Doc.: 15-06-0369-07-003c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 2006 Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /083r0 Submission Tony Pollock, NICTA Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Advertisements

Doc.: c MAC simulation scenarios Submission January 17, 2007 Chun-Ting Chou, PhilipsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /281r3 Submission July, 2006 Jinkyeong Kim, ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
July 2005 Slide 1 doc.: IEEE / 419 r0 Submission Abbie Mathew, NewLANS Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
IEEE /r0 Submission Slide 1 Hiroyo Ogawa, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /348r0 Submission July, 2004 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co,. Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission November 15, 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE e Submission March 2015 Ken Hiraga (NTT) et al, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /281r0 Submission May, 2006 Jinkyeong Kim, ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /263r0 Submission May, 2004 Yozo Shoji, CRL Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /286r3 Submission July, 2006 Noriyasu Kikuchi, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
doc.: IEEE r0 Submission March 2000 Rick Alfvin, Eastman Kodak CompanySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE n Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Patient.
September 2003 doc.: IEEE Submission Slide 1 Jason Ellis, Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE Submission doc. : IEEE March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission Philips May, 2006 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE a Submission January 2004 Pat Kinney, Kinney Consulting LLCSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /229r0 Submission 07/2000 Jim Lansford, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /436r0 Submission November 2003 Vijay DhingraSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE xxxxx Submission doc. : IEEE wng0 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /327 Submission July 2002 Intel Research and Development Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Submission November 2015 Slide 1Li Qiang, Huawei Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
September 2006 Bruce Bosco, MotorolaSlide 1 doc.: IEEE c Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
May 18, 2006 Slide 1 doc.: IEEE c Submission Ali Sadri (Intel Corporation) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE r1 Submission November, 2004 Keiichi Ohata, NECSlide 7 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission July, 2005 Skafidas,Pollock,Saleem, NICTASlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission September 2006 Slide 1 Hirokazu Sawada, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /291r2 Submission July 2006 NiCT, NTTSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission January 2006 Ali Sadri (Intel Corporation)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
May 2005 Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /295r0 Submission Abbie Mathew, NewLANS Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Submission.
<month year> doc.: IEEE /271r0 September, 2000
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Usage model for short-range line-of-sight.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Discussion of antenna model and channel.
18 January 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ MAC for 60 GHz Gigabit WLAN/WPAN]
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of Available Channel Measurements/Models]
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
Submission Title: [Wireless Display Throughput Requirements]
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2006
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Wireless Display Throughput Requirements]
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
November 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Applications and requirements for mm wave.
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2006
November 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Applications and requirements for mm wave.
July 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Usage model for short-range line-of-sight.
June, 2006 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 June, 2006
Submission Title: [Summary of available data and models]
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2006
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Simplified geometry for the usage model.
November 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Sept 2006
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Sept 2006
Submission Title: [Summary of available data and models]
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
June, 2006 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 June, 2006
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
October 11, 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c]
July 2010 <month year> doc.: IEEE g Doc.: IEEE g
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
Presentation transcript:

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary of the Usage models for c] Date Submitted: [September 21, 2006] Source: [Ali Sadri, Company [Intel Corporation] Address [[Intel Corporation, Evening Creek Drive,San Diego, CA ,USA ] ] Voice: [ ] FAX: [] Re: [] Abstract:[Summary of the Usage Models for c agreed to at the San Diego IEEE meeting] Purpose:[To be included in 15.3c Usage Model Document] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 2 UM1 Uncompressed Video Streaming Point-to-point U1/U3 EnvironmentThroughput MAC SAP BER/PiERDistanceNote NLOS, LOS Residential (STB-TV) 1.78 Gbps 1.49, W/O Blk Stream, Up to 1080i, 24, BER for PHY Simulations *Justification for this value is needed 5 No data retransmission required Unidirectional data transmission noted by Solid line Low bitrate reverse link Target of PiER for HDMI Pixel is RGB, 24 bits LOS, NLOS Residential (STB-TV) 3.56 Gbps 2.98, W/O Blk Stream, Up to 1080p, 24, BER for PHY Simulations *Justification for this value is needed 10 TV PC, uMPC, Set top Box (STB) TV or Monitor

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 3 UM1 Uncompressed Video Streaming Point-to-point U1/U3 EnvironmentThroughput MAC SAP BER/PiERDistanceNote NLOS Residential (STB-TV) 3.56 Gbps 2.98, W/O Blk Stream, Up to 1080p, 24, BER for PHY Simulations *Justification for this value is needed 5 m No data retransmission required Unidirectional data transmission noted by Solid line Low bitrate reverse link Target of PiER for HDMI Pixel is RGB, 24 bits LOS Residential (STB-TV) 3.56 Gbps 2.98, W/O Blk Stream, Up to 1080p, 24, BER for PHY Simulations *Justification for this value is needed 10 m TV PC, uMPC, Set top Box (STB) TV or Monitor

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 4 Motion Motion: To freeze the content of UM1, except the BER/PiER column, Doc c, Slide 2. –Moved, A. Sadri –Second, T. Pollock –Yes=25 –No=0 –Abstain=0

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 5 Motion Motion: To freeze the content of UM1, except the BER/PiER column, Doc c, Slide 3. –Moved, J. Barr –Second, A. Seyedi –Yes=14 –No=10 –Abstain=2

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 6 UM2 multi Uncompressed Video Streaming U1/U3 Point-to-multi-point EnvironmentThroughput MAC SAP BER/PiERDistanceNote Residential TV1:LOS TV2:NLOS TV1: 1.75 Gbps 1.49, W/O Blk Stream 1080i, 24, BER for PHY Simulations *Justification for this value is needed STB-TV1 & STB-TV2 5 m TV1-TV2 5 m No data retransmission required Unidirectional data transmission noted by solid line for U1 Low bitrate reverse link TV1-TV2 are not co-located, separation 5 m Different video content transmitted on each link Target of PiER for HDMI Pixel is RGB, 24 bits TV2: 0.62 Gbps 0.497, W/O Blk Stream 720x480p, 24,60 U1/U3 TV1 TV2 Separated by 5m TV or Monitor PC, uMPC, Set top Box (STB)

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 7 UM2 multi Uncompressed Video Streaming Continue EnvironmentThroughput MAC SAP BER/PiERDistanceNote Residential TV1:LOS TV2:NLOS TV1: 0.62 Gbps 0.497, W/O Blk Stream 720x480p, 24, BER for PHY Simulations *Justification for this value is needed STB-TV1 & STB-TV2 5 m TV1-TV2 5 m No data retransmission required Unidirectional data transmission noted by solid line for U1 Low bitrate reverse link TV1-TV2 are not co-located, separation 5 m Different video content transmitted on each link Target of PiER for HDMI Pixel is RGB, 24 bits TV2: 0.62 Gbps 0.497, W/O Blk Stream 720x480p, 24,60

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 8 Motion Motion: To freeze the content of UM2, except the BER/PiER column, Doc c, Slide 6-7. –Moved, A. Seyedi –Second, T. Pollock –Yes=19 –No=0 –Abstain=3

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 9 UM3 Office Desktop TV HDD Printer (PR) Computer (C) U1/U2 U9 U5 EnvironmentThroughput MAC SAP BER/PERDistanceNote NLOS, Desktop (C-TV) LOS, Desktop (C-HDD) NLOS, Office (C-PR) 3.56 Gbps 2.98, W/O Blk Stream, 1080p, 24, 60 And/or 1.75 Gbps 1.49, W/O Blk Stream 1080i, 24, BER for PHY Simulations *Justification for this value is needed 1 mNo data retransmission required for TV Unidirectional data transmission noted by solid line for U1 & U9 Low bitrate reverse link for unidirectional link TV, HDD, PR are not co- located, separation by 120 deg. Target of PiER for HDMI Pixel is RGB, 24 bits One simulation for this Usage Model 0.25 Gbps, average async. Each direction for HDD 8% PER before retransmission 2K Byte 1 m 0.5 Gbps, average async. 8% PER before retransmission 2K Byte 5 m TV or Monitor

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 10 Motion Motion: To freeze the content of UM3, except the BER/PER column, Doc c, Slide 9. –Moved, S. Kato –Second, I. Toyoda –Yes=17 –No=1 –Abstain=7

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 11 UM4 Conference Ad-hoc EnvironmentThroughput MAC SAP BER/PERDistanceNote LOS, office. (C0-TV) LOS, Desktop (C0-C1-C2) LOS, office (C0,C1,C2)- WB 1.75 Gbps 1.49, W/O Blk Stream 1080i, 24, BER for PHY Simulations *Justification for this value is needed 5 m No data retransmission required for TV1 Unidirectional data transmission noted by solid line for U1 Low bitrate reverse link for unidirectional link device are not co- located, geometry TBD Target of PiER for HDMI Pixel is RGB, 24 bits One simulation for this Usage Model Total Async throughput of 1 Gbps Gbps,, average async. Each direction 8% PER before retransmission 2K Byte 1 m Gbps,, average async. Each direction for WB 8% PER before retransmission 2K Byte 3 m Computer (C0) Computer (C1) Computer (C2) TV Wireless Bridge (WB) U2 U17 U16 U17 U16 TV or Projector

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 12 Motion Motion: To freeze the content of UM4, except the BER/PER column, Doc c, Slide 11. –Moved, A. Seyedi –Second, T. Pollock –Yes=18 –No=1 –Abstain=5

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 13 UM5 Kiosk File-downloading EnvironmentThroughput MAC SAP BER/PERDistanceNote LOS-office (Server-PDA or PDA-STB) 1.50 Gbps burst (Server-PDA or PDA-STB) 8% PER before retransmission 2K Byte 1 mAsymmetric download/Upload Low data rate reverse link Degradation due to PDA jitter needs to be considered in the simulation PDA jitter needs to be specified LOS-office (Server-PDA or PDA STB) 2.25 Gbps burst (Server-PDA or PDA-STB) 8% PER before retransmission 2K Byte 1 m Movie and Game Kiosk Mobile Storage Device, PDA STB, Game Consol U7/U9

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 14 Motion Motion: To freeze the content of UM5, Doc c, Slide 13. –Moved, S. Kato –Second, I. Toyoda –Yes=14 –No=3 –Abstain=5

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 15 U#ApplicationCovered by Channel Model # Separation (m) LOS/NLOSTX PositionRX PositionMotionScore 3= high 2=mid 1=Low U1A1 Uncompressed Video Streaming Residential5-10There could be a wall between the TX and RX The transmitter sits on a shelf near or under the STB or AV receiver There may be two units at each end spaced about 1m apart for diversity The receiver sits somewhere near the TV There may be two units at each end spaced about 1m apart for diversity Fixed, Link may be temporarily shadowed by Human Body 2.82 U17A7 Gigabit Ethernet Office Conference Room Library 3-5mLOSTransmitter/receiver is and access point located near the ceiling Transmitter/receiver is a portable device (e.g. laptop) located on a desk Fixed2.81 U16A6 Ad-hocOffice Conference Room Library Desktop 3-5mLOSTransmitter/receiver is a portable device (e.g. laptop) located on a desk Fixed2.70 U5A2 File Transfer and synch Office Desktop 1-3NLOS / LOS Transmitter next or close to the receiver 2 fixed device Transmitter next or close to the receiver 2 fixed device Fixed2.64 U6A2 File Transfer and synch Desktop office 1-3mLOS/NLOSThe transmitter/receiver is a portable device (PDA or PMP) and is placed on the table in front of or next to the computing device The transmitter/receiver is a PC placed on the desk. Fixed2.61 U2A1 Uncompressed Video Streaming Conference room10-20LOSThe transmitter is located on or near the presenter’s podium, It is connected to a laptop or a multimedia server The receiver is mounted on or close to the ceiling and it (the receiver) is connected to a HD projector, which illuminates a large screen Fixed,2.57 U3A1 Uncompressed Video Streaming Residential3-5mLOS/NLOSThe transmitter is a portable device (PDA or PMP) and is placed on the table in front of or next to the TV. The receiver sits somewhere near the TV There may be two units at each end spaced about 1m apart for diversity Fixed, Link may be temporarily shadowed by Human Body 2.52 Use Case Definition

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 16 U#ApplicationCovered by Channel Model # Separation (m) LOS/NLOSTX PositionRX PositionMotionScore 3= high 2=mid 1=Low U11A3 Wireless Desktop Desktop Office 1-3NLOSTransmitter in the drawer or in a cabinet beneath the monitor Receiver on the desk or next to the laptop SameDevice is jittered during transmission such as handheld in hand or laptop on lap 2.52 U7A2 File Transfer and synch Office Conference Room * 1-3mLOSThe transmitter/receiver is a kiosk in a store The receiver is a portable device (PDA, PMP, digital camera) placed next to the kiosk Fixed2.50 U9A2 File Transfer Residential Office 0.1-1LOSTX/RX near AV recorder, Kiosk or associated with portable device. TX/RX is associated with portable device Fixed during transferring 2.43 U14A5 Short range Backhaul Corridor20-30mLOSThe transmitter and receiver are connected to the wall or ceiling in a corridor Fixed2.42 U10A3 Wireless Docking station Office Desktop 1-3NLOSTransmitter on the deskReceiver in the drawerFixed2.31 U4A1 Video Streaming Residential0.1-1LOSTransmitter near AV player or associated with portable device Receiver is associated with portable device Fixed during streaming 2.25 U13A4 Mobile Gaming Residential1-3mLOSTransmitter is a hand-held device (e.g. mobile phone) The receiver is placed near a TV Jittered (hand movement) 2.10

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 17 U#ApplicationCovered by Channel Model # Separation (m) LOS/NLOSTX PositionRX PositionMotionScore 3= high 2=mid 1=Low U8A2 File Transfer Office3-5mLOS/NLOSThe transmitter is a PC or a portable device placed on a desk The receiver is a printer located elsewhere in the room Fixed2.07 U15A5 Short range Backhaul AWGN LOSTransmitter on Pole top or on a tower or outdoor on the wall Receiver on Pole top or on a tower or outdoor on the wall Transmitter on Pole top or on a tower or outdoor on the wall Receiver on Pole top or on a tower or outdoor on the wall Fixed, jitter due to wind 2.00 U12A4 Mobile Gaming Residential Office 1-3LOSTransmit and receive are held closely to each other Jitter1.61

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 18 Resolutions

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 19 HDMI Requirement

doc.: c summary-usage-model Submission September 2006 Ali Sadri, Intel CorporationSlide 20 Binary Ranking by straw poll UM1= 32 UM2=6 UM3=4 UM4=27 UM5=28