What’s New in Acute Coronary Syndromes? Claudia Bucci BScPhm, PharmD Clinical Coordinator, Cardiovascular Diseases Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre 13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 30, 2009 at CET. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLATO trial.
Advertisements

HEARTLINE HSM Genoa Cardiology Meeting
Progress in Oral Anti- Platelet Therapy Rabih R. Azar, MD, MSc, FACC Division of Cardiology Hotel Dieu de France Hospital 1.
Title: PLATO Key Points:
Anti thrombotics in STEMI Journal review Dr Nithin P G.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes Chapter 26 Jean-Claude Tardif, Phillipe L. L’Allier, David.
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use is Likely a Marker for, Rather than a Cause of, a Higher Risk of Cardiovascular Events: Insights from PLATO Shaun G. Goodman,
North of Tyne anti-platelet guidelines: use in primary care Jane S Skinner Consultant Community Cardiologist.
Oral Antiplatelet Agents: A Cornerstone of Therapy for Atherothrombotic Disease Aspirin and clopidogrel: - Reduce the risks of myocardial infarction, ischemic.
Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLAT elet Inhibition and patient O utcomes trial Outcomes in patients.
Khawar Kazmi. Thrombosis LipidsInflammation Thrombus Platelets and thrombin Quiescent Plaque Plaque rupture PATHOGENESIS ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME.
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Luigi Oltrona Visconti Divisione di Cardiologia IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo Pavia Sindromi coronariche acute nei pazienti con fibrillazione.
TOTAL Stroke in the TOTAL trial: Randomized trial of manual aspiration Thrombectomy in STEMI TOTAL Trial Investigators.
TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel TRITON-TIMI 38 TRITON-TIMI 38 Elliott M. Antman, MD.
Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D.
Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D.
ACS is a major public health challenge In the US:  Over 1.5 million people experience ACS annually 1 In the EU:  ACS is the most common cause of death,
Clopidogrel in ACS: Overview Investigator, TIMI Study Group Associate Physician, Cardiovascular Division, BWH Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard.
The Landscape of Oral Antiplatelet Agents 2009 George D. Dangas, MD, PhD, FSCAI, FACC Associate Professor of Medicine Columbia University Medical Center.
VBWG CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance trial.
VBWG OASIS-5 The Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trial.
Post-PCI/MI Thrombotic Events – A Plateletcentric Problem!!!!
Rob Storey Reader and Honorary Consultant in Cardiology, University of Sheffield The changing world of adjunctive pharmacology.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Robert F. Storey Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Cardiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Stent thrombosis Future directions.
Stents Are Not Enough: Recent Clopidogrel Data Rob Henderson Nottingham City Hospital Rob Henderson Nottingham City Hospital.
Evolution of pharmaceutical antithrombotic therapy in CVD Dr Rob Butler Dept of Cardiology University Hospital of North Staffordshire Drug It!
CABG Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the PLATO trial Claes.
Karlis TRUSINSKIS Interventional Cardiologist Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Riga, LATVIA ANTIAGREGANTS IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME.
John H. Alexander, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiovascular Research Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke Medicine Update on antithrombotics.
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
Naotsugu Oyama, MD, PhD, MBA A Trial of PLATelet inhibition and Patient Outcomes.
Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLAT elet Inhibition and patient O utcomes trial Outcomes in patients.
Bi Qi Neurology Department of Beijing Anzhen Hospital of the Capital University of Medical Sciences ACS Complicated Cerebrovascular Disease—— How to Choose.
Pocket Guide to Anticoagulation in AF & Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in ACS Rumi Jaumdally 2015 This brief presentation will summarise the recently published.
Medical management after PCI Ma Hong 1 st affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.
1 Advanced Angioplasty London, England 27 January, 2006 Jörg Michael Rustige,MD Medical Director Lilly Critical Care Europe, Geneva.
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
Dr Jonathan Day Senior Director Global Medical The Medicines Company Bivalirudin Advancing Anticoagulation in ACS.
NSTE Acute Coronary Syndromes
Trial Vignettes Cameron G Densem TRITON-TIMI 38 ARMYDA OPTIMA.
Hypothesis: baseline risk status of the patients and proximity to a recent cardiovascular event influence the response to dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients.
TRITON TIMI-38 STEMI cohort Primary End Point (CV death, MI and stroke at 15 months) Adapted from Montalescot et al. ESC Time (days)
TRITON-TIMI 38 AHA 2007 Orlando, Florida
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
TRITON TIMI-38 STEMI cohort Clopidogrel Under Fire: Is Prasugrel in Primary PCI or Recent MI Superior? Insights From TRITON-TIMI-38 Gilles Montalescot,
Adapted from Angiolillo DJ et al. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97: Individual Response Variability to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in the Steady State Phase of.
Acute Coronary Syndrome: In Hospital Antiplatelet Management
수요저널 우종신. ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update 2011 Class I 1. After PCI, use of aspirin should be continued indefinitely. (Level of Evidence.
Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI Theodore A Bass, MD FSCAI President SCAI Professor of Medicine, University of Florida Medical Director UF Shands CV Center,Jacksonville.
The Big Antiplatelet Debate: Why I Prefer Ticagrelor Over Prasugrel
_________________ Caitlin M. Gibson, PharmD, BCPS
Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC, FSCAI
Should We Preload STEMI Patients with Antiplatelet Therapy?
NOACs for ACS: Is there a Role?
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Which Antiplatelet Therapy for PCI?
Antiplatelet Therapy For STEMI: The Case for Cangrelor
The Big Antiplatelet Debate Why I Prefer Prasugrel Over Ticagrelor
Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives Variable Response to Clopidogrel.
Table. Clinical Efficacy and Safety
The Management of ACS “Updated Perspectives and Goals” Rafid F. Al-Aqeedi FIBMS ( Med ), MRCP (London), DM ( Int.Card.), FACC, FESC Consultant Interventional.
Why I Prefer Ticagrelor
August 30, 2009 at CET. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLATO trial.
What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose?
TRITON-TIMI 38 AHA 2007 Orlando, Florida
OASIS-5: Study Design Randomize N=20,078 Enoxaparin (N=10,021)
The Case for Routine CYP2C19 ( Plavix® ) Genetic Testing
Presentation transcript:

What’s New in Acute Coronary Syndromes? Claudia Bucci BScPhm, PharmD Clinical Coordinator, Cardiovascular Diseases Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre 13 th Annual Contemporary Therapeutic Issues in Cardiovascular Disease May 7, 2010

ObjectivesObjectives To review recent evidence of antiplatelet therapies in the management of ACS To review recent evidence of antiplatelet therapies in the management of ACS à Clopidogrel (CURRENT/OASIS-7) à Prasugrel (TRITON-TIMI 38) à Ticagrelor (PLATO) To provide an update on pharmacotherapeutic issues in the management of ACS. To provide an update on pharmacotherapeutic issues in the management of ACS.

Platelet Cascade Platelet 5HT PAF EPI ADP Thrombin Collagen TXA 2 Gp 2b/3a receptor Platelet Aggregation Clot Clopidogrel Prasugrel Ticagrelor ASA Platelet Abciximab Eptifibatide Tirofiban

Medication In Hospital Long-Term Aspirin 160mg to chew, followed by ECASA 81mg daily ECASA 81mg daily indefinitely Clopidogrel 300mg or 600mg X 1, followed by 75mg daily 75mg daily ≥ 1 year Minimum: 4 weeks (BMS) 3-6 months (DES) Use of Antiplatelets in ACS and PCI

Limitations of Current Antiplatelet Therapy Slow Onset Slow Onset Level of Platelet Inhibition Level of Platelet Inhibition Variability of Response Variability of Response à High on-treatment platelet reactivity leads to increased risk of ischemic events. increased risk of ischemic events. à Medication adherence à Patient factors à P2Y12 receptor affinity à Under-dosing

CURRENT/OASIS-7CURRENT/OASIS-7 R UA/NSTEMI or STEMI Clopidogrel Day 1 = 600 mg LD Day 2 – 7 = 150 mg daily Day 8-30 = 75 mg Clopidogrel Day 1 = 300 mg LD + placebo Day 2 – 7 = 75 mg daily + placebo Day mg daily HIGH DOSE STANDARD DOSE All patients: ASA low dose (75-100mg) OR high dose ( mg) Up to 30 days

25,087 ACS Patients (UA/NSTEMI 70.8%, STEMI 29.2%) Planned Early (<24 h) Invasive Management with intended PCI Ischemic ECG Δ (80.8%) or ↑cardiac biomarker (42%) 25,087 ACS Patients (UA/NSTEMI 70.8%, STEMI 29.2%) Planned Early (<24 h) Invasive Management with intended PCI Ischemic ECG Δ (80.8%) or ↑cardiac biomarker (42%) PCI 17,232 (70%) Angio 24,769 (99%) Angio 24,769 (99%) No PCI 7,855 (30%) No Sig. CAD 3,616CABG 1,809CAD 2,430 Efficacy Outcomes:CV Death, MI or stroke at day 30 Stent Thrombosis at day 30 Safety Outcomes:BleedingCURRENT/OASIS-7CURRENT/OASIS-7

Clopidogrel: Double vs Standard Dose StandardDoubleHR 95% CI PIntn CV Death/MI/Stroke PCI (2N=17,232) No PCI (2N=7855) Overall (2N=25,087) MI PCI (2N=17,232) No PCI (2N=7855) Overall (2N=25,087) CV Death PCI (2N=17,232) No PCI (2N=7855) Overall (2N=25,087) Stroke PCI (2N=17,232) No PCI (2N=7855) Overall (2N=25,087)

Days Cumulative Hazard Clopidogrel: Double vs Standard Dose Primary Outcome: PCI Patients Clopidogrel Standard Clopidogrel Double HR % CI P= % RRR CV Death, MI or Stroke

Stent Thrombosis Days Cumulative Hazard C Standard, A Low C Standard, A High C Double, A Low C Double, A High

CURRENT-OASIS 7 Conclusions High Dose Clopidogrel High Dose Clopidogrel à stent thrombosis and major CV events in PCI patients. à ↑ CURRENT-defined major bleeds but not TIMI major, ICH or fatal. High Dose ASA High Dose ASA à No significant difference in efficacy or bleeding (with trends towards greater efficacy).

Limitations of Current Antiplatelet Therapy Slow Onset Slow Onset Level of Platelet Inhibition Level of Platelet Inhibition Variability of Response Variability of Response à High on-treatment platelet reactivity leads to increased risk of ischemic events. à Medication adherence à Patient factors à P2Y12 receptor affinity à Under-dosing

Clopidogrel (Plavix®) Prasugrel (Effient®) Ticagrelor (Brilinta®) EvidenceCUREPCI-CURE TRITON-TIMI 38 PLATO Dose mg X 1 75 mg od (150mg X 7d) 60mg X 1, 10mg od 180mg X 1 90mg bid Approved Indications * MI, stroke, PAD (secondary prev’n) MI, stroke, PAD (secondary prev’n) ACS +/- PCI ACS +/- PCI NSTEMI/STEMI with PCI - Availability * Yes June Cost$2.58/day?? Update: Antiplatelet Agents in ACS and PCI *as of May 2010

Clopidogrel (Plavix®) Prasugrel (Effient®) Ticagrelor (Brilinta®) MechanismIrreversibleIrreversibleReversible Inhibitory effect Onset 2 h < 30 min 1-2 h Peak response 2-5 h 2-4 h 1-3 h MetabolismProdrug (CYP 2C19, 3A, 2B6, 1A2) Prodrug (3A4, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19) Not a prodrug Duration 5-7 days 24 – 48 h Comparison of Antiplatelet Agents in ACS

N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1108

Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation (IPA) at 24 Hours (Healthy Volunteers) Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation (%) Response to Prasugrel Response to Clopidogrel Clopidogrel Responder Clopidogrel Non-responder *Responder =  25% IPA at 4 and 24 h Interpatient Variability Brandt, Payne, Wiviott et al AHJ 2007

TRITON-TIMI 38 Double-blind ACS (STEMI or UA/NSTEMI) & Planned PCI ASA PRASUGREL 60 mg LD/ 10 mg MD CLOPIDOGREL 300 mg LD/ 75 mg MD 1 o endpoint: CV death, MI, Stroke 2 o endpoints:CV death, MI, Stroke, Rehosp-Rec Isch CV death, MI, UTVR Stent Thrombosis (ARC definite/prob.) Safety endpoints: TIMI major bleeds, Life-threatening bleeds Key Substudies: Pharmacokinetic, Genomic Median duration of therapy - 12 months N= 13,600 Wiviott SD et al. New Engl J Med 2007;357:

10 15 Days Prasugrel Clopidogrel Intent To Treat: n=13,608; Lost to Follow-Up: n=14 (0.1%) HR 0.81 ( ) P<0.001 ARR=2.2% NNT= (n=781) 9.9 (n=643) HR 0.77 ( ) P<0.001 HR 0.80 ( ) P<0.001 CV Death/MI/Stroke (%) TRITON-TIMI 38: CV Death, MI, Stroke Wiviott SD et al. New Engl J Med 2007;357:

Prasugrel Clopidogrel TRITON-TIMI Days After Randomization End Point (%) (n=111) 2.4 (n=146) Non-CABG TIMI Major Bleeds CV Death, MI, Stroke P=0.03 P<0.001 ↓138 events ↑ 35 events 12.1 (n=781) 9.9 (n=643) Prasugrel Clopidogrel Wiviott SD et al. New Engl J Med 2007;357:

TRITON-TIMI 38: Non-CABG TIMI Major Bleeds Patients (%) Non-CABG TIMI Major Through day 3 At study end After day 3 to study end (n=6,716) (n=6,741) Life Threatening Bleeds 1.8% 0.4% 0.3% 1.0% 0.6% n= % n= % n=56 1.4% n=85 P=0.03 P=0.26 P=0.03 P=0.01 Wiviott SD et al. New Engl J Med 2007;357:

P=0.002 Odds Ratio 4.73 P<0.001 TIMI Major or Minor CABG-related TIMI Major Bleeding Requiring Transfusion P<0.001 At risk 6/189 At risk 24/179 (n=6,716) (n=6,741) Patients (%) 3.2% 13.4% n=244 n=182 n=231 n= % 5.0% 3.0% 4.0% TRITON-TIMI 38: Other TIMI Bleeds Wiviott SD et al. New Engl J Med 2007;357:

Prasugrel BetterClopidogrel Better HR P* value P** interaction TRITON-TIMI 38: Non-CABG TIMI Major Bleed History of stroke or TIA Yes No Any of the following: Age >75 y, Body wt. <60 kg, History stroke/TIA Yes No *Tests HR=1.0 within subgroups; **Tests equality HR between subgroups Wiviott SD et al. New Engl J Med 2007;357:

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO) Primary endpoint: CV death + MI + Stroke Key secondary: CV death + MI + Stroke in patients intended for invasive management Total mortality + MI + Stroke CV death + MI + Stroke + recurrent ischaemia + TIA + arterial thrombotic events MI alone / CV death alone / Stroke alone / Total mortality Primary safety: Total major bleeding 6–12 month exposure Clopidogrel If pre-treated, no additional loading dose; if naive, standard 300 mg loading dose, then 75 mg qd maintenance; (additional 300 mg allowed pre PCI) Ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose, then 90 mg bid maintenance; (additional 90 mg pre-PCI) UA/NSTEMI (moderate-to-high risk) STEMI (if primary PCI) All receiving ASA; clopidogrel-treated or naive; randomised within 24 hours of index event (N=18,624) NEJM 2009;361:

PLATO: CV Death, MI or Stroke Days after randomisation Cumulative incidence (%) P<0.001 HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.92 ) RRR = 16%, ARR = 1.87%, NNT = 54 Clopidogrel Ticagrelor NEJM 2009;361:

PLATO: Major Bleeding Days from first IP dose Clopidogrel Ticagrelor HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.95–1.13), p=0.43 K-M estimated rate (% per year) NEJM 2009;361:

PLATO Total Major Bleeding NS 0 K-M estimated rate (% per year) PLATO major bleeding TIMI major bleeding Red cell transfusion * PLATO life- threatening/ fatal bleeding Fatal bleeding Ticagrelor Clopidogrel NEJM 2009;361:

PLATO Non-CABG and CABG-related Major Bleeding p=0.03 NS K-M estimated rate (% per year) Non-CABG PLATO major bleeding Non-CABG TIMI major bleeding CABG PLATO major bleeding CABG TIMI major bleeding Ticagrelor Clopidogrel NEJM 2009;361:

PLATO: Safety TicagrelorN=9333 Clopidogrel n=9291 p Dyspnea Dyspnea requiring discontinuation 13.8%0.9%7.8%0.1%<0.001<0.001 Ventricular Pauses ≥ 3 sec ≥ 5 sec 5.8%2.0%3.6%1.2% Increase in SrCr (%) 1month 12 month End of Tx 10±22 11±22 8±21 9±22 10±22 <0.001< NEJM 2009;361:

These slides have been provided, on request, by the AstraZeneca Medical Affairs  Last Maintenance Dose Loading Dose Onset Maintenance Offset IPA % Ticagrelor (n=54) Clopidogrel (n=50) Placebo (n=12) weeks * * * * * * * * * ‡ † †  20 µM ADP- Final Extent Gurbel PA, et al Circulation ;120:

Intensive Statin Therapy in PCI JACC 2009;54: