April’s School Special Education Coordinators’ Monthly Meeting April 13, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Childhood Outcomes… Who, What, Where and How
Advertisements

Erik McCormick Former OSEP Part B Data Manager September 29, 2006 Special Education Data – The Old, the New and the Huh?
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
Best Practices in IEP writing September 26, 2012.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Discipline Under the IDEA Tulsa Public Schools Special Education and Student Services Presenter: Cheryl Henry August, 2011.
An Introduction To Special Education Produced by WSPEI Funded by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
OF ECSE COMPLIANCE PRESENTATION FOR THE 2014 MO-CASE CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 23, 2014.
May 14,  IDEA Funds  Summer Reports  ESY  COSF  Discipline  Indicator 11  Table 4  2013 – 2014  Reminders  Training  Next Meeting.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Extended School Year Decision Determination Process February 3,
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
Monthly Special Education Coordinator Meeting November 13, 2012.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
SPECIAL EDUCATION 101 What Do YOU Need to Know?
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR SERVICES (ESYS) July 1, 2009 Revised 12/01/2009.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR SERVICES (ESYS) Effective July 1, 2009 Revised July, 2010.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Special Education Coordinators’ Meeting May 11, 2015.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
Special Education School Coordinator Monthly Webinar September 14, 2015.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
The New IDEA in Special Education
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
Special Education Coordinators’ Meeting June 1, 2015.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Required Services and Procedures for Students with Disabilities Presented by Scott Hall and Ty Manieri 2010 Oregon Special Education Fall Conference Eugene,
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
 CIO Training Special Education VR Reports.
Special Education School Coordinator Monthly Webinar October 12, 2015.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Appleton Area School District
SPED Coordinator’s Webinar 2/9/15
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
St. John the Baptist School System Special Education Chairperson’s Meeting September 8, 2016.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

April’s School Special Education Coordinators’ Monthly Meeting April 13, 2015

Agenda  Annual Reviews  Disciplining Students with Disabilities  Referrals  Summer Reporting Plan:  ESY  Seniors/Exiting (Table 4)  60-Day Timeline (Indicator 11)  Discipline (Table 5)  Childhood Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)  Summer Planning  Closing

Annual Review

Annual Review Agenda Annual Review Review progress toward annual goals for last 9 weeks of the IEP Determine whether these annual goals have been met Discuss Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Behavior Discuss annual goals and services (including accommodations) for next IEP Annual Review + Reevaluation Determination Review existing data for reevaluation planning portion; this will include: Review progress toward annual goals for last 9 weeks and discuss all other existing/new information Determine whether these annual goals have been met Determine whether student continues to be eligible for and need special education services Discuss Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Behavior briefly again Discuss annual goals and services (including accommodations) for next IEP

Present Level Data If you’re using CBM data to write annual goals on, make sure you’re looking at several data points and not just one measure You should have been using CBM measures to progress monitor throughout the year, so your PLPs/Findings should reflect a year’s worth of data/progress Give 3 different measures and take the average or median score For example, if you’re assessing present levels in reading fluency at the 4 th grade level, give 3 different 4 th grade passages and take the average of the 3 scores or use the median (middle) score Don’t write annual goals based on 1 data measure/data point

Disciplining Students with Disabilities Reminders

Disciplining Students with Disabilities  Students with IEPs are given 10 “free and clear” days at the beginning of the year which may be used by the school/district for OSS and that is all for the whole school year! OSS days transfer with students from school to school and district to district.  Administrators and IEP teams should consider those 10 days a barometer for program effectiveness, including behavior plan needs. As the student begins to “use up” the 10 days, IEP teams must respond to instructional and behavioral needs by calling IEP meetings, completing FBAs, writing BIPs, and making changes to IEPs or placements.  Rule of Thumb: If a student has 6 or more OSS days, an IEP meeting should be held. The administrator may contact the case manager and request the IEP team meet.

Disciplining Students with Disabilities  In more cases than not, when situations rise to our office, children have received more then 10 days out of schools suspensions without being afforded any of their procedural safeguards.  It’s imperative that each school has a procedure in place that alerts administrators to the face that the student is a child with a disability AND the number of days out of school (not providing the services of the IEP as stated by the IEP).  Check your School’s P&Ps to see how you’re supposed to be tracking OSS days.  Be familiar with your School’s Student Handbook concerning discipline, suspension, and expulsion processes.  ISS counts as OSS if the student IS NOT provided access to coursework or Special Ed. teacher support/supervision.

Disciplining Students with Disabilities  Once 10 days have been exceeded, a manifestation meeting must be held for each and every infraction/disciplinary action in which OSS is considered again.  If there is a change in placement due to a disciplinary reason, the child may be suspended again, but must receive services that will enable him to continue to participate in the general education curriculum, although in another setting, and to progress toward meeting his annual goals.  Incidents must be logged into PowerSchool in a timely fashion. Table 5 (discipline data) will once again be pulled from PS. It is critical you are coordinating with your PS person to make sure all discipline incidents are entered correctly.

Referrals

 Just a few reminders about referrals:  There is no summer cut-off for submitting referral packets  If you receive a referral at the end of the school year, you must schedule an evaluation planning meeting within a reasonable amount of time from the parent request/SIT team referral, conduct the evaluation, and determine eligibility - EVEN IF THIS MEANS CALLING STAFF BACK IN DURING THE SUMMER  Be aware of that phrase “within a reasonable time”  At this point, as a District, we have not defined what that time period should be;  The average time for districts/states that have defined this seems to be 20 school days to 30 calendar days  Please don’t make us define it for you

Summer Data Reporting

Summer Reporting Indicator 11 – 60-day timeline Includes an explanation for all students for whom the 60-day timeline was exceeded COSF – Childhood Outcome Summary Form Entry and exit data ESY Table 5 – discipline Pulled from PowerSchool Table 4 – exiting Summary of Performance

Upcoming Reporting Dates DateReportPurpose June 3ESY June 17Table 5 June 25COSF July 22Indicator 11 August 5Table 4 We do not know what the reporting dates will be yet. The above dates are tentative and based on last year’s reporting calendar; please keep checking the data calendar on the BookShelf for benchmark/feedback dates.

 These data are required reporting from the schools to the District and then from the District to the state and then from the state to the feds.  Make sure you’ve discussed with your school leader how this will happen.  There must be someone at the school who is knowledgeable about these data, can answer questions, and can make corrections upon request.

Indicator 11

Indicator 11 – 60-day Timeline At this point we have no idea how the OSES will pull these data – “we are still developing the report” We are trying to create some sort of compliance check report to help with this Start looking at Enrich to make sure dates are correct Date signed consent to evaluate was received Date evaluation was completed (all new info gathered) Date eligibility was determined It may be helpful (not required) to keep a spreadsheet Student’s name Date signed consent to evaluation received Date evaluation completed Date eligibility determined

COSF

Summer Reporting - COSF  Percent of preschool children (age 3 – 5) with IEPs who demonstrate improved outcomes in the following areas:outcomes in the following areas A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships); B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy; C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

COSF Don’t forget that every child that is served by us for at least 6 months before they turn 6 years old must have an entrance and exit COSF competed. Within the next few weeks, I’ll follow-up with specific schools about kids who meet the above profiles so you can begin verifying the data. If you have a child who is preschool aged and was served for at least 6 months prior to turning 6, please check out the COSF resources found on the BookShelf under Resources.

ESY

ESY Determination  Eligibility must be discussed annually  Make this decision at AR regardless of when AR occurs  Not necessarily in “May” What must be considered: 1)REGRESSION/RECOUPMENT 2)CRITICAL POINT IN INSTRUCTION/EMERGING SKILLS 3)INTERFERING BEHAVIOR 4)TRANSITION 5)SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND what data do you have to support these?

ESY  ESY  For any student who will be receiving ESY services, begin gathering that information; you will need to send it to the District toward the end of May.  The purpose is for potential additional funding for ESY services (100% goes back to the school – historically it’s around $ per student).  Kendall will send out the reporting template soon.

ESY Guidelines  Information is on the BookShelf

Table 5 – Discipline

Summer Reporting – Table 5  Table 5 (Discipline)  This is a required Federal/State report (must be accurate).  Kendall will send out the template.  It was due last year on June 13,  The data are pulled from PS. Your PS person has/will receive information on incident reports from Zee. Make sure you are following your school’s P&P as to how you’re tracking this information.

Exiting: Seniors with and without a diploma and those who Age-Out.

Seniors – Exiting  Please see “SCPCSD Seniors who are Exiting” file on the BookShelf for specific end of the year instructions.  You must complete a Summary of Performance for these students.

Reevaluations for Seniors: College/SAT  OSEP is clear to say that LEAs do not need to conduct full reevaluations on the basis of meeting a requirement for another agency (see Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 156 p & OSEP Letter to Moffett 2009). Therefore, DO NOT agree to conduct further testing or submit a referral packet to the district on the basis of fulfilling such a request. The only reason to conduct further testing as part of a reevaluation is when the team needs additional data to determine (§ ): 1) whether a child continues to have a disability, 2) the educational needs of the child, 3) the present levels of academic achievement and related developmental needs of the child, 4) whether the child continues to need special education and related services, and/or 5) whether any additions or modifications to the special education and related services are needed to enable the child to meet the measurable annual goals set out in the IEP of the child and to participate, as appropriate, in the general education curriculum.

Aging Out  At the conclusion of the school year of when the child will turn 21 PRIOR to September 1 of the next school year, the child can be considered “aged-out.”  This group of students may be eligible for ESY services.  These students must have a Summary of Performance.

Non-Graduates  For students who have not received a “state certificate” or “diploma” AND are still eligible to return for another school year, an IEP must be in place and ready for the student on the first day of school.  Even if they have told you “I’m not returning.”

Summer Planning

 Start the conversation now with your school leader about how summer data reporting will be handled.  Trainings will begin in late July for new and returning coordinators.

In Closing....

Next Meeting  May 11, 10:00 optional PD  Working with outside service providers (Mariann Carter, Jamie Hubbard, Brittany McCutcheon)  May 11, 2:30  Topics:  Summer Reporting Templates (ESY/Table 5)  COSF Lists  Ind 11/Table 4  Seniors/Closing Records