G030241-00-D LSC Changes in Preparation of High Power Operations Commissioning Meeting, May 5, 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg, Matt Evans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Advertisements

8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford 1 Length and angular control loops in LIGO Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Hanford.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
European Gravitational Observatory25/01/20061 Alignment : Hardware & Software Status Henrich Heitmann, Julien Marque with the contribution of: INFN Frascati,
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.
Matthew Evans, Ph237 April Application of Simulation to LIGO Interferometers  Who am I? »Matthew Evans, Ph.D. from Caltech on Lock Acquisition 
Higher order laser modes in gravitational wave detectors
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
1 LA electronics meeting, Cascina, Virgo alignment system overview ● Linear Alignment principle ● Optical configuration ● Present situation.
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Commissioning Report LSC Meeting, Hanover August 19, 2003 Peter Fritschel, MIT.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
Takanori Sekiguchi External Review Control and tuning of suspension 1 T. Sekiguchi KAGRA 4th External Review.
Matt Evans, LSC March 2003 (G E)1 Lock Acquisition in LIGO  Who am I? »Matt Evans »Caltech graduate  What is Lock Acquisition? »The process.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LIGO-G D Commissioning, Part II PAC 12, June 2002 Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
TCS and IFO Properties Dave Ottaway For a lot of people !!!!!! LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of.
G D LIGO Commissioning Update LSC Meeting, Nov. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg Paul Schwinberg.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
LIGO-G D Online Digital Signal Processing NSF Review, October 23, 2002 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
GEO Status and Prospects Harald Lück ILIAS / ETmeeting Cascina November 2008.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
LIGO Commissioning June 10, 2002
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Optical PLL for homodyne detection
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Commissioning Update PAC 15, Dec. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Thermal Compensation Installation at LHO
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Lock Acquisition Real and Simulated
Effect of sideband of sideband on 40m and Advanced LIGO
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Alignment Investigations towards Advanced Virgo
Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Automatic Alignment Control scheme for Advanced Virgo
Presentation transcript:

G D LSC Changes in Preparation of High Power Operations Commissioning Meeting, May 5, 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg, Matt Evans

G D LIGO I2 High power operation  First step: making it available  H1: ~5 W laser, low optical efficiency  new PMC installed, 80% transmission  Main EO modulator damaged, loses 15%, to be replaced soon  Currently 3 W into MC, maybe 60% of this at RM  10 W Laser head will need some service  L1: ~3 W laser  PMC efficiency good  EO modulators lose ~30%  Need to service laser head, diagnose modulators

G D LIGO I3 High power operation  Second step, using it  Plan: lock at ~1/10 full power, then turn up the power  Radiation pressure misalignments a real problem at full power  Remote power control  DC motor rotation stage for ½-wave plate  Installed & working on H1 (Rick & Christina)  Epics sequencer, serial port communication to motor controller  Compensating for power increase  MC: EO shutter is throttled down  IFO: Leave in acquire mode, ramp up LA Pin parameter  QPDs: dynamic range already used up by acquisition power swings Need to reduce analog whitening gain, while compensating digitally Mods: lowered transimpedance to 1 kohm, whitening gain at max, fixed analog gain at end increased from 2 to 3

G D LIGO I4 LA code compensation  Pin parameter  Power measurements (SPOB, PTRR, PTRT) are all divided by Pin  Their meaning remains the same as the power is increased: Grec/Trm  Sensing matrix elements are all multiplied by Pin  Input matrix elements (inverse of sensing matrix) are reduced proportionally to the power increase … more later  Works on H1 for a 2x power increase: 0.8 W to 1.6 W  QPD gain reallocation performed on LSC-LA_PTRR/T_SLOPE channels

G D LIGO I5 H1: 2x remote power increase Arm power gain doesn’t change SPOB does change, radiation pressure?

G D LIGO I6 QPD Signals: Present  Problems:  No proper AA filtering for ASC  Whitening filters not compensated for LSC ISC/DSC end/mid QPD signals quadrants high gain ASC LSC high/low gain logic Input filter modules analog whitening filters 16k 2k 16k

G D LIGO I7 QPD Signals: New  Input filters moved to end/mid ISC/DSC end/mid QPD signals quadrants high gain ASC LSC high/low gain logic analog whitening filters Input filter modules 16k 2k 16k

G D LIGO I8 LSC Input Matrix: Present  Matrix fixed in detection mode  No thermal heating adjustment  No power increase adjustment  Noise from power measurements in acquisition mode too high for running User Input Acquisition DetectAcquire Copy PIN NPTRX NPTRY NSPOB

G D LIGO I9 LSC Input Matrix: New  In detection mode:  Low-pass filters on measured power values  Use diagonal elements of acquisition code (mask) User Input Acquisition Copy NPTRX NPTRY NSPOB Filter Modules for Power Actual Detection Mask PIN Copy Configuration

G D LIGO I10 Mode Overlap and SPOB in the Sensing Matrix  Sensing Matrix Elements  Field amplitude  Signal gain  Local oscillator  Spatial Overlap Coefficient  Changes with thermal lensing, alignment  Estimated by input spatial overlap  Robust in simulation

G D LIGO I11 Erika’s FFT results for sideband gain