 Up to what level of classification can we perform on LISSIII/LISSIV data?  Is any advantage of high spectral resolution of LISSIII over LISSIV. If.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRESENTATION ON “ Processing Of Satellite Image Using Dip ” by B a n d a s r e e n i v a s Assistant Professor Department of Electronics & Communication.
Advertisements

Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
Change Detection Analysis of Eco-Sensitive Area using Remotely Sensed Data By Abhijat Arun Abhyankar.
Desheng Liu, Maggi Kelly and Peng Gong Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy & Management University of California, Berkeley May 18, 2005 Classifying.
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Change analysis of Northborough, Massachusetts, Kristopher Kuzera and Silvia Petrova 1987 LANDSAT TM – 30m resolution False Color Composite Bands.
An Overview of RS Image Clustering and Classification by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks Frank Westerlund.
Introduction. Evaluation of ARTMAP classifiers - Dependence on cluster representation Large number of classification algorithms available without detailed.
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 18 February 2010 Reading: Ch – 7.19 Last lecture: Spectral Mixture Analysis.
EPRU, CPSV, UPC Barcelona, Spain The Use of Remote Sensing to Describe Residential Densities Structures in Urban Land Use Remote Sensing application of.
Global Land Cover: Approaches to Validation Alan Strahler GLC2000 Meeting JRC Ispra 3/02.
Habitat Analysis in ArcGIS Use of Spatial Analysis to characterize used resources Thomas Bonnot
Image Classification
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Classification Advantages of Visual Interpretation: 1. Human brain is the best data processor for information extraction, thus can do much more complex.
Methods of Validating Maps of Deforestation and Selective Logging Carlos Souza Jr. Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia—Imazon.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Image Classification R.A.ALAGU RAJA Remote Sensing & GIS Lab Department of ECE Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai.
Co-authors: Maryam Altaf & Intikhab Ulfat
By Phoebe Oduor.  Countries are required to report on their GHG emissions to UNFCCC every four years (mandatory) and every two years (intermediary) 
1 Urban Growth Simulation A Case Study of Indianapolis Sharaf Alkheder & Jie Shan School of Civil Engineering Purdue University March 10, 2005.
Land Cover Classification Defining the pieces that make up the puzzle.
Seto, K.C., Woodcock, C.E., Song, C. Huang, X., Lu, J. and Kaufmann, R.K. (2002). Monitoring Land-Use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM.
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
Aseri Baleilevuka OCEANS & ISLANDS PROGRAM SOPAC-SPC Benthic Habitat Mapping Lifuka Island.
BUILDING EXTRACTION AND POPULATION MAPPING USING HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES Serkan Ural, Ejaz Hussain, Jie Shan, Associate Professor Presented at the Indiana.
Fuzzy Entropy based feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data Mahesh Pal Department of Civil Engineering National Institute of Technology.
Image Classification 영상분류
Crop Area Estimation for Bundi Tahsil of Rajasthan using Remote Sensing and GIS Technique Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya Chitrakoot.
Automated Target Recognition Using Mathematical Morphology Prof. Robert Haralick Ilknur Icke José Hanchi Computer Science Dept. The Graduate Center of.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of.
Crop Mapping in Stanislaus County using GIS and Remote Sensing Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of.
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy
IMPROVING ACTIVE LEARNING METHODS USING SPATIAL INFORMATION IGARSS 2011 Edoardo Pasolli Univ. of Trento, Italy Farid Melgani Univ.
Application of spatial autocorrelation analysis in determining optimal classification method and detecting land cover change from remotely sensed data.
Manifestation of Land Use/Land Cover Change Analysis and Its Impacts on Soil Properties in Gadarif Region, Sudan Faculty of Forest, Geo and Hydro Sciences,
Fuzzy Regions for Handling Uncertainty in Remote Sensing Image Segmentation Ivan Lizarazo, (a) and Paul Elsner (b) (a) Department of Cadastral Engineering.
Supervised Classification in Imagine D. Meyer E. Wood
An Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Population Growth in the Pedernales River Basin Kelly Blanton-Project Manager Paul Starkel-Analyst Erica.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
APPLIED REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY TO ANALYZE THE LAND COVER/LAND USE CHANGE AT TISZA LAKE By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János ** * Department of Land Use.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
Housekeeping –5 sets of aerial photo stereo pairs on reserve at SLC under FOR 420/520 –June 1993 photography.
Cell Segmentation in Microscopy Imagery Using a Bag of Local Bayesian Classifiers Zhaozheng Yin RI/CMU, Fall 2009.
Chapter 7 Maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed imagery 遥感影像分类的最大似然法 Chapter 7 Maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed imagery.
Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas Sarah Belcher & Grant Cooper December 8, 2014.
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps THEMATIC ACCURACY.
US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.
Intelligent Database Systems Lab 國立雲林科技大學 National Yunlin University of Science and Technology Self-organizing information fusion and hierarchical knowledge.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Supervised Training and Classification
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
Built-up Extraction from RISAT Data Using Segmentation Approach
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
Using aerial images for urban planning
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Incorporating Ancillary Data for Classification
By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János **
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
الدكتور: أحمد رأفت غضية صفاء عبد الجليل كامل حمادة
Paulo Gonçalves1 Hugo Carrão2 André Pinheiro2 Mário Caetano2
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Supervised Classification
An Image Classification of Khartoum, Sudan
MRV & Reporting Status & Related Space Data Needs
University College London (UCL), UK
Change in Land Cover in Elk Grove
Presentation transcript:

 Up to what level of classification can we perform on LISSIII/LISSIV data?  Is any advantage of high spectral resolution of LISSIII over LISSIV. If yes than how can we use it for classification ?  Would object based classification method work on LISS III/LISSIV. If yes than what would be the level of accuracy?  Would knowledge based classification give the appropriate result for low and medium resolution images?  Could we increase the accuracy of these classification methods? Objectives

 Maximum Likelihood (ML) (Parametric Classifier)  Object Based (OB) (Fuzzy classifier)  Knowledge Based (KB) (Non-parametric Classifier)

DATA AND STUDY AREA  Satellite images of the area IRS-P6 LISS IV IRS-P6 LISS III  Toposheet of the area (1:50,000)  Field data (training sites, test sites, GPS locations)

Sahaspur, Rampur and adjoining area (Dehradun dist.)

Images Preprocessing stages Training Sites Classification Methods Prepare land use /land cover map Accuracy Analysis Comparison Final results LISS IV LISS III Maximum Likelihood Knowledge Based Object Based Maximum Likelihood Knowledge Based Object Based Ground Truth Methodology Flowchart Separability analysis

No.First LevelSecond LevelThird Level 1.Built up landResidential Industrial 2.Agriculture landCropland Fallow land 3.ForestEvergreenDense/Open 4.Water bodiesRiverDry/Perennial Water NRSA LANDUSE/ LANDCOVER CLASSIFICATION SCHEME APPLIED ON STUDY AREA

LISS III LISS IV FEATURE SPACE FOR LISS III AND LISS IV (MLC)

SEPARABILITY ANALYSIS FOR LISS III AND LISS IV

CLASSIFIED IMAGE OF LISS III AND IV (MLC) LISS IV LISS III

SEGMENTATION PARAMETERS FOR OBJECT-ORIENTED METHOD LISS IV LISS III

CLASS DESCRIPTION (OBJECT BASED) Agriculture (LISSIII) Agriculture (LISSIV) Urban (LISSIII) Water (LISSIII) Urban (LISSIV) Water (LISSIV)

FEATURE SPACE FOR LISS III AND LISS IV (OBJECT-ORIENTED) LISS IV LISS III

Dry river/Industrial Urban/Agriculture FEATURE SPACE OF SPECTRALLY MIXED CLASSES (LISS III OBJECT BASED CLASSIFICATION)

Dry river/Industrial Residential/Dry river Industrial/Urban FEATURE SPACE OF SPECTRALLY MIXED CLASSES (LISS IV OBJECT BASED CLASSIFICATION)

LISS III, IV CLASSIFIED IMAGE (OBJECT BASED)

RULES FOR EXPERT CLASSIFIER

LISS IV CLASSIFIED IMAGE (EXPERT CLASSIFIER) After Rule base classification Before Rule base classification

Table 6: Overall accuracies (OA) & Kappa (K) achieved through various classification methods. Dataset Pixel based Classification approach(MLC) Object based Expert classifier Increase in accuracy from MLC to Object Based Increase in accuracy from MLC to Expert classifier LISS IV (OA) LISS III (OA) LISS IV (K) LISS III (K)

CONCLUSION  On LISS III and LISS IV images up to second and third level of classification is possible but consideration of accuracy is needed.  High spectral resolution of LISS III can provide some good results to separate classes as compare to LISS IV.  Object based classification can also be applicable on LISS III and LISS IV images. But in LISS III it needs more parameters as compare to LISS IV.  By the help of expert classifier the accuracy of maximum likelihood results can be improved by the help of some additional layers.