Functional Neuroimaging of Speech Perception in Infants Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dehaene S., and Hertz-Pannier, L. By Divya Patel
Why study infants? Adult human brain: anatomical and functional specialization for speech processing How? – clarify how it emerges through development
Language and infants? Considerable language takes place in the 1 st year Development in: – Phonology: organization of sounds – Prosody: tone of voice, rhythm – Word segmentation: when a word starts/ends
Motivation Not much known about brain mechanisms Studies mostly use ERPs – Great know temporal lobes contain neural circuit for phoneme discrimination – Not as great do not provide spatial information This study uses fMRI
Experimental Design 20s Silence 20s of forward speech 20s of backward speech 20 healthy, non-sedated infants (2-3mo) Speech = highly intonated female voice; in French
Hypothesis Forward speech = ↑ activation than backward speech Fast temporal auditory transitions and phonetic information will be jointly activated
Activation to Sound Similar to adults
Brain Lateralization Similar to adults
Forward Speech vs. Backward Speech In adults, the area is left superior temporal sulcus
Awake vs. Asleep
Was the hypothesis supported? Forward speech = ↑ activation than backward speech in left angular gyrus and left mesial parietal lobe Fast temporal auditory transitions and phonetic information will be jointly activated in left temporal lobe – From superior temporal gyrus to surrounding areas of superior temporal sulcus Yes
Other underlying mechanisms? In adults: – Precuneus and dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) activated during retrieval In infants: – Precuneus and dlPFC activated May indicate early engagement of active memory retrieval mechanism Yes, there seems to be
Strengths Approaches were different than prior studies – Used fMRI – Used non-sedated babies Very straight forward Images corresponding to brain parts Limitations Not enough background – Assumed all readers would know basic infant brain development
Future Directions It would be interesting to do a longitudinal study, to understand when exactly the changes take place To create a study where retrieval can be tested, perhaps through habituation To find specific evidence for either – nativist view (language mechanisms are innate) – interactionist view (language mechanisms are developed through interaction)
QUESTIONS? Dehaene-Lambertz G, Dehaene S, Hertz-Pannier L. (2002) Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science 298(5600):