BES Pilot Overview August 2011 National Center on Education and the Economy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION OF THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INITIATIVE 1 Transforming Education in Kentucky Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner Michael.
Myra Pannell Research and Curriculum Unit Mississippi State University
STATE BOARD EXAMINATION CONSORTIUM ARIZONA MEETING November 2009.
High School Course Information You Need For Your Child’s IGP.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Southern Regional Education Board Cheryl Blanco, Vice President, Special Projects Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)
Successful Practices Network Career & Technical Education CTE Program Approval NYS Board of Regents Approved New Regulations for Career.
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
Career and Technical Education in Arizona adds so much value to the lives of its citizens and the state’s economy that every parent and student considers.
Dec. 14, 2010 APS BOE Workshop Graduation Requirements High School Presented By: Division of Instruction PACESetters!
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Pathways To Graduation October 3, 2014.
Fall 2011 Pilot Project Region 10 Module Four B College and Career Readiness Standards 1.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Pathways To Graduation Ensuring Students Graduate College, Career and Citizenship Ready Fourth Annual CTE Conference Hofstra University.
Division of Florida Colleges Update
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Higher Education Connections ECRC Partnership Council January 30, 2013.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
South Harrison Community School Corporation – College & Career Readiness Initiative SUPERINTENDENT - DR. MARK EASTRIDGE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGE & CAREER READINESS.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Dorchester District Two Rising 9th Grade Scheduling Information
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Excellence for All Grant Opportunity August 23, 2012 Jean Massey Associate State Superintendent Career and Technical Education 1 Kim S. Benton, Ed. D.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
Arizona’s Move On When Ready Initiative AASBO MEMBERSHIP MEETING November 10, 2010 Sybil Francis, Executive Director Center for the Future of Arizona.
Arizona’s Move On When Ready Initiative January, 2011.
Governor’s Commission on College and Career Success Making Pennsylvania Competitive: Educating the Next Generation of Workers, Innovators & Entrepreneurs.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Mississippi State Board of Education Presentation on State Board Examination System Lynn J. House, Ph.D. January 20,
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
ADVANCED OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO STUDENTS Fast Forward Program IDAHO STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
New Graduation Requirements November 10, Outline 1.Update on Graduation Requirements Work 2.Job Skills Assessment Recommendations 3. Substitute.
Tab 6, Page 11 Creating the Future of Public Education: Graduation Requirements in New York State NYS Board of Regents Regional Forum January 2011.
THE ARIZONA MOVE ON WHEN READY INITIATIVE AUGUST 2011 INFORMATIONAL SESSION Sybil Francis, Ph.D., Executive Director Amanda Burke, Director, Education.
Excellence For All: World-Class Instructional Systems For Our Schools Fall 2011 The National Center on Education and the Economy.
Move On When Ready Standard Diploma Provision May 8, 2014.
CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment San Diego, California – June 23, 2015.
College and Career Readiness: Measures/Aligning Instructional Materials Dublin Scioto High School March 2012.
Charles Pack Jr. WorkKeys and KeyTrain Help Make The Academy of Careers and Technology A West Virginia Exemplary School.
Power Point Introduction The new Oregon Diploma raises the rigor of educational requirements in order to ensure that students graduate with the skills.
State Consortium for BOARD EXAMINATION SYSTEMS SHEEO MEETING August 2010.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Tech Prep Planning District Meeting Kelly Jung. Meeting Goals Goal of Standards Explore the Structure of New FCS Content Standards Discuss the Pathway.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Math Summit II Held on August 11 th, 12 th, and 13 th, 2010 at Baker College.
College Preparatory Course Certification Pilot May 5th,
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Oregon Standards: An Update 2009 Superintendent’s Summer Institute Oregon Department of Education August 3, 2009.
February 15, 2006 Highly Qualified Requirements for Exceptional Student Education Teachers What’s New?
1 Getting the Most from your ACT Explore and ACT Plan Reporting Package.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Grant Project Overview Meeting September 27, 2011.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Validating Nevada’s College Readiness Standards For Presentation to the High School Graduation Committee February 24, 2016.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Operation Inform Tests and Testing The State University of New York
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
Dorchester District Two Rising 9th Grade Scheduling Information
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Advanced International Certificate of Education
Life High School Waxahachie 8th Grade Parent Night– Class of 2021
Presentation transcript:

BES Pilot Overview August 2011 National Center on Education and the Economy

Board Examination Systems Big Idea: By participating in the Board Examination Systems pilot, students participate in a rigorous, curriculum-driven proven system of aligned instruction and examinations guided by national and international college and career readiness standards designed to ensure they master the knowledge and skills needed to be prepared for and succeed in postsecondary studies without remediation – whether that is at a trade or technical school, community college or four-year baccalaureate degree granting institution. 2

Board Examination Systems Board Examination Systems are coherent and fully aligned instructional systems currently used in many high performing countries. They include: A set of courses that constitute a core curriculum and that are aligned to the new Common Core Standards Thoughtfully constructed course designs captured in a syllabus High quality exams derived from the curriculum using multiple assessment methods designed to determine whether the students have mastered the curriculum described in the syllabus Instructional materials of various sorts designed to support the syllabus Quality teacher training matched to the course syllabi 3

Standards & Test Systems vs. Curriculum-Driven Systems S & T Systems Assumes standards and tests alone will drive performance up No direct link to classroom practice Leaves the disadvantaged behind, with weak curriculum, weak teaching C-D Systems Assumes that aligned, powerful instructional system is needed to drive high student performance Direct link to classroom practice Closes the gap between the advantaged and the disadvantaged 4

International Results  CBEEEs are utilized in many countries  Research on the association between CBEEEs as exit tests and student achievement, through performance comparisons on international assessments between countries with and without high school exit exams, has found favorable results, such as higher student performance in math and science in countries that utilized a CBEE (Bishop, 1998; Fuchs & Woessmann, 2007). 5

International Results  More than 20 years benchmarking high performing education systems across the world: America’s Choice: High Skills or Low Wages?! Tough Choices Tough Times Standing on the Shoulders of Giants  International research on high school exit examinations, and specifically Curriculum-Based External Exit Exams (CBEEEs), influenced the identification of a Board Examination System as a reform strategy (NCEE, 2010) 6

Role of NCEE  The National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE) is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that is staffing, managing, piloting, securing outside technical expertise for, and convening a consortium of states to implement board examination systems  States launching lower division board examination systems as part of the pilot’s 21 school launch in 2011 include: Arizona, Connecticut, Kentucky, and Mississippi  We are currently recruiting schools for the cohort starting in 2012 from existing and new states 7

Role of NCEE  Hired University of Michigan Institute for Social Research to conduct an independent evaluation of the three-year pilot study to: Gather implementation information Gain understanding of efficacy of the Board Examination Systems pilot 8

Role of NCEE  Convened a Technical Advisory Committee to: Select Board Examination Systems providers, in conjunction with the State of Kentucky Education Department, for the lower and upper division (completed) Assure that the BES courses are compatible with the new Common Core State Standards (completed) Set the recommended pass points on the English and mathematics examinations to an empirically determined college-ready standard (underway) Assess the validity, reliability and fairness of the exams going forward (underway) 9

NCEE Board Examination Systems Consortium: Required Core Courses NCEE LOWER DIVISION PROGRAM REQUIRED COURSES  2 yrs English  2 yrs Mathematics  2 yrs Science: Lab-based science, Engineering, or IT  2 yrs History 1 yr American History; 1 yr World History  1 yr or 2 semesters from among the arts  A course in economics (required by AZ statute) Note: The lower division program leaves ample room for student electives. NCEE LOWER DIVISION PROGRAM REQUIRED COURSES  2 yrs English  2 yrs Mathematics  2 yrs Science: Lab-based science, Engineering, or IT  2 yrs History 1 yr American History; 1 yr World History  1 yr or 2 semesters from among the arts  A course in economics (required by AZ statute) Note: The lower division program leaves ample room for student electives. Lower Division Exams (Diploma When Passed) NCEE UPPER DIVISION PROGRAM REQUIRED COURSES  2 yrs English  2 yrs Mathematics  2 yrs Science Lab-based science, Engineering, or IT  1 yr or 2 semesters of History, Economics, or other social science  1 yr or 2 semesters from among the arts NCEE UPPER DIVISION PROGRAM REQUIRED COURSES  2 yrs English  2 yrs Mathematics  2 yrs Science Lab-based science, Engineering, or IT  1 yr or 2 semesters of History, Economics, or other social science  1 yr or 2 semesters from among the arts Stay in High School Stay in High School 10

BES Program Pathways Once students qualify to earn a lower division diploma, multiple options are open to them including: Remaining in high school and taking the necessary additional coursework to prepare for university entry Graduating and enrolling in full-time community college courses on the students' current high school campus or on a community college campus Enrolling in a full-time career and technical education program offered on a community college campus, a high school campus or a joint technical education district campus, or any combination of these campuses 11

Lower Division  ACT QualityCore  Cambridge IGCSE courses and exams 12

Lower Division: A Closer Look Not elite programs but designed to prepare students for elite programs Prepares students to a minimum college-readiness standard by 16 –Not intended to pack 4 years of high school into 2 years but offers rigorous curriculum to prepare students for success in postsecondary educational pursuits –Students become “diploma eligible” – are not required to graduate early –Requires collaboration across P-20 educational pipeline Offers options to bright students who are dropping out because of boredom Supports less-prepared students to pass end of course exams though middle school coursework, formative assessments, spiral curriculum, and other district specified interventions 13

Upper Division  ACT QualityCore  Cambridge AS/A Levels/AICE Exams leads to AICE Diploma  College Board Advanced Placement, including the Advanced Placement International Diploma (APID) option  International Baccalaureate 14

Upper Division: Key Benefits Students motivated to take tough courses and study hard A very strong curriculum and teachers trained to teach it for schools and students with weak instructional resources A strong system for preparing the most able students for selective colleges Supports less-prepared students to pass end of course exams though lower division coursework, formative assessments, spiral curriculum, and other district specified interventions Trading a time-in-the-seat system for one that rewards performance College entrants ready to do college-level work 15

Commitment: Role of States Share data related to setting exam cut scores Provide data to evaluators Assist with securing post-secondary education involvement Approve NCEE Board Examination Providers for State Procurement purposes Grant high school diploma – or waivers to existing “seat time” diplomas – to those who meet the lower division board exam standards and wish to move on

BES Pilot: Role of Arizona Provided strong support through former Senator and current State Superintendent John Huppenthal on Move On When Ready (MOWR) bill sponsorship and on implementation, as well as from Senator Rich Crandall and State Board of Education Member and Amphitheater Superintendent Vicki Balentine Developed MOWR legislation to award Grand Canyon Diplomas to those who meet the lower division board exam standards and wish to move on Established Center for the Future of Arizona (CFA) as entity responsible for implementation Sharing data related to setting exam cut scores Providing data to evaluators Assisting with securing post-secondary education involvement Approved NCEE Board Examination providers for State Procurement purposes 17

BES Pilot: Broad Implementation Steps Start with demonstration schools that will participate in a 3-year national pilot Finalize technical work Work with external evaluator – University of Michigan Institute for Social Research Establish new pathways to include post-secondary institutions Recruit volunteer schools, volunteer teachers, volunteer students Set up alternative performance based diploma, based on the lower-division exams Expand as system proves itself 18

Broad Implementation Steps Ideal Target DateDeliverable November 15 or earlier if possible  Cambridge Registration Form to CIE  Board Examination Systems Pilot Commitment Letter Submission to NCEE  Center for the Future of Arizona Commitment Letter Submission to CFA November -January  New School Site Visits by CIE Conducted January  Design Teams Established and Implementation Planning Commenced February – April February/April – July  Implementation Planning Via Design Teams Commenced – with NCEE facilitation and CFA involvement  Implementation Planning Continued – with NCEE facilitation and CFA involvement March 15 or earlier if possible  Implementation Planning Guide Submission to CFA January – March  Stage One On-Line Teacher and Principal Training April  Face to Face Teacher and Principal Training Conducted 19

® 20