LO: I will know how thinkers have solved the problem of speaking meaningfully about God by making negative statements of what God is not.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Via Negativa L/O: To learn and understand what is meant by the term Via Negativa. Task One: What is God? Write a short list of what you believe God is.
Advertisements

Anthony Flew and A. J. Ayer
The Religious Hypothesis
Religious language: Flew, Hare and Mitchell
Verificationism and religious language Michael Lacewing
Pragmatism: metaphysics is meaningful only if it has practical consequences What we mean by reality is the product of our ideas and ideals, all of which.
What do you see? According to logical positivism, do your statements have meaning? What do you see? According to logical positivism, do your statements.
Religious Language Michael Lacewing
1 From metaphysics to logical positivism The metaphysician tells us that empirical truth-conditions [for metaphysical terms] cannot be specified; if he.
LO: I will consider the falsification principle’s effect on religious language Hmk: Read Mark Vernon article on ‘The Via Negative’ before tomorrow’s lesson.
Introduction to A2 Philosophy Homework: Background reading – ‘Questions about God.’ – Chapter 4 – God and Language, by Patrick J. Clarke.
Task: Take a look at the following statements: “I am the bread of life” “I am the true vine” “I am the way, the truth and the life” “I am the resurrection.
This is the beginning of the “The Jabberwocky” by Lewis Carrol.
Epistemology revision Responses: add a ‘no false lemmas’ condition (J+T+B+N) Responses: replace ‘justified’ with ‘reliably formed’ (R+T+B) (reliabilism)
Religious Language Speaking about God Part 1. Why Religious language? The concept of a God is: Something other Something timeless We talk of things using.
Michael Lacewing Emotivism Michael Lacewing
The Verification Principle & Religious Language The Logical Positivists, led by the philosophers of the Vienna Circle and then further developed by A.J.Ayer.
“God talk is evidently non-sense” A.J. Ayer. Ayer is a logical positivist – a member of the Vienna Circle. Any claim made about God (including Atheistic)
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
Religious Language  Language is about communication  Religious language is a means of communicating about religion  This can be within three contexts:
Philosophy of science II
This is the beginning of the “The Jabberwocky” by Lewis Carrol.
LO: I will know about Wittgenstein’s views on religious language Hmk: Prepare for tracker assessed presentations Due next Wednesday 1 st There won’t be.
This week’s aims To explain and analyse Bultmann’s approach to religious language To review the religious language unit To practise planning and writing.
Epistemology revision Concept empiricist arguments against concept innatism:  Alternative explanations (no such concept or concept re- defined as based.
Is it possible to verify statements about God? The Logical Positivists would say no – God is a metaphysical being and it is impossible to empirically verify.
Language Games L/O: To understand and be able to explain clearly what is meant by the term Language Games Starter: Recapping Myth and Symbol. Get into.
Via Negativa L/O: To learn and understand what is meant by the term Via Negativa. Task One: What is God? Write a short list of what you believe God is.
Can religious language be meaningful? Today’s lesson will be successful if you can: Explain the Verification Principle Critique the Verification Principle.
Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980) What is Philosophy? Excerpted from Geisler & Feinberg’s.
Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 Epistemology: How do we know? Excerpted Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982.
Ayer & the Weak Verification Principle LO’s: 1: To understand the ideas of A.J. Ayer 2: To consider how he developed the verification principle LO’s: 1:
This week’s aims To practise planning and writing answers to past questions To set out written work in a clear, integrated, logical form To explain and.
Criticisms of Flew Possible responses Hare – religious statements are unfalsifiable and non-cognitive but still play a useful role in life (parable of.
A PRIVATE LANGUAGE? Language is about communication and can only take place when two or more people use words and ideas they have in common. We can understand.
Extent to which Challenges to Religious Experience are Valid, including CF Davis
Hempel’s philosophical behaviourism
Religious language: the University debate
Religious responses to the verification principle
Verificationism on religious language
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
Religious Language as cognitive, but meaningless
The philosophical problems of the verification principle
THE VIA NEGATIVE STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Religious Language.
RM Hare - The Parable of the Paranoid Lunatic
RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE.
Reading material Articles: Tillich on symbols & Aquinas on analogy questions 1. What is art? 2. Does it open up new levels of reality for you? 3. Does.
What was AJ Ayer’s book called?
Using Analogy to Understand God
RECAP Odd one out Match them up 1. Hare 4. Hick 7. Flew 2. Swinburne
Did King Harold die at the battle of Hastings?
Is this statement meaningful?
4 B Criticisms of the verification and falsification principles
The Verification Principle
Philosophy of Religion Revision: Religious Language
In pairs, attempt to describe an object in the room by saying what it is not…. It is not red…..
RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE.
MITCHELL AND FLEW - OVERVIEW
Flying pig spotted in Amazon Jungle…
Think, pair, share A: Explain Hick’s analogy of the celestial city B: Explain Swinburne’s analogy of the toy’s in the cupboard. A: Explain Hare’s analogy.
Discussion: Can one meaningfully talk of a transcendent metaphysical God acting (creating sustaining, being loving) in a physical empirical world? Ayer.
The Falsification Principle
‘A triangle has three sides’
Religious Language as cognitive, but meaningless
‘Torture is Good’ How does that phrase make you feel?
By the end of today’s lesson you will
What has this got to do with religious language?
Verification and meaning
A guide for the perplexed (who think it is all meaningless)
Presentation transcript:

LO: I will know how thinkers have solved the problem of speaking meaningfully about God by making negative statements of what God is not

Logical positivism Vienna Circle Verification Principle Falsification The belief that statements are only meaningful if they can be verified by the senses. There are strong and weak forms of the principle generally associated with the Vienna Circle and A. J. Ayer ( ) respectively. Strong – applied to anything that can be verified conclusively by observation and experience. Weak – refers to statements that can be shown to be probable by observation and experience. A movement in philosophy that believed that the aim of philosophers should be the analysis of language, particularly the language of science. They believe that that propositions only have meaning if they can be verified empirically. The group of philosophers including Schlick ( ) and Neurath ( ) who gave rise to the logical positivist movement. If there is no way of disproving a statement, then it is meaningless

Select any object in the room (without telling the person next to you what it is.) Have a go at describing it to them by saying what it is not. What did we learn from this activity?

God is transcendent so you cannot say what God is. However, you can clearly say what God is not. Via negativa literally means the ‘negative way.’

Take the Mark Vernon article, ‘On seriously doubting the existence of God.’ Read through it and answer the following questions: What is the Via Negativa Where did the idea of Via Negativa come from? As you are reading, note down your own responses to what you read. Do you agree/disagree? Why? What are the implications for what is being said for Theists/Athests, etc?

Well… it’s not cancer, not a heart attack, not liver failure...

C. S. Lewis, in his book Miracles, advocates the use of negative theology when first thinking about God, in order to cleanse our minds of misconceptions. He goes on to say we must then refill our minds with the truth about God, untainted by mythology, bad analogies or false mind-pictures.

Strengths It prevents anthropomorphic statements being made about God It can be seen as more respectful. We are not reducing God to our level of understanding. Some argue that the Via Negativa is the best way for conveying the idea of a transcendent God Weaknesses It still results in a limited understanding. What are we actually left with if all we can talk about are negative statements? The Via Negativa is not a true reflection of how religious people speak of God. They do not talk in the negative but rather seek positive knowledge of what God is. The Via Negativa claims that no positive statement about God can be made. Surely that in itself must be a positive statement?

Can you define the following? To use language univocally and equivocally Cognitive and non-cognitive statements Analytic and Synthetic statements Tautology Metaphysics Eschatology Blik Anthropomorphism

So far we have covered: 1. The Vienna Circle, Logical Positivism and the Verification principle 2. Difficulties with the Verification Principle 3. Weak Verification Principle (Ayer) 4. Criticisms of the Weak verification principle 5. The Falsification Principle (Flew, the response of Hare [blik] and Mitchell) 6. The Via Negativa and strengths and weaknesses

‘Religious Language is meaningless.’ Discuss (35 marks)

Students take the ‘hot-seat’ and answer questions from the class about the topic on Religious Language