1 Release Grade – סיפורו של מדד Riki Tzadok – May 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C9: SOA Management with Actional® for Sonic™
Advertisements

Web Development Engineering Processes Introduction to Web Development Outsourcing Processes.
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Integrating Collaborative Requirements Negotiation and Prioritization Processes: A Match Made in Heaven Nupul Kukreja Annual Research Review 14 th March.
CS487 Software Engineering Omar Aldawud
Sixth Hour Lecture 10:30 – 11:20 am, September 9 Framework for a Software Management Process – Artifacts of the Process (Part II, Chapter 6 of Royce’ book)
Stepan Potiyenko ISS Sr.SW Developer.
SE 450 Software Processes & Product Metrics Software Metrics Overview.
Innovation and IS Kieran Mathieson. What is Innovation?  Long definition Successful innovation is the creation and implementation of new processes, products,
Jw consulting SAP R/3 QM Workshop Rheinfelden Kurt Fantes Prototyp jw LIMS.
Software Test Plan Why do you need a test plan? –Provides a road map –Provides a feasibility check of: Resources/Cost Schedule Goal What is a test plan?
12 Steps to Useful Software Metrics
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Trusted IT Group. The challenge: 40 active, concurrent IT projects  Unsatisfactory Project Delivery.
Software Project Management Fifth Edition
Chapter 4 Components of the Software Quality Assurance System
Agile Assimilation & Scaling. 2  About me…  How did we start?  Bottom-up  Task Force  Learning  Pilots  First stage analysis + recommendations.
Stakeholder Engagement during Implementation of Universal MSI Screening in a Large Healthcare System Stakeholder Engagement during Implementation of Universal.
Reporting to Management Using Microsoft Project and EPM Derek Loar, Pcubed.
The Services Model: Transitioning Your Mind & Your Team Bonnie M. Robertson The Robertson Company.
Team Assignment 15 Team 04 Class K15T2. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Measurement process 3. GQM 4. Strength Weakness of metrics.
Eighth Hour Lecture 7:30 – 8:20 pm, Thursday, September 13 Workflows of the Process (from Chapter 8 of Royce’ book)
Lecture 4 Software Metrics
Monitoring and Evaluation Management of a Training Program.
BA 471 Management Information Systems Process Maturity and Quality.
Work package 2: User analysis and usability testing Responsible partner: Danish Data Archives WP leader: Anne Sofie Fink, DDA.
Company LOGO Team assignment 03 Team 04 K15T02. Members… 1.Hoàng Thị Kim Dâng 2.Thái Thanh Nhã 3.Trần Thị Mộng Hà 4.Trần Tiễn Hưng 5.Chu Thị Thu Hương.
Quality Software Project Management Software Size and Reuse Estimating.
T Iteration Demo Group name [PP|I1|I2] Iteration
QA Methodology By Rajib Roy Independent Consultant Qcon.
CHAPTER 16 Project Wrap-Up.
Mark Dixon 1 Tech – Introduction. Mark Dixon 2 Module Aims give you experience of: –The Software Development Lifecycle Analyse (of Problem / Application.
Chapter 2 Software processes. Topics covered Software process models Process activities Coping with change.
Software Production Chapter 2: Identifying Software Development Activities.
© G. A. Motter, 2006, 2008 & 2009 Illustrated by Examples Quality Function Deployment and Selection Matrices Customer Driven Product Development.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
Theories of Agile, Fails of Security Daniel Liber CyberArk.
Control Phase Part of the Report Out for Completed Projects Lean Government Initiative.
Compuware Corporation Deliver Reliable Applications Faster Dave Kapelanski Automated Testing Manager.
T Iteration Demo Tikkaajat [PP] Iteration
T Project Review Muuntaja I1 Iteration
Requirements in the product life cycle Chapter 7.
Software Test Plan Why do you need a test plan? –Provides a road map –Provides a feasibility check of: Resources/Cost Schedule Goal What is a test plan?
Cognos 8: Software for Management Information System.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
Improving The Customer Experience Our Commitment To Operational Excellence Gita MacLean, May 21 st /2015.
SOA-37: SOA Management with Actional ® for Sonic ™ Unplugged - Live at work… Jiri De Jagere Senior Solution Engineer.
Swami NatarajanOctober 1, 2016 RIT Software Engineering Software Metrics Overview.
Integrated ALM with Cross-Tool Reporting Kovair Marketing Kovair Software Copyright ©
Project Management The End Stage
The world’s first Learning Motivation Environment
Software Verification and Validation
Dinesh Rawat , Software Test Manager
Module 10: Customer Satisfaction
Class 7 – Inception Phase: Steps & techniques
Real Metrics for Real Decisions
Improve Business Satisfaction by 10% Through Business Relationship Management Relationship management is the #1 driver of business satisfaction with IT.
12 Steps to Useful Software Metrics
Software Requirements
Recognization and management of RISK in educational projects
د. حنان الداقيز خريف /28/2016 Software Quality Assurance ضمان جودة البرمجيات ITSE421 5 – The components of the SQA.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
DMAIC Analyze, Improve, Control
Agile Delivery Process Improvement
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, 2004.
PLANNING ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Software Product Management Metrics
Conducting a Target Hazard Analysis for Your Community
Some Closing Thoughts Software Engineering.
Presentation transcript:

1 Release Grade – סיפורו של מדד Riki Tzadok – May 2008

How do we know the Quality of our products? A Solution is found It is not top secret Life is not easy… Making it a working tool! It works! The End? Summary

3 Chapter A – How do we know the quality of our Products? Management Requirements: Tool to measure the quality of software deliverables Based on data and not on ‘gut feeling’ Use existing tools/methods Easy to use and understand

4 Chapter B – A solution is found i Based on ‘non closed’ defects (no 0 defects upon delivery….) Reflects the customer’s point of view Normalized between -  to 100 Uses existing tools Release Grade – score for SW deliverables

5 Release Grade Calculation Basics Each defect is given a weight based on its Severity and Impact (customer point of view) Defect weight = Severity weight * Impact weight All defect weights are summed – ‘R-Sum’ The sum is normalized versus a reference project (‘I- Sum’), to give a grade between -  to 100 Release Grade =

6 Weights of Impact & Severity

7 Chapter C – It is not top secret!

8 Measurements Portal (2)

9 Chapter D – Life is not easy… People don’t like to be measured What’s in it for me?? Defects database should be validated The relevant tools are not implemented in all R&D organizations Different scales are needed according to product maturity & complexity

10 Chapter E – Making it a working tool! The challenge: identify the most relevant user (Release managers) and find out how the metric can help them. if you can’t beat them – join them “if you can’t beat them – join them” – we asked one of the release managers to join the team and we learned better her needs and concerns …and then the tool team gave us just the right solution:

11 Measurements Portal (3)

12 Measurements Portal (4)

13 Measurements Portal (5)

14 Chapter F – In works!

15 The End? Extend usage to post release Use the release grade as a tool to evaluate sub- contractors deliveries Reflect testing progress vs. release grade Build metrics for development phase as well “The race for quality has no finish line” “The race for Quality has no finish line…”

16 Release Grade helps us define measurable targets for release quality and can be used as an additional exit criterion. Release Grade serves both for monitoring and as a working tool (helps in decision making). Summary Release Grade is now implement in about 50% of R&D resulting in a major decrease in deferred defects backlog, which means improved product quality and better customer satisfaction.

17 Thanks…. To Tzachi Sadi – the initiator The Implementation team: Shouky Dan, Miki Arad, Nadav Alon, Michal Mahlab All VAS–SQM for their support, ideas, and objections

18 ריקי צדוק קומברס, הברזל 29 תל-אביב