Doc.: IEEE 802.19-06/0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks Notice:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0029r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks, one.
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission July 2014 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRISlide 1 Status of ISM Bands Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE Jan07-RR-TAG_Liaison_Report.ppt _RR-TAG_802.22_Liaison_Report_Jan07 Submission January 2007 Peter Murray,
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0009r1 Submission March 2008 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 March 2008 Opening Report Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0020r2 Submission July 2008 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview Notice: This document has been prepared.
Sg-whitespace-09/0029r1 Submission February 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenarios Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0022r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 May 2006 Opening Report Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0003r0 Submission January 2006 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Multiple Access and Effects of Aggregation Notice: This document.
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
March 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2013
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Call for Contribution to IG CUB
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
SG CUB Tentative Timeline
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TV White Space Coexistence Plan
November Opening Report
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
Contribution on Location Privacy
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
Decision on SG Formation
November Opening Report
TVWS Coexistence Study Group Extension Request
On Coexistence Mechanisms
San Francisco Liaison Report
July Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2009
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
July 2014 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2014
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
Reference Use Cases Date: Authors: September 2010
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Decision on SG Formation
September Opening Report
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
Addressing White Spaces Across all of IEEE 802
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
Coexistence Reconfiguration Parameters
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
November Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
November 2012 Opening Report
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
September 2012 Opening Report
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Motion for Study Group on TV White Space Coexistence
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
November 2014 Opening Report
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 2 Introduction The purpose of this presentation is to stimulate a discussion of various Coexistence Scenarios for the Recommended Practice

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 3 Coexistence Scenario 1: Frequency Static Unlicensed Wireless Networks Two wireless networks Frequency static Either co-channel or adjacent channel Interference dominated by the close proximity of one device in each network

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 4 Coexistence Scenario 1: Frequency Static Unlicensed Wireless Networks

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 5 Coexistence Scenario 2: Frequency Static & FHSS Unlicensed Wireless Networks Same as coexistence scenario 1 just one system is a FHSS system (e.g. BT)

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 6 Coexistence Scenario 3: Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) A primary user in a portion of the band Unlicensed system uses spectrum sensing and dynamic frequency selection (DFS) to identify occupied and vacant channels Examples –WRAN in operating unused TV channels –WLAN operating in 5 GHz band and avoiding radar system

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 7 Coexistence Scenario 3: Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS)

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 8 Coexistence Scenario 4: Clear Channel Assessment Two unlicensed wireless networks sharing a common frequency band One or both of the systems use some form of clear channel assessment to test whether the channel is occupied or not before using the channel –Regular operation –The 20/40 MHz problem –The y problem with non systems in the band –WLAN/WPAN attempting to share the frequency band

doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 9 More Examples Fill in more examples based on TAG discussion