Codling Moth Orchard Sampling Protocol Wendy Jones WSU - TFREC Wenatchee, WA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
Advertisements

Member consultation 2007 Draft ISPM: Sampling of Consignments Steward: David Porritt.
Optimizing the use of the codling moth granulovirus: Final Report L. Lacey S. Arthurs R. Fritts R. Behle A. Knight.
© ENDURE, February 2007 FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY © ENDURE, February 2007 FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY Codling moth (Cydia pomonella) biology and control Spain.
Interaction of chemigation timings with efficacy of reduced-risk insecticides and An update on West Coast cranberry variety trials and other pest management.
Ch © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Example R-Chart.
Soil Sampling For Home Landscape and Garden Developed by: Dr. Teri Hamlin Georgia Department of Education.
Timing Insecticides for Control of OFM/CM Deborah Breth CCE-LOF.
Pecan Production 101: Sunlight, Crop Load Management, Pollination
Physical Evidence used to Establish Reference Conditions for the Southwest Jemez CFLR Project In order to set goals that underlie restoration treatments,
Ellsworth/UA Integrated Management of Whiteflies in Arizona Peter C. Ellsworth, Ph.D. IPM Specialist, University of Arizona Maricopa, AZ, USA & Steve Naranjo,
S Concepts of Integrated Pest Management Leonard Coop Assistant Research Professor Oregon State University Integrated Plant Protection Center 2040 Cordley.
Insects & Diseases. IPM Defined:  "IPM is a sustainable approach to managing pests by combining biological, cultural, physical and chemical tools in.
NYFVI Grant – Feb. 07-Jan 09 Testing the “PETE” Insect Developmental Model to Limit Resurgence of CM in Apples Deborah I. Breth, CCE-LOF Art Agnello, NYSAES,
Sharwil avocados from Hawaii to the continental United States Commercial shipments of Sharwil avocado may be moved interstate between November 1-March.
Citrus to Australia 9 Point Plan  Protocol for the 2008/09 Shipping Season “9-point Plan” - Final At least two technical employees from each packing facility.
Hypothesis Testing “Teach A Level Maths” Statistics 2 Hypothesis Testing © Christine Crisp.
Foliage Pests of Pecan Will Hudson Extension Entomologist.
MAINTENANCE PART 2. Inlet free of obstructions Inlet free of obstructions Adequate scour protection provided.
CAPTURING SAMPLE COLLECTION DESCRIPTIONS IN THE IR-4 FIELD DATA BOOK Edith Lurvey & Van Starner Phoenix Conference 3/2/06 (8:15 a.m.)
You would not go and count every single flower
Quality control of raw materials In-process control
Basic quality control tests in medical radiography
12 Steps to Useful Software Metrics
Integrated Pest Management
Pest Management Decisions
Review of the Systems Approach Work Plan for the Exportation of Apples from the United States into Taiwan Presented by APHIS July 26 and 27, 2005.
TAIWAN QUARANTINE REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLES Section A: Implementation of field inspections 1. Conditions for orchards Under supervision of exporting country’s.
In-Field Management for Oriental Fruit Fly in the Sharwil Avocado Systems Approach for Export Grant T. McQuate, Roger Vargas & Peter Follett USDA-ARS Daniel.
Mating disruption trials for control of Bonagota cranaodes (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple in Brazil Miryan D.A. Coracini 1, Evaldo F. Vilela 2, Paulo.
Unit D: Controlling Pests and Diseases in the Orchard Lesson 1: Managing and Controlling Pests of Fruit and Nut Crops 1.
ANCOVA Lecture 9 Andrew Ainsworth. What is ANCOVA?
Oklahoma State University Sorghum Headworm Sequential Sampling System Tom A. Royer Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology.
SAMPLING PROCEDURES.
EXPORT OF TABLE GRAPES TO CHINA BY KHOMOTSO MASHALA
Pre-registration, and Industrial Training Rules, Regulation, Guidelines FICT-PK (May 2010) (Special Briefing)
How to Register a League Version 1.02 Rev RegisterASA.com 2012 Season 1v1.02 Rev
Physical and Mechanical Practices in Mango IPM
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine United States Department of Agriculture.
Fruit & Vegetable Production Unit for Plant Science Core Curriculum Lesson 4: Integrated Pest Management Fruit & Vegetable Production Unit for Plant Science.
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine Exporting California Navel Oranges to.
Integrated Pest Management. Learning Objectives 1.Define IPM (Integrated or Insect Pest Management). 2.Describe why IPM is important. 3.Describe what.
Funded by an annual grant from the Northwest Center For Small Fruit Research Acknowledgments Biology and Control of Blueberry.
Graphing.
Pest Monitoring and Scouting in grapes
High codling moth pressure and small plots (cv. Bartlett) Treatment Rate (form/ac) % Stings% Entries Check Carpo- virusine 400 ml
Sampling  When we want to study populations.  We don’t need to count the whole population.  We take a sample that will REPRESENT the whole population.
IPM I – Integrated P – Pest M - Management.
Economic Thresholds in Weed Management and Demonstration of HADSS.
TDTIMS Overview What is TDTIMS? & Why Do We Do It?
1 CSCD 326 Data Structures I Hashing. 2 Hashing Background Goal: provide a constant time complexity method of searching for stored data The best traditional.
Overview Report of 2007 Problems Experienced & Solutions Procedures for USA a)PPECB quality inspection b)GEF stickers on approved pallets c)Fruits subjected.
Chapter 9, Part E. VII. Calculating the Probability of Type II Errors A common decision in business is whether to accept a shipment or not, based upon.
Integrated pest management (IPM) : 1.As the practice of preventing or suppressing damaging populations of insect pests by application of the comprehensive.
Pruning Ornamental Trees and Shrubs George Driever Area IPM Specialist.
Soil Sampling for Fertilizer and Lime Recommendations.
Systems Approach Concept and Application 24º Technical Consultation among ORPF, August 2012 Maria Inés Ares President of Directive Committee.
PRE-PACKAGED PRODUCTS SAMPLING Ben Aitken Trading Standards Officer Trading Standards MBIE New Zealand Kevin Gudmundsson Legal Metrology Advisor Trading.
Advances in Management of Corn Earworm in Sweet Corn Rick Foster Purdue University and Rick Weinzierl University of Illinois.
Double and Multiple Sampling Plan
Final Data Review and Invalidation
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Plodia interpunctella Cryptolestes ferrugineus
Incorporating Weather Information into the Insect Pest Management Decision-making Process Larry Gut.
2006 Relative Luminosity Tai Sakuma MIT 3/19/2007.
Compaction Process in the Field
Pest Monitoring and Scouting in grapes
Double and Multiple Sampling Plan
Time Approval Overview March 27, 2003
Statistical Quality Control
Presentation transcript:

Codling Moth Orchard Sampling Protocol Wendy Jones WSU - TFREC Wenatchee, WA

Background  After interception of 3 codling moth larvae Taiwan mandated a stricter protocol for screening lots for larvae to lift suspension for the remainder of the 2004 crop.  Industry loss $26M  For the 2005 season, Taiwan mandated that we develop and implement measures to evaluate the efficacy of orchard control programs to eliminate high risk lots from being exported to Taiwan.

Supplying Orchard Requirements  Must follow pest control practices recommended by Federal/State Cooperative Extension Service.  Management practices may use: monitoring, degree-day models for treatment timing, chemical controls, biological control, mating disruption, or a combination of methods.  Growers must maintain records of all codling moth management activities and supply records to APHIS &/or BAPHIQ on request.  Growers will be identified by grower lot number on the end panel of each carton packed for Taiwan.  Before any grower lot is submitted for packing, the efficacy of the orchard codling moth control program must be evaluated to eliminate high risk orchards.

Field Evaluation Protocol - 2 Steps 1)Voluntary Initial Screening - Codling Moth Trap Catches 2)Required Codling Moth Damage Pre- packing Evaluation

 If cumulative trap catch in a single CM trap during 2nd & 3rd generations is 30 or more CM per trap in a conventionally treated orchard or 20 CM per trap in a mating disruption orchard, the orchard is considered high risk for export.  Use a large delta trap with a 1 mg lure (1X lure type) for conventional orchard; use a 10 mg lure (10X lure type - e.g. Biolure, Superlure, Megalure) for mating disruption orchard.  Use at least 1 trap per 5 acres; monitor weekly. Voluntary Initial Screening Guidelines

Required CM Damage Pre-Packing Fruit Evaluation 1)On-tree visual inspection using the sequential sampling protocol; 2) Bin sampling alternative: use if on-tree sample not done, or use to re-sampling if needed.

Bin Sampling Protocol fruit per grower lot /variety with no more than 25 fruit from top layer of each bin for 60 bins/lot; -If grower lot is less than 60 bins, sample more per bin; -Must represent all parts of orchard; (or this shipment) -All suspect fruit must be cut; -Over 2 fruit (>0.15%) with a larva rejects orchard; -May be sampled in orchard or at packinghouse; -A person qualified to identify codling moth damage & larvae; (cert. cull cutter or PCO) -Record form must be used.

Sequential Sampling Protocol 1)Blocks chosen for sampling should be reasonably uniform in terms of cultivars, growing conditions and codling moth management program. 2)Any person qualified to recognize codling moth damage in the field can do the sampling. (cert. PCO) 3)Avoid sampling at noon, and don’t sample looking into the sun. 4)Take a break after 4 hours of sampling.

Sequential Sampling Protocol 5)Starting in the portion of the orchard with highest CM density or history of damage, select trees randomly within the area, but separated by at least 70 feet ( paces), working in a grid pattern. 6)Each tree sample will consist of 60 half-fruit.

7) A half-fruit is one where you can see the entire side of the fruit and the calyx. Partially hidden fruit should not be counted. 8) Start sampling fruit at the top of the tree counting each half-fruit and moving down the tree. Sequential Sampling Protocol

9)Continue counting half-fruit as you work your way down the tree. 10)You can move around the tree as long as fruit aren’t counted twice. 11)If there aren’t 60 half-fruit on the tree, its OK to continue to the adjacent tree. 12)All suspect fruit must be cut and examined for live larvae. Record only live larvae as damage.

Use of a pruning pole is recommended to remove suspect fruit for cutting.

Cutting Fruit 13)All suspect fruit must be cut and examined for larvae. 14)Fruit should be cut through the center from stem to calyx. 15)Side entries should also be cut and examined. 16)Record only the number of fruit with live larvae on the record sheet for each tree.

Codling Moth Larvae Codling moth tunnel through the fruit flesh to reach the seeds at the core. In relatively new entries, young larvae may not yet be inside the fruit but are still alive and must be counted.

Sequential Sampling Worksheet  Use of the data recording form is mandatory.  It determines the number of trees required for sampling based on number of live larvae found.  It must accompany the 1st shipment of bins to the packinghouse.  The form verifies that fruit come from a Sec.1.4 compliant orchard.

Orchard CM Control Worksheet Here’s how the table works:  The table is designed to determine if the infestation level is greater than or equal to 0.2% (reject) or less than or equal to 0.04% (accept).  The minimum number of trees to sample in a “clean” orchard is 21.  Sample 21 trees and record the number of fruit with live larvae in the 1st shaded column. (not # of larvae)  The 2nd shaded column is a running total of the number of CM infested fruit.  Compare that number to the number in the “Above” or “Below” columns to see if you need to continue.

Using the CM Control Worksheet Example 1. Percentage of fruit with live larvae is 1.3% and by the tenth tree sampled there is enough information to reject the orchard because it exceeds the 0.2% threshold for acceptance. - Begin recording data in the first line. - Compare the cumulative number to the “Above” and “Below” columns. - Here, the cumulative number at tree 10 matches the number in the “Above” column, rejecting the orchard as being too high risk.

Using the CM Control Worksheet Example 2. The percent infested is 0.0%, but can’t be determined until the minimum number of trees, 21, have been sampled. - Work same as previous example filling in count data. - With no larvae found a decision can’t be made until the “Below” column registers ‘0’. - At this point the orchard is accepted as being low risk.

Using the CM Control Worksheet Example 3. The final count is between 0.2% and 0.04% preventing a decision from being reached. -After reaching the last tree the count is 5 -Since 5 is between 3 and 8 an absolute decision can not be made. -At this point you either do another field sampling within 7 days or do a bin sampling. -If this happens again on second try, the orchard lot is rejected for export.

Questions?