Chapter 8: The Principal as Decision Maker Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Drilling Down to Individual Students: Using Academic Intervention Plans to Make AYP Attainment Personalized Jennifer D. Morrison, SDT, Baker Middle School.
PLP Circle of Support: A prevention/intervention model December 12, 2003 Rhode Island Department of Education.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Principals Session: Introduction to NTI Goals and Session Framework for Principals EngageNY.org.
What can we do to improve student learning?. Introduction What do teachers and school leaders do that has the greatest impact on student performance?
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
APS District Technology Plan Team Project July 17, 2012 Jill Roberts, Sam Skeels, Deb Stevenson.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Summer Leadership Institute
CHAPTER 19 Building Software.
Development of Competence Profile Quality managers in VET-institutions Project no: PL1-LEO This publication [communication] reflects the.
Child Study. What is Child Study? The CSC is a school-based team, convened for the purpose of reviewing any problems (academic/developmental, behavioral,
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Case Competition Workshop Co-sponsored by: Consulting Club, Graduate Marketing Association, Finance Association November 30, 2005.
Miyo Wahkohtowin Community Education Authority Maskwacis Student Success Program Presented by Ahmad Jawad March 8, 2011.
Using a Comprehensive Assessment Plan to Meet All Students’ Instructional Needs Leadership Conference 2005 Orlando, Florida Pat Howard and Randee Winterbottom.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Standard V: Teacher.
Chapter 2: Creating a Vision for Learning
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Quality Function Deployment
Chapter 6: Student Services Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
Academic Intervention Services: Deepening the Conversation District 75 NYCDOE.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Maricopa Priorities Status Update Fall Maricopa Priorities Basics What it isWhat it’s not A regular, cyclical, bottom-up process to: ▫Evaluate everything.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Cluster Cycle 2: Meeting 3
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Instructional Decision Making in Iowa IOWA. Iowa’s Experience: How it all started Began in Discussions with stakeholders Parents Teachers Administrators.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
Initial Group Data Meeting Preparation & Facilitation August 23, 2012.
EDA 6061: Organization and Administration of Schools Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
Importance of Building Family and Community Engagement for Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Support There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Anne Arundel County Public Schools Intro to Online Data Systems For AP’s Oct 27 th and 28th, 2010 Mike Ballard Cathy Gillette.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
MTSS/CPST/RTI. District Priority Good News Griffin’s on Top of It!
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
Drilling Down to Individual Students: Using Academic Intervention Plans to Make AYP Attainment Personalized Jennifer D. Morrison, SDT Baker Middle School.
Chapters 9 and 14: Developing Effective Communications and Community Relations Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
EDA 6061: Exam Review Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
Which critical component (or guiding principle) of MTSS does the following statement belong with? A district-wide commitment and focus on student achievement.
Chapter 1: Cultivating Community, Culture, and Learning Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
Supplemental Math Digital Tool: Dreambox
Lorain City Schools 90 Day Entry Plan Update.
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Problem Solving Process.
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Presented by: Dr. Sue Abel
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Grand Canyon University
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 8: The Principal as Decision Maker Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011

Agenda Leadership Book Presentations – Laura, Kirsten, Marissa, Ayesha Tallahassee update Chapter 8: Principal as Decision Maker Using school data to make decisions

Major Themes: Chapter 8 The decision making process Rational decision making Shared decision making Leadership style continuum and decision making

Florida Principal Leadership Standards Standard 6: Decision Making. Effective school leaders employ and monitor a decision-making process that is based on vision, mission and improvement priorities using facts and data. The leader: Gives priority attention to decisions that impact the quality of student learning and teacher proficiency; Uses critical thinking and problem solving techniques to define problems and identify solutions; Evaluates decisions for effectiveness, equity, intended and actual outcome; implements follow-up actions; and revises as needed; Empowers others and distributes leadership when appropriate; and Uses effective technology integration to enhance decision making and efficiency throughout the school.

The Decision Making Process Identifying the ProblemGenerating AlternativesEvaluating AlternativesChoosing an alternativeImplementing the Decision Evaluating decision Effectiveness

Defining the Problem Key piece to effective decision making Get specific when defining any problem and make sure it is actually a problem

Common Methodologies used to Solve Problems Problem Solving Decision Making Analysis – Utilized forced ranking to prioritize solutions amongst chosen variables for consideration SWOT Analysis Decision Tree – Developing a flow chart of decisions

Leadership-Style Continuum p. 216

Using Data to Make Decisions Extremely valuable to new school leaders – Experienced leaders can lean on experience to make decisions, new leaders cannot You have to be able to properly analyze data first

Case Study: Lake Nona HS Step One: Look at the data and analyze each area to determine next steps.

What are your options? A.Data is on target. Strategy is working and personnel is performing B.Data is not on target A.Strategy is not working B.Personnel is not performing

Case Study: Lake Nona HS Step Two: In areas where data is not on target, dig a little deeper within each area to develop a clearer picture a) Is there anything that could have skewed the data? b) Is the data you are investigating an anomaly? Consistent with prior years?

Digging Deeper School to school comparison – Compare overall results with those of other schools within the district to understand how much above/below the mean each data point falls – Look at schools with similar demographics to compare apples to apples?

Developing a Strategy Once you have identified which data point you are trying to move, you have to begin to implement a decision making strategy. Do you: – Make changes by yourself? – Enlist your leadership team to come up with ideas? – Develop a committee of teachers/professionals to weigh in? – Students, parents….?

Evaluating Personnel How do you determine whether or not your issue is the strategy or the people implementing the strategy? How do you ensure that your strategy has been implemented with fidelity? – Leading indicators vs. lagging indicators

Case Study: Lake Nona HS In our case, after bringing together a team of administrators, we realized that it was both a strategy and personnel issue. Our strategy did not provide enough support, so we developed additional interventions including Pull out programs targeting our lowest students Integrating complex text with reading strategies in Physical Science, Biology, Geography and World History

Case Study: Lake Nona HS After compiling data from our reading program, we moved our lowest performing teacher into another subject and hired a high performing reading teacher. – This resulted in a Win-Win. The teacher (who was admittedly struggling, is much more successful.

Case Study: Lake Nona High School Results – Use of leading indicators to measure progress real time

For Next Week Osceola County Spring Break!!!