NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 4 of 20 April 7, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Telecommunication Union ITU Green Standards Week, Rome, Italy, September 5 – 9, 2011 ICT in Organizations Current Status of the ITU-T SG5.
Advertisements

BLOCK Life-cycle Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Analysis looking beyond the boundaries of your control 2011 TRB Waste Management and Resource Efficiency Workshop.
Materials Management and Climate Change An Introduction.
® Marketing. ® Product Catalog The ViewPoint Windows and Doors Catalog – the most basic marketing tool that answers almost any question a distributor.
It All Adds Up Climate Change: Connections and Solutions Lesson 4.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
CONSUMPTION & VOLUNTARY SIMPLICITY Source: elephantjournal.com.
February 4, 2015 National 8(a) Association Winter Conference Orlando, FL Sustainability for Small Business.
BACKGROUND ON MATERIALS GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS John Davis High Desert RMDZ April 10, 2014.
IDSA – Digging Deeper, July , San Francisco, CA Life Cycle Thinking in Sustainable Design Joep Meijer President of theRightenvironment Chemical.
Sustainability Reporting Workshop: Carbon Management Plans and the Carbon Metric Click anywhere to move to the next slide Originally delivered in March.
1 MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Good Company 65 Centennial Loop, Suite B Eugene, Oregon phone fax /17/2015.
Committed to connecting the world GUIDANCE ON GREEN ICT PROCUREMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT & LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) APPROACH FOR THE.
How to Reduce your Carbon Footprint By: Shannon Houst.
Welcome to {Organization} Appraising Green Residences An Appraisal Continuing Education Course.
Environmental Fundamentals of Alternatives Presentation for CEA/NRCan Workshop: Diversifying the Mix - Alternatives to Conventional Generating Technology.
How can housing be made more sustainable?
………………………. A perspective of life cycle thinking We believe in decision making based life cycle thinking. It results in: -no trade-offs in life cycle phases.
Carbon Labelling: Theory and Practice R ebecca White Food and Drink Innovation Network Seminar 18 April 2007.
GREEN BUILDING.
Carbon offsets in our back-yard: Northern Virginia Community College & WGES CleanSteps Carbon Offsets Rob Johnson NOVA – Sustainability Officer Laura Pagliarulo.
The TNA Process in Costa Rica Experiences and lessons learned Francisco Sancho Advisor TNA
Life Cycle Assessment Overview of LCA and Methodology October 30, 2012.
Chapter 7 – Built Environment. Introduction What is built environment? Two strategies to consume less resources – Use less material – Use more material.
Resource Efficiency Opportunities in the Building Sector
16469 Low Energy Building Design Sustainability – an overview
Summary of LCA Review including carbon issues Julian Parfitt WRAP LCA Symposium ‘Making the most of LCA thinking’ 23 November 2006, Savoy Place, London.
1 Managing Renewables Integration Valerie Fong Utilities Director Power Association of Northern California September 17, 2013.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 14 of 20 May 17, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
By Daniel, Tyler, Adamis and Andrey. “How does Green Technology affect society as a whole?” Making products environmentally friendly The Government using.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 6 of 20 April 14, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 13 of 20 May 12, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
Reported By: Pierre Froilan A. Cua.  Life cycle analysis is the primary tool to analyze green buildings versus the traditional design, construction,
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 3 of 20 April 5, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 10 of 20 April 28, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene,
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 11 of 20 May 5, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
Sustainability at NMSU A part of the integrated planning process.
16469 Low Energy Building Design Sustainability – an overview Dr Nick Kelly ESRU.
Food Waste… A Recipe for Disaster!. Recipe for Disaster!
Climate change, land, materials and products: new reports from EPA and the Product Policy Institute GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference October 19,
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Greening Government ICT EPEAT – an overview Simon Redding Environment Agency.
The Energy & Climate Benefits of the 3 R’s The Energy & Climate Benefits of the 3 R’s Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Sara Hartwell U.S. EPA Office of Resource.
CHAPTER 7: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Kyoto and Beyond.
Zero Waste Schools Meeting March 12 th, Envision a world without waste 75% diversion by 2010 Reduce GHG emissions to 25% below 2005 levels by 2025.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 18 of 20 May 31, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
Are your construction projects costing the Earth? James Fiske.
Generic Modeling. 2 home back first prev next last What Will I Learn? In this lesson, you will learn to: –Define generic modeling –Evaluate and describe.
Benefits to Recycling Mary Rieu-Sicart April 6, 2014.
Climate Change Workshop: CIWMB GHG Reduction Measures Strategic Policy Development Committee May 8 th, 2007 Judith Friedman, CIWMB.
Sustainability at NMSU A part of the integrated planning process.
Lesson 12: Dealing with future energy demand.  MUST discuss the effectiveness of ways of reducing energy demand understand that some decisions have ethical.
CEC Secretariat Report on Green Building in North America.
Climate Action Plans and Energy Strategies (CAPES) + Reducing Our Carbon Footprints An Open Classroom Charrette Led by Dann Sklarew, with Support from.
CARBON FOOTPRINT. REMEMBER THE CARBON CYCLE… LIST THE VARIOUS WAYS YOU DEPEND ON ENERGY IN A TYPICAL DAY.
Methods of Managing Food Waste: Systematic Literature Review with Harmonization 1 Methods of Managing Food Waste: A Systematic Literature Review with Harmonization.
Investing in the green economy: GIB’s approach to ensuring positive green impact 15 th September 2014.
Under Guidance of – Prof. SRIHARI Prepared By – ANUPAM MURMU ASHUTOSH GANDHEWAR KUSHAL MURARI
Intel Corporation External Environmental Goals
How can the world stabilise carbon dioxide emissions?
Mitigation System PCEA 8 September 2015.
Materials Management and Climate Change
Climfoot training session
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
Carbon Footprint.
Carbon Footprint.
Sustainable buildings
Reducing construction phase greenhouse gas emissions of detached houses through material supply chain management Jani Laine.
Presentation transcript:

NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 4 of 20 April 7, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR

GOOD JOB! Everyone got 15 of ____________ SF 6 2. ___________ 3._____________ HFCs PFCs SCOPE 1 4. Circle one: Direct/Indirect SCOPE 3 6. Circle one: Direct/Indirect SCOPE 2 5. Circle one: Direct/Indirect 7. _______________ 8. _______________ 9. _____________________ 10. ________________________ 11. ________________________ 12. ________________________ 13. ________________________ 14. ________________________ 15. ________________________

overview DEQ Home LCA –review results, discuss implications –prepare for next week’s readings Homework for next time

learning objectives Get experience with looking at LCA results Understand and summarize main points Look at various ways of presenting information Discuss implications for various types of decision making

home LCA briefly summarize (cite charts to make the point) –main purpose? (particular angle (due to funder)?) –functional unit? –What is being studied here? What are the impact categories? –strategies called out in the report? –other points? sensitivity analysis and pie charts: if you remove a big slice, it all changes (including high-priority actions) (this is a general observation) comment on: –what to do with existing homes –implications for durability/longevity? –putting results in context of personal/HH consumption

home LCA fair game –If life-cycle stages are in rows and impacts are in columns, what are the rows and columns of the LCA? –What are the highest-impact items? Name a few. –Does the answer to that depend on who the actor is? Give examples. –To what extent and in what actions are GHG reduction and waste reduction correlated? (carbon goggles) –What major resource impacts associated with a home purchase and use are missing? where this material will/could resurface –your personal climate action plan –discussion of McKinsey’s Pathways –subsequent discussions of carbon goggles

Initial Study Question: Over the life of a home, how can you use fewer building materials or prevent waste? 7 initial study question and purpose Purpose: Support decisions by DEQ to form programs, policies, and actions to prevent waste generation from the residential building sector in a way that maximizes overall environmental benefits. Purpose: Support decisions by DEQ to form programs, policies, and actions to prevent waste generation from the residential building sector in a way that maximizes overall environmental benefits.

***Lifetime = 70 years***  2262 square feet  3 bedrooms  2 baths  2 car garage  2.5 occupants  “move-in ready”  includes original and replacement materials  vinyl windows  asphalt roof  gas furnace, no A/C  designed to 2008 Oregon energy code  energy use modeled for Portland, OR climate 8 the functional unit: standard home

I’ll give it to you blank next time and you can fill it in Note how hard it is to zero in on “before”, “during” and “after”

DEQ Home LCA: goal definition and scoping

activity 1: write out main lessons of study use your knowledge of the portion you read sum up primary lessons into a few bullets imagine you are responsible for: –policy decisions –certification implications –a home buying decision

Major take-aways? (green & dotted bars only)

Major take-aways? (yellow bars)

Major take-aways?

two views of US emissions implication: transform our economy * applied thinking

two views of US emissions implication: transform our economy * applied thinking

two views of US emissions implication: transform our economy * applied thinking “On a per-home basis, constructing smaller residences is among the most influential options for preventing waste and reducing a variety of environmental impacts, including Climate Change.”

two views of US emissions implication: transform our economy * applied thinking What are possible policy implications? What are possible certification implications? What are possible home buying implications?

example: building life-cycle BEFORE DURING AFTER

Which stage determines all decisions? BEFORE DURING AFTER

Which stage lasts the longest? BEFORE DURING AFTER

Which stage costs the most? BEFORE DURING AFTER

life-cycle cost for Medium Standard Home

“before”“during”“after” Version 1: life of the materials

“before”“during”“after” Take-away: what can you do to extend the life of the materials?

Version 2: life of the house “before”“during”“after”“before”“during”

Which stage emits the most GHGs? BEFORE DURING AFTER

climate impacts from Medium Standard Home

“during”: energy consumption “before”: materials “after”

30 GHGs from production, landfill and recycling

31 Impacts from materials (over 70 years)

Why are energy and climate impacts different for some materials and the same for others?

~80%~15% 33 life cycle GHG impacts

34 ~25% ~70% life cycle non-renewable energy impacts

apples, oranges, pineapples, sheep, toasters

activity 1 continued: New lessons to add? use your knowledge of the portion you read sum up primary lessons into a few bullets imagine you are responsible for: –policy decisions –certification implications –a home buying decision

Major take-aways?

I’ll give you the list next time and ask you to draw it on a linear scale

homework keep reading DEQ Home LCA –be prepared to discuss results start your personal carbon footprint and climate action plan

Feel free to contact me: Kelly Hoell (541) 341-GOOD (4663), ext. 217 Have a good weekend!