Terrestrial Ecology and Land Cover/Change Science Review: Basis of Successful Land Product Validation Jeffrey L. Privette NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CEOS Working Group on Information Systems and Services - 1 Core Site WGISS Test Facility WGCV & WGISS Efforts John Faundeen & Stu Doescher, USGS WGISS-15.
Advertisements

Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
The North American Carbon Program Google Earth Collection Peter C. Griffith, NACP Coordinator; Lisa E. Wilcox; Amy L. Morrell, NACP Web Group Organization:
Linking In situ Measurements, Remote Sensing, and Models to Validate MODIS Products Related to the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Peter B. Reich, University.
Issues, Needs, Directions (Insights into the Programs) Woody Turner Earth Science Division, NASA Headquarters April 23, 2013 Biodiversity and Ecological.
Scaling GPP at Flux Tower Sites in the Context of EOS/MODIS Validation
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
Committee on Earth Observing Satellites Land Product Validation subgroup LBA Fire and Deforestation Accuracy Assessment 26 July 2004 Jeff Morisette
MODIS Science Team Meeting - 18 – 20 May Routine Mapping of Land-surface Carbon, Water and Energy Fluxes at Field to Regional Scales by Fusing Multi-scale.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Globally distributed evapotranspiration using remote sensing and CEOP data Eric Wood, Matthew McCabe and Hongbo Su Princeton University.
VENUS (Vegetation and Environment New µ-Spacecraft) A demonstration space mission dedicated to land surface environment (Vegetation and Environment New.
The SAFARI 2000 Data Distribution System Jeffrey L. Privette NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Many others from NASA, Wits, NDMC, ORNL 28 August 2001.
SAFARI 2000 Data Activities at the ORNL DAAC Bob Cook, Les Hook, Stan Attenberger, Dick Olson, and Tim Rhyne Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Bridging the Gap in Scales between Flux Towers, Ecosystem Models and Remote Sensing R.J. Olson 1, R.B. Cook 1, L.M. Olsen 1, T. A. Boden 1, J.T. Morisette.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Charge to workshop: Develop an international protocol to quantify the accuracy of remote sensing.
EOS Program VALIDATION EOS Field Campaign Experience DAVID STARR Former EOS Validation Scientist For Steve Platnick EOS Senior Project Scientist GOES-R.
Satellite Cross comparisonMorisette 1 Satellite LAI Cross Comparison Jeff Morisette, Jeff Privette – MODLAND Validation Eric Vermote – MODIS Surface Reflectance.
Sentinel-3 Validation Team (S3VT) Meeting ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy, th November 2013 General Presentation Template for S3VT meeting Project name.
MODIS Land and HDF-EOS HDF-EOS Workshop Presentation September 20, 2000 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC Code 922, Raytheon ITSS MODIS Land Science Team Support.
LAND PRODUCT VALIDATION update F. Baret, J. Nightingale, S. Garrigues, J. Nickeson Missoula, 17 June /29.
11-12 June 2015, Bari-Italy Coordinating an Observation Network of Networks EnCompassing saTellite and IN-situ to fill the Gaps in European Observations.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy ORNL DAAC Overview for ESIP Carbon Cluster Environmental Data Science & Systems Objective:
15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.
J.L. Privette, NASA’s GSFC New CEOS WGCV Subgroup on Land Product Validation (LPV) Jeffrey L. Privette, NASA’s GSFC Jeffrey Morisette, SSAI.
Remote Sensing Break-out: Wed. Jan 24, 9:30-12:00 Summary report Joost van Haren Jeff Morisette.
MODIS Workshop An Introduction to NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS), Terra, and the MODIS Instrument Michele Thornton
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
CEOS WGCV Land Product Validation Sub-Group Overview Joanne Nightingale, Jaime Nickeson (Sigma Space Corp / NASA GSFC) With input from LPV Focus Group.
VALERI, Avignon 10 March 2005 Stephen Plummer Olivier Arino (ESA), Freddy Fierens (VITO Consortium), Jing Chen (U. Toronto), Gerard Dedieu.
Five MODLAND babies in 2000, more on the way… MODLAND Validation Update for Terra and Aqua (on-line) Jaime Nickeson: additional support for Validation.
WSL Workshop The Long and Winding Road to MODIS Data.
What Do NGOs Do With FIA Data? (Preview: a lot!) Christine Negra The Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment March 2009 SAF National FIA.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Entering A New Landsat Era – The Future is Now Tom Loveland U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources.
Investigating the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems (ICCTE) Scott Ollinger * -PI, Jana Albrecktova †, Bobby Braswell *, Rita Freuder *, Mary Martin.
Slide 1 18-Nov-15 GOFC GOFC SDI Issues T. Fisher.
AGRO 500 Special Topics in Agronomy Remote Sensing Use in Agriculture and Forestry Lecture 6 Leaf area index (LAI) Junming Wang Department of Plant and.
1 - ORNL DAAC | Terra Data Products Review, Jan 7-8, 2002 Data Support for Validation of EOS Land Products Larry Voorhees, Dick Olson, Bob Cook, ORNL *
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
Global Terrestrial Observing System linking the world’s terrestrial monitoring systems to provide a global vision of the Earth we share.
WGISS and GEO Activities Kathy Fontaine NASA March 13, 2007 eGY Boulder, CO.
Cyberinfrastructure to promote Model - Data Integration Robert Cook, Yaxing Wei, and Suresh S. Vannan Oak Ridge National Laboratory Presented at the Model-Data.
Remote Sensing Subgroup 2: Process-based modeling of carbon fluxes Remotely sensing measurements as inputs into terrestrial and marine process models that.
ORNL DAAC: Introduction Bob Cook ORNL DAAC Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
ATT Contribution to GEO Archive Task Team WGISS – 22 Sep 11 – 15, 2006 Annapolis, USA.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Plenary Agenda Item #3 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6 November 2015.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Calibration and validation of satellite sensors 1 Sharlene-Asia Naicker Maanda Rambau Sedzani Elia Muravha Amanda Forbes Busisiwe Nkuzani Busisiwe Nkuzani.
.. Jeff Morisette Jaime Nickeson, Jeff Privette & the MODIS Land Discipline team MODIS Science Team Meeting 13 July 2004.
Land Product Validation subgroup activity in support of LAI inter-comparison.
NSIDC—Enhancing NASA’s Contribution to Polar Science A response to the NRC Polar Research Board’s review of NASA’s polar geophysical data sets Mark Parsons.
Terrestrial Ecosystems Monitoring Sites (TEMS) Who, what, where International on-line directory of monitoring sites and networks carrying out long-term.
1 SAFARI 2000 Data Activities at the ORNL DAAC Bob Cook 1, Carroll Curtis 1, Les Hook 1, Tim Rhyne 1, and Jeff Privette 2 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Land Report Back Chris Justice. MODIS Issues Science and Applications reviews presented on Day 1 –Additional results presented on forest monitoring by.
LAI Intercomparison workshop III Missoula Montana 16 August 2004 Jeff Morisette (301)
1 J. Ranson NASA’s Earth Observing System Terra Mission Update Jon Ranson, Terra Project Scientist Si-Chee Tsay, Terra Deputy Project Scientist NASA’s.
Land Surface Imaging VC: Terms of Reference Julio Dalge, P.G. Diwakar, John Faundeen INPE ISRO USGS CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA March 12,
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Global land cover validation activities Martin Herold (FSU Jena) & Mark Friedl (UBoston) CEOS Cal/Val land subgroup (land cover)
Validation of ASTER and MODIS surface temperature and vegetation products with surface flux applications Principle Investigators Tom Gower, Univ. of Wisconsin.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
Future directions of CEOS WGCV: Incoming chair perspective
Global Terrestrial Observing System
Land Cover Land Use Change (LCLUC) training initiatives
NPOESS Airborne Sounder Testbed (NAST)
WGCV Overview K. Thome WGISS#45 / WGCV#43
Site classifications, definitions, and updates to Landnet
Carbon Actions for WGCV
WGISS Working Group for Information Systems & Services
Presentation transcript:

Terrestrial Ecology and Land Cover/Change Science Review: Basis of Successful Land Product Validation Jeffrey L. Privette NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Warren Cohen, John Dwyer, S. Tom Gower, Simon Hook, Chris Justice, Alfredo Huete, Jeff Morisette, Ranga Myneni, Dick Olson, Steve Running, David Starr

Challenge One of the five primary objectives of the Earth Science Enterprise: Identify and measure the primary causes of change Impossible to accomplish without knowledge of measurement uncertainties No precedent for global validation of land products

What We Knew Going In… Excellent knowledge of point issues Limited knowledge of site (25 km 2 ) issues spatial and temporal sampling scaling of point measurements error budgeting Poor knowledge of global sampling issues except inherently cost-prohibitive without strategic planning

EOS Response EOS Validation Program Office/D. Starr Guidance from Instrument Teams Priorities (e.g., low level products first) Approaches Community resources 1997 NRA for EOS Validation Investigators Shared responsibility with product developers

Strategic Plan 1: Focus Sites EOS Land Validation Core Sites Facilitate resource sharing and synergies in validating multiple sensors and products Built on existing stations, resources, experts FLUXNET, AERONET, LTER, etc. Long-term duration Stratified by “6 biomes” of Myneni/Running Jointly nominated by Instrument and (newly selected) Validation PIs

EOS Land Validation Core Sites

Solutions Data “stockpiles” for EOS Core Sitesstockpiles Unique online ftp directories at EROS Data Center  200 km x 200 km MODLAND product subsets  Landsat 7 ETM+ scenes (coordinated by MODLAND) SeaWiFS, ASTER, UMD/CRESS, others joined Centralized field data registry WWW metadata catalog and data linking at ORNLWWW metadata catalog Field investigator upkeep and control of native data Accommodates 6-month public release policy for EOS Validation Investigators Strategic Plan 2: Simple, Fast Data Provision

/1999/2000/2001 EOS Land Product Validation FTP Server /GLCTS/Landsat7 /”site name” /Geocover/MODIS/ASTER /”site name” Level-0R Level-1G MOD09A1 MOD13A2 MOD43B3 AST_L1B Accessible from Land Validation Web Site or ORNL DAAC Mercury

or enter specific coordinates 2. Spatial Search (use cursor to define area of interest) Mercury Searching 3. Temporal Search 1. Fielded Search (using picklists for Project, Site PI, Parameter, etc.)

Strategic Plan 3: International Buy-in Committee on Earth Observing Satellites (CEOS) Composed of the world’s space agencies Coordinates civilian observations from space Working Group for Calibration and Validation (WGCV)  Facilitates and encourages standards, efficiencies, best practices  Four Subgroups  Synthetic Aperture Radar  Microwave Sensors  Infrared and Visible Optical Sensors (IVOS)  Terrain Mapping No mechanism for coordinating or advancing validation of higher level land products Calibration emphasis

Strategic Plan 3: International Buy-in Committee on Earth Observing Satellites (CEOS) Composed of the world’s space agencies Coordinates civilian observations from space Working Group for Calibration and Validation (WGCV)  Facilitates and encourages standards, efficiencies, best practices  Five Subgroups  Synthetic Aperture Radar  Microwave Sensors  Infrared and Visible Optical Sensors (IVOS)  Terrain Mapping  Land Product Validation Calibration emphasis

WGCV Subgroup on Land Product Validation Chartered in 2000 with strong NASA advocacy Founding focus: Support of Global Observations of Forest Cover (GOFC/GOLD) needs (fire, land cover and biophysical products) Multinational endorsement and participation particularly from Europe and Japan (ENVISAT, ADEOS2/GLI/ POLDER2)

Case Study 1: ASTER/Hook MODIS and ASTER thermal infrared systems and products Approach Verification of sensor calibration at simple sites Determination of lower- to higher level product uncertainties at realistic sites Data from ground, aircraft, other sensor and lunar looks Sites: 6 in U.S., 3 in Australia

ASTER Spectral Calibration Accuracy with Time

Case Study II: BigFoot/FLUXNET

BigFoot: Site-based Sampling and Modeling Methodology

Parameters v. Products Landcover 1,2 LAI 1,2 FPAR 1,2 NPP 1,2 GPP 1,3,4 NEP 1,3,4 1 = MODIS 2 = field measure 3 = modeled 4 = tower/eddy flux

Example: Comparing Landsat and MODIS LAI Products BigFootMODLAND

Generalizing BigFoot’s Approach Over FLUXNET Data from Flux Towers Micro-meteorological data (hourly/daily) Incident PAR Air Temperatures Vapor Pressure Rainfall Wind Land surface properties (seasonal/annual) Land cover Leaf area index Soil carbon Soil nitrogen Biomass (stem) Fluxes : CO2, water and heat MODIS PRODUCTS MOD-17 8-d GPP MOD-17 ANPP Ecosystem models are used to relate flux measurements to MODIS derived products VALIDATION Based on Nemani/2/28/00

FLUXNET Validation Web Site: FLUXNET Validation Web Site: Online Access to FLUXNET Data

Case Study III: LAI Network/Myneni Joint activity of CEOS LPV & MODLAND MODIS LAI and FPAR Open-invitation workshops from to Findings: Several foreign groups sampling LAI, some addressing scaling Strong interest in cross-comparisons, technical exchange and trouble-shooting Regional networks could be developed for MODLAND LAI validation needsnetworks

LAI Product Evaluation month pathfinder Leverage existing field campaigns field campaigns Workshop: Rome, June 2001 MODLAND coordinating Landsat ETM+ acquisitions and MODLAND LAI subsets

LAI Product Evaluation: Participating Sites

Validation… What Works? Dedicated science team liaisons for validation Simplified data access (dedicated archives) Strong communication between Product PIs and Validation PIs Algorithm or product familiarity Strong attention to error budgeting Satellite constellations International partnerships and coordination Networks, networks, networks Duration (mission succession), consistency

Validation… To Be Resolved Global Representivity How many points in time, space and biome? Scaling Infancy for many products Communication of Results Formal venues lacking User Input Better knowledge = greater cost How much is enough? Uncertainty Embedding Product data layer with pixel-by-pixel uncertainties

“Under-represented” Climate Combinations for North America and Asia

Concerns and Recommendation EOS underscored two relevant lessons: Sensor characteristics change throughout their lifetimes, including prelaunch Algorithms change Algorithms change throughout their lifetimes Reprocessing happens. Throughout NPP/NPOESS era (present to ~2020), NASA is purchasing products from industry Is NASA ready to conduct performance verification? Could NASA credibly challenge a vendor on an underperforming high level product? Permanent NASA Office on Calibration and Validation

Status of ASTER Data Products