Quantum limits on estimating a waveform I.What’s the problem? II.Quantum Cramér-Rao bound (QCRB) for classical force on a linear system Carlton M. Caves.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

Quantum-limited measurements: One physicist’s crooked path from quantum optics to quantum information I.Introduction II.Squeezed states and optical interferometry.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Quantum Feedback Control of Entanglement in collaboration with H. M. Wiseman, Griffith University, Brisbane AU University of Camerino, Italy Stefano Mancini.
Quantum limits on estimating a waveform I.Introduction. What’s the problem? II.Standard quantum limit (SQL) for force detection. The right wrong story.
Displaced-photon counting for coherent optical communication Shuro Izumi.
Dual Sphere Detectors by Krishna Venkateswara. Contents  Introduction  Review of noise sources in bar detectors  Spherical detectors  Dual sphere.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Complexity and Disorder at Ultra-Low Temperatures 30th Annual Conference of LANL Center for Nonlinear Studies SantaFe, 2010 June 25 Quantum metrology:
Characterization and optimization of entangled states produced by a self-phase-locked OPO J. Laurat, G. Keller, J.A.O. Huguenin T. Coudreau, N. Treps,
Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Eugene PolzikLECTURE 5.
Chapter 8. Linear Systems with Random Inputs 1 0. Introduction 1. Linear system fundamentals 2. Random signal response of linear systems Spectral.
Matched Filters By: Andy Wang.
A quantum optical beam n Classically an optical beam can have well defined amplitude AND phase simultaneously. n Quantum mechanics however imposes an uncertainty.
Various ways to beat the Standard Quantum Limit Yanbei Chen California Institute of Technology.
E n t a n g l e m e n t Teleportation Alice and Bob Nonlocal influences Fidelity (a) Paranormal phenomena (b) Men are from Mars. Women are from Venus (c)
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
Center for Quantum Information and Control Quantum control and feedback: A circuit-based perspective I.Is there a problem? II.Measurement-based and coherent.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
NOISE IN OPTICAL SYSTEMS F. X. Kärtner High-Frequency and Quantum Electronics Laboratory University of Karlsruhe.
White Light Cavity Ideas and General Sensitivity Limits Haixing Miao Summarizing researches by several LSC groups GWADW 2015, Alaska University of Birmingham.
Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement I.Introduction II.Ramsey interferometry and cat states III.Quantum and classical resources IV.Quantum information.
Interferometer Topologies and Prepared States of Light – Quantum Noise and Squeezing Convenor: Roman Schnabel.
Tags: Sys IS, Optimal, Subtraction, Adaptive…. List of useful documentation.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
LIGO- G D Proposal to the NSF: Low Noise Suspensions and Readout Systems for Future LIGO Interferometers Stan Whitcomb LIGO Program Advisory Committee.
LONG-LIVED QUANTUM MEMORY USING NUCLEAR SPINS A. Sinatra, G. Reinaudi, F. Laloë (ENS, Paris) Laboratoire Kastler Brossel A. Dantan, E. Giacobino, M. Pinard.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Quantum noise observation and control A. HeidmannM. PinardJ.-M. Courty P.-F. CohadonT. Briant O. Arcizet T. CaniardJ. Le Bars Laboratoire Kastler Brossel,
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
An Introduction to Kalman Filtering by Arthur Pece
On the statistics of coherent quantum phase-locked states Michel Planat Institut FEMTO-ST, Dept. LPMO 32 Av. de l’Observatoire, Besançon Cedex
Quantum limits on linear amplifiers I.What’s the problem? II.Quantum limits on noise in phase-preserving linear amplifiers. The whole story III.Completely.
Alexander Khalaidovski, Henning Vahlbruch, Hartmut Grote, Harald Lück, Benno Willke, Karsten Danzmann and Roman Schnabel STATUS OF THE GEO HF SQUEEZED.
IEN-Galileo Ferraris - Torino - 16 Febbraio 2006 Scheme for Entangling Micromeccanical Resonators by Entanglement Swapping Paolo Tombesi Stefano Mancini.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
AIC, LSC / Virgo Collaboration Meeting, 2007, LLO Test-mass state preparation and entanglement in laser interferometers Helge Müller-Ebhardt, Henning Rehbein,
Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entanglement
Quantum Theory of the Coherently Pumped Micromaser István Németh and János Bergou University of West Hungary Department of Physics CEWQO 2008 Belgrade,
October 1, 2007 Quantum Optical Sensing: Single Mode, Multi-Mode, and Continuous Time Jeffrey H. Shapiro.
Carmen Porto Supervisor: Prof. Simone Cialdi Co-Supervisor: Prof. Matteo Paris PhD school of Physics.
Opening our eyes to QND technical issues (workshop and open forum) “It’ll be the blind leading the blind” - Stan Whitcomb “You can see a lot by looking”
Optomechanics Experiments
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Violation of a Bell’s inequality in time with weak measurement SPEC CEA-Saclay IRFU, CEA, Jan A.Korotkov University of California, Riverside A. Palacios-Laloy.
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Matrix Product States in Quantum Metrology
Quantum-limited measurements:
New directions for terrestrial detectors
Overview of quantum noise suppression techniques
Scheme for Entangling Micromeccanical Resonators
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Quantum-limited measurements:
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
Haixing Miao University of Birmingham List of contributors:
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen February 2004
Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005
Squeezed states in GW interferometers
LIGO Quantum Schemes NSF Review, Oct
UNIT 5. Linear Systems with Random Inputs
Quantum noise of white light cavity using double-gain medium
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
Quantum metrology: An information-theoretic perspective
Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian
Presentation transcript:

Quantum limits on estimating a waveform I.What’s the problem? II.Quantum Cramér-Rao bound (QCRB) for classical force on a linear system Carlton M. Caves Center for Quantum Information and Control, University of New Mexico M. Tsang and C. M. Caves, “Coherent quantum-noise cancellation for optomechanical sensors,” PRL 105, (2010). M. Tsang, H. M. Wiseman, and C. M. Caves, “Fundamental quantum limit to waveform estimation,” arXiv: [quant-ph]. Collaborators: M. Tsang, UNM postdoc H. M. Wiseman, Griffith University

measurement noise Back-action force SQL

Langevin force When can the Langevin force be neglected? Narrowband, on- resonance detection Wideband detection

The right story. But it’s still wrong. SQL for force detection Use the tools of quantum information theory to formulate a general framework for addressing quantum limits on waveform estimation.

Noise-power spectral densities Zero-mean, time-stationary random process u(t) Noise-power spectral density of u

QCRB: spectral uncertainty principle Prior-information term At frequencies where there is little prior information, Quantum-limited noise No hint of SQL, but can the bound be achieved? 1.Back-action evasion. Monitor a quantum nondemolition (QND) observable. 2.Quantum noise cancellation (QNC). Add an auxiliary negative-mass oscillator on which the back-action force pulls instead of pushes.

Achieving the force-estimation QCRB Oscillator and negative-mass oscillator paired sidebands paired collective spins Collective and relative coördinates Quantum noise cancellation (QNC) W. Wasilewski, K. Jensen, H. Krauter, J. J. Renema, M. V. Balbas, and E. S. Polzik, PRL 104, (2010).

Cable Beach Western Australia

QCRB for waveform estimation Classical waveformPrior information Measurements Estimator Bias

Handling the measurements Hamiltonian evolution of pure states, but all ancillae subject to measurements

QCRB for waveform estimation Gives a classical Fisher information for the prior information. Apply the Schwarz inequality! Gives a quantum Fisher information involving the generators.

QCRB for waveform estimation Two-point correlation function of generator h(t)

QCRB for force on linear system Force f(t) coupled h=q to position Gaussian priorClassical prior Fisher information is the inverse of the two-time correlation matrix of f(t). Time-stationaryTwo-time correlation matrices are processesdiagonal in the frequency domain. Diagonal elements are spectral densities. QCRB becomes a spectral uncertainty principle.

Optomechanical force detector (a)Flowchart of signal and noise. (b)Simplified flowchart.

QNC I (a) QNC and frequency- dependent input squeezing. (b) QNC by output optics (variational measurement) and squeezing. W. G. Unruh, in Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravitation, and Measurement Theory, edited by P. Meystre and M. O. Scully (Plenum, New York, 1983), p M. T. Jaekel and S. Reynaud, Europhys. Lett. 13, 301 (1990). H. J. Kimble, Y. Levin, A. B. Matsko, K. S. Thorne, S. P. Vyatchanin, PRD 65, (2002). S. P. Vyatchanin and A. B. Matsko, JETP 77, 218 (1993).

QNC II (a)QNC by introduction of anti-noise path. (b)Simplified flowchart. (c)Detailed flowchart of ponderomotive coupling and intra- cavity matched squeezing. (d)Implementation of matched squeezing scheme.

QNC III Input (a) and output (b) matched squeezing schemes and associated flowcharts (c) and (d).