Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development Phone: 800-857-9362 x93830 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PDMP & HITI IG Development Workgroup Session August 14, 2014.
Advertisements

Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Public Health Reporting Initiative January 11, 2012.
Report Writing Three phases of report writing Exploratory phase (MAPS)
Harmonization Opportunities Russell Leftwich. Past Harmonization Efforts Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) – IHE, Health Story, HITSP 32, HL7 – 3,000 ballot comments.
The BIM Project Execution Planning Procedure
Public Health Reporting Initiative June 13, 2012.
Public Health Reporting Initiative – Stage 3 Sprint.
Public Health Reporting Initiative October 3, 2012.
Clinical Oncology Patient Transfer Summary Ballot Development Spring Ballot Clinical Oncology Treatment Plan and Summary, Release 1 Ballot for May 2013.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Electronic Determination of Coverage (eDoC) Home Health User Story February 4, 2015.
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
Overview of Interoperability Standards Advisory Steve Posnack Director of Office of Standards and Technology, ONC 1.
ONC Standard and Interoperability (S&I) Public Health Reporting Initiative (PHRI) Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH; CDC ONC S&I PHRI Co-Lead November 8, 2012.
Transitions of Care Initiative Companion Guide to Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Automate Blue Button Initiative Content Workgroup Meeting November 19, 2012.
EMR Data Portability Setting the Stage for Interoperability May 5, 2008 By: Harley Rodin & Ed Chang.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development Phone: x
GE 121 – Engineering Design Engineering Design GE121 Reporting the Outcome Lecture 7A.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 15, 2011.
Data Segmentation for Privacy Agenda All-hands Workgroup Meeting May 9, 2012.
ToC Use Case Components Lightning Overview Presented to LCC WG December 1,
Public Health Reporting Initiative April 4, 2012.
HIT Standards Committee S&I and CDA – Update and Discussion November 16 th, 2011 Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
EDOS Workgroup Update May 21, 2013 Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
PDMP & HITI IG Development Workgroup Session August 21, 2014.
S&I Integration with NIEM (DRAFT) Standards Development Support June 8, 2011.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development 1.
Data Provenance Community Meeting November 6, 2014.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
S&I PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTING INITIATIVE: DEVELOPING OF A TEAMING APPROACH S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, Co-Lead September,
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 1, 2011.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) eDoC eClinical Templates on FHIR using Structured Data Capture Use Case May 13, 2015.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting November 5 th, 2014.
Data Segmentation for Privacy November 16 th, 2011.
Lab Results Interface Validation Suite WG July 28, 2011.
Requirement Engineering. Recap Elaboration Behavioral Modeling State Diagram Sequence Diagram Negotiation.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) LCC All Hands Meeting April 4,
Public Health Reporting Initiative October 31, 2012.
Immunizaton Content Profile IHE Educational Workshop 2008 IHE Patient Care Coordination Alean Kirnak Software Partners LLC.
Data Provenance Community Meeting May 15 th, 2014.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)
Agenda for Wed, 10/12/11 4-5pm ET 4:00-4:05 Welcome & Intro, John Stinn 4:05-4:10 Update from ONC, Riki Merrick 4:10-4:35 PH Reporting Standardization.
Standard Operating Procedures Definition: A detailed, written instructions to achieve uniformity of the performance of a specific function.
Public Health Reporting Initiative June 27, 2012.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 29, 2011.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Electronic Determination of Coverage Harmonization August 14, 2013.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Public Health Reporting Initiative November 14, 2012 Dial in: ; #
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday, April 22, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, May 23, 2013.
PDMP & HITI Solution Planning Workgroup Session June 26, 2014.
Public Health Reporting Initiative July 25, 2012.
PIX/PDQ – Today and Tomorrow Vassil Peytchev Epic.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) eDoC eClinical Templates on FHIR using Structured Data Capture Use Case May 27, 2015.
Public Health Reporting Initiative September 19, 2012.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, July 11, 2013.
CCD and CCR Executive Summary Jacob Reider, MD Medical Director, Allscripts.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Domain Site Visit Team Orientation Office of Quality Performance and Accreditation.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Author of Record L2 Harmonization March 26, 2014.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting July 18, 2011.
Report Writing Three phases of report writing Exploratory phase (MAPS)
Policy & Procedure Writing
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Systems Architecture & Design Lecture 3 Architecture Frameworks
US Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI): Data Provenance IG
Presentation transcript:

Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development Phone: x

Agenda New Member Introductions Implementation Guide Development: Project Plan Implementation Guide Table of Contents Next Steps Additional Questions?

Suggested Ground Rules Everyone may speak ID your name & user story (report type) Listen carefully Read assigned work and minutes before each meeting Limit “back-pedalling” to critical issues Yield when it is “good enough”- do not let perfection threaten good Seek consensus quickly; let moderator test consensus If consensus fails, Tier 2 steps back to see if consensus can procede for this first version of the specification Concerns about process? Immediately bring to Foldy’s attention –

Implementation Guide Development Goal: Develop implementation guidance for the common core data elements using both 2.x and CDA in parallel Sequential approach to finalizing common core data elements and reviewing implementation guidance ToC and process: 8/30 meeting 1 st set of data elements: 9/6 meeting 2 nd set of data elements: 9/13 meeting 3 rd set of data elements: 9/20 meeting Outstanding issues & finalization: 9/27 meeting Final draft review: 10/4 meeting Data Harmonization Finalize common core objects (e.g., “Patient Information”) and associated elements Technical Team Create implementation guidance in 2.x and CDA for finalized objects Develop introductory and explanatory sections of the Implementation Guide(s) Sprint Team Review and comment on the implementation guidance Accept the final Implementation Guide(s)

Implementation Guide ToC Developed two preliminary tables of content to outline what is included in a 2.x guide and what is included in a CDA guide As the implementation guidance is written and reviewed, the table of contents may change to accommodate discussions/requirements out of the sprint group The Public Health Reporting Implementation guide will draw from existing implementation guidance for public health reporting (e.g., Cancer, Immunization, etc.)

ToC-CDA 1.Introduction6 1.1.Purpose6 1.2.Audience Requisite Knowledge6 1.3.Scope6 1.4.Summary of Key Technical Decisions PHRI User Story Development Data Harmonization Profile - Approach to Core Common and Extended Use of CDA Document Standards Conformance to this Guide6 1.5.Sequence Diagram7 1.6.Actors and Roles7 1.7.Key Technical Decisions Data Harmonization Profile Overview Exchange Specification Conformance to this Guide7 1.8.Organization of this Guide Conventions Used in this Implementation Guide Element Attributes Key Words8 2.Document Specifications8 2.1.Header8 3.Section Specifications8 3.1.Allergy8 3.2.Diagnosis8 3.3.Employer Information8 3.4.Encounter8 3.5.Facility8 3.6.Immunization (Vaccination)8 3.7.Medication8 3.8.Order8 3.9.Patient Contact Information Patient Information Procedure Provider Information Report Result Social History Specimen Vital Sign Indicators9 4.Field Level Implementation Specification9 5.Additional Implementation Guidance9 Appendix A: Reference Documents10 Appendix B: Definitions and Acronyms11 Appendix C: Summary of Data Element Optionality Data Element Optionality Examples of NULL Flavors Entity Optionality12 Appendix D: Recommended Value Sets and Vocabulary Summary13

ToC 2x 1.Introduction6 1.1.Purpose6 1.2.Audience Requisite Knowledge7 1.3.Scope7 1.4.Summary of Key Technical Decisions PHRI User Story Development Data Harmonization Profile - Approach to Core Common and Extended Use of HL7 2.x Messaging Standards Conformance to this Guide7 1.5.Organization of this Guide Conventions Used in this Implementation Guide Key Words8 2.Public Health Reporting Specification – HL7 Segments8 2.1.Adverse Event9 2.2.Allergy9 2.3.Diagnosis9 2.4.Employer Information9 2.5.Encounter9 2.6.Facility9 2.7.Family History9 2.8.Immunization9 2.9.Medication Order Patient Contact Information Patient Information Procedure Provider Information Result Social History Specimen Vital Sign Indicators10 3.Public Health Reporting Specification – HL7 Data Fields10 4.Defining the HL7 MSH Segment11 5.Public Health Reporting Specifications – HL7 2.x Messaging Example – Public Health Core Report11 6.Public Health Reporting Development Resources12 7.Additional Implementation Guidance12 Appendix A: Reference Documents13 Appendix B: Requirements Traceability Matrix13 Appendix B: Definitions and Acronyms14 Appendix C: Summary of Data Element Conformance Optionality Examples of NULL Flavors15 Appendix D: Recommended Value Sets and Vocabulary Summary 16 8.IG Compliance Matrix – Internal Only16

Example Purpose (2.x guide) The purpose and value of this implementation guide document for the PHRI initiative. In the purpose section, it will be important to note why we are taking the technical approach that was taken in PHRI in relation to defining the core common, and why we will be creating implementation guides for both CDA and HL7 2.x messaging. The Public Health Reporting Specification – HL7 2.x Messaging is designed to provide a catalog of segments to be used in generating public health reports, as a series of messaging profiles for use by public health stakeholders. This approach supports multiple objectives: 1.Maintenance: Any subsequent change to any segments or fields that are used in public health reports will be made in a single source which then gets republished and made available to the public health community 2.Translation: This specification can the natural home for mapping tables from key public health reporting data elements (the core common) - the mapping tables would be built into the structure of the message 3.Familiarity: those familiar with either this guide or the CDA guide can, by contact, become familiar with the other, lessening the stress of decisions on which way to go. 4.Issues of incompatibility can be addressed in one location, so that all public health reports using HL7 2.x messaging standards can draw from a single source of changes

Questions to Consider As you review sections of the Implementation Guide, keep in mind: “Does the implementation format chosen make sense? I.e. When we describe what a procedures section will look like in a public health report, is it usable to an implementer?” As we move towards elaborating report type specifications, which report types can work towards 2.x and CDA guides? Leveraging the common core and then developing report type specific data elements to create implementation guidance

Questions / Discussion? Wiki Page Or click “Implementation Guide” button from any PHRI wiki page Will post presentations, meeting minutes, “homework”, and documents for review Additional Questions? Contact Lindsay Brown 10