Stability of FPPs- Conducting, Bracketing, Matrixing Sultan Ghani.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stability Studies - Evaluation of Outcomes and Development of Documentation For Regulatory Submissions Bob Seevers.
Advertisements

Slide 1 of 30D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept Training Workshop for Evaluators from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities in East African Community.
Statistical Evaluation of Dissolution for Specification Setting and Stability Studies Fasheng Li Associate Director, Pharmaceutical Statistics Worldwide.
2-4 ICH Quality Guidances: an overview
Annual Product Review (APR) Product Quality Review (PQR)
CPH training | January |1 | Stability testing of Active pharmaceutical ingredients Hua YIN.
Statistical Approaches to Addressing the Requirements of the New FDA Process Validation Guidance for Small Molecules 1 Jason Marlin, MS/T Statistics, Eli.
Finished Pharmaceutical Product Specifications
1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
Stability data required by WHO-PQP Mercy Acquaye.
Sultan Ghani WHO Prequalification Programme of Priority Essential Medicines, October 2010, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Experience of Pre-Qualification Program.
GMP Document and Record Retention
Batch Reworking and Reprocessing
Mitigating Risk of Out-of-Specification Results During Stability Testing of Biopharmaceutical Products Jeff Gardner Principal Consultant 36 th Annual Midwest.
World Health Organization
Stability testing of Finished Pharmaceutical Products
API Stability Testing WHO PQ Requirements Presented by Rutendo Kuwana Accra, Ghana December 2009.
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Quality control of raw materials In-process control
Office of New Drug Chemistry, OPS, CDER, Food and Drug Administration Establishing Dissolution Specification Current CMC Practice Vibhakar Shah, Ph.D.
Slide 1 of 19D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept Training Workshop for Evaluators from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities in East African Community.
Pharmaceutical Product Quality Assurance Through CMC Drug Development Process Presented by Darlene Rosario (Aradigm) 21 October 2003 Meeting of the Advisory.
Reference, Retention and Reserve Samples
STABILITY STUDIES GABRIEL K. KADDU
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLS ACPS March 12-13, 2003 Stephen K. Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team Leader CDER/Office of New Drug Chemistry Co-Chair, Comparability.
Regulatory requirements on Medicine Stability Guidelines relevant for Stability testing Sultan Ghani.
Post approval changes- Variations Mercy Acquaye. Presentation Outline Introduction to Guidance Classification of changes Approval of changes Definitions.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Drug Stability.
Stability Q1(R2). Role Of Stability Safety and efficacy of drug product are established during development via clinical studies Quality is established.
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
Inspection Issues in the Analytical Laboratory: An FDA Perspective Yvonne McKnight Chemist US Food and Drug AdministrationPhone: x
Sultan Ghani WHO Prequalification Programme of Priority Essential Medicines, October 2010, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Dossier Requirements for Generic Medicines.
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
Important informations
Predicting Physical Stability in Q1A(R) Chi-wan Chen, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Chemistry Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
HELM AG Module 3 Christa Clasen Ankara, 6./7. April 2006.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Prequalification of Medicines Program
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
Stability Trials ASEAN Guidelines. The Objective of a stability study To determine the shelf life, namely the time period of storage at a specified condition.
Comparability Protocols Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer DBA/OBRR/CBER September 16, 2009.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Pharmaceutical Quality Control & current Good Manufacturing Practice PHT 436 Lecture 11 1.
VICH Guidelines: Stability Testing of New Veterinary Drug Substances and Medicinal Products Mai Huynh U.S. FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine Washington.
VICH Outreach Forum Stability Studies to address climatic zones III and IV Mai Huynh US FDA/Center for Veterinary Medicine October 26-27, 2015.
Quality Control significance in pharmaceutical industry
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
David G. Donne, Ph.D. and Thomas J. DiFeo, Ph.D.
In the name of God. Common Technical Document On Biotech.
CAPA Central Administration of Pharmaceutical Affairs EDA The Egyptian Drug Authority NODCAR National Organization for Drug Control & Research The empowered.
Stability study of DS and DP Patchara Kootiratrakarn 30 April 2016.
HOLD-TIME STUDIES.
LABORATORY SAMPLES AND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
STABILITY ?.
Physico-chemical Control of Dosage Forms
STABILITY TESTING OF ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS (API) & ASSIGNING RETEST PERIOD OF API’S January, 2015.
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
GL 45 (R) – Bracketing and matrixing designs for stability testing of new veterinary drug substances and medicinal products.
Radiopharmaceutical Production
GL3 (R) – Stability Testing of New Veterinary Drug Substances and Medicinal Products (+ Annex GL 4 - Requirements for New Dosage Forms)
Quality guidelines on impurities
GL 51 – Statistical evaluation of stability data
GL8 (R) – Stability testing for medicated premixes
Presentation transcript:

Stability of FPPs- Conducting, Bracketing, Matrixing Sultan Ghani

 Stability of Finished Pharmaceutical Product (FPP)  Bracketing & Matrixing

 Pre-formulation studies on pilot scale batch should be conducted  Stress testing may be performed on the pharmaceutical product  Selection of batches: At least two pilot scale batches and the third one can be smaller  Container closure system should be the same as proposed for marketing

 Specification: Appropriate physical, chemical, biological and microbiological attributes, also preservative content  Shelf-life acceptance criteria should be established, as well as difference between shelf-life and release specifications  A single stability batch should be tested for antimicrobial preservative effectiveness  Validated stability indicating analytical procedure should be applied

 Testing frequency: Frequency of testing should be sufficient to establish stability profile for product. For proposed shelf-life of 12 months, the frequency of testing should be three months over the first year, six months over the second year, and annually thereafter. For accelerated storage, a minimum of three time points (036) is recommended.  Reduced design: Matrixing and bracketing principle can be used if justified  Storage condition should be monitored and recorded (see Table 1)

 Commitment: Long-term stability data do not cover the proposed shelf-life granted at the time of approval. Commitment should be made to continue stability studies (post-approval). Three production batches covering the proposed shelf- life.  Evaluation: Systematic approach for the evaluation of the stability information, including all attributes. All results must remain within specification throughout the shelf-life. If the data are limited, it is unnecessary to go through the statistical analysis.

Table 1 StudyStorage ConditionTime Period Long-Term 25 º C, 60% RH 30 º C, 65% RH 30 º C, 75% RH 12 months or 6 months Intermediate 30 º C, 65% RH 6 months Accelerated 40 º C, 75% RH 6 months Long-Term 5ºC5ºC 12 months Accelerated 25 º C, 60% RH or 30 º C, 65% RH or 30 º C, 75% RH 6 months Long-Term -20 º C 12 months

Testing Conditions of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Recommended Statement 25ºC/60% RH (long term) 40ºC/75% RH (accelerated) “Store below 25ºC” 30ºC/65% RH (long-term) 40ºC/75% RH (accelerated) “Store below 30ºC” 25ºC/60% RH (long-term) 30ºC/65% RH (intermediate) “Store below 25ºC” 30ºC/75% RH (long-term)“Store below 30ºC” 30ºC/65% RH (long-term)“Store below 30ºC” 25ºC/60% RH (long-term)“Store below 25ºC” 5ºC ± 3ºC “Store in a refrigerator (2ºC to 8ºC)” -20ºC “Store in a freezer

Q1D - Bracketing and Matrixing

 Outlines recommendations, principles, and considerations for reduced designs.  Terms: ◦ Full Design: samples for every combination of all design factors are tested at all time points ◦ Reduced Design: not all samples for every factor combination are tested at all time points ◦ Bracketing: testing samples on the extremes of certain design factors (e.g., strengths, container sizes and/or fills)

 Terms (cont’d) : ◦ Matrixing: testing a selected subset of the total number of possible samples for all factor combinations at a specified time point, while testing another subset of samples at a subsequent time point

 Basic Principles: ◦ some reduced designs may need minimal justification, some designs may require more justification ◦ assumptions should be assessed and justified ◦ potential risks should be taken into consideration  Note: ◦ if a reduced design is proposed to be implemented after approval of the original submission, a prior approval application should be filed (e.g., in Canada: a “Level 2 - Notifiable Change”)

 Bracketing - Strengths: ◦ A pplicable: strengths of identical or closely related formulations ◦ Applicable with additional justification (e.g., supporting data): strengths where the relative amounts of the drug substance and excipients vary within the product line ◦ Not applicable: different excipients among strengths

 Bracketing – Container Size, Fill: ◦ A pplicable: same container closure system where either the container size or fill varies while the other remains constant ◦ Applicable with additional justification (e.g., supporting data): same container closure system but both the container size and fill vary ◦ Not applicable: different container closure systems

 Bracketing - Considerations:  I f stability of extremes are shown to be different, the intermediates should be considered no more stable than the least stable extreme  Selected extreme may be dropped from proposed market presentations

 Matrixing: ◦ applicable:  strengths with identical or closely related formulations  container sizes or fills of the same C/C system  different batches made with the same equipment and process ◦ applicable with additional justification:  where the relative amounts of excipients change or different excipients are used ◦ not applicable:  different storage conditions  different test attributes

 Matrixing - Considerations:  - D esign should be balanced as far as possible so that each combination is tested to the same extent over the intended duration of the study and through the last time point prior to submission  - Where time points are matrixed, all selected factor combinations should be tested at the initial and final time points (and the last time point prior to submission)