behavior data in order to formulate and recommend ways to better and more fully model important impacts of congestion and pricing on travelers and transportation systems, leading to “break-through” solutions, in general and with respect to some key issues: Highway utility formulation – assessment of delays /time in congestion Heteroscedasticity of travelers’ VOT, Reliability of travel Site specific testing - estimation of new relationships / impacts of pricing & congestion & travel demand, with validation of findings and testing for cross sites / transferability Consideration of implications and requirement for application, with some implementation testing / demonstration Synthesis of findings and general recommendations for model developers, with an emphasis on model structure and statistical estimation of parameters

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, Primary Data to support modeling advancements: Travel behavior data: Stated Preference surveys (SP) – choice experiments, endogenous supply measures Revealed Preference surveys (RP), supplemented with supply-side measures Panel surveys / Repeated measurements Time and costs / networks: observed and simulated: “Snapshot” – concurrent with demand measures Time-series / longitudinal – (e.g. variability/reliability) Forecasting simulation capability Modeling systems Source of road use cost and LOS measures affecting Capacity to absorb advanced methods (i.e., ABM+dynamic simulation framework)

SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, C04 Research Settings Principal Sites: Integrated regional data and implementation testing: San Francisco (SFCTA, MTC) Seattle (PSRC) New York (NYMTC, MTA, NYCDOT, PANYNJ ) Supporting Sites: Project site specific analysis / Transferability testing: Minneapolis: I-394 MnPASS HOT (MnDOT) Chicago (CMAP) San Diego: I-15 ML (SANDAG) Orange County: SR-91 (OCTA) Baltimore Region: DYNASMART-P NY BPM Region: Mode and Route choice demand model implementation with DYNASMART-P

Heading to finish … Past: Project development and enhancement of data were more consuming time and resources than expected Present: With time extension, the focus is now intensely on completing and integrating the model estimation, addressing and documenting necessary technical details Next: Recognize the need for generalized findings to emerge that will inform modelers (and their patrons) regarding productive paths for model improvements related to highway congestion and pricing HRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, 20109