Www.ieagreen.org.uk Remediation of Seepage from Geological Storage (GHG/07/43) Aim of study was to: Identify remediation approaches and techniques that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Microseismic Monitoring of CO 2 Storage at Weyburn James Verdon University of Bristol, U.K Microseismic Monitoring.
Advertisements

Solution of Benchmark Problems for CO 2 Storage Min Jin, Gillian Pickup and Eric Mackay Heriot-Watt University Institute of Petroleum Engineering.
Introduction to Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The.
Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Hydrodynamic analysis of spreading regimes and multi-component gas diffusion in the underground storage of radioactive wastes I.Panfilova, A.Pereira, S.C.Yusuf,
Long Term Integrity – Well Abandonment (GHG07/51) Risk assessment studies completed so far have all highlighted wells as a high potential.
CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
1 Convolutional Time-Lapse Seismic Modeling for CO 2 Sequestration at the Dickman Oilfield, Ness County, Kansas Jintan Li Advisor: Dr. Christopher Liner.
Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Quality Management within the Clinical Research Process
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
INFLUENCE OF CAPILLARY PRESSURE ON CO 2 STORAGE AND MONITORING Juan E. Santos Work in collaboration with: G. B. Savioli (IGPUBA), L. A. Macias (IGPUBA),
The Teapot Dome Field Experimental Facility: CO 2 Program Summary Presentation for the Wyoming Pipeline Authority October 2006 Vicki Stamp CO2 Program.
Carbon Storage. Presentation titlePage 2 Overview of Geological Storage.
Integrated Drilling and Logging Program Approach in HPHT Environment: Successful Drilling of Deepwater Oberan Field, Nigeria, ENI Deepest Well in Deep.
FIGURE 15-1 Simplified cross section developed from site and subsurface characterization.
10 years of SLEIPNER CO2 Storage
Overview of Oil & Gas Sector The following slides are not a tutorial but merely an overview of the various phases involved in an oil & gas development.
Chapter 1 RESERVOIR.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
Carbon Capture and Storage: What Does Integrated Assessment Modelling Analysis Tell Us? Dr Vaibhav Chaturvedi Research Fellow Council on Energy, Environment.
Marginal Field Development Advances in 3D Geological Modeling: How it can help?
Evaluation of a bedrock aquitard for regional- and local-scale groundwater flow Kenneth R. Bradbury, Madeline B. Gotkowitz, and David J. Hart Wisconsin.
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
Legal and Regulatory Status of CO 2 Capture and Storage John Gale IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
09.35 Task 1: Overall monitoring objectives. Andy Chadwick, BGS (10 mins) 1.
1 A Time-Lapse Seismic Modeling Study for CO2 Sequestration at the Dickman Oilfield Ness County, Kansas Jintan Li April 28 th, 2010.
Liaison activities with other organisations (GHG/07/46) EPRI CCS-CDM working group CSLF Financing CCS (joint IEA GHG – IEA CCC) Det.
TCCS8, June 17-18, MItigation and Remediation of CO 2 Leakage Project granted under EU FP7 Energy – Theme 5.2 Mitigation and remediation of leakage.
OIL RECOVERY MECHANISMS AND THE MATERIAL BALANCE EQUATION
Improving the knowledge of carbon storage and coal bed methane production by in situ underground tests HUNOSA:N. C ANTO A. G ONZÁLEZ,
TOUGH2. Background TOUGH: Transport Of Unsaturated Groundwater and Heat Based on Equation-of-State models.
Improved Recovery Demonstration for Williston Basin Carbonates DE-FC22-93BC14984 Luff Exploration Company Mark Sippel, Consulting Engineer.
Earth Science Division E RNEST O RLANDO L AWRENCE B ERKELEY N ATIONAL L ABORATORY B ERKELEY L AB 9/30/03 G. Michael Hoversten Sally Benson Erika Gasperikova.
Mighty River Power’s Geothermal R&D Programme
Bonn, Germany Sunday, 25 March 2012 The Carbon dioxide Capture and geological Storage As project activities Under CDM – The Durban Regulation First SDM.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
Assessment Outcomes 2 and 3 Russell Taylor. Assessment Outcome 2 Set-up an operational computer system with a range of computer hardware Practical & Theoretical.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Monitoring and Protecting Groundwater During Oil & Gas Development Overview of Colorado Aquifer Systems November 26, 2012 Christopher J. Sanchez, P.G.
© NERC All rights reserved Task 3: Review of findings from experimental and natural seepage sites and modelling Comparison with onshore sites.
The Role of Groundwater Sampling/Monitoring COGCC Proposed Rule 609 University of Colorado Law School Nov 26, 2012.
Co-Production of Hydrogen and Electricity (GHG/07/42) Hydrogen may be used in future as an energy carrier In the long term it is expected.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
OVERVIEW OF OIL & GAS EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT and STATE REGULATION OVERVIEW OF OIL & GAS EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT and STATE REGULATION February 18, 2012.
Two types of data requirements: 1. "time-series monitoring data" which requires real- time continuous collection (sea surface temperature, stream gauges,
Risk Assessment for Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Presented to: West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Sacramento, California September.
RCS Partnerships Annual Meeting Pittsburg December 2007 Gulf Coast Stacked Storage SECARB Phase II Test #1 Susan Hovorka, Tip Meckel, JP Nicot, Fred Wang,
R K Jain. CO 2 emission responsible for global warming Development process to go unhalted. Ways and means to be found for controlling and abating CO 2.
ITW2008: P. Campus, R. Oldfield Bermuda, 3-7 November 2008 The recently installed IMS Infrasound Station IS51, Bermuda Paola Campus Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban.
Institute of Volcanology and Seismology FEB RAS
CO 2 Storage Challenges to the Iron and Steel Industry John Gale General Manager IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Steel Institute VDEh Auditorium D ü sseldorf,
Schlumberger Carbon Services Economics & Risk of Scaling Up for Carbon Storage John Tombari Vice President North & South America Schlumberger Carbon Services.
Wytch Farm Field Development Project
1 Section 4- Characterization  Characterization is 95% of the Success of ISCO  Develop a complete and comprehensive Conceptual Site Model  ISCO is a.
LM-01L Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Larry R. Myer Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Physics of Sustainable Energy March.
Summary of the current status of studies Reports published since the last ExCo meeting Studies underway Studies about to start Other.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluating uncertainty in areas contributing recharge to wells for water-quality network design.
Slim Borehole Scanner (SBS) An Update
Groundwater Protection Project Greg Robison Project Manager Ed Sullivan Consulting Engineer June 23, 2008.
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Recent progress and big ideas on CCS US/international perspective.
Michael Feliks UK Operations Manager Cluff Geothermal.
Environmental Impact Assessment Speaker : Yong Hoon Kim, Ph.D.
- Environmental Impact Assessment and Leakage detection -
Andrzej Kotyrba Central Mining Institute Katowice, Poland
Recent Advances in Well-Based Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration
Potential for Geological Carbon Sequestration using deep saline aquifers in the Illinois Basin GIS Term Project Julien Botto.
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
In service monitoring Near miss logging Continuous improvement
Presentation transcript:

Remediation of Seepage from Geological Storage (GHG/07/43) Aim of study was to: Identify remediation approaches and techniques that are available such seepage occur from geological storage sites Assess likely costs of remediation Study undertaken by Advanced Resources Inc. USA Report 2007/11, August 2007

Strategy Five component plan proposed Detailed site selection to determine most favourable sites to prevent seepage at outset Core to strategy Place emphasis on ensuring long term well integrity Identify all old abandoned wells in the vicinity of the proposed CO 2 storage site, Design and install injection wells that are resistant to CO 2, Ensuring proper closure of the CO 2 storage site

Strategy Conduct a phased programme of simulation modeling to track and predict CO 2 plume Multiple simulations required with calibration from monitoring activities Install and maintain a comprehensive monitoring programme Designed to be an early warning system Provide data for calibration of models Response plan required to contain seepage from most likely seepage scenarios

Remediation Costs Remediation Costs Seepage prevention costs Main cost issues are: Rigorous site selection Monitoring Well integrity testing Cost for site selection estimated to vary between $5m and $20m per site Biggest single cost item drilling of coring/observation well Costs vary based on data availability

Remediation Costs Costs for monitoring and seepage detection Seepage Dependent on formation EOR/Storage monitoring costs estimated to range from $48m to $78m Deep saline aquifer with high residual gas saturation and low plume travel monitoring costs estimated to range from $43m to $73m Deep saline aquifer with low residual gas saturation monitoring costs estimated to range from $49m to $80m Well bore integrity monitoring costs Dependent on depth well condition etc., Costs estimated from $12m to $18m for 10 wells and 10 logging runs per 50 years

Remediation Costs Seepage remediation costs Costs dependent of seepage event Examples of costs for source location: Cost for locating a single well could be $100k per survey Costs of running a diagnostic survey was estimated at £300k per well 3D seismic survey to identify source of leakage estimated at $100,00 per km2 Costs for well plugging typically $50k per well Costs for well remediation range from $30 to 100k per well Costs for remediation through cap rock could be $2m

Example Storage Case Example storage case used to illustrate costs of remediation Case example: 1000MWe, 50 years operation, 10 injection wells, plume extends 80 km2 Total costs for comprehensive remediation programme was $120m per site Equates to $0.45 to 0.5/t CO 2

Conclusions Costs for comprehensive remediation package for seepage is small compared to overall cost of CCS project Only adds 0.5/t CO 2 to overall costs If costs for CCS range $35 to 50/t CO 2 this equates to 1 to 1.4% of total cost