Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Low and Negligible Risk Research Update - Ethics.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Areas of Research Specific issues. Clinical Trials Phase I First use in humans of an experimental drug or treatment In a small group of healthy volunteers.

Advertisements

Human Research Ethics Forum

Ethical considerations in educational research

Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Ethics Forum – May 2012.

Ethical regulations for health research involving human subjects in Cambodia By Chap Seak Chhay, MD, MPH, MHPEd Public Health and Health Professions Educator.

Human Research Ethics - what are they and where can we get some?

Good Clinical Research Practice Guidelines For Informed Consent Presented by Catherine May Acting Research Practice Development Officer The Office of Research.

Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.

Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.

DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.

Post-trial Access to Treatment by Patients participating in Clinical Trials Presented by Dr T K S Letlape Chairman: South African Medical Association President-Elect:

Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?

Protecting Human Participants in Research syr

CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.

Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants

Essential research ethics and the approval process Dr Xiaoming Zheng Chair, School of Dentistry and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee 17 March.

Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,

Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.

Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?

Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.

Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval

Ethics and Regulatory Approvals Alison Robertson CMDHB Research Officer.

University of Western Sydney Comments on your HREC Application.

 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.

The Research Ethics Review Process at SJGHC [Presented at Research Readiness Education Program, SJOGHC Subiaco, 12 August 2015] Ms Gorette De Jesus Executive.

Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Ethics Forum – June 2013.

Andrew Thornton, Chairman, RAH HREC

The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB

Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

Help us Help you: IRB Policy Updates Susan Bankowski, MS, JD IRB Chair.

Submitting IRB Applications (or “Do I have to do an IRB?”) Linda A. Detman, Ph.D. Research Associate Lawton & Rhea Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and.

“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.

Legal & Ethical Issues. Objectives At the completion of this session the participant will be able to: ◦ Describe the ethical principles associated with.

The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.

How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.

IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.

The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.

SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.

R&D – a perspective Dr Nana Theodorou Research Coordinator Sheffield Clinical Research Office.

Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.

Human Research Ethics: Issues and Procedures Dr. Constance Jones Chair, Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects.

WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.

Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.

Ethics and Privacy in Intensive Care Research Dr Ian Seppelt Dept of Intensive Care Medicine Nepean Hospital, Sydney.

Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.

EXPEDITED PROTOCOL REVIEW AN IRB INFOSHORT APRIL 2013.

Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.

Do we really need Human Research Ethics processes in Community Health? John Bamberg (Research and Evaluation Consultant)

Levels of Review of Research and Quality Improvement Walter Kraft, MD Associate Director, Office of Human Subjects Protection Department of Pharmacology.

Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.

 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.

Marianne M. Elliott Office of Research Integrity and Ethics Bureau of Medicine and Surgery U. S Navy.

8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.

Using Australian Clinical Sites – Challenges for International Sponsors Prof A J (Tony) Webber Clinical Network Services Pty Ltd Brisbane, Australia.

0 Ethics Lecture Research. ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY Disclosures  The speaker has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.

Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.

CHC Annual Conference 28 June 2012 DRIVING IMPROVEMENT THROUGH INDEPENDENT AND OBJECTIVE REVIEW 1 Healthcare Inspectorate Wales Our focus over the next.

The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.

GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)

CLINICAL TRIALS.

Protection of Human Subjects In Research

Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18

IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections

Research Ethics Committees

What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol

Human Participants Research

Research, Experimentation, & Clinical Trials

NIH GCP Training Amy Jo Jenkins, Sr

Research with Human Subjects

Presentation transcript:

Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Low and Negligible Risk Research Update - Ethics

>The expression ‘low risk research’ describes research in which the only foreseeable risk is one of discomfort. Research in which the risk for participants is more serious than discomfort is not low risk. >The expression ‘negligible risk research’ describes research in which there is no foreseeable risk of harm or discomfort; and any foreseeable risk is no more than inconvenience. What is LNR Research? NHMRC (2007) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.

Research that can be exempted from review >Institutions may choose to exempt from ethical review research that: (a) is negligible risk research; and (b) involves the use of existing collections of data or records that contain only non-identifiable data about human beings. >Quality Assurance activities >Audit activities NHMRC (2007) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.

Quality Assurance and Audit >An activity where the primary purpose is to monitor, evaluate or improve the quality of health care delivered is a quality assurance study. >Quality assurance and research are activities that form a continuum. The ethical principles of integrity, respect for persons, beneficence and justice apply to all QA and research activities. >Where quality assurance proposals could infringe ethical principles that guide human research, independent ethical scrutiny of such proposals should be sought. NHMRC (2003) When does quality assurance in health care require independent ethical review?

Publishing and presenting QA or audit >Journal editors or conference organisers may have a view that any results presented require ethical oversight. >“Where it is proposed that a report of a QA activity undertaken in accordance with this advice is to be published, an HREC may advise a journal editor that it is satisfied that the activity has been so undertaken. This will obviate any need for requests for retrospective approval.” >When in doubt consult the committee. NHMRC (2003) When does quality assurance in health care require independent ethical review?

What is LNR Research at RAH? >Non-invasive collection of specimens. >Collection of blood samples by venipuncture, in amounts not exceeding 450 millilitres in an eight week period and no more often than two times per week, from subjects who are 18 years of age or older and who are in good health and are not pregnant. >Moderate exercise by healthy volunteers. >The study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens. >Studies which involve exposure to ionising radiation of up to 1mSv in dose.

What is NOT LNR Research >Research involving investigational drugs or investigational therapies (NS3.3). >Research involving randomisation to one or more experimental treatments (NS3.3) >Research involving genetic studies which may have relevance to a patient’s or relative’s current or future health (NS3.5). >Research involving stem cells (NS3.6) >Research which requires a third party consent or ICU research (NS4.4). >Research in subjects with cognitive impairment or mental illness (NS4.5) >Research involving aboriginal subjects (NS4.7) NHMRC (2007) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.

For LNR studies which may be suitable for expedited review >Check with Heather whether the study is appropriate for expedited review. Heather will consult the Chairman as necessary. >Submit electronically (eg ): Cover letter Protocol Informed Consent Questionnaires Advertising material Any other material Radiation Safety Report EPA Notification form

SA Health LNR Application Form - Headings

Reminder… >The NHMRC National Approach to mutual recognition of ethical review applies to “clinical trials”. >There is no expectation that LNR research would similarly be covered under a mutual recognition arrangement. >Within SA Health there is an expectation that LNR research approved at one institution does not need to be re- reviewed at another.