Threats to validity in intervention studies Potential problems Issues to consider in planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda Group Hypotheses Validity of Inferences from Research Inferences and Errors Types of Validity Threats to Validity.
Advertisements

Questions What is the relationship between ‘research designs’ and ‘research strategies’? Which method of experiments, within subjects or between subjects.
Evaluation Procedures
Defining Characteristics
Research designs and methods
Inadequate Designs and Design Criteria
GROUP-LEVEL DESIGNS Chapter 9.
Internal Threats to Validity
CHAPTER 8, experiments.
Research Design and Validity Threats
Research Problems.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS Criteria for Experiments
Who are the participants? Creating a Quality Sample 47:269: Research Methods I Dr. Leonard March 22, 2010.
1 Exploring Quasi-Experiments Lab 5: May 9, 2008 Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and.
Lecture 10 Psyc 300A. Types of Experiments Between-Subjects (or Between- Participants) Design –Different subjects are assigned to each level of the IV.
Hypotheses & Research Design
Questions What is the best way to avoid order effects while doing within subjects design? We talked about people becoming more depressed during a treatment.
Group Discussion Describe the similarities and differences between experiments , non-experiments , and quasi-experiments. Actions for Describe the similarities.
CHAPTER CHAPTER 7 Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research.
Quasi-Experimental Designs Whenever it is not possible to establish cause-and-effect relations because there is not complete control over the variables.
Experimental Research
Experimental Design 264a Marketing Research. Criteria for Establishing a Causal Relationship Concomitant variation Temporal variation Control over other.
EVALUATING YOUR RESEARCH DESIGN EDRS 5305 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & STATISTICS.
Experimental Research Take some action and observe its effects Take some action and observe its effects Extension of natural science to social science.
Chapter 8 Experimental Research
Experimental Design The Gold Standard?.
The following lecture has been approved for University Undergraduate Students This lecture may contain information, ideas, concepts and discursive anecdotes.
Selecting an Appropriate Design for the Evaluation
Research Tools and Techniques
Research and Evaluation Center Jeffrey A. Butts John Jay College of Criminal Justice City University of New York August 7, 2012 How Researchers Generate.
Research Methods for Counselors COUN 597 University of Saint Joseph Class # 5 Copyright © 2015 by R. Halstead. All rights reserved.
Group Discussion Explain the difference between assignment bias and selection bias. Which one is a threat to internal validity and which is a threat to.
V ALIDITY IN Q UALITATIVE R ESEARCH. V ALIDITY How accurate are the conclusions you make based on your data analysis? A matter of degree Non-reification.
ECON ECON Health Economic Policy Lab Kem P. Krueger, Pharm.D., Ph.D. Anne Alexander, M.S., Ph.D. University of Wyoming.
Group Quantitative Designs First, let us consider how one chooses a design. There is no easy formula for choice of design. The choice of a design should.
Experimental Design Presented By: Amber Atwater & Charlott Livingston.
Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design.
By: Valerie Passalacqua Alana Goldstein Gloren Brown.
1 Experimental Research Cause + Effect Manipulation Control.
Research methods and statistics.  Internal validity is concerned about the causal-effect relationship in a study ◦ Can observed changes be attributed.
Research Methods ContentArea Researchable Questions ResearchDesign MeasurementMethods Sampling DataCollection StatisticalAnalysisReportWriting ?
Research in Communicative Disorders1 Research Design & Measurement Considerations (chap 3) Group Research Design Single Subject Design External Validity.
Threats to Validity. overview of threats to validity confounding variables faulty manipulation loose procedures order effects experimenter effects Hawthorne.
Experimental Research
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 5 Validity in Experimental Research.
Ch 9 Internal and External Validity. Validity  The quality of the instruments used in the research study  Will the reader believe what they are readying.
1 Module 3 Designs. 2 Family Health Project: Exercise Review Discuss the Family Health Case and these questions. Consider how gender issues influence.
Experimental & Quasi-Experimental Designs Dr. Guerette.
 The basic components of experiments are: 1) taking action 2) observing the consequence of that action  Experimental model is most closely linked to.
Journalism 614: Experimental Methods Experimental Research  Take some action and observe its effects –Extension of natural science to social science.
CHAPTER 8 EXPERIMENTS.
Research Design: Causal Studies l Quick Review: Three general forms of quantitative research studies –Descriptive: Describes a situation –Relational :
Chapter 18 Experimental and Quasi- experimental Research.
Can you hear me now? Keeping threats to validity from muffling assessment messages Maureen Donohue-Smith, Ph.D., RN Elmira College.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Internal Validity Questions
Experimental Research
Experiments Why would a double-blind experiment be used?
Clinical Studies Continuum
Chapter 8 Experimental Design The nature of an experimental design
Experiments: Part 3.
The Nonexperimental and Quasi-Experimental Strategies
Internal Validity - The extent to which all explanations for changes in the DV between conditions have been eliminated -- other than the IV. ie(7a)
External Validity.
Experiments: Part 3.
Experiments: Part 3.
Chapter 18: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Experimental Research
Experimental Research
Within-Subjects Experiments
Presentation transcript:

Threats to validity in intervention studies Potential problems Issues to consider in planning

Threats to Internal validity Threats to External validity Problems we might encounter in this particular study. Problems that might limit the generalizability of the results An important distinction Credited to Campbell & Stanley (1963)

Threats to Internal validity Outside events (History) Attrition Maturation Selection Practice (testing) Instrumentation Regression

Outside events (History) Problems with issues that happen out in the real world News events The “Sesame Street” example Control groups can help deal with this

Attrition Drop outs A big issue in longitudinal studies College studies are a classic example Differential attrition –Can make new programs look good –Can make new programs look bad Not always a problem in short-term

Maturation Normal development may occur while the new treatment is being studied An important issue with young children Comparison groups can help

Selection effects In comparative studies How are people “selected” for the treatment and non- treatment conditions? –Volunteers? –Intact groups? What “biases” might be present?

Practice effects Can occur with tests Also a potential problem with interviews Observations Other situations? Can be tricky to control

Instrumentation Changes in the “instruments” Different tests Different questions (in interviews or questionnaires) Different interviewers Different observers Different scoring systems Different raters

Regression to the mean Regression artifacts High scores tend to be “not quite as high” Low scores tend to be “not quite so low” Only an issue in special circumstances Can have important effects –The “Head Start” example

Threats to External validity Limited samples Special arrangements Expectancy effects Sensitization Multiple treatments