OVERVIEW VANCOUVER, FEBRUARY 2012. WHO AND WHAT IS EPR CANADA? EPR Canada has been formed by a group of like-minded individuals with extensive EPR experience.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Support for the coordination of activities TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS Context, Rationale and State of Play Presentation by Julie Sors European Commission Rotterdam,
Advertisements

Summary of Report to IATI Steering Committee, Paris 9 February 2011 Richard Manning.
Presented at the ECOSOC 2012 Development Cooperation Forum 1 st High-level Symposium Bamako, Mali 5-6 May 2011 by Timothy Lubanga, Assistant Commissioner.
Strengthening National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) in the Hemisphere, an essential element in the development of National Quality Infrastructure (NQI)
GK12 Program Sustainability and Building Partnerships Educating Private and Public Partners to HELP MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Centre of Excellence The Housing Authority Network ‘HUB’
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Overview of the Global Fund: Guiding Principles Grant Cycle / Processes & Role of Public Private Partnerships Johannesburg, South Africa Tatjana Peterson,
1 Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 820 First Street, NE Washington, DC
THE NATIONAL FOREST PROGRAMME FACILITY
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
U n i t 6 Multisectoral collaboration. © WHO, │ By the end of this unit, the trainee should be able to: explain why there is a need for multisectoral.
The Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs Aboriginal Economic Development Supports Ontario Library Association Superconference January 29, 2014.
Canada’s Drug Strategy. 2 Purpose Provide an overview of Canada’s renewed National Drug Strategy  Historical context  Impetus for change  Renewed National.
Shoppers Drug Mart: Our Approach to Government Relations Presentation to the Canadian Assistive Devices Association 19 September 2012.
Article 5 of the Energy Services Directive Edward Green.
Samuel Steel Safety Group Meeting Four November 20, 2014 Samuel Safety Systems.
Strengthening Our Collective Impact: Developing A Strategic Plan for CMHA National Conference Workshop Materials Kelowna, British Columbia September, 2011.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
IAWP Awards Training August Recognition of Excellence The IAWP awards program recognizes outstanding workforce professionals on the chapter/international.
WSSB Capacity Enhancement Workshop 1 Session 3 Contract Management Systems.
Hungarian Presidency programme and results in the field of Cohesion Policy Zsuzsanna Kondor, National Development Agency, Coordination MA 23 June 2011.
Armenia and Diaspora Armenia’s investment climate and Diaspora’s participation in development policies. Hayk Sargsyan, Johns Hopkins University.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Mission & Current Projects Community Data Webinar June 19, 2013.
Dr. David Mowat June 22, 2005 Federal, Provincial & Local Roles Surveillance of Risk Factors and Determinants of Chronic Diseases.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
The Global Fund - Proposal Process & Round 8 February 19, 2008.
1 ACLA: An Overview and 2010 Proposed Budget. Topics to be Covered Overview of ACLA Program Services Outreach Services 2009 Focus 2010 Agenda and Budget.
Process of a Bill Parliamentary Law Making – Legislative Process © The Law Bank Parliamentary Law Making Process of a bill 1.
I m p a c t Euronatur Conference Bonn, Sept 7th, 2005 impact | policy consulting simone lughofer Achieving Sustainable Rural Development through Partnership.
The Multilateral Fund and its Management Structure UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund 3-5 May 2006 Alberta, Canada Maria Nolan Chief Officer - Multilateral.
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
MCC Priorities Impact 2011 … an MCC public affairs and advocacy strategy … Prepared by Daniel H. Tessier President Presented by Jennifer Ross MCC Board.
A vehicle for improving government efficiency and governance.
Efficiency ׀ Transparency ׀ Accountability Multi-Donor Trust Fund Office Fund Management for Development Assistance UN-REDD Programme Policy Board Panama,
COMMUNITY COALITION BUILDING. Workshop Objectives  Describe effective community coalition building  What?  Why?  How?  Key challenges and success.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
SPC - Energy Program 2016 Work Program. Pacific Energy Sector Management Objective Strong leadership, good governance, effective multi-sectoral coordination.
Regional Action Plan for Sustainable Transport of Dangerous Goods along the Mekong River Final Regional Workshop, October 2014 Bangkok, Thailand.
2008 Communication “A European Agenda for Culture in a globalizing world” Published by the European Commission May 2007 Adopted by the Culture Council.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Knowledge Exchange to Policy Action The Active Healthy Kids Canada Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth Building Capacity for Use in.
WELS Scheme Independent Review. Background WELS scheme commenced in 2005 s76 of WELS Act 2005 requires an independent review after 5 years Dr Chris Guest.
Promoting Canada’s Language Industry & Stakeholder Collaboration Promoting and Supporting Canada’s Linguistic Duality This project is funded by the Government.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
HELLENIC REPUBLIC OGP initiatives: Greece Timetable of Actions OGP Greek Coordination Team Nancy Routzouni Nikoleta Charalampopoulou Ministry of Interior.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Economics of Policing Shared Forward Agenda Economics of Policing Shared Forward Agenda.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
BC SUPPORT Unit: Overview and update
NMHIMSS Meet the Board & Committees May 26th, 2016
ACCELERATINGCLEAN INNOVATION IN CANADA
Ontario Public Service (OPS) Aboriginal Procurement Pilot Initiative
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
MEDITERRANEAN PUBLIC SERVICE AWARDS (MPSA) ___________________________
Civilian Secretariat for Police
Improve Your Odds A Grant Writing Workshop
Presentation transcript:

OVERVIEW VANCOUVER, FEBRUARY 2012

WHO AND WHAT IS EPR CANADA? EPR Canada has been formed by a group of like-minded individuals with extensive EPR experience and connections across the country - Geoff Love - Jo-Anne St. Godard - Duncan Bury - Christina Seidel - Glenda Gies - Don Jardine - Georges Portelance EPR Canada is dedicated to fostering informed debate and to being a forum to advance EPR in Canada by focusing on and promoting: Leadership and innovation Best practices in policy development and program operations Defining and advancing efficient and effective program, implementation, management and harmonization

WHO IS FUNDING THE INITIATIVE AND WHAT IS THE BUDGET? Currently supported by the seven partners No government funding will be accepted Planned first year budget of approximately $20,000 Hard costs – translation, website, printing, telephone Intention of creating a post-graduate student scholarship to support questionnaire administration and evaluation

EPR QUESTIONNAIRE AND REPORT CARD EPR Canada is developing Canada’s first environmental report card of federal, provincial and territorial EPR policies and program performance Ministers will receive a questionnaire with a set of questions on EPR policies and programs in their jurisdiction Responses will be evaluated and scored by the seven EPR Canada partners Scores will indicate areas of strength and potential areas of policy and program improvement The report card is modeled on the successful report card developed and published by the Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance (CEEA)

CEEA QUESTIONNAIRE AND REPORT CARD MODEL Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance (CEEA) model Evaluation of government energy efficiency policy and programs High participation - successful co-ordinated multi- stakeholder promotion of energy efficiency

WHY IS EPR/REP CANADA SPONSORING A REPORT CARD? There is no aggregated or comparative national reporting on EPR in Canada Government legislation and actions play a key role in stimulating private sector and consumer activity in EPR program development, performance and monitoring The report card will assist in identifying best practices and enhancing the standards, effectiveness and efficiency of EPR policies and programs The report card will allow benchmarking and comparison of policies and programs and support the further development and use of EPR instruments

WHO IS THE AUDIENCE FOR THE REPORT CARD? Government officials and elected representatives Governments will be able to benchmark their performance against other jurisdictions and Will be able to identify best practices which could assist in advancing EPR in their own jurisdictions Producers, brand owners, producer responsibility organizations and industry and business associations Will have a concise national overview of EPR implementation, practice and plans Results will encourage further harmonization of programs across the country in the interests of program effectiveness and efficiency.

THE QUESTIONNAIRE Uses the OECD/CCME definition of EPR Uses weighted criteria and will include a guide on how to respond Question categories: Producer responsibility policy and action Progress on commitments to the CCME Canada-wide Action Plan for EPR Progress on other waste reduction and waste diversion commitments Program transparency and accountability Program targets, performance measurement and reporting Decision-making and approvals process Harmonization Progress on design for the environment Leadership and innovation Awareness and public outreach

WHO WILL BE EVALUATING THE QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES AND PREPARING THE REPORT CARD? The review panel will be made up of the initial seven members of EPR Canada for this first year. Additional panelists may be added in future years. Panelists will not be paid for their time to review the governments’ EPR submissions or to prepare the summary report/evaluations of the information submitted through the completed questionnaires.

QUESTIONNAIRE AND REPORT CARD TIMETABLE The questionnaire and guide explaining the questions will be ready to distribute to federal, provincial and territorial government ministers in February/March 2012 Six to eight weeks will be given to complete the questionnaire Four to six weeks will be necessary to conduct the review and prepare a summary report The first report is to be made public by the end of June EPR Canada plans over the next 5 years to prepare a regular report card on each government’s EPR activities

WILL THE RESULTS BE PUBLIC AND PUBLISHED? The results will be made public during an environment week or at some other related public event Individual, detailed government submissions will not be made public by EPR Canada A summary report, with individual jurisdiction scores, will be distributed to the media and other interested stakeholders The report will also be posted on the EPR Canada website which is currently being developed

WHAT HAPPENS IF JURISDICTIONS CHOOSE NOT TO PARTICIPATE? This is a voluntary initiative – no jurisdiction is required to participate Non-responses will however be noted in the report card In the case of the Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance, provincial authorities have found it to be in their interest to respond to the questionnaire and have used the report card to conduct an independent “check–up” of their progress against their energy efficiency goals and objectives and to measure progress relative to other jurisdictions It is anticipated that the EPR Canada initiative will similarly support best practices and can also contribute to the goal of helping to harmonize EPR programs in different parts of Canada

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Duncan Bury duncanburyconsulting.ca (613) Geoff Love routcom.com (647)