WINDSOR TORNADO STUDY - STMAS (updated 9/16/2009 by Huiling Yuan and Yuanfu Xie)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Balance of Cloud Vertical Velcoty
Advertisements

Space and Time Multiscale Analysis System (STMAS)
Advanced Research WRF High Resolution Simulations of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma (2005) Kristen L. Corbosiero, Wei Wang, Yongsheng Chen, Jimy Dudhia.
Rapid Refresh and RTMA. RUC: AKA-Rapid Refresh A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of off-time or continuous observations.
5/22/201563rd Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference, March 2-5, 2009, St. Petersburg, FL Experiments of Hurricane Initialization with Airborne Doppler.
The Variational Version of the Local Analysis and Prediction System (LAPS): Hot-start Data Assimilation of Convective Events Steve Albers, Yuanfu Xie,
Mike Evans / NWS Binghamton, NY. Outline Large-scale pattern / meso-analysis Radar data High resolution model output Summary.
FORECAST PERFORMANCE OF AN OPERATIONAL MESO-GAMMA-SCALE MODELLING SYSTEM FOR EXTRATROPICAL SYSTEMS Anthony P. Praino, Lloyd A. Treinish IBM Thomas J. Watson.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System Cliff Mass, Dave Ovens, Jeff Baars, Mark Albright, Phil Regulski, Dave Carey University of Washington.
Update of A Rapid Prototyping Capability Experiment to Evaluate CrIS / ATMS Observations for a Mesoscale Weather Event Valentine G. Anantharaj Xingang.
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
Hector simulation We found simulation largely depending on: Model initialization scheme Lateral boundary conditions Physical processes represented in the.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
Atmospheric Modeling at RENCI Brian J. Etherton. Atmospheric Modeling at RENCI Focus of RENCI for C- STAR project is to provide modeling support/development.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Hongli Jiang, Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Zoltan Toth
Evaluation of Potential Impacts of Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements on High-impact Weather Forecasting: A Regional OSSE Study Zhaoxia Pu and Lei Zhang University.
Incorporation of TAMDAR into Real-time Local Modeling Tom Hultquist Science & Operations Officer NOAA/National Weather Service Marquette, MI.
Storm-scale data assimilation and ensemble forecasting for Warn-on- Forecast 5 th Warn-on-Forecast Workshop Dusty Wheatley 1, Kent Knopfmeier 2, and David.
Space and Time Multiscale Analysis System A sequential variational approach Yuanfu Xie, Steven Koch Steve Albers and Huiling Yuan Global Systems Division.
Model Resolution Prof. David Schultz University of Helsinki, Finnish Meteorological Institute, and University of Manchester.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Potential Benefits of Multiple-Doppler Radar Data to Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting: Assimilation of Simulated Data Using WRF-3DVAR System Soichiro.
WSN05 6 Sep 2005 Toulouse, France Efficient Assimilation of Radar Data at High Resolution for Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Keith Brewster,
Hurricane Microphysics: Ice vs Water A presenation of papers by Willoughby et al. (1984) and Heymsfield et al. (2005) Derek Ortt April 17, 2007.
A Sequential Hybrid 4DVAR System Implemented Using a Multi-Grid Technique Yuanfu Xie 1, Steven E. Koch 1, and Steve Albers 1,2 1 NOAA Earth System Research.
LAPS / STMAS Verification Activities Steve Albers, Isidora Jankov ESRL / GSD Verification Summit September 2011 Updated Sep 7, 2011.
Performance of the Experimental 4.5 km WRF-NMM Model During Recent Severe Weather Outbreaks Steven Weiss, John Kain, David Bright, Matthew Pyle, Zavisa.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 4 activities.
The EnKF Analyses and Forecasts of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm By Nusrat Yussouf 1,2 Edward Mansell 2, Louis Wicker 2, Dustan.
Mesoscale Simulation of a Convective Frontal Passage Travis Swaggerty, Dorothea Ivanova and Melanie Wetzel Department of Applied Aviation Sciences Embry-Riddle.
5 th ICMCSDong-Kyou Lee Seoul National University Dong-Kyou Lee, Hyun-Ha Lee, Jo-Han Lee, Joo-Wan Kim Radar Data Assimilation in the Simulation of Mesoscale.
MCS Introduction Where? Observed reflectivity at 3km from
Ensemble variability in rainfall forecasts of Hurricane Irene (2011) Molly Smith, Ryan Torn, Kristen Corbosiero, and Philip Pegion NWS Focal Points: Steve.
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
1985 Hurricane Elenna taken from the Space Shuttle Hurricane/Typhoon Data Assimilation using Space-Time Multi-scale Analysis System (STMAS) Koch S., Y.
Data Assimilation for High Impact Weather Forecast Yuanfu Xie NOAA/OAR/ESRL OAR/ESRL/GSD/Forecast Applications Branch.
DRAFT – Page 1 – January 14, 2016 Development of a Convective Scale Ensemble Kalman Filter at Environment Canada Luc Fillion 1, Kao-Shen Chung 1, Monique.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration WRF and the coastal marine environment Kate LaCasse SOO/SPoRT Workshop 11 July.
Numerical Simulation and Prediction of Supercell Tornadoes Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of.
NCEP Production Suite Review
Recent and Future Advancements in Convective-Scale Storm Prediction with the High- Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Forecast System NOAA/ESRL/GSD/AMB Curtis.
Simulations of MAP IOPs with Lokal Modell: impact of nudging on forecast precipitation Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani ARPA – Servizio Idro-Meteorologico.
Acknowledging SATREPS. COP17 theme? Comparison: 1 km and 200 m February diurnal temperature cycle.
CWB Midterm Review 2011 Forecast Applications Branch NOAA ESRL/GSD.
African easterly wave dynamics in a full-physics numerical model. Gareth Berry and Chris Thorncroft. University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, NY,USA.
An examination of the potential aviation application of high-resolution convective resolving models initialized with LAPS and STMAS Ed Szoke 1,2, Isidora.
The Developmental Testbed Center: Historical Perspective and Benefits to NOAA Steve Koch DTC Deputy Director Director, NOAA/ESRL/Global Systems Division.
All-Sky Visualization Using the the Local Analysis and Prediction System (LAPS) Steve Albers 1,2, Yuanfu Xie 1, Vern Raben 3, Zoltan Toth 1, Kirk Holub.
1 WRF Configuration for Ukraine  Input & boundary conditions from NCEP GFS model  3 day forecasts every 6 hours  10 km horizontal grid, 200x200 gridpoints.
WINDSOR TORNADO STUDY - STMAS (updated 10/21/2009 by Huiling Yuan and Yuanfu Xie)
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 Observation Denial and Performance of a Local Mesoscale Model Leela R. Watson William H. Bauman.
Implementation of Terrain Resolving Capability for The Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System (VDRAS) Tai, Sheng-Lun 1, Yu-Chieng Liou 1,3, Juanzhen.
Utilizing High-Resolution WRF Model Output to Improve NWS Forecasts in Complex Terrain Brett E. McDonald, Ph.D. Science and Operations Officer National.
Example Radar Data Assimilation Direct analysis of radar radial velocity data using enhanced NCEP GSI-3DVAR Analysis of radar reflectivity via ARPS complex.
STMAS/LAPS for Convective Weather Analysis and Short-range Forecast
Anthony P. Praino, Lloyd A. Treinish
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
CAPS is one of the first 11 NSF Science and Technology (S&T) Centers
All-Sky Visualization Using the
LAPS / STMAS Niche Highly Portable System, Easy to Use – Many Collaborators/users World Wide Federal/State Gov’t, International, Academia, Private Sector.
Concurrent Visualization (NASA Goddard and Ames)
LAPS Hurricane Analysis and Forecasting of Dennis and Katrina
Tucson, AZ Initial Results 8/10/2011 – 8/15/2011
CAPS Real-time Storm-Scale EnKF Data Assimilation and Forecasts for the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments: Towards the Goal.
RAINEX briefing at the NOAA AOC in Tampa
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Real-time WRF EnKF 36km outer domain/4km nested domain D1 (36km)
Start Hot-Start Section
Presentation transcript:

WINDSOR TORNADO STUDY - STMAS (updated 9/16/2009 by Huiling Yuan and Yuanfu Xie)

Windsor tornado case, 22 May 2008 Tornado touched down at Windsor, Colorado around 17:40 UTC, 22 May 2008 Facts: Most expensive tornado in Colorado's history 1 fatality, injuries, 850 home damages ~$200 million F3 (wind as high as 130 to 150 mph) NWS Doppler Radar Image at 11:44 AM MDT

Simulation of Windsor tornado case, 22 May 2008, 5 km run Tornado touched down at Windsor, Colorado around 17:40 UTC, 22 May 2008 STMAS initialization 5 km 279x208, test 21 levels background model: RUC 13km, 17 UTC (also tested 15 UTC, 16 UTC) hot start (cloud analysis) Boundary conditions (BCs): RUC 13km, 3-h RUC forecast (initialized at 15 UTC) WRF-ARW 5 km with nested 1.67 km (301x313), 1-h forecast, 35 levels Thompson microphysics 10 min output Postprocessing: reflectivity Verification: wind, reflectivity

00-01hr 800mb reflectivity initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, mosaic radar vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 5 km

00-01hr 800mb reflectivity initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, mosaic radar vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 1.7 km nested in 5 km

Simulation of Windsor tornado case, 22 May 2008, 1.67 km run STMAS initialization 1.67 km 301 x 313, test 21 and 41 levels background model: RUC 13km, 17 UTC hot start (cloud analysis) Boundary conditions (BCs): RUC 13km, 3-h RUC forecast (initialized at 15 UTC) WRF-ARW 1.67 km, 1-h forecast, 35 levels (81 levels tested) Thompson microphysics 10 min output Postprocessing: reflectivity

00-01hr 800mb wind initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, STMAS analysis vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 1.7 km

00-01hr wind cross-section initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, STMAS analysis vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 1.7 km

00-01hr omega cross-section initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, STMAS analysis vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 1.7 km

00-01hr 800mb reflectivity initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, mosaic radar vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 1.7 km

00-01hr reflectivity cross-section initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, mosaic radar vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 1.7 km

00-01hr 800mb reflectivity initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, WRF forecast (nested 1.7 km from 5 km STMAS vs. 1.7 km STMAS)

00-01hr reflectivity cross-section initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, WRF forecast, RUC vs. STMAS, 1.7 km

00-01hr 800mb wind initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, WRF forecast (LAPS vs. STMAS), 1.7 km

00-01hr reflectivity cross-section initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, WRF forecast (STMASL21 vs. STMASL41), 1.7 km

Simulation of Windsor tornado case, 22 May 2008, 800 m run STMAS initialization 800 m 257 x 257 background model: RUC 13km, 17 UTC hot start (cloud analysis) Boundary conditions: RUC 13km, 3-h RUC forecast (initialized at 15 UTC) WRF-ARW 800 m, 1-h forecast, 81 levels Thompson microphysics 10 min output Postprocessing: reflectivity

00-01hr 800mb reflectivity initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, mosaic radar vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 800m

00-01hr reflectivity cross-section initialized at 17 UTC 22 May 2005, mosaic radar vs. WRF forecast (STMAS), 800 m

Summary of Windsor tornado case, 22 May 2008 Initial conditions are the most important factor Little BC impacts for 1-h forecast Tested 5km, 1.7km, with different RUC BCs (e.g., 3-h fcst from15 UTC, RUC analysis at 18 UTC, etc.) Forecasts initialized at finer analysis are better than inner nesting. Hot start initialization is very important for tornado forecasting Resolutions (both horizontal and vertical) in initialization play an important role; parameters in model less important (vertical resolution).

Future Modeling Considerations Resolution (horizontal & vertical) Microphysics Scheme Reflectivity Calculation