Presentation to the Providence School Board January 14, 2013 Federal Budget Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
M AXIMIZING F LEXIBILITY IN THE A DMINISTRATION OF F EDERAL G RANTS July 17, 2013.
PROGRAMS OF STUDY NONTRADITIONAL CAREERS AND THE FUTURE OF CTE MIMI LUFKIN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PARTNERSHIPS IN EQUITY An Equity.
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Presentation to the Providence School Board: June 18, Federal Budget: Preliminary Overview.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
District Improvement Plan August 10, 2015.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
GRANTS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW Presented by: Darrell M. Haley Grants Financial Management Office Business Operations Department Division of Business.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): Overview and Implications for New Jersey Peter Shulman & Jill Hulnick Deputy Commissioner.
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Title III Fiscal Requirements and ESSA changes
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
BUDGET TOWN HALL MEETING
Brand Message.
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Title 1 Annual parent Meeting
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Supports for ESSA Implementation
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to the Providence School Board January 14, 2013 Federal Budget Overview

FY12-13 Context for Federal Budget PPSD VISION AND MISSION VISION: The Providence Public School District will be a national leader in educating urban youth. MISSION: The Providence Public School District will prepare all students to succeed in the nation’s colleges and universities, and in their chosen professions.

FY12-13 Context for Federal Budget PPSD STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESS Engaged Students and Families. -Provide all students and families with access to excellent schools and prepare all students for success in their post-secondary endeavors. Highly Effective Educators. -Promote high expectations and support and support the growth and development of teachers, leaders, and staff. Student-Centered Instruction. -Implement a rigorous and engaging curriculum and provide rich learning opportunities at all grade levels and in all content areas. Systems that Work. -Build, refine, and create systems that support high-quality teaching and learning. Collaborative Community. -Foster rich and meaningful partnerships with members of district community promoting a shared investment in Providence’s youth.

Federal Budget as Percentage of PPSD Funds

FY13-14: Challenges Federal budget expected to be lower next year than this year  Funding for federal programs is determined by using the most recent population and poverty counts of children residing in each jurisdiction, as determined by the by U.S. Census.  The amount of funding each district receives is influenced by the change in the poverty level in each district as compared to the change in poverty levels of the entire nation; thus, a rise in poverty levels in non-urban school districts would result in a reduction in the amount of funding in urban areas as the same amount of national funding must be shared with a larger number of districts.  Funding notification from RIDE typically occurs in March or April of each year Fourteen (14) more schools identified as being in need of intervention Staffing: Over reliance on federal funding for administrative positions Sequestration: The automatic across-the-board cuts for most federal programs and activities have been delayed for two months  The mini-deal between Congress and the Administration resolves many of the tax portions of the Fiscal Cliff, but delays the spending cut portions of the Fiscal Cliff for another two months.  8.2% projected cuts in education across all titled funds, but delayed to take effect until the FY13-14 year.

“Supplement, Not Supplant” What does “Supplement, Not Supplant” mean? federal funds must enhance or increase the level of funding which is normally available from state or local sources; federal funds must not replace state and local funds.

Federal Funding Sources – CRP Funding Source Purpose FY12 Allocations FY13 AllocationsChange from ‘12 Title I Improving the academic achievement of disadvantaged students $ 22,076,259 $ 20,749,365 $ (1,326,894) Title II Teacher Quality/Class Size $ 3,650,626 $ 3,564,925 $ (85,701) Title III Limited English Proficient $ 889,356 $ 1,011,374 $ 122,018 IDEASpecial Education $ 6,665,400 $ 6,463,952 $(201,448) IDEA Preschool Special Education $ 207,196 $ 205,457 $ (1,739) TOTAL: $33,488,837 $ 31,995,073 $ (1,493,764) Note: Roughly $700K go to private school services

Federal funds can be used to: Federal funds cannot be used to: Fund “supplementary” programs; Fund “supplementary” materials and staff; and Fund programs that specifically support students with the greatest academic need. Federal funds should be used to carry out activities in the School Improvement Plan (SIP) Federal funds cannot be used to: Carry out activities that are required by State law, regulations or union contracts; Replace or rehire teaching positions or local other activities that have been cut; or Purchase “core” materials or services for students and classrooms; Use of Federal Funds

Title I Required Reserves Funds Previously Reserved for Choice/Supplemental Education Services – 20% of total allocation (Note: The U.S. Department of Education approved Rhode Island’s request for flexibility under NCLB; the 20% set aside must be used to support district improvement strategies on the needs of schools identified as Priority, Focus, or Warning schools ). Professional Development – 10% for districts/schools in need of improvement Parental Involvement – not less than 1%, 95% of the 1% must be distributed to schools Private School Services – sufficient for the provision of equitable services as compared to Providence students, to include parental involvement services Neglected/Delinquent Youth – as necessary to provide comparable services; PSD reserves $15K for additional services to students living in neglected facilities Homeless Services – not required, however PSD sets aside approx. $10K-$15K to provide additional services to support students experiencing homelessness

Focus of the FY13 CRP Implementation of key district strategies and initiatives to create dramatic positive improvement in student outcomes: I. Curriculum, Instruction & Assessment o Rigorous and relevant curricula aligned to performance standards for K-12 instruction o Transition to Common Core in English language arts o Research-based instructional programs, strategies, practices and tools o Comprehensive Assessment System which supports screening, progress monitoring, benchmarking, and end-of-course assessments of student learning across time II. Student Supports and Services o Multi-tiered Support System providing Academic and Social/Emotional programs and interventions o Programs to support English Language Learners o Virtual Credit Recovery and Learning Recovery o Transition Supports and Programs III. Aligned and Differentiated Professional Development o Comprehensive, ongoing training aligned to district initiatives and targeted school-based needs o Educator evaluation supports o Master Schedule Process Improvement Partnership IV. School Intervention and Innovation Initiatives o Lead partners and EMOs provide direct support and oversight of clusters of schools V. Expanded Learning Opportunities o Investing in innovations that promote in-school and out-of-school learning opportunities

Federal Funding Sources – Other Allocations Funding SourcePurposeFY12 AllocationsFY13 Allocation Perkins to develop more fully the academic, career, and technical skills of secondary and postsecondary students who elect to enroll in CTE programs $ 1,357,084 $ 1,193,198 SIG 1003(a) to provide support to schools that have missed Adequate Yearly Progress by providing resources to help schools overcome barriers to improving academic performance $ 1,309,200.00$1,817,500 SIG 1003 (g) – Cohort 1 to provide public school districts with additional funds and resources to assist their persistently lowest-achieving schools $ 3,972,909.99*$3,680,040 SIG 1003(g) – Cohort 2 $ 1,101,406.00**$1,101,406 RTTT Supports state and district initiatives in the following areas: curriculum and instruction, instructional management system, educator evaluation, human capital management, and school transformation $ 18,363,446 ($9,311,282 is the direct allocation to the district covering 4 year grant period) * Budget submitted; awaiting final approval **Awaiting final verification from RIDE

Overview of All Federal Funding