Presentation to Joe Smith Prepared for the Learning from Award Winning Teacher Education Programs Session Professional Development School Special Interest.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CASS Network of 21 st Century School Systems Rocky View School Division – February 15,2011.

Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.

Moving from Programs of Study to Rigorous Programs of Study in Oklahoma OkACTE Summer Conference 2012.

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

STEM Model Curriculum Units Curriculum Summit November 12-13, 2012.

A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.

COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.

Transitioning to the Common Core Common Core Academy - Summer 2011.

Roles and Responsibilities of the Instructional Coach

OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.

Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.

Academic Planning and Budget Building Meeting 3. * The current model we use must change to meet current as well as new and emerging client and community.

MASTERS DEGREE IN CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION. WHY CHOOSE TEXAS TECH? Texas Tech graduates develop expertise that prepares them to assume professional leadership.

Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.

What do we mean when we talk about PD?

CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.

Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements

Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.

How do we go about program assessment? What we are doing and why? Robert Gabriner, San Francisco State University Debby Zambo, Arizona State University.

Joint Advisory Board/Working Group Meeting November 18, 2010 School of Education.

Northwest Florida State College Bachelor of Science in Education

Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.

U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 2009 PROJECT DIRECTOR’S CONFERENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. DONNA M. SOBEL, PH.D. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO.

Building Capacity in Chinese and Arabic Pam Delfosse World Languages Education Consultant Claire Kotenbeutel Critical Language Fellows Project Consultant.

Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.

Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.

This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,

Collaborative Model of Social Work Education with Strong University – Agency Partnerships Michael A. Patchner, Ph.D. Indiana University School of Social.

SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.

Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address

2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB.

WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.

NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.

Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.

Northwest Florida State College Programs of Study: Elementary Education Middle Grades Mathematics Middle Grades General Science 1.

Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.

The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.

Professional Development in Challenged Environments Project: Making Mathematics Matter (PM³) A Model for Effective PD Conversations Among Colleagues March.

Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A

ML evi ne CP ED Co nv en in g Ju ne  The Purpose  The People  The Process.

1 Rossier School of Education Defining Excellence in Urban Education.

New York Institute of Technology

The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.

STEM EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION Barbara McAllister May 2013 INTEL’S MODEL FOR.

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.

What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….

NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.

Developing Educational Leaders Who Create Tomorrow’s Opportunities: Issues for Partner Instructors in the College of Education April 10, 2008.

Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.

Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana

6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.

Pathways Project Evaluation Objective #1: To change classroom pedagogy and improve the ability of faculty to effectively integrate Internet-based tools.

Jillian Gourwitz, Ph.D. Suzanne M. Martin, Ph. D. University of Central Florida.

CD FIELD PRACTICE I Course Description: Supervised field practice for developing basic competencies in Community Development (9 units). Requires.

Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.

Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?

FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.

Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.

 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.

Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.

By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.

Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge

Improving Teaching Practices through the Use of Video-Case Analysis

Field Experiences and Clinical Practice

NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice

Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool

NJCU College of Education

Minnesota State University, Mankato

Presentation transcript:

Presentation to Joe Smith Prepared for the Learning from Award Winning Teacher Education Programs Session Professional Development School Special Interest Group Association of Teacher Educators Diane Yendol-Hoppey, Jennifer Jacobs, Danielle, Dennis, Katie Tricarico, Rebecca Burns, Jeni Davis, Sarah van Ingen with doctoral student representation from Stephanie Branson and Wendy Baker

Presentation to Joe Smith Defining Characteristics High quality, conceptually-organized coursework Extensive, scaffolded field experiences High quality supervision Inclusion of Signature Pedagogies in PDSs Guided by conceptual framework

Presentation to Joe Smith Programmatic Conceptual Framework

Presentation to Joe Smith Program Goals Strengthen teacher leadership within the partnership Strengthen collaboration between partners Strengthen sustainability by appropriating adequate resources Develop PSTs’ knowledge, skills, abilities, and dispositions needed to demonstrate inquiry, inclusion, innovation, and integration Foster PSTs’ ability to demonstrate professional competencies

Presentation to Joe Smith Create a culture that nurtures a strategically focused research agenda Create a culture of research dissemination Develop, implement, and evaluate strategies for embedded professional development Develop structures and relationships that support on-going discussion between stakeholders Program Goals

Presentation to Joe Smith USF Pathways to Certification Urban Teacher Residency Partnership Program (UTRPP) Cohort Partnership Program (CPP)

Presentation to Joe Smith Theoretically-Sound and Research-Based Essential Elements of Both Pathways

Presentation to Joe Smith Program Structures Quality Coursework Adopted signature pedagogical routines; Education of teacher educators; Scaffolded learning experiences Teacher Research Systematically threaded research process; Culminating in a capstone research product; Teacher Inquiry Conference Quality Field Supervision Shared boundary roles (PRTs); Consistency with supervision to build relationships with schools over time; Methods course instructors serve as supervisors Quality Residency Residency: Specifically developed innovation context for research and collaboration; clinically-centered Cohort: Similarly developed innovation context; Clinically- rich Opportunities for alternative summer field experiences

Presentation to Joe Smith Comparing the two pathways Urban Residency Partnership Program (UTRPP) Elementary Cohort Partnership Pathway (CPP) # of Students60300 # of Schools620 # of Cohorts210 # of Field Experiences 5 (2 Year-Long)5 (Scaffolded)

Presentation to Joe Smith Comparing the two pathways Urban Residency Partnership Program (UTRPP) Elementary Cohort Partnership Pathway (CPP) Duration2000 hoursabout1000 hours SupervisionPRT’s & Content Coaches PRT’s, GA’s, Instructors, Faculty PDS Characteristics 1 CommunityIndividual Schools

Presentation to Joe Smith Collaborative Oversight

Presentation to Joe Smith Research-Based Assessment Framework Captures progress towards: 4I’s Conceptual Framework Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAPs) 2010 ESOL Endorsement Standards 2011 Florida Reading Endorsement Competencies 2011 Florida Subject Matter Competencies and Skills

Presentation to Joe Smith The “Bucket Plan” Collaboration among stakeholders from college and school partners resulted in a cohesive set of: –Critical tasks –Formative and Summative Assessments –Dispositional Assessments –Coaching Tools –ePortfolio Initiative –Online Surveys

Presentation to Joe Smith Alignment of Program Goals, Activities, and Assessment

Presentation to Joe Smith

Final Thoughts Responded to recent policy, research, and accountability demands by re-envisioning teacher education through clinically-rich and clinically-centered pathways Intense collaboration Attention to data and research Nurturing the next generation of teacher educators Advancing K-12 students in Florida Public Schools

Presentation to Joe Smith Thank you! Diane Yendol-Hoppey Rebecca West Burns