Team 3 Adaptive Cruise Control. Outline Reintroduction Feasibility Engineering Analysis Design Norms Major Obstacles Overcome Obstacles Yet to Overcome.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conclusions: Sessions 2 & 3 James Gover, IEEE VTS.
Advertisements

EET 419 Team 4. Problem correctly identifying the occupancy of a passenger bus and that the passengers remain safely seated throughout the extent of the.
Motion in One Dimension Problems MC Questions 2. A motorcycle is moving with a speed v when the rider applies the brakes, giving the motorcycle a constant.
Team 4 Senior Design Final Presentation May 7, 2011.
Design Specifications Design is directed toward human beings. To design is to solve human problems by identifying them and executing the best solution.
SOAP February 27, 2014 Armstrong Hall of Engineering 1 SOAP.
Chamber Project Mechanical Engineering Group. Team Members and Responsibilities  Traci Traughber: Research Tracks  Chris Griffin: Research Cars & Calculations.
Some important pedestrian considerations 4-1. Skew increases crosswalk length, decreases visibility 4-2.
Adaptive Cruise Control System ENGR 340 April 13, 2007.
Adaptive Cruise Control System ENGR 340 May 1, 2007.
Adaptive Cruise Control System ENGR 340 February 26, 2007.
Parameters & Observations. Level 1: Patients Level 2: Physicians User Level Level 3: Developer.
Adaptive Cruise Control System ENGR 340 May 5, 2007.
Team 3 Adaptive Cruise Control Project Goal Our goal is to provide an after market product that will prevent unnecessary braking while using cruise control.
THE “ JAM HANDELER ” THE “ JAM HANDELER ”. In the modern urban world, most people spend hours commuting in heavy traffic. Time and mental energy are wasted.
Distributed Reinforcement Learning for a Traffic Engineering Application Mark D. Pendrith DaimlerChrysler Research & Technology Center Presented by: Christina.
Overview of Project Lydia Eatmon ACC2 Fall Project Adaptive Cruise Control Diver aid, part cruise control, part collision avoidance Motivation for.
Team 7: Engineering an Alternate Route to Styrene.
TEAM 8 Barry Li Victor Chen Elyas Sepasi Aron McKinnon ENSC 305/440 April 15 th,
Lead Black Slide. © 2001 Business & Information Systems 2/e2 Chapter 13 Developing and Managing Information Systems.
Field evaluation of an advanced brake warning system David Shinar Human Factors 1995 Presented by: Derrick Smets.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY DRIVE AT THE RIGHT SPEED FOR THE CONDITIONS HIGHWAY, TOWN, RESIDENTIAL THIS IS A LIMIT NOT A TARGET 120 KPH.
Design Criteria and Constraints
Data Acquisition Real-Time System Integration Preston Schipper Matt Hulse Adrienne Baile DARSI II.
TEAM 1: ON WINGS LIKE A PENGUIN ENGINEERING 339 – SENIOR DESIGN.
Sensors Cassandra, Gayathri, Rohan, Patrick. -Many distractions while driving -Want to dramatically reduce accidents that occur -Try to figure out ways.
Safety All The Time Oyuki Ogawa Executive Vice President DENSO CORPORATION.
[ Rhythm Reloaded ] Team 6 CEAC Presentation. Team 6 Reintroduction Andy Gabler Ben Moes Nathan Brinks David van Geest.
© 2001 Business & Information Systems 2/e1 Chapter 13 Developing and Managing Information Systems.
Office of Highway Safety Collision Warning Systems Kristin Poland, Ph.D.
AHS – The Vision. The Automated Highway System (AHS) and The Intelligent Vehicle Initiative (IVI)
CAROL GUENTHER Crash Prevention Technology What is it? Biomimetic Car Robot Drive BR23C Concept robot Developed by Nissan with the University of Tokyo.
Press Release 7/2/09. Safer Travel Cleaner air.
KeypadFunctionDescription A Accelerator Accelerate Speed B Brake Decrease Speed C Cruise On Turn on cruise system * + Increase speed # -Decrease Speed.
Christian Pfretzschner Mike Handlogten Jason Kraai Brady Rathbun Julie Stoddard Our Team.
IntelliDriveSM Update
21 September The Defensive Driver CS-410 Concept Presentation Presenter:
Integrating Trust and Driver’s Safety By Robin Mitchell.
Chapter 6 Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
[ Rhythm Reloaded ] Team 6 2nd Progress Presentation.
Casey Smith Doug Ritchie Fred Lloyd Michael Geary School of Electrical and Computer Engineering December 15, 2011 ECE 4007 Automated Speed Enforcement.
Transferable Skills. Communication Being able to read and understand information Being able to communicate ideas and information effectively by speech.
CS-EE 481 Spring February 2006 University of Portland School of Engineering Project Umpqua Electric Vehicle Drive System Team Abdullah Binsaeed Dustin.
Copyright Efeco group 2014 = Eugène Schmidt & company The reconstruction of the Belgian industry was the start point for Mr. Eugène Schmidt to found in.
STEM Problem Solving Process QuestionsResearch Possible Solutions Plan Development Correction to Solution Test Data Collection Refine Solution Deployment.
Some alternatives for pause switch Pause switch prohibit (US) Pause switch mandatory (EU) Pause switch option (UN, Taiwan) No switch-off on reverse condition.
Project: Automated Pool Chemical System 3/1/10 Oral Presentation #3 Engr. 340.
Problem Solving Process Questions Research Development Plan Test Data Collection Refine Solution Deployment Plan.
NicarAGUA – Team 17 SETH KOETJE, JESSE VANDERWEES, HANNAH VANDERVORST, DALTON VEURINK.
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES Presented by Anju.J.S. CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Find reaction time Materials: –Ruler or meter stick –Calculator –Scratch paper or notes –Do multiple trials.
Managing Technology and Innovation
In-Vehicle Monitoring Technology
ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS
Team members: Project Manager: Alex Crimin Facilitator: Chengzhu Jin
HISTORY FLATBED ACQUISITION
THE NEXT STEP IN RESILIENT, HIGH-CAPACITY NETWORK CONNECTIVITY
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Janet Wright Adult Social Care Leeds City Council
Presented by Sanil Kumar .P.V Roll no:62 S7 Mechanical Engg:
30 miles in 1 hour 30 mph 30 miles per hour
6-Stroke Team 14.
Prepared by : fatheyah faqih Supervisor:Dr.Falah Hassn
Autonomous Obstacle Detection System
The Calvin Bolt 3.0 Team 5 – Steering and Braking Enhancements on Calvin Bolt Status Update: december 7, /16.
An object travels 40 miles in 2 hrs. Calculate its speed?
KEYLESS ENTRY PUSH TO START BACK UP CAMERA.
Speed = Distance divided by time
ME321 - Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines Design Process Notes
Presentation transcript:

Team 3 Adaptive Cruise Control

Outline Reintroduction Feasibility Engineering Analysis Design Norms Major Obstacles Overcome Obstacles Yet to Overcome Decisions Significant Changes

Team 3: Members Erik Barton Nate Barker Nate Sportel Bryan Bandstra Chris Vonk

Our Project Design an Adaptive Cruise Control System –Safer Cruise Control System –Decrease driver irritation and frustration –Accomplishes these goals by detecting speed and distance of car ahead

Feasibility Budget Feasibility: All Parts donated –Radar - TRW –NeoVi - Johnson Controls –LCD/Touch Screen, PLC, Laser - Highlight Industries –DE2 Board - Calvin –Dyno (for testing) –Chrysler Sebring - Bryan Bandstra

Feasibility Market Feasibility –Real Examples: Jaguar, Mercedes –Conclude there is a need and a market Technical Feasibility –Assured by JCI experts –Group Members with experience with parts

Engineering Analysis Meeting with JCI: system design Research of Bus System –CAN, J1850 –NeoVi card solution Did Calculations of Speed, distance, maximum angle –Safe driving distance –Turn radius –Speed max and min Decision Matrices

Design Norms Transparency Stewardship Justice Caring Trust Humility

Obstacles Overcome Acquired all necessary parts!!! Radar eliminates the need for prototype alternatives Bus system compatibility

Obstacles Still Remaining Turns/Hills Issues Programming Getting all parts to work together as a full system Installing into a specific car FCC licensing –Applied for but not yet acquired

Decisions LCD/Touch Screen Radar DE2 Board Speed Range (50 to 80 mph) Following Distance (3 seconds) Warning using LCD and Sound No Brakes

Significant Changes Use of DE2 board instead of PLC –More digital options –Faster Acquisition of Parts

QUESTIONS?