What matters? Assessing conditions in the Alpha Academic Services programs to enhance educational effectiveness, student engagement and retention at ACU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of Academic Leadership in Student Success August 21, 2012 Deans and Department Chairs` Dialogue Southern Utah University Charles Schroeder, Consultant.
Advertisements

1 Student Engagement Retreat: The Sophomore Student November 18, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
Dr. Bettina Shuford, Associate Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs Dr. Amy Gauthier, Senior Associate Director, Housing and Residential Education High Impact.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement Users’ Workshop November 4, 2011 Seton Hall Law School 1.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Student Success Factors Faculty In-Service Program Tuesday, August 25.
Creating a Culture of Collaboration: Collecting Community Engagement Data Susan Connery, Director of the Feinstein Community Service Center Christopher.
College of Basic and Applied Sciences Advising/Retention Report.
Cabrillo College Emerging Scholars Institute Draft Proposal Update Spring 2008.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Supporting Student Success in the First Year. Supporting Student Success in First Year New students - life perspectives Changing student profiles What.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
An Equal Opportunity University Third Annual Meeting of the Provost’s Committee on Undergraduate Student Success October 22, 2009.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Rebecca Ryan Associate Director Cross-College Advising Service University of Wisconsin-Madison With special.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Vice President for Student Affairs Georgia Regents University Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation of Success Transfer.
 Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.
Student Learning Outcomes: Interpretations, Validity, and Factor Development Krista Soria and Laura Gorny This project was funded by the Undergraduate.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
In this session, participants will learn what assessment of student engagement has shown St. Louis Community College (STLCC) about transfer success and.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Fostering Student Success at SCSU Melanie Guentzel Peg Furshong Matt Trombley Victoria Williams Work cited: Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H., Whitt,
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
University Senate Meeting January 25, General Issues Required to report on 14 Standards, including all the Federal Requirements Core requirements:
Key Issues in Recruiting and Retaining Underrepresented Students in STEM Pat Marsteller Director, Hughes Science Initiatives Director, Emory Center for.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
Focusing on the Co-Curriculum Key to Competitiveness Conference Orlando, Florida June 28, 2006 George L. Mehaffy 1.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Chelan Community College Completion Project By: Ardith, Megan, & Michelle.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation
Presentation transcript:

What matters? Assessing conditions in the Alpha Academic Services programs to enhance educational effectiveness, student engagement and retention at ACU Book 1—Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success Book 2—Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter by George D. Kuh, J. Kinzie, J.H. Schuh and, E. Whitt and Associates. (2005). By James Scudder Individual, Group and Organizational Interventions

Presentation Overview Guest Speaker Book title and its origin (ISES from SSC from DEEP) NSSE Book 2 -- SSC Primary Book -- ISES Why I chose to work with Alpha Academic Services Video’s –Testimonials –Programs that support students through holistic education Conclusion

Guest Speaker Director of Alpha Academic Services—Scott Self –Tell us about Alpha Academic ServicesTell us about Alpha Academic Services Q & A Please consider this information while I speak about these books.

Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success (ISES) Referred to as ISES, this book is a template for institutions to use with the book Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter (SSC) (Kuh et. al., 2005). ISES can be used to: –examine what institutions or programs are doing, –how well they are doing it, and –where they falling short in creating the conditions for student success.

Origins of ISES and SSC SSC was written as a result of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). The NSSE Institute formed a study over a two year period and called it the DEEP project (Documenting Effective Educational Practices). The DEEP committee use the results from the NSSE to find themes that help define effectiveness of institutions. 20 DEEP schools—11 public + 9 private What is NSSE? Does anyone recall their experience with NSSE?

OIRA and ACU’s 2007 NSSE Results There is a Student Survey There is a Faculty Survey Where is the Staff Survey—If there were how would NSSE results change? If they created one who would participate in it?

Book 2—Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter Based on NSSE, “what does an educationally effective college look like in the 21 st century?” SSC p xvi Is it the buildings? Is it the parking lot? Is it the students? Is it the faculty and staff? Is it the hospitality? Is it the mission? Is it all of the above and more? The answer to this question will be explained by this presentation.

Part One: Student engagement is the key to student success Based on NSSE results –What are students saying about themselves? –What are faculty saying about students? A blue print for becoming a high performing institution –Does one size fit all?

Group Work--Part One: Chapter One How do ACU students experience the five clusters? Chapter One: The five clusters of NSSE 1.Academic challenge: 2.Active and collaborative learning: 3.Student-faculty interaction: 4.Enriching educational experiences: 5.Supportive campus environment:

Part One: Chapter One Chapter One: The five clusters of NSSE--students have the opportunity to: 1.Academic challenge: Preparing for class, reading and writing, develop critical thinking skills, institutionally supportive environment for academics, etc. 2.Active and collaborative learning: Class participation, making presentations, in and out of class group projects, tutoring or teaching other students, etc. 3.Student-faculty interaction: Discussing grades or assignments, career goals, discussing assignments outside of class, etc. 4.Enriching educational experiences: Talk with students with different religious beliefs, political opinions, values, race, ethnicity, use of technology, internships, etc. 5.Supportive campus environment: Help students succeed academically, cope with nonacademic responsibilities, thrive socially, student-peer and student-faculty relations, etc.

Part Two: Chapters Two-Seven six overarching features found to be common in the 20 DEEP schools Chapters Two - Four. Chapter 2: A “living” mission and “lived” educational philosophy Specific to the institution, mission--espoused mission vs. enacted mission, philosophy-- compass for mission Who knows the mission? SSS at FSU is mentioned p Chapter 3: An unshakeable focus on student learning emphasis on holistic student learning is broad and deep in policies and practice Hiring of faculty and staff Make time for students - LC, Facebook, etc. Learning and teaching styles - CTE, etc Work with students they have Chapter 4: Environments adapted for educational enrichment Where they are and who they are Local community Strong attachments Interior and Exterior spaces--encourage participation

Part Two: Chapters Two-Seven six overarching features found to be common in the 20 DEEP schools Chapter 5: Clearly marked pathways to student success Guideposts: first year programs advising sessions, capstone courses Publications: describe student experience Resources and services Standards need support: TRiO, Writing Center Chapter 6: An improvement oriented ethos Does performance match potential? Does not settle, always improving Innovative Systematically collecting information to improve Improvement and innovation grounded in its mission Chapter 7: Shared responsibility for educational quality and student success All programs, all offices, all units Leaders clearly and consistently articulate the core operating values and principles All “model the way” All are supportive educators Operate across “silos” Model and hold each other accountable Hospitality

Group Work--Part Three: Chapters Eight - Twelve Effective Practices: Where Does This Happen at ACU? (programs and policies) Chapter Eight - Twelve: The five clusters of NSSE 1.Academic challenge: Inform students of expectations, provide support, celebrate scholarship, etc. 2.Active and collaborative learning: Teach and encourage collaboration, peer teaching and tutoring, service learning, etc. 3.Student-faculty interaction: Opportunities for research, first-year seminars and capstone experiences requiring regular contact with faculty, use of technology, etc. 4.Enriching educational experiences: Value of diversity, activities that promote cross-cultural understanding, civic engagement, and self-reflection, study abroad, internships and real-life situations, etc. 5.Supportive campus environment: Transition programs, early-warning systems, advising, mentoring, learning support resources, peer support, faculty and staff, administrators etc.

Group Work--Part Three: Chapters Eight - Twelve Effective Practices: What are some of the supportive programs that allow ACU to be effective in encouraging student engagement? (programs and/or policies) Chapter One: The five clusters of NSSE 1.Academic challenge: Classroom, residence halls, Alpha, etc. 2.Active and collaborative learning: Labs, residence halls, learning communities, Alpha, LC, WC, etc. 3.Student-faculty interaction: Offices, labs, service projects, etc. 4.Enriching educational experiences: office multicultural enrichment, residence halls, study abroad, Alpha, etc. 5.Supportive campus environment: SOS, student success, career planning, counseling, Alpha, etc.

VIDEOS Who are our students, Alpha’s and therefore ACU’s?

Semester project I plan to use this template to help Alpha answer the following questions: 1.Considering the population Alpha Academic Services serves on the ACU campus, does it contribute to it’s graduation rates? 2.To What extent does Alpha challenge and support students and foster their learning and personal development? 3.How does Alpha know? 4.What might Alpha do differently to improve student learning and persistence on the ACU campus? I anticipate that I will find more questions to answer as I work on this project.

Why focus on student success? As the pressure to become premiere, “the pool of prospective undergraduates is wider, deeper, and more diverse than ever, and four-fifths of high school graduates need some form of postsecondary education to acquire the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to address increasingly complex social, economic, and political issues” (Kuh et. al., 2005, p 3). Kuh and his associates state that Adelman, (2004), and Pascarella &Terenzini, (2005), suggest that the best predictors of whether a student will graduate are academic preparation and motivation. As universities and colleges seek to become more “selective - recruiting the best and the brightest students, it is not an approach that expands access or addresses the human capital needs of individuals or society” (Kuh et. at., 2005, p 3). Last argument. We speak of cultural diversity on campus, I believe diverse backgrounds educate their peers about the other side of the tracks, intentionally and unintentionally. Given the opportunity for a college education, and through conditions mention in this presentation, they bloom and contribute to a better society.

Sources Book 1—Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success Book 2—Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter By George D. Kuh,J. Kinzie, J.H. Schuh and, E. Whitt and Associates. (2005).