Impact of age and comorbidities on treatment effect, tolerance and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated on CALGB 80203.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “ VELOUR” Study Author: J Tabernero et al Reviewed by: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of FOLFIRI or FOLFOX with Bevacizumab or Cetuximab for patients w/ KRAS wild type untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma.
1Stopeck A et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Vascular issues associated with bevacizumab Stuart M. Lichtman, MD, FACP 65+ Clinical Geriatric Program Associate Attending Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,
The Use of Trastuzumab in the Elderly in the Adjuvant Setting and After Disease Progression in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Dall.
Cetuximab + Cisplatin in Estrogen Receptor-Negative, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, HER2-Negative (Triple-Negative) Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Outcomes Following Adjuvant 5-FU based Treatment (AT) for Colon Cancer vs Impact on Recurrence Rate, Time from Recurrence to Death.
Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Singh PP et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 407.
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Rituximab Maintenance versus Wait and Watch After Four Courses of R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Previously Untreated Young.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Shows Superior Efficacy in Comparison to Bendamustine.
Monoclonal Antibodies EGFR Inhibitors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where are we and What’s next Discussion of Abstracts Jeffrey Meyerhardt,
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
The impact of smoking on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB Nadine A. Jackson, Charles S.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Figure 1. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival analyzed with fixed effect model. Table 1: Relevant trials Table 2. Methodological quality Conclusions.
Impact of Bevacizumab (Bev) on Efficacy of Second-Line Chemotherapy (CT) for Triple- Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of RIBBON-2 Brufsky A et al. Proc.
Age > 50 Abstract Background Limited data exists regarding outcomes and AT benefit/toxicity in Y pts with stage II and III CC. We examined overall survival.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Phase III Study of First-Line XELOX Plus Bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 Cycles Followed by XELOX Plus BEV or Single Agent (s/a) BEV as Maintenance Therapy in.
Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/- cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Results Abstract Analysis of Prognostic Web-based Models for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: A Population-based Validation of Numeracy and Adjuvant! Online.
SNDA # GLIADEL® WAFER (Polifeprosan 20 with Carmustine Implant) APPLICANT: GUILFORD PHARMACEUTICALS ODAC: December 6, 2001 Medical Reviewer: Alla.
INTERGROUP STUDY 0148 BMS CA Effect of TAXOL® (paclitaxel) and Doxorubicin Dose on Disease Free and Overall Survival of Patients with Node Positive.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage*: The 2015 Annual Meeting of the CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015 San Antonio, Texas.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
Dr. Marco Matos JOURNAL CLUB GCUH 4/07/14.
Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Monthly Carboplatin versus Single-Agent Therapy in Patients Age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 Randomized Phase III Study in Advanced.
Higher Vitamin D Levels Associated With Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
MJ O’Connell for the ACCENT Collaborative Group
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Presentation transcript:

Impact of age and comorbidities on treatment effect, tolerance and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated on CALGB JA Meyerhardt 1, N Jackson McCleary 1, D Niedzwiecki 2, D Hollis 2, A Venook 3, RJ Mayer 1, R Goldberg 4 1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 2. CALGB Statistical Center, Durham, NC; 3. University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA; 4. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC REVISED ABSTRACT Background: Little is known regarding the interaction of comorbid conditions (CC) & age when treating pts for mCRC. We sought to determine the impact of CC and age (<70 & ≥70 yrs) on survival & toxicity in these pts. Methods: We utilized a cohort of 238 pts with mCRC enrolled in CALGB 80203, a curtailed, multicenter 2x2 phase III trial of fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) ± cetuximab. Endpoints were overall survival (OS; time to death), progression-free survival (PFS; time to recurrence or death), and grade 3/4 toxicity. 219 pts (92%) completed a self-administered questionnaire on diet and lifestyle that included a modified Charlson’s comorbidity survey. Those who completed the questionnaire were included in the comorbidity analyses; the entire cohort was included in the age analyses. Cox models were adjusted for treatment arm, gender, & prior rx. Results: In CALGB 80203, 77% were 70. Thirty-eight percent of pts had at least one CC (36% < 70 yrs; 46% ≥ 70 yrs). At least one grade 3/4 toxicity was experienced by 87% of pts ≥70 v 66% <70 (p=0.002), primarily hematologic (56% v 31%, p=0.003). Amongst 238 pts, 94% and 84% experienced a PFS event & OS event, respectively. No pts are censored prior to 3 yrs. Median follow-up was 23 mos. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for ≥70 v <70 of PFS was 1.0 ( ) and of OS was 1.1 ( ). Similarly, there were no significant differences in HR for PFS and OS by number of CC. Table 2 demonstrates no evidence of interaction between CC and age. Conclusions: While the early closure of CALGB presents sample size limitations for subset analyses, we did not observe an impact on PFS or OS by age &/or CC. Older pts did experience more toxicity from therapy. Further studies with larger datasets are warranted. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of patients with mCRC self-reporting comorbid conditions, we did not observe an impact of age or number of comorbid conditions on progression-free or overall survival. Possible limitations of this study include accuracy of self- reported comorbidity data and early closure of the parent study limiting sample size. Further prospective studies investigating the impact of the number, type and severity of comorbid conditions by age with larger datasets are warranted. CALGB was supported, in part, by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA31946) to the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Richard L. Schilsky, M.D., Chairman) and to the CALGB Statistical Center (Stephen George, PhD, CA33601) as well as support from Bristol-Meyers Squibb. This companion study was partially funded by an unrestricted grant to the CALGB Foundation from Sanofi-Aventis. Dr. Jackson McCleary was supported by an ASCO/Hartford Foundation Young Investigators Award Gastrointestinal cancers are primarily diseases of persons in their sixth, seventh, and eighth decade of life with incidence and mortality increasing with advancing age. Although the 5-year relative survival (66%) with this cancer is identical for persons under the age of 65 and for persons 65 to 74 years, it declines to 60% for individuals 75 years or older. There is a paucity of information concerning the factors that modify treatment effect, tolerance and toxicity of elderly patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Comorbid conditions are thought to modify treatment response, tolerance and toxicity, distinct from performance status and has a negative impact of comorbidity on cancer survival independent of functional status. Little has been shown depicting normative data for comorbid conditions in older individuals receiving treatment in the adjuvant or metastatic setting for colorectal cancer, particularly in a non-research, standard treatment setting versus a clinical trial. RESULTS BACKGROUND METHODS The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) clinical trial is a multicenter, 2 x 2 randomized clinical trial evaluating the treatment efficacy of irinotecan, 5-florouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) versus oxaliplatin, 5-florouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) with and without cetuximab in individuals with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. The study opened in December 2003 and closed in January Of the 238 patients accrued, 54 (23%) are 70 years and older. This trial was later modified to CALGB to include randomization to bevacizumab. CALGB included a self-completed questionnaire that featured a modified Charlson’s survey; thus, it uniquely addresses the question of comorbidity in the context of a biologic agent, cetuximab, in combination with chemotherapy. Available data include patient demographics, ECOG performance status, disease stage, treatment arm, treatment response, comorbid conditions, and treatment-related toxicity. Endpoints were overall survival (OS; time to death), progression-free survival (PFS; time to recurrence or death), and grade 3/4 toxicity. Cox models were adjusted for treatment (rx) arm, gender, & prior rx. Table 1: Baseline characteristics by age Table 4- Grade 3 or higher toxicity by age and number of comorbid conditionsTable 2 - Survival (unadjusted and adjusted) by # comorbid conditions and age *Adjusted for treatment arm, gender, prior adjuvant therapy Table 3 – Kaplan Meier survival estimates for comorbidity and age The objective of this study is to elucidate treatment outcomes in regards to treatment response, survival, tolerance and toxicity in older colorectal cancer patients as modified by the presence of comorbid conditions. OBJE CTIVES  Comparing those with <2 comorbid conditions to those with 2 or more within age groups *Comparing those with grade 3 or higher toxicity to those without across age groups £P-value not applicable †P-value calculated by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test given small n within each cell, whichever is appropriate *Missing N=19 – analysis of comorbidity (age <70: 171 (78%), 70+: 48 (22%) limited to those who completed the questionnaire.