National Heritage Areas An Option for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Delta Protection Commission June 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VALUES BASED MANAGEMENT. Venice Charter Conserve historic and aesthetic values Dont reconstruct Do as little restoration or repair as possible.
Advertisements

Corridor Management Planning for Scenic Byways Transportation Conference 2006 Presentation Deborah Divine Kansas Scenic Byways Program Manager.
Implementing Service First References & Recommendations.
Rouge Park Governance Review. Rouge Park is… A major regional park in York and Durham Regions and Toronto, accessible by public transit throughout the.
National/State Scenic Byways Program Overview Frost/Stagecoach Byway route Progress on Byway Corridor Management Plan Public Visioning Forum Robert Frost.
The Creative Economy The Intersection of Arts and Business in Our Communities A project of the New Hampshire Creative Communities Network.
Welcome! Big Bend Scenic Byway Program. Goals For This Presentation - To Provide An Understanding Of: u The Scenic Highways Program: What it IS Importance.
A Green Infrastructure Strategy for Rochdale MBC.
I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor Management Plan - Committee Session February 6, 2010.
Interfacing Initiatives Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI)  Expansion of leadership and civic engagement to capitalize on innovative strategies 
TRI-REGIONAL HERITAGE TOURISM PROJECT. Project Background  Sponsors—North Carolina’s Northeast, North Carolina’s Eastern Region, and North Carolina’s.
Restoring Our Heritage. Recognizing Our Future. Lockport’s Flight of Five: Erie Canal Locks #67-71.
Sarah C. Gracey, Urban Forestry Coordinator Kentucky Division of Forestry.
I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor Management Plan Public Meetings February 23 & 24, 2011.
DATA VISUALIZATION NEEDS IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Trish Settles, AICP Principal Planner/Project.
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
Organizational Structure of Tourism
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Tourism Development Through Public-Private Partnerships – The Alabama Agri-Tourism Trail Southern Community Development Educators May 19, 2004 Tampa, FL.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Working to improve availability of plant materials for partner organizations Shannon Hatch DEVELOPMENT OF NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS FOR RIPARIAN RESTORATION.
Tourism Planning Lecture 3.
Palmetto-Peartree Preserve: Community Forestry in Eastern North Carolina Community-Owned Forests Conference Missoula, MT June 16-19, 2005 Mikki Sager,
Daniel Oppenheimer Tamarisk Coalition May 20, 2014.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Alliance of National Heritage Areas. What is the mission of a Non-Profit for non-profits. To create and enhance strategic links among the Congressionally.
CULTURAL HERITAGE TOURISM: A SUSTAINABLE STRATEGY October 27, 2010 – Sustainable Tourism Laboratory Blackstone River Valley Tourism Council, Rhode Island.
A Land Preservation Framework for the Cacapon Watershed of West Virginia Michael P. Strager Charles B. Yuill Natural Resource Analysis Center West Virginia.
Yosemite Region Entity Meeting Monday 9 January 2006.
Visitor Center Heritage Crossroads: Miles of History Heritage Highway  Designated in 2008 as a Florida Scenic Highway by Florida Department of Transportation.
Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve Regional Conservation Partnership Gathering Raising and Spending Private Dollars November 15, 2010 Tin Smith.
Blackstone Valley Prioritization Project Blackstone River-Users Conference September 18, 2012.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Program Overview Sandra Kosek-Sills PhD Ohio Lake Erie Commission.
February 2006 National Scenic Byways Program: Nominations WWW. BYWAYSRESOURCECENTER.ORG National Program processes.
Sustainable Development Innovations Fund. Fund Overview Created in October 1989 Provides financial assistance for development, implementation and promotion.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
Lake Michigan Coastal Program Coastal 101 – 2007 Edition.
BUILDING STRONG SM Northwestern Division Presented by Lori Rux Chief, Program Support Division June 11, 2009 BPA Direct Funding for Corps Hydropower Projects.
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Taunton River Wild & Scenic Study A Partnership Effort on Behalf of The Taunton River.
Planning and Sustainability Paul Farmer American Planning Association M6: Protecting the Urban Environment and Historical and Cultural Heritage.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
September 23, 2010 Overview of DWR’s Flood Management Activities Related to the Delta A Briefing to the Delta Stewardship Council 1.
Colorado Front Range Trail Corridor Plan Colorado Front Range Trail Corridor Plan.
Managing Through Partnerships Ralph Cantral NOAA’s Ocean Service September 5, 2003.
Ohio & Erie Canal Association Current Initiatives March 2011.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
The Heritage Area American Heritage Areas Partnership Program (HR 3707) (1994)
1 Office of Travel & Tourism Industries, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Organization of American States XXI Inter-American.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
CREATING A CALUMET NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. Proposed Calumet National Heritage Area ONE CONNECTED, BI-STATE REGION FRAMED BY TWO NATIONAL PARKS.
Our Mission The mission of the Mississippi River Collaborative is to promote the magnificence and diversity of the Mississippi River as a national treasured.
Our Mission... “To facilitate collaboration and partnerships through a comprehensive master plan which promotes economic growth, community development.
GALVESTON BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM A CATALYST FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION Sarah Bernhardt, Ph.D. Lower Rio Grande Valley 18 th Annual Water Quality Management.
RESOURCE POTENTIAL AND CONSERVATION VALUES. Traditional Land Use and Occupancy Archeology, Rare Features, Historic Sites Wildlife Habitat Value 2/15.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Teaching Through The Trails An Educator’s Guide to the Tennessee Civil War Trails Program.
Office of Greenways & Trails
Workshop for Interpretive Centers Mississippi River Parkway Commission
Proposed Caddo Lake National Heritage Area (CLNHA) Phase Zero
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
NHA Mission & Vision Statements
I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor
Presentation transcript:

National Heritage Areas An Option for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Delta Protection Commission June 2010

What are National Heritage Areas (NHA)? A "national heritage area" is a place designated by the United States Congress where natural, cultural, historic and recreational resources combine to form a cohesive, nationally- distinctive landscape arising from patterns of human activity shaped by geography. These areas tell nationally important stories about our nation and are representative of the national experience through both the physical features that remain and the traditions that have evolved within them. Cane River NHA John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley NH Corridor

NHA’s Combine preservation, recreation, economic development, heritage tourism, and heritage education to interpret and promote their region’s distinctive landscape. Augusta Canal NHA South Carolina National Heritage Corridor National Coal Heritage Area

Since 1984, 49 places have been designated as NHAs Examples 2) John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley NH Corridor 12) Ohio & Erie Canalway NH Corridor 13) Rivers of Steel NHA 15) Silos and Smokestacks 20) Yuma Crossing NHA 25) Mississippi Gulf Coast NHA Designated NHAs as of Source: National Park Service

Benefits of NHA Designation (Tangible) Branding of region as place of national stature Limited financial assistance from National Park Service (NPS) that provides valuable “seed” money that can help leverage other money from state, local and private sources Help to connect with other federal agencies Planning and interpretation assistance and expertise from NPS Use of NPS arrowhead symbol

Benefits of NHA Designation (Intangible) Retain/interpret the landscape for future generations Protect community identity, pride and sense of place Educational and inspirational opportunities that encourage residents and visitors to stay in a place Building of strong commitment to stewardship Offer a collaborative approach to conservation that does not compromise local control over the landscape

Economic Development Benefits of NHA Economic Impact of Heritage Tourism Spending 2005 Total of 5 Surveyed NHAs Projected Estimate for All 27 NHA Sites (based on total visitors) Heritage Area Visitors Heritage Area Visits5,534,53468,301,409 Direct and Total Effects of Heritage Area Visitor Spending Sales ($000's)$440,617$5,437,634 Personal Income ($000's)$166,521$2,055,030 Jobs9,415116,192 Value Added ($000's)$251,170$3,099,672 Total Economic Effects Sales ($000's)$689,104$8,504,204 Personal Income ($000's)$258,096$3,185,148 Jobs12,343152,324 Value Added ($000's)$406,161$5,012,413 Source: Alliance of National Heritage Areas:

NHA vs. National Park The Federal government does not impose land use controls to NHAs No federal land acquisition authority is granted with NHA designation NHAs are locally-managed designations that are coordinated by a local entity in partnership with stakeholders that work collaboratively on projects to meet stated goals NPS staff are enlisted as partners with the community in planning and implementing heritage area activities NPS is always advisory, neither makes nor carries out management decisions

NHA management entity May be a state or local agency, federal commission or private nonprofit corporation Empowered to create a management plan for the NHA, and is authorized to receive federal funds on the area’s behalf Examples: –Silos and Smokestacks NHA: Silos and Smokestacks, 501(c)(3) non-profit organization –Delaware and Lehigh NHC: Delaware and Lehigh NHC Commission, congressionally authorized commission –Yuma Crossing NHA : Yuma Crossing National Heritage Corp, 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

Management Plan Upon receiving designation, management entity and partners have three years to develop a plan and receive approval by the Secretary of the Interior Plan describes how management entity and partners will work together towards a common vision May include: interpretation/marketing plan, economic development plan, special projects, partnership development, organizational structure overview, and more

Case study #1 – Silos and Smokestacks (America’s Agricultural Heritage Partnership) Agritourism and Regional Branding

Case study #2 – Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Small town revitalization Map of Pennsylvania, showing Delaware and Lehigh NHC

NHA Criteria 1.An area has an assemblage of natural, historic, or cultural resources that together represent distinctive aspects of American heritage worthy of recognition, conservation, interpretation, and continuing use, and are best managed as such an assemblage through partnerships among public and private entities, and by combining diverse and sometimes noncontiguous resources and active communities. 2.Reflects traditions, customs, beliefs, and folklife that are a valuable part of the national story. 3.Provides outstanding opportunities to conserve natural, cultural, historic, and /or scenic features. 4.Provides outstanding recreational and educational opportunities. 5.The resources important to the identified theme or themes of the area retain a degree of integrity capable of supporting interpretation.

NHA Criteria (cont.) 6. Residents, business interests, non-profit organizations, and governments within the proposed area are involved in the planning, have developed a conceptual financial plan that outlines the roles for all participants including the federal government, and have demonstrated support for designation of the area. 7. The proposed management entity and units of government supporting the designation are willing to commit to working in partnership to develop the heritage area. 8. The proposal is consistent with continued economic activity in the area. 9. A conceptual boundary map is supported by the public. 10. The management entity proposed to plan and implement the project is described.

How is the Delta nationally significant? Natural Heritage –One of the only ‘Inverse Deltas’ in the world –Second largest estuary in U.S. –Pacific flyway stopover –Mediterranean climate, that supports anadromous fish –Inland delta in the middle of huge urban areas –Wealth of natural resources Cultural Heritage –Gold Rush Corridor –Major center for water based recreation –Multi-Cultural rural landscape –Key act of hydraulic infrastructure/engineering –Productive agricultural region which shipped products throughout the world –Innovative center for agricultural equipment invention

Natural Heritage and Natural Resources 1873 map illustrating the large size of the Delta’s watershed

Pre-1850 chart of the Sacramento River (current Rio Vista to Sacramento) for Gold Rush navigation Clamshell dredger constructing levees Gold Rush and Reclamation “Tule-Breakers,” pre-1900

Levi Painter’s farm near Courtland ca 1880 Various produce labels, The original Caterpillar, 1906 Agricultural Heritage

Netherlands route poster,1911 Netherlands route map, 1911 Delta Queen and Delta King, 1939 Recreational Paradise

Isleton’s Japantown, pre 1926 Map of Asian landholdings in Delta, circa 1920 Mainstreet Locke, 1939 Courtland’s Chinatown, circa 1920 Multicultural Rural Landscape

Completion of a Feasibility study 1.Defining the study area. 2.Public involvement strategy. 3.Determination of the region’s contribution to the national heritage and development of potential themes. 4.Natural and cultural resources inventories, integrity determinations, and affected environment data.

Completion of a Feasibility study (cont.) 5. Management alternatives and preliminary assessment of impacts. a. No action/use of existing authorities alternative. b. NHA designation. 6. Boundary delineations. 7. Heritage area administration and financial feasibility. 8. Evaluation of public support and commitments.

Potential Projects Heritage Education Regional BrandingHistoric Preservation Heritage Tour Routes AgritourismEcotourism

More Information Delta Protection Commission National Park Service Alliance of National Heritage Areas