Session Peering Protocol over SOAP I-D ( draft-ietf-drinks-spp-over-soap-01) draft-ietf-drinks-spp-over-soap-01 0 Presenter: Vikas Bhatia (On behalf of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Location Conveyance in SIP draft-ietf-sipping-location-requirements-02.
Advertisements

SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-02 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
71 th IETF meeting Experience of implementing NETCONF over SOAP ( draft-iijima-netconf-soap-implementation-06) Tomoyuki Iijima, Yoshifumi Atarashi, Hiroyasu.
XKMS Specifications Phillip Hallam-Baker. Changes Since 1.1 Cosmetic Significant.
April 23, XKMS Requirements Update Frederick Hirsch, Mike Just April 23, 2002 Goals Requirements Summary –General, Security Last Call Issues –For.
CT-KIP Magnus Nyström, RSA Security OTPS Workshop, October 2005.
OTP-ValidationService: Summary, Status, and Next Steps OTPS Workshop, February 2006.
EAP Channel Bindings Charles Clancy Katrin Hoeper IETF 76 Hiroshima, Japan November 08-13, 2009.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
11/10/031 ENRP and ASAP Updates and Issues Presenter: Qiaobing Xie November 10, 2003.
11/18/021 Endpoint Name Resolution Protocol Presenter: Qiaobing Xie November 18, 2002.
1 CPCP Hisham Khartabil XCON WG IETF 60, San Diego 2 nd August, 2004
MIF API draft-ietf-mif-api-extension-05 Dapeng Liu.
NEA Working Group IETF meeting Nov 17, 2011 IETF 82 - NEA Meeting1.
1 ADVANCED MICROSOFT WORD Lesson 15 – Creating Forms and Working with Web Documents Microsoft Office 2003: Advanced.
1 SIPREC Recording Metadata format (draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format- 01) IETF-80 SIPREC MEETING R Parthasarathi On behalf of the team Team: Paul Kyzivat,
draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-01
RTSP Substream Control Extension (IETF #83) Peiyu YUE (Roy) Huawei Technologies.
SPPF Batch DOS Considerations Jeremy Barkan Xconnect 28 March
DIME WG IETF 79 DIME WG Status & Other Stuff Thursday, November 11, 2010 Jouni Korhonen, Lionel Morand.
XCON WG IETF-73 Meeting Instant Messaging Sessions with a Centralized Conferencing (XCON) System draft-boulton-xcon-session-chat-02 Authors: Chris Boulton.
CLUE framework updates IETF 85, Atlanta. “Capture encoding” “Capture encoding” was term agreed by the list to define a specific instantiation of a media.
Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-19.txt IETF Meeting Paris - August 2005 Denis Pinkas
RTSP to Draft Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2236bis-02.txt Authors: Henning Schulzrinne, Anup Rao, Robert Lanphier, Magnus Westerlund.
Draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-0draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08 draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-09 in progress Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared.
SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
SIP working group IETF#70 Essential corrections Keith Drage.
March 2006 CAPWAP Protocol Specification Update March 2006
Draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 1 FEC framework Configuration Signaling draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt IETF 76 Rajiv Asati.
Abierman-netconf-mar07 1 NETCONF WG 68 th IETF Prague, CZ March 19, 2007.
#3: Protocol Document (draft-ietf-drinks-spprov) Presenter: Syed Ali (On behalf of the authors: Ken Cartwright, Syed Ali, Alex Mayrhofer and Jean-Francois.
#4: Transport Document ( draft-ietf-drinks-sppp-over-soap) Presenter: Syed Ali (On behalf of the author: Ken Cartwright) 0.
Real-Time Streaming Protocol draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-01.txt Magnus Westerlund.
© NOKIAMSF Paris drieft-ietf-grmp-04.PPT / 28 March, 2000/ ADo page: 1 Review of draft-ietf-gsmp-04 Avri Doria, Nokia Fiffi Hellstrand, Nortel Networks.
IETF 57 PANA WG PANA Discussion and Open Issues (draft-ietf-pana-pana-01.txt) Dan Forsberg, Yoshihiro Ohba, Basavaraj Patil, Hannes Tschofenig, Alper Yegin.
RADEXT WG IETF 81 Agenda July 25, Please join the Jabber room:
Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) IETF-92 Dallas, March 26, 2015 draft-ietf-tram-stunbis Marc Petit-Huguenin, Gonzalo Salgueiro.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt RTSP draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2396bis-10 Magnus Westerlund Co-auhtors: Henning Schulzrinne, Rob Lanphier,
Requirements and Selection Process for RADIUS Crypto-Agility December 5, 2007 David B. Nelson IETF 70 Vancouver, BC.
RFC 2716bis Wednesday, July 12, 2006 Draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-02.txt Dan Simon Bernard Aboba IETF 66, Montreal, Canada.
Diameter SIP Application
Page th IETF Vancouver, B.C., Canada Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS Greg Bernstein.
August 2001 Slide 1 Extensions to TLS Simon Blake-Wilson Certicom David Hopwood Independent Consultant Jan Mikkelsen Transactionware Magnus Nystrom RSA.
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-00.
DIME WG IETF 84 Diameter Design Guidelines draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-15 Tuesday, July 31, 2012 Lionel Morand.
Issue EAPoL-Key message generation at WTP or AC Issue 199, summarized as:...the WTP maintains the KeyRSC while the AC requires this information to.
Draft-ietf-p2psip-base-08 Cullen Jennings Bruce Lowekamp Eric Rescorla Salman Baset Henning Schulzrinne March 25, 2010.
SPPP Transport Session Peering Provisioning Protocol draft-ietf-drinks-sppp-over-soap-04.
IETF-84 EMU TEAP Updates Nancy Joseph Salowey Hao Zhou
The OASIS Feedback Process Using OASIS to Drive Improvement.
CLUE protocol CLUE design team meeting 07/10/ /10/2013.
Doc.: IEEE /2179r0 Submission July 2007 Steve Emeott, MotorolaSlide 1 Summary of Updates to MSA Overview and MKD Functionality Text Date:
Stephen Banghart Dave Waltermire
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
XCON WG IETF-64 Meeting XCON Framework Overview & Issues
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Sanjay Wadhwa Juniper Networks
draft-ietf-geopriv-lbyr-requirements-02 status update
WEB API.
Joe Clarke (presenting)
SSL Protocol Figures used in the presentation
$, $$, $$$ API testing Edition
GeneRic Autonomic Signaling Protocol draft-ietf-anima-grasp-08
STIR WG IETF-99 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-00) July, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das, and An.
TREx ESC Coordinator Training
RFC 5539 Update Status draft-badra-netconf-rfc5539bis-00
Joe Clarke (presenting)
IETF 87 DHC WG Berlin, Germany Thursday, 1 August, 2013
Interoperabilty Cipher Suites
Presentation transcript:

Session Peering Protocol over SOAP I-D ( draft-ietf-drinks-spp-over-soap-01) draft-ietf-drinks-spp-over-soap-01 0 Presenter: Vikas Bhatia (On behalf of the authors)

1 Note: This is not a new draft either! draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-00 replaced draft-ietf-drinks-sppp-over-soap-07 (Jan, 2012 )

Summary of updates in -00 and -01 Made enhancements to result messages, result codes, and to the result message XML definition. Made updates to the Security Considerations Removed reference to “TransIdType” from the Protocol document 2

Result Code related updates (1 of 2) Result Code 2001 (“Request Too Large”)is “parameterized”: – Allows the SPPF server to specify maximum requests supported in a single SPP Protocol over SOAP operation – “Request Too Large. MaxSupported:[Maximum requests supported]” – Example: “Request Too Large. MaxSupported:1000” Corrected the numbering of Result Codes: – Like 21* Result codes started with 2103, changed to start with

Result Code related updates (2 of 2) Added restriction on min and max length of message in a response from the SPPF server: – Defined a type "MsgType" to add min length (3) and max length (255) to a result’s message text Introduced enumeration "ResultCodeValType" to define all the Result Codes. As a result “ResultCodeType” definition is as follows: 4

Security Considerations section updates Updated text in ‘Security Considerations’ section: The text identifies DoS risk when the TLS server does not request a certificate from the client (As per the TLS specifications, it is optional for the TLS servers to request a certificate from the client) 5

Also… Removed “TransIdType” from the Protocol document Was already present in the Framework document 6

Next Steps Resolve open items and make updates Close to WGLC? 7