Judy Rink University of South Carolina.  …..a change from highly qualified teachers (meaning their preparation, courses they attend and degrees that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Foundation A Look at the Evaluation Process by The Teacher Foundation (TTF)
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Difficult Conversations
Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
Workshop 2 Day 2 Classroom Observation Certification Assessor Training Program.
Judy Rink Emeritus Professor University of South Carolina.
Trends in Teacher Evaluation Systems in Public Education CEC’S POSITION ON SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION.
Teacher Excellence and Support System
EDU 250 Roxanne Stansbury  It is important to learn about Danielson’s Domains because they are the framework for how we measure effective teaching.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Research on Teaching (RT) and Research on Teaching Physical Education (RT-PE) KNR 158 Instructional Strategies in Physical Education.
NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Dr. Kelly Bikle Winter 2007.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
DASA Policy and Practice Conference June 24, 2015.
Understanding Student Expectations & Effective Teaching Presented by: Dr. Laura Marler Associate Professor of Management College of Business Mississippi.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
MAR*TEC Supported Assessing Teacher Candidate Effective Integration of Technology in Clinical Practice SRATE 2003 Susan Arisman Marcia Cushall Frostburg.
Supporting and Coaching Classroom Facilitators Oudete Taylor August 13, 2015.
Final Reports from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project Tom Kane Harvard University Steve Cantrell, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Validity Validity is an overall evaluation that supports the intended interpretations, use, in consequences of the obtained scores. (McMillan 17)
Planning for Instruction Chapter 6 NC Teaching Standard IV.
Gathering Evidence.  A type of assessment with respect to how and when evidence of student learning is gathered; consists of a number of components that.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Teacher Evaluation Systems 2.0: What Have We Learned? EdWeek Webinar March 14, 2013 Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Category 1 Category 2Category 3Category.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Effective Teaching ELED 3050 Chapter 1. How do you define Effective Teaching 1.The Role Model Definition 1.The Psychological Characteristics Definition.
Rospenda stiggins chapter 41 Designing Quality Assessments.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Characteristics of Effective Teachers Foundations of Teaching.
Joshua Miller Blytheville Middle School 7 th Grade Math Student Engagement.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
COMPSCI 747 Pedagogies and instructional design
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Effective Instructional and Accommodative Practices
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Prepared by: Toni Joy Thurs Atayoc, RMT
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Planning and Preparation
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
REPORTING.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
OBSERVATION AND FEEDBACK
Teacher Insight Survey 2019
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Judy Rink University of South Carolina

 …..a change from highly qualified teachers (meaning their preparation, courses they attend and degrees that they have) to the degree to which they produce the desired student outcomes. (National Council on Teacher Quality [NCTQ], 2011)

 Student achievement gains and teacher observation together have the best predictive value (Gates Foundation, 2013b).

 Value added modeling  Non-tested subject areas – school scores

 Problem 1: Measures of student achievement  Problem 2: Observation of Teaching

 We do not have clear outcomes and when we do these are not measured by standardized tests that would allow student scores to be compared across teachers.  There is no consensus in the profession on what is important for students to learn (if anything).

 Is observation of what the teacher does sufficient?  Are generic variables appropriate?  Are observers qualified?

 Opportunity to learn/content  Teacher expectations/role definitions/time allocations;  Classroom management/student engaged time;  Success level/academic learning time;  Active instruction by the teacher;  Group size;  Presentation of information (structuring, sequencing, clarity, enthusiasm);  (h) asking questions (difficulty level, cognitive level, wait- time, selecting respondents, providing feedback); and  (i) handling seatwork and homework assignments. Brophy and Good (1984).

 DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION  DOMAIN 2: THE CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT  DOMAIN 3: INSTRUCTION  DOMAIN 4: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

 The tool is very high inference  Each of the components of a construct would have to be defined very specifically  Specific examples for each component is needed  Rubrics with multiple levels of performance would have to be designed

 They are a snapshot of behavior  They do not consider appropriateness: The appropriateness of teacher behavior depends on what the students are doing and the appropriateness of that behavior to the content.  Observing teaching without also observing the effect of teacher behavior on what the students do in the context of the content is problematic.

 Positive Effectives of accountability  Shared vision  Advocacy  Teacher development  Increased effort