Ergodicity in Natural Fault Systems K.F. Tiampo, University of Colorado J.B. Rundle, University of Colorado W. Klein, Boston University J. Sá Martins,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall Analysis (1)
Advertisements

Spatial point patterns and Geostatistics an introduction
Statistical mechanics
, CZE ISMD2005 Zhiming LI 11/08/ and collisions at GeV Entropy analysis in and collisions at GeV Zhiming LI (For the NA22 Collaboration)
Scaling of viscous shear zones with depth dependent viscosity and power law stress strain-rate dependence James Moore and Barry Parsons.
Scaling Laws, Scale Invariance, and Climate Prediction
Assimilating Data into Earthquake Simulations Michael Sachs, J.B. Rundle, D.L. Turcotte University of California, Davis Andrea Donnellan Jet Propulsion.
Peyman Mostaghimi, Martin Blunt, Branko Bijeljic 11 th January 2010, Pore-scale project meeting Direct Numerical Simulation of Transport Phenomena on Pore-space.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , EARTHQUAKE.
February 24, 2003James N. Brune Precarious Rocks, Shattered Rock, and Seismic Hazard at Low Probabilities for Yucca Mountain Presentation to the Nuclear.
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Statistical.
Chapter 5: Calculating Earthquake Probabilities for the SFBR Mei Xue EQW March 16.
Omori law Students present their assignments The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.
Volcano Monitoring: MAUNA LOA ( GG130 ) Geophysics (Deformation via GPS and InSAR, Seismicity, etc. )
4. TESTS 5. CONCLUSIONS 2. METHOD We base the study on the method proposed by Zúñiga and Wyss (1995) which was originally intended for finding suitable.
Impact of Different Mobility Models on Connectivity Probability of a Wireless Ad Hoc Network Tatiana K. Madsen, Frank H.P. Fitzek, Ramjee Prasad [tatiana.
11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.
Chaos, Fractals and Solitons in A Model for Earthquake Ruptures Elbanna, Ahmed and Thomas Heaton
Omori law The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.
IE 594 : Research Methodology – Discrete Event Simulation David S. Kim Spring 2009.
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
Data Assimilation and the Development of the Virtual_California Model Paul B. Rundle Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA Presented at the GEM/ACES Workshop,
Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey
1 SUBSTRUCTURE DISCOVERY IN REAL WORLD SPATIO-TEMPORAL DOMAINS Jesus A. Gonzalez Supervisor:Dr. Lawrence B. Holder Committee:Dr. Diane J. Cook Dr. Lynn.
Monte Carlo Simulation CWR 6536 Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology.
Lecture 10: Mean Field theory with fluctuations and correlations Reference: A Lerchner et al, Response Variability in Balanced Cortical Networks, q-bio.NC/ ,
An Introduction to Seismic Eruption software and an associated classroom activity Michael Hubenthal, IRIS Educational Specialist.
Changes in Floods and Droughts in an Elevated CO 2 Climate Anthony M. DeAngelis Dr. Anthony J. Broccoli.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
Interacting Earthquake Fault Systems: Cellular Automata and beyond... D. Weatherley QUAKES & AccESS 3 rd ACES Working Group Meeting Brisbane, Aust. 5 th.
Eigenpattern Analysis of Geophysical Data Sets Applications to Southern California K. Tiampo, University of Colorado with J.B. Rundle, University of Colorado.
Yan Y. Kagan & David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Earthquake Predictability Test of the Load/Unload Response Ratio Method Yuehua Zeng, USGS Golden Office Zheng-Kang Shen, Dept of Earth & Space Sciences,
SCEC Workshop on Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation and Validation Development of an Integrated Ground Motion Simulation Validation Program.
Numerical simulations of thermal counterflow in the presence of solid boundaries Andrew Baggaley Jason Laurie Weizmann Institute Sylvain Laizet Imperial.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation Durham, 6th-13th December : Computational Materials Science: an Overview CASTEP Developers’ Group.
Karen Felzer & Emily Brodsky Testing Stress Shadows.
Coulomb Stress Changes and the Triggering of Earthquakes
Plasmasphere Refilling Rates Inferred from Polar and IMAGE Satellite Spectrogram Data T. Huegerich(1), J. Goldstein(1), P.H. Reiff(1), B.W. Reinisch(2)
California Project Seismicity in the oil and gas fields Tayeb A. Tafti University of Southern California July 2, 2013.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
2. MOTIVATION The distribution of interevent times of aftershocks suggests that they obey a Self Organized process (Bak et al, 2002). Numerical models.
Data Mining Using Eigenpattern Analysis in Simulations and Observed Data Woodblock Print, from “Thirty-Six Views of Mt. Fuji”, by K. Hokusai, ca
An Examination of the Relation between Burn Severity and Forest Height Change in the Taylor Complex Fire using LIDAR data from ICESat/GLAS Andrew Maher.
112/16/2010AGU Annual Fall Meeting - NG44a-08 Terry Tullis Michael Barall Steve Ward John Rundle Don Turcotte Louise Kellogg Burak Yikilmaz Eric Heien.
Intermittency Analysis and Spatial Dependence of Magnetic Field Disturbances in the Fast Solar Wind Sunny W. Y. Tam 1 and Ya-Hui Yang 2 1 Institute of.
Does the Scaling of Strain Energy Release with Event Size Control the Temporal Evolution of Seismicity? Steven C. Jaumé Department of Geology And Environmental.
Негауссовские распределения спиральности солнечных магнитных полей в цикле активности Kuzanyan Kirill Kuzanyan Kirill; Sokoloff Dmitry (IZMIRAN, RAS &
How is an Earthquake’s Epicenter Located? Seismic wave behavior –P waves arrive first, then S waves, then L and R –Average speeds for all these waves is.
Evaluation of simulation results: Aftershocks in space Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
Earthquake Machine Mechanical Modeling to Increase Student Understanding of Complex Earth Systems Most of you are probably covering strike-slip faults.
U of Minnesota DIWANS'061 Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and.
The Snowball Effect: Statistical Evidence that Big Earthquakes are Rapid Cascades of Small Aftershocks Karen Felzer U.S. Geological Survey.
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
MA354 Math Modeling Introduction. Outline A. Three Course Objectives 1. Model literacy: understanding a typical model description 2. Model Analysis 3.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , SHORT-TERM PROPERTIES.
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
6/11/2016Atomic Scale Simulation1 Definition of Simulation What is a simulation? –It has an internal state “S” In classical mechanics, the state = positions.
Applying Statistical Seismology to Image the Physical Properties of the Crust Egill Hauksson, Caltech, Pasadena, CA Presented at Statsei9 in Potsdam,
Jiancang Zhuang Inst. Statist. Math. Detecting spatial variations of earthquake clustering parameters via maximum weighted likelihood.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich
CAP, CSB Study on Spatial and Temporal Variation of LURR
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
Tectonics V: Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation
Southern California Earthquake Center
Mean and Fluctuating Quantities
Discussion Session: FAMOS, Oct. 2013
Presentation transcript:

Ergodicity in Natural Fault Systems K.F. Tiampo, University of Colorado J.B. Rundle, University of Colorado W. Klein, Boston University J. Sá Martins, University of Colorado

Motivation Earthquakes are a high dimensional complex system having many scales in space and time. Recent work with numerical simulations of fault system dynamics suggests that they can be interpreted as mean field threshold systems in metastable equilibrium (Rundle et al., 1995; Klein et al., 1997; Ferguson et al., 1999). In these systems, the time averaged elastic energy of the system fluctuates around a constant value for some period of time, which are punctuated by major events that reorder the system before settling into another metastable energy well. One equilibrium property that can be recovered in simulations of metastable equilibrium systems is ergodicity (Klein, 1996; Egolf, 2000). Can the same be said of the natural fault system?

Ergodicity A system in metastable equilibrium is locally ergodic, over a large enough spatial and temporal region. Statistically, a system is said to be effectively ergodic if, for a given time interval, the system has equivalent time-averaged and ensemble-averaged properties. Ergodicity also implies stationarity. One way to measure the ergodicity of such a system is to check a quantity called the Thirumalai-Mountain (TM) energy metric (Thirumalai & Mountain, 1993; Klein et al., 1996). This energy metric measures the difference between the time average of a quantity, generally related to the energy of the system, and the ensemble average of that same quantity over the entire system.

Thirumalai-Mountain Metric The energy-fluctuation metric, proposed by TM is where is the time average of a particular individual property related to the energy of the system, and is the ensemble average over the entire system. If the system is effectively ergodic at long times,, where D is a constant that measures the rate of ergodic convergence.

Seismicity Data SCEC earthquake catalog for the period Data for analysis: , M ≥ 3.0. Events are binned into areas 0.1° to a side, over an area ranging from 32° to 40° latitude, -125° to -115° longitude. Lat Long Total numbers of events per year are calculated for each location, approximately 8000 locations.

TM Metric for Numbers of Events The energy-fluctuation metric, for numbers of earthquakes, is the time average of the seismicity at each site, and is the ensemble average over the entire system, where L is the total number of sites in the region.

Entire Region,

Variance in Space and Time SpatialTemporal Cumulative Magnitude Variance

Varying Region Size, Coalinga

Varying Region Size, Northridge

Varying Region Size, Landers

Conclusions If natural earthquake fault systems are locally ergodic, over a large enough spatial and temporal regime, they can be considered to be in metastable equilibrium over some period of time. Ergodicity implies stationarity over the same spatial and temporal regions. This finding validates the use of near mean field models to study earthquake fault networks, and the principles and procedures of statistical mechanics to study both natural and simulated fault systems. We can use this property to study various aspects of the natural fault network.

Landers & Northridge