LIGO-G050069-00-D ETM STRUCTURAL DESIGN SUMMARY FEA OF PROPOSED ETM STRUCTURE ANSYS Workbench (ANSYS University Advanced) version 9.0 LIGO-G050187-00-Z.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
Advertisements

Advanced LIGO UK G K 1 Blade committee notes Justin Greenhalgh with Norna Robertson, Calum Torrie, Mike Plissi, Caroline Cantley LSC, March 2004.
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
Acoustic properties of a prototype for a hollow spherical gravitational antenna (^) Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso dell’INFN (*) Laboratori Nazionali.
24-Oct-07G ADVANCED LIGO SUSPENSIONS LSC-Virgo Meeting, Hannover 22 nd - 25 th October 2007 Suspensions/Isolation Working Group Parallel Sessions.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Update: the View from Caltech Phil Willems LIGO/Caltech Livingston LSC Meeting March 17-20, 2003.
MICE RF Cavity Design and Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
LIGO-G D 1 Coupled Dynamics of Payload Structures on the Seismically Isolated Optics Table Dennis Coyne, LIGO Caltech SWG Meeting, 2 Sep 2005.
Slide HALLD TAGGER MAGNET STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Presented by William Crahen 6/10/09 Pole Plate analysis Vacuum chamber analysis Vacuum chamber tie rods and.
Nut, washer and locking device removed from model.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Mass Savings and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Preparation for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) 100 gram Case Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold]
Status of the 201 MHz Cavity and Coupling Coil Module Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Video Conference March 10, 2004.
Review of HAM Suspension Designs for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson HAM Isolation Requirements Review Caltech, July 11th 2005.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO1 Finite Element Modeling Requirements Dennis Coyne Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication.
FEA History: Lower Structure Table 1: Early results (from ANSYS Worbench 8.0)
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO: Detector Organization, Responsibilities, Authority and Decision Tree: SUS and COC Dennis Coyne, Carol Wilkinson, David.
April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews.
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
LSC Meeting August ‘04 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) Program Update: LSC Meeting, Hanford Dave Ottaway for the LASTI team August.
Advanced LIGO UK G K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G K.
EMDM Monolithic suspension development Activity plan Piero Rapagnani Detector meeting
Ansys Workbench 6 Case Study with Plate and Shell Analyses ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis.
SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR ADVANCED LIGO: Update on GEO Activities Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Louisiana,
Conceptual Design for Advanced LIGO Suspensions Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University for the GEO suspension team +contribution.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
Update on Advanced LIGO suspension design and technology development towards the quad noise prototype Caroline A. Cantley for Advanced LIGO Suspension.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth Mechanical precision and vibration behavior of mechanical supports Johan Wickström GFA-ATK.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
Advanced LIGO Suspension Status Caroline A. Cantley Advanced LIGO Suspension Team / University of Glasgow for the GEO600 Group LSC Meeting, LLO March 2004.
Daniel Clark Dan DeBra Victor Herrera Brian Lantz Joe Hansen Jeff Kissel Michael Meyer Brian O’Reilly Celine Ramet & Staff at LLO Anamaria Effler Michael.
G Consideration of HAM SAS for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker LIGO Excomm 30 April 07.
SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR ADVANCED LIGO: Update on GEO Activities Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Hanford.
Moment Connection Requires Bolts Outside the Flanges
Advanced LIGO UK G K 1 Some recent work on blade performance Caroline Cantley, Justin Greenhalgh, Mike Plissi, Norna Robertson, Calum Torrie,
Update on Suspension Activities for Advanced LIGO Caroline A. Cantley University of Glasgow for the GEO600 Group LSC Meeting, Livingston, March 2003 (Technical.
Prototype Quadruple Pendulum Update – Part 1 Norna Robertson and Calum Torrie University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Hanford,
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 1. Introduction Both cavities will be supported by the fundamental power coupler and a number of blade flexures.
LIGO- G050xxx -00-D Advanced LIGO SUS Installation into BSC Chambers: Mechanical Fixtures Dennis Coyne (with input from many) G May 4 th 2005.
Type IV Cryomodule (T4CM) Vibration Analysis Update January 23, 2007 Mike McGee 3 rd T4CM Meeting at INFN-Milan.
1 Assembly and installation of TM0 in the Lab Assembly and installation of TM0 in the Lab F. Rossi September.
Chapter Nine Bolt Pretension.
LIGO-G R Inverted pendulum studies for seismic attenuation Ilaria Taurasi University of Sannio at Benevento, Italy September 20, 2005 Supervisor.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
LHC Collimators Phase 2 - Visit to Plansee 28th August Materials for Phase II collimators.
Workshop 3 Various Workshops for SOLSH190 Solid-Shell Element
AMS TRD GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM BOX_S Mechanical Structure Corrado Gargiulo* Robert Becker** *INFN Roma1 **MIT CERN, July AMS TRD GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM.
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
Status of report on chapter 6: Warm cryostat mechanical calculation PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN Page 1 CERN, May 20th 2015.
AMS Tracker Meeting17/10/05 Eric Perrin (GE) Tracker mechanics at Uni -Ge Safety issues Assembly Still to be made.
LIGO-G D Design Requirements Larry Jones Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication Bidder’s Conference April.
Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 15/02/16 (final update of placement  )
Frequency analysis of quad noise prototype Justin Greenhalgh summarising work of Tim Hayler and others in T K LSC Meeting, LHO, March 2006 LIGO-G K.
Overview of monolithic suspension work for Advanced LIGO Mariëlle van Veggel, Mark Barton, Tim Bodiya, Alan Cumming, Liam Cunningham, Giles Hammond, Gregg.
Correspondence with HuntVac. Jan 13 Sven, Thanks for the call. Just to recap (and so I don’t lose my notes): · Redesign AL box vessels. · QTY.
First Wall Panel - Overview
BM&N STS ladders assembly in VLHEP
Panda Solenoid Content Interface Box Cold Mass Layout Cooling Lines
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 04/22/2016
Ladder Assembly All tools and jigs produced Glue dispensing works
Neutrino v2.1 structural assessment
Mechanical Loss of Vacuum Compatible Epoxies for Tuned Mass Dampers
FEA Analysis of the LHCB Velo RF foil
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Advanced LIGO Quad Prototype Janeen Romie LSC, March 2004
Dump Core Studied Design Solutions
Yoshiyuki Obuchi NAOJ / Mechanical Engineering shop Dec. 29th 2016
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
Fixed Support Design & Testing
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G D ETM STRUCTURAL DESIGN SUMMARY FEA OF PROPOSED ETM STRUCTURE ANSYS Workbench (ANSYS University Advanced) version 9.0 LIGO-G Z Information also covered in LIGO-T DRAFT March 22 nd 2005 Calum Torrie, Tim Hayler, Russell Jones, Mike Perreur-Lloyd, Janeen Romie, Dennis Coyne, Caroline Cantley, Norna Robertson, Larry Jones, Mike Gerfen and Justin Greenhalgh

LIGO-G D Layout of the Controls prototype 710 mm x 550mm 440 mm x 440 mm 2005 mm

LIGO-G D REQUIREMENTS The first resonance limits, including structural and non structural mass, and assuming a perfectly rigid support: > 200 Hz first resonance for the upper structure > 100 Hz Lower structure > 100 Hz combined upper and lower structure Initially confirmed by FEA with a 15% contingency, later confirmed by prototype testing.

LIGO-G D MASS BUDGET UPPER TOP MASS, 22 kg x 2 (S)= 44 kg » Tablecloth etc … (NS)15 kg + 25 % C= 19 kg » Top Stage (NS)24 kg + 25 % C= 30 kg » Ring (NS)5 kg % C= 10 kg » UPPER STRUCTURE 37 kg + 25 % C= 46 kg LOWER » UI MASS, 22 kg x 2 (S)= 44 kg » PEN MASSES, 40 jg x 2 (S)= 80 kg » TEST MASSES, 40 kg * 2 (S)= 80 kg » CLAMPING etc, % C (NS) = 29 kg removable ? » Ring (NS) 5 kg + 100%= 10 kg » Lower Structure (NS),23 kg + 25% C= 29 kg TOTAL= 422 kg OVERALL NON-SUSPENDED MASS inc. STRUCTURE ~ 140 kg Actual Non-suspended mass inc. Structure~ 133 kg Cf. 418 kg from LIGO-T030137

LIGO-G D Designing for vacuum Full penetration welds, avoids trapped volumes. No mating surface areas that trap residue from cleaning process. Welding method TIG, full penetration welds requires back gassing technique, labour intensive. Looking into possibility of dip brazing. Nitronic 60 thread inserts to inhibit wear, dust and galling. All holes to be through holes, LIGO-T D Grade of Aluminium 6061-T6 is acceptable with respect to out- gassing requirements, reference LIGO vacuum compatible materials list, LIGO-E B-E.

LIGO-G D Beams and Shells Upper structure example Box structure, 1 st mode 90 Hz. Box structure with plates, 1 st mode 118 Hz. Truss structure, 1 st mode 240 Hz

LIGO-G D ETM STRUCTURES CAD MODELS

LIGO-G D Solid model FEA Clamping, Meshing, Convergence & Comparison CLAMPING » Surface fixed235 Hz and 252 Hz » point locations215 Hz and 228 Hz » 4 corners188 Hz and 202 Hz MESH » in general basic mesh with ~ 50,000 elements. Had to use ~ 120,000 elements for overall structure. Assumes complete connectivity, welded structure. Defeaturing the model such as rounds and holes. CONVERGENCE Increase number of elements until solution converges » work in process to cover this using reference LIGO-T COMPARISON Solid model with beams and shells model ALGOR and ANSYS Comparative analysis

LIGO-G D UPPER STRUCTURE GOAL: Hz + 15% contingency NOTE: - Comparative analysis done in ALGOR! Mass = 84 kg; # of elements = 26,000; clamping at 14 points, same as the overall structure. 14 fixed supports around the ledge. 1 st mode = 214 Hz2 nd mode = 217 Hz

LIGO-G D LOWER STRUCTURE # of elements = 45,000 Clamping method, fixed support on ring surface. 1 st mode = 130 Hz 2 nd mode = 131 Hz Mass = 50 kg GOAL: Hz + 15% contingency NOTE: - Comparative analysis done in ALGOR!

LIGO-G D Overall Structure Modeling Tying together the Upper and Lower structure models we have a structure below the requirement of the mass budget with a 1 st resonance of 85 Hz. Model Notes Mass = 133 kg Nodes = 115,000 Elements = 57,000 1 st Mode = 85 Hz (long.) 2 nd Mode = 94 Hz (trans.) 3 rd Mode = 144 Hz (tors.) Fixed at 14 points around the top of the structure

LIGO-G D Potential Improvements By adding more stiffening members to both the Upper and Lower Structure we have been able to increase the first mode to above 100Hz, however we now are over the mass budget requirement. Model Notes Mass = 140 kg Nodes = 125,000 Elements = 62, st Mode = 103 Hz (long.) 2 nd Mode = 108 Hz (trans.) 3 rd Mode = 178 Hz (tors.) Fixed at 14 points around the top of the structure Plates Added X-Brace Added Lower Structure Stiffeners

LIGO-G D Future Plans TWO STRUCTURES CONTROLS PROTOTYPE for CALTECH and MIT. Both will be made by Caltech Machine shop. Piece parts being made at CALTECH now for the upper structure. Lower structure will be in the CALTECH Machine shop by the end of the month. RESONANCE TESTS at STANFORD - Stanford transfer function tests will be done with the Seismic technology demonstrator.

LIGO-G D History: Other Examples

LIGO-G D

LOWER STRUCTURE - JAN GOAL: Hz + 15% contingency NOTE: - Comparative analysis done in ALGOR! # of nodes = 127,000 Fixed Support 1 st mode = 146 Hz 2 nd mode 157 Hz # of elements (for comparison only!) Transverse Longitudinal Mass= 44 kg

LIGO-G D OVERALL STRUCTURE - JAN GOAL: Hz + 15% contingency Mass 121 kg f1 = 99 Hz f2 = 111 Hz f3 = 177 Hz # of nodes = 124,000 # of elements = 62,021 Clamped at 14 fixed points

LIGO-G D OVERALL STRUCTURE - FEB GOAL: Hz + 15% contingency Latest Model Mass = 133 kg Nodes = 115,000 Elements = 57,000 1 st Mode = 85 Hz (long.) 2 nd Mode = 94 Hz (trans.) 3 rd Mode = 144 Hz (tors.)