T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 1 Managing Employee Engagement in this Crisis Copyright © 2009 The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Happy at work. What is happiness at work? Why should I care?
Advertisements

TAKING HR TO THE BOTTOM LINE Presented by AL LUCIA
GALLUP UNIVERSITY SAIC Engagement Every Day: 2011 Engagement Survey – Business Impact Analysis (BIA)
A Healthy Workplace Canadian HW Criteria & Implementation John Perry (
© Development Dimensions Int’l, Inc., MMIIX. All rights reserved. 1 You must be the change you wish to see in the world” -Gandhi.
© Copyright 2012 Avatar HR Solutions Employee Engagement: The Prescription for a Healthy Patient Journey Kevin Sheridan Senior Vice President – HR Optimization.
Introduction to StrengthsQuest
Reinventing talent development. Copyright © 2011 WOW! transformations All rights reserved. 2 helps you OPTIMIZE the return on your talent investment.
Gail Preece About Peopletopia.
2011 Engagement Survey Results – SAIC-Frederick, Inc.
The Value of Employee Wellbeing By Doris Walczyk.
What is Morale and its importance in an organization? Jennifer Xavier.
Hamtramck Employee Engagement Leadership Initiative.
Chapter 10 Employee Separation and Retention McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Human Resource.
1-1 Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 10 Employee Separation and Retention McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill.
Chapter 3: Attitudes and Job Satisfaction
2003 SOLUTIONS FOR ORGANISATIONAL EXCELLENCE. solutions for organisational excellence 2 Internal Service Quality Source: “Putting the Service Profit Chain.
Managers roundtable 9/25/2013
Emerging approaches to workplace stress E. Kevin Kelloway, Ph.D. Professor of Management and Psychology.
Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Workplace Emotions, Attitudes, and Stress.
Why does employee engagement matter?
Calculating ROI: & Ensuring that OD Initiatives Provide Measurable Results… May, 2005.
Why Employee Engagement is Must?. What is Employee Engagement?  Employee engagement is a workplace approach designed to ensure that employees are committed.
Current Trends in Workforce and Succession Planning IPMA – HR Training Conference Seattle, Washington October 5, 2010 Eva Santos, Director Department of.
Why good HR makes good business sense? Slide 1 of 9 Source: Heskett et al. (2008). Service-profit chain. (Harvard) Parasuraman & Owen Business Strategy.
Understand What Drives Employee Engagement
CREATING TRANSFERRABLE WEALTH THROUGH STRENGTHS AND ENGAGED MANAGEMENT Jim Downing, PhD Executive Leadership Resources, Inc. January 2, 2013.
Building a Customer- Centric Organization – Customer Relationship Management CHAPTER 11 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
1 Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
Business Impacts of Flexibility: An Imperative for Expansion Business and Professional Women’s Foundation Audio Conference May 23,2006.
Organizational Commitment
Making Flexibility Work in Your Organization June 27, 2011 MNCPA Management & Business Advisors Conference.
Hello! My Name is: My Five Signature Themes Are:
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Attitudes Attitudes are predispostions to act As an ID, they affect behavior both directly and indirectly They help us understand present and past behavior.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION USDA FSA Executive Presentation (11/03) 1 Gallup Q 12 ® Engagement Index at FSA DAM Engaged Not Engaged Actively Disengaged.
Wellness In The Workplace Internal Affairs ©All rights reserved to Joan Jacobs.
C ALCULATING ROI. Why do we Calculate ROI? TO ENURE THAT OD INITIAVES PROVIDE MEASUREABLE RESULTS!
ENGAGING THE FUTURE OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION 2015.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3: Attitudes and Job Satisfaction 3-2.
Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin The Real Value ($) in Employee Engagement Surveys Organizational Excellence Group UT –
Teri Ridler Hands On Leaderhip. Engagement = Success Gallup Data: Companies with Engaged Employees: o Have 50% lower turnover o Experience 56% higher.
Starter Question Think about a personal relationship you have had (romantic or friendship). Why did/do you feel committed to that person? How did you know.
The Inspiration Triangle Teri Ridler Director of Human Resources SeaWorld Orlando.
Chapter One Customer Focus and Managing Customer Loyalty.
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: Are you stuck on an escalator?
Copyright 2004 ROI Institute, Inc. how me the money! Moving from Impact to ROI Patti Phillips, Ph.D.
2011 Iowa Bankers Association Human Resources Conference April 19, 2011.
1 PEOPLE PERFORMANCE Dependability: Productive, safe and reliable employees.
Retaining Top Talent in Tough Economic Times Susan R. Vroman.
Workplace Flexibility: An Opportunity. 61% 81% 20% +
BUILDING A GREAT PLACE TO WORK & LEARN PRINCIPAL SESSIONS FOR PASCO COUNTY February 2015 JerLene Mosley, Senior Consultant Individualization.
Creating A Can-Do Workforce Through StrengthsQuest Debra L. Hammond, Executive Director California State University, Northridge University Student Union,
Marketing Review 1.0 Presley G, Lauren F, Ryan S, Sydney S, Madison M, Shauna G.
1 Candace J. Chitty RN, MBA, CPHQ, PCMH-CCE. At the end of this webinar participants will be able to: 1. Understand the relationship between employee.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.. Chapter 3: Attitudes and Job Satisfaction.
Copyright © 2015 Studer Group. Please do not quote or disseminate without Studer Group authorization Evidence-Based Leadership The Missing Link to Results:
What is your purpose? Who do you want to help?
SEMINARIE MIDDENKADER VLAAMSE OVERHEID
Juengling & Associates, LLC
2011 Engagement Survey Results – SAIC-Frederick, Inc.
Service - Profit Chain Inputs Outputs
Authors: Tom Rath & Donald Clifton, Ph.D.
The Customer: Key to Market Success
TDMN Employee Engagement
The Power of Employee Engagement
Lecture Enhancers Chapter One. Lecture Enhancers Chapter One.
By Md. Al-Amin (Mli).
Presentation transcript:

T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 1 Managing Employee Engagement in this Crisis Copyright © 2009 The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. All rights reserved. T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION R OMANIA

T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION Employee satisfaction vs. ROI 2

T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 3 Engagement Predicts: Profit (+) Sales (+) Productivity (+) Employee Turnover (-) Customer Loyalty & Engagement (+) Safety Incidents (-) Absenteeism (-) Theft (-) Company Advocacy (+) Satisfaction with Leadership (+) Life Satisfaction (+) Stress (-) Mortality (-)

T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 4 Employee Retention + 50% Customer + 56% Safety + 63% ENGAGED WORK UNIT Profitability + 27% Productivity + 38% + 78% Overall Performance (composite of all five outcomes) +94% Composite Performance (composite of direct outcomes) Engaged work units have higher success rates (improvement in probability of success: above-average performance) Copyright © 2009 The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. All rights reserved. Findings Disengagement is Very Expensive

T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 5 3+ Million Employee Interviews 10+ Million Customer Interviews 2+ Million “Fit to Role” Reviews 200,000 Managers Interviews 100,000 Leadership Interviews Concurrent study of recent advances in neuroscience, psychology and economics. Copyright © 2006 The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. All rights reserved. “Focused”: Finding the right questions

T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 6 Gallup Q 12 ® Engagement Index XYZ Company by Sales Unit Engaged Not Engaged Actively Disengaged Copyright © 2006 The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. All rights reserved.

T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 7 Engaged  These employees are loyal and psychologically committed to the organization. They are more productive, more likely to stay with their company for at least a year, less likely to have accidents on the job, and less likely to steal. These employees have most of their performance- related workplace needs met. Not Engaged  These employees may be productive but they are not psychologically connected to their company. They are more likely to miss workdays and more likely to leave. These employees have some of their performance- related workplace needs met but have many needs unmet. Actively Disengaged  These employees are physically present but psychologically absent. They are unhappy with their work situation and insist on sharing that unhappiness with their colleagues. These employees have most of their performance-related workplace needs unmet. Copyright © 2006 The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. All rights reserved. Using the Q 12 ® items, Gallup can calculate the following three categories of employees:

T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 8 Business is common sense 1. COMMUNICATION 2. CHANGE MANAGEMENT 3. HOPE