LEGALESE BLONDE RIAA vs. NAPSTER Daniella Nero University of Hawaii at Manoa AMST 334 Sp-13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ethics Of Digital Music What Is The Future Of Copyright???
Advertisements

MP3 Critics Web-Based Music Downloading Services CSCI 110 Dr. Bowring Matt Lyons Jarrett Bouchette Brittany Bridges.
THE AFTERMATH OF P2P NETWORK DOWNLOADS IN THE MUSIC INDUSTRY AND RIAA {THE NEW DIRECTION OF THE INDUSTRY}
Intellectual Property Image: William J. Wynn.
(c) Jakob Iversen, 2003 Online Music Industry 311: Fall 2003.
Copyright or Copywrong. What is a copyright and what can be copyrighted? What is “Fair Use” and what four factors determine “Fair Use”? What are the two.
Thad Davis - Damian Forbes - Jessica Salins - Oscar Sandoval.
Shawn Fanning: Entrepreneur By Ramit Prasad Biographical Information Born in 1980 Family lived in poverty Raised in Brockton Oldest of 4 children.
New Developments in E- Commerce: Legal Issues Professor Nancy King Oregon State University Aarhus School of Business.
The Anti-Piracy Campaign: The Drag Behind Their Efforts Jamal Haskin.
Tackling Online Piracy without Harming Consumer Rights IES - IBBT Workshop Strengthening the European Information Society - Consumers in Media Policy and.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye1 A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 4: Intellectual Property.
Copyright Infringement
Copyrights1 By Saud Al-Harbi & AbdulAziz Al-Shamrani.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 4, 2009 Copyright – Indirect, Digital Issues.
© 2005 UMFK. 1-1 Napster internet business models text and cases Jeffery T. Pelletier.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 1, 2007 Copyright – Digital Issues.
Grokster Bart Wagner. Shut Down Grokster, which lost in the Supreme Court a lawsuit filed by Hollywood to stop illegal file sharing on peer-to-peer networks,
Filesharing and the birth of the digital music industry Liisa Benmergui DAP02S October 28, 2004.
MP3.com v RIAA Lee Ha Lucas Mays Alan Tsang. Introduction  Background  Debate over the issues  Application of ethical tests  Possible social consequences.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 4, 2008 Copyright – Digital Issues.
Port 21 (Distribution and Promotion Remix) Brian Geoghagan Winter 2005 COM546 Professor Gill.
Intellectual Property
P2P WeeSan Lee
Music File Sharing Caitlin Smith Stewart Rutledge Jess Culpeper.
CptS 401 Adam Carter. Quiz Question 1 According to the book, it is important to legally protect intellectual property for the following reason(s): A.
PERSONAL TECHNOLOGIES MS. BROCK – SCT 11. THE DOWNLOAD GENERATION DIGITAL MUSIC TECHNOLOGY – CHANGE IN HOW MUSIC IS RECORDED, DELIVERED AND PLAYED EXPLOSIVE.
Intellectual Property Rights and Online File Sharing Erwin Solis Antoine Herve Matt Olsen Nikolai Hart Tim Scott.
Music Downloads David Jenkins PERS In The Beginning… In the 1950’s, a company called RCA (Radio Corporation of America) introduced the first synthesizer,
Intellectual property rights concern the legal ownership and use of intellectual property such as software, music, movies, data, and information. Intellectual.
Intellectual Property Rights Online File Sharing Brett Colbert Wendi Jardin Victor Cortez Brett Colbert Wendi Jardin Victor Cortez.
Finishing Up Fair Use; More on Copyright
COPYRIGHT & THE WEB LIS Information Technologies – Dr. Gilok Choi Pratt Institute, School of Information & Library Science Spring, 2009 By Diane.
Jolly Phan Cal State University of San Marcos Professor Fang Fang IS News 11/12/2009.

CS110: Computers and the Internet Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property (Part 1)
徐晨桓 李柏穎.  Definition  Introduction  History  Example - Napster  Example - Gnutella 徐晨桓 李柏穎 2/27.
ITIS 1210 Introduction to Web-Based Information Systems Chapter 38 How Music Sharing and File Sharing Work.
Classroom Activity – Lesson 1: “Defining Terms”. “Capitalism” is identified by its characteristic institutions Institutions: the formal and informal “rules.
Emily Adler, Megan Gasvoda, and Kristine McNally.
Intellectual Property in Peer-to-Peer Networks Artsiom Yautsiukhin Natallia Kokash Intellectual Property Law, 18 October 2005.
By Edward Frimpong MUSIC PIRACY. WHAT IS MUSIC PIRACY? Music piracy can be defined as the stealing of music. One scenario could be borrowing a friend's.
File Sharing Networks: Sony, Napster, Grokster, Bit Torrent Richard Warner.
2000s. Day 72: Music and Copyright Music industry initially regarded the Internet with caution and suspicion, which soon erupted into outright hostility.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Intellectual Property.
Problem Based Learning Project Presented by Penny Reagan, Elizabeth Stewart & Stephanie Watkins.
The Start Shawn Fanning (19-yr-old student nicknamed Napster) developed the original Napster application and service in January 1999 while a freshman.
p2p challenges law (and vice versa) Charles Nesson October 2, 2004.
N a p s t e r. How it all began… Napster began in a college dorm room when a student named Shawn Fanning wanted to share some of his songs with his friends.
Internet and Intellectual Property  University of Palestine  Eng. Wisam Zaqoot  Feb 2010 ITSS 4201 Internet Insurance and Information Hiding.
Joint Committee of the Higher Education and Entertainment Communities John C. Vaughn Executive Vice President Association of American Universities November.
Copyright and Intellectual Property Right 1. 2 Use and Protection of Intellectual Property in Online Business Intellectual property (general term) includes:
Team Wikipedia Distributing digital stored information (computer programs, multi-media, etc). Regular methods : Removable media
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye1 A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 4: Intellectual Property.
MP3s: Legal? Ethical? Rolando Lopez CS 99 Dartmouth College.
Piracy: Crime or Expression? As of 2012 there have been 15 Anti-Piracy laws enacted to protect Intellectual Property copyright in the form of media. There.
Copyright Computer crime and cyber security.
Chapter 9: Internet Law, Social Media, and Privacy
Napster Intellectual Property Rights vs. Music for Free
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
File Sharing Legalities and Ethics
Eldred v. Ashcroft.
By: Justin, Juan, Jian, and Jazlin
How the music industry has been affected by the internet and digital downloading By Peter Harris.
Copyright VI: Copyright & Internet Services
Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003
File Sharing Networks: Sony, Napster, Grokster, Bit Torrent
Computer 101 Extra Credit By: Marjorie Jackson.
April 24, 2019– Columbia College / Business of Design
Presentation transcript:

LEGALESE BLONDE RIAA vs. NAPSTER Daniella Nero University of Hawaii at Manoa AMST 334 Sp-13

RIAA Recording Industry Association of America Background ▫Founded in 1952 ▫Trade organization representing the recording industry ▫Promotes creative and financial vitality of major music companies Concept ▫Protect intellectual property ▫Protect First Amendment Rights ▫Conduct research ▫Review state and federal law

NAPSTER Background ▫Site launched in 1999 ▫Founders were Shawn Fanning, John Fanning and Sean Parker ▫Program developed while in college, Northeastern University Concept ▫Peer-2-peer file sharing site ▫Sharing music in mp3 format ▫Search function made all music easily accessible ▫At its peak, in 2001, almost 30 million people used the service

LAWSUIT Plaintiff: RIAADefendant: Napster Lawsuit filed on December 7, 1999 Sued Napster for copyright infringement ▫Contributory ▫Vicarious Sought protection under DCMA At stake: ▫Future of Napster ▫Future of p2p file sharing ▫Relationship between new technologies, music, users and producers

OTHER OPINIONS 18 copyright law professors at American universities: “The decentralized model of peer-to-peer networking poses a significant challenge to sectors of the entertainment and information businesses that follow a model of centralized control over content distribution” From Appeal Nos and to the United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit D.J. Xealot “Napster is a great promotion tool that provides an affordable alternative to major labels for artists like myself” From “Policing the Internet” by Alan Marzilli, (p.49)

OUTCOME Case decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on February 12, 2001 Laws applied in the case: ▫17 USC section 501 (Copyright Infringement) ▫17 USC section 106 (Exclusive Rights in Copyrighted Works)

ETHICAL CONCLUSION Ethics Norms/Values Right/wrong Theft in a digital society Record companies/ users Utilitarian Approach Legally vs. ethically right

REFERENCES Law_Prof_Consortium idea-dot-dot-dot stnad&source=bl&ots=jzaB2GyVJj&sig=KBfGI9Ta1Nn19CVRlYiDDw_i1GI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=axdEUYjV POTgyQGR34HQAg&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBA Law_Prof_Consortium idea-dot-dot-dot stnad&source=bl&ots=jzaB2GyVJj&sig=KBfGI9Ta1Nn19CVRlYiDDw_i1GI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=axdEUYjV POTgyQGR34HQAg&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBA IMAGE CREDITS

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.