Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Advertisements

1 Warp-POSINST is used to investigate e-cloud effects in the SPS Beam ions Electrons Spurious image charges from irregular meshing controlled via guard.
CornellVideo Talk. Dec page 1 John Byrd Experimental studies of the fast- beam ion instability in the ALS- The Sequel John Byrd Lawrence Berkeley.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Review of Electron Cloud R&D at KEKB 1.Diagnostics 1.Beam Size Blow-up 2.Beam Instabilities 3.Electron Density 4.SEY (Secondary Electron Yield) 2.Mitigation.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Recent observations of collective effects at KEKB H. Fukuma, J. W. Flanagan, S. Hiramatsu, T. Ieiri, H. Ikeda, T. Kawamoto, T. Mitsuhashi, M. Tobiyama,
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
10/18/2005 FII in damping ring L Wang1  Smaller (vertical) beta function  Long bunch spacing Both growth rate and tune-shift are small if there is a.
Frank Zimmermann, ILC DR teleconference fast ion effects analytical estimates of  trapping condition  exponential FBII rise time  incoherent.
E-Cloud Effects in the Proposed CERN PS2 Synchrotron M. Venturini, M. Furman, and J-L Vay (LBNL) ECLOUD10 Workshshop, Oct Cornell University Work.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Sep 29 – Oct 3, 2009 LCWA 09 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas Sept 29 – Oct 4, 2009 Damping Ring R&D updates SLAC Mauro Pivi SLAC Allison Fero.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
Electron cloud in the wigglers of ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Motivation and Overview David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Nov 17, 2009 Webex Assessing the 3.2 km Ring feasibility: Simulation parameters for electron cloud Build-up and Instability estimation LC DR Electron Cloud.
Highlights from the ILCDR08 Workshop (Cornell, 8-11 July 2008) report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo, in CLIC Meeting Goals of the workshop:
ATF Fast Ion Study Plan N.Terunuma (KEK) Results in 2007, 2008 Vertical emittance studies at ATF Plan.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
Design of a one-stage bunch compressor for ILC PAL June Eun-San Kim.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
1 Update on Ion Studies Guoxing Xia, Eckhard Elsen ILC2007 Workshop, May 30~Jun 2, 2007 DESY, Hamburg.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
Fast Ion Instability Study G. Rumolo and D. Schulte CLIC Workshop 2007, General introduction to the physics of the fast ion instability Fastion.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
Two-Stream Phenomena in CLIC G. Rumolo and D. Schulte for the ACE, 3 September 2008 * thanks to W. Bruns, R. Tomás, SPSU Working Team General introduction.
Two-beam instabilities in low emittance rings Lotta Mether, G.Rumolo, G.Iadarola, H.Bartosik Low Emittance Rings Workshop INFN-LNF, Frascati September.
Two beam instabilities in low emittance rings Lotta Mether, G.Rumolo, G.Iadarola, H.Bartosik Low Emittance Rings Workshop INFN-LNF, Frascati September.
Observations of Electron Cloud Phenomena at PETRA III Presentation at the ECLOUD 2012 workshop Rainer Wanzenberg ECLOUD 2012 June 5-8, 2012 Hotel Hermitage.
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
Electron Cloud Experimental Plans at Cesr-TA ILCDR08 - July 10, 2009 G. Dugan Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Experiments on Fast Ion Instability at PLS
Electron Cloud, IBS, and Fast Ion Update
Modeling of fast beam-ion instabilities
Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08
Electron cloud and ion effects in SuperKEKB
Fast Ion Instability Study at DESY
Status of Fast Ion Instability Studies
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Fast Ion Experiments at ATF
E-cloud instability at CESR TA
Fast ion instability WP 15
Junji Urakawa ( for collaborators ) March KEK at LNF
Collective effects in CEPC
SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)
A Head-Tail Simulation Code for Electron Cloud
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
Instability measurement plans at ATF
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
Presentation transcript:

Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Outlines Ions-related instabilities Fast ion instability (FII) Simulation of FII Future R&D for FII Summary ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Ions related instabilities (1) The ions come from collision ionization process of residual gas in the vacuum chamber by beam particles, or via residual gas ionization and desorption by synchrotron radiation or via beam losses These ions in the beam result in beam emittance growth, beam size blow-up, additional tune shifts and beam lifetime reduction etc. Ion instabilities include conventional ion trapping instability and fast ion instability ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Ions related instabilities (2) At conventional storage rings, ion trapping instabilities can be cured by filling the ring partially, e.g, leaving an ion clearing gap of a few us in length In low emittance and high intensity rings, such as ILC damping ring (DR), the effects of ions created during the passage of a single bunch train become important. The so called fast ion instability is one of the most important issues in R&D of ILCDR ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Fast ion instability (1)  The residual gas in the vacuum chambers can be ionized by the single passage of a bunch train  The interaction of an electron beam with residual gas ions results in mutually driven transverse oscillations  Ions can be trapped by the beam potential or can be cleared out after the passage of the beam  For ILC damping ring, the growth rate of this instability is high ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007 Linear theory of FII (Tor, Frank, Stupakov, etc) This instability has been confirmed experimentally in many facilities such as ALS, TRISTAN AR, PLS, Spring-8, ESRF, KEKB HER, ATF DR etc. Characteristics of FII

Fast ion instability (2) Linear theory of FII Critical mass Incoherent tune shift The exponential vertical instability rise time # of bunches bunch spacing bunch intensity critical mass incoh. tune shift at train end exponential rise time at train end ns2.0E s ns1.0E s Partial pressure of CO is 0.15nTorr; one long bunch train and 30% relative ion frequency spread are assumed here Estimation of FII in OCS6 DR ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Fast ion instability (3) Traditional methods to clear ions from electron beam include electrostatic electrodes, beam shaking and gaps in the bunch trains Clearing electrodes may increase the chamber impedance Beam shaking requires dedicated device to drive the ions and beam and may cause coherent transverse instabilities Multi-train fill pattern with regular gaps is an efficient and simple way to remedy of FII Bunch by bunch feedback system? ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Fast ion instability (4) Ion line density is If mini-train is introduced in the fill pattern, the diffusion of the ions during the gaps causes a larger size of ion cloud and a lower ion density. In order to evaluate the effects of gaps, an Ion-density Reduction Factor is defined as here, is the diffusion time of ion cloud. IRF is the ratio of the ion density with gaps and without gaps. So the fill pattern can be optimized in terms of obtain the smallest possible IRF (this work is ongoing) ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Simulation results on effect of train gaps for ILC DR ( Wang, et al. EPAC06) ρ average [m -3 ] Build-up of CO+ ion cloud at extraction (with equilibrium emittance). The total number of bunches is 5782, P=1 nTorr. IRF=0.017 in this case! with equilibrium emittance ε x = 0.5 nm ε y = 2 pm ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007 Fast ion instability (5)

Simulation of FII (1) Weak-strong approximation Electron beam is a rigid gaussian Ions are regarded as Marco-particles The interaction between them is based on Bassetti-Erskine formula Six collision points in the ring Circumference [m] Energy [GeV]5.0 Harmonic number14516 Arc cell typeTME Transverse damping time [ms]25.7 Natural emittance [nm]0.515 Norm. natural emittance [μm]5.04 Horizontal initial emittance [nm]4.599 Vertical initial emittance [nm]4.599 Horizontal equilibrium emittance [nm] Vertical equilibrium emittance [pm]2.044 Natural bunch length [mm]6.00 Natural energy spread [10 −3 ]1.28 Average current [mA]402 Mean horizontal beta function [m]13.1 Mean vertical beta function [m]12.5 Bunches per train2820 Particles per bunch2 x Bunch spacing [m]1.8 ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Simulation of FII (2) Kicks between electrons and ions (based on Bassetti-Erskine formula) ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007 The ions drift in the space between adjacent bunches linearly

Simulation of FII (3) Beam motion between ionization points can be linked via linear optics For the flat beam, we mainly care about the vertical direction (y direction) ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Simulation of FII (4) ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007 Vertical position of bunch centroid in units of σy as a function of number of turns

The vertical action of the bunch centroid Simulation of FII (5) ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007 Vertical centroid action in units of εy as a function of number of turns

Vertical oscillation Simulation of FII (6) Oscillation amplitude in units of σy as a function of number of turns ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Future R&D for FII (1)  A proposal has been submitted to TB of ATF international collaboration meeting  A plan on experimental studies of FII in ATF DR is ongoing (see Junji’s presentation)  Goals of FII experiment:  Distinguish the two ion effects: beam size blow-up and dipole instability.  Quantify the beam instability growth time, tune shift and vertical emittance growth. Based on the linear model, the growth rate is proportional to the ion density (the related parameters include vacuum pressure, gas species, average beam line density, emittance, betatron functions and beam fill pattern).  Flatness of beam and its effect on FII growth.  Quantify the bunch train gap effect  Beam shaking effect  Provide enough experimental data to benchmark against simulations results. Understand of other measurements (e.g. ALS, PLS and KEKB)  Check effectiveness of feedback system to suppress the FII ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Beam centroid oscillation amplitude with respect to number of turns One long bunch train is used in simulation ! The 60 th bunch is recorded here Beam energy [GeV]1.28 Circumference [m]138.6 Harmonic number330 Momentum compaction2.14E-3 Bunch population [×10 9 ]1.6, 3.7 and 6.0 Bunch length [mm]6 Energy spread0.06% Horizontal emittance [mrad]1.4E-9 Vertical emittance [mrad]1.5E-11 Vacuum pressure [nTorr]1 and 5 Parameters of ATF damping ring Future R&D for FII (2) ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Future R&D for FII (3) Beam centroid oscillation amplitude with respect to number of turns If we introduce the gaps between the bunch trains, the growth will be greatly reduced ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Bunch population1.6E92.0E10 Vacuum pressure [ntorr] Ion density [m -1 ] Critical mass Ion oscillation frequency2.4E7 2.4E7 2.4E78.6E7 8.6E7 8.6E7 FII growth time [s]6.8E-5 1.4E-5 6.8E-61.5E-6 3.1E-7 1.5E-7 FII grow. time (10% ion freq. spread) [s]4.0E-4 8.1E-5 4.0E-53.2E-5 6.5E-6 3.2E-6 Tune shift1.9E-5 9.5E-5 1.9E-42.3E-4 1.2E-3 2.4E-3 Analytical estimation of Ion effects in ATF damping ring Future R&D for FII (4) ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Summary Fast ion instability is still one of critical issues for R&D of ILCDR Simulation results show that this instability is within control (need further check) R&D of FII should be strengthened further and well coordinated around the world Bunch by bunch feedback systems, up-to-date vacuum technology etc. are closely related to FII There is an excellent opportunity to characterize FII systematically at ATF DR and to compare to simulation results ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007

Thanksforyourattention! Thanks for your attention !

Linear theory The growth time of FII is closely related to the beam sizes, the larger the value σ y 3/2 (σ x +σ y ) 3/2, the larger the characteristic FII growth time. It is possible to use the up-to-date feedback system (~0.1ms) to damp the FII growth. Critical mass, ion density, FII growth time, ion oscillation frequency, ion angular frequency, FII growth time in presence of ion angular frequency variation, and the coherent tune shift due to ions ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007