Clinical Decision Support Systems Paula Coe MSN, RN, NEA-BC NUR 705 Informatics and Technology for Improving Outcomes in Advanced Practice Nursing Dr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patient Engagement: Begins with Patient- and Family- Centered Care Bernard Roberson, MSM, BA, HSC Administrative Director Patient and Family Centered Care.
Advertisements

Canadian Health Outcomes for Better Information and Care
Presented by [Insert name of presenter] [Insert title] [Insert LHD/SHN name] Month 2014 PD2014_030 Using Resuscitation Plans in End of Life Decisions.
PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE
1 Palliative Care and Shared Decision-Making HOW TO BECOME AN INFORMED HEALTHCARE DECISION MAKER.
In this section think about….  What qualifications would be required for each of the HELP roles?  Describe the job descriptions for each of these roles.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues Marian Ford Erin Gonzales November 2, 2010.
EFFECTIVE DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION
Health Literacy Perspective of a Hospital Clinician and Educator Health Literacy Workshop Sydney, November 2014 Professor Imogen Mitchell Senior Staff.
Overview of Nursing Informatics
1 Chapter 8 Subjective Probability. 2 Chapter 8, Subjective Probability Learning Objectives: Uncertainty and public policy Subjective probability-assessment.
Happy semester with best wishes from all nursing staff Dr Naiema Gaber
Value of Library and Information Services in Patient Care Study Executive Summary Talbot Research Library Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nurse Revalidation.
Nursing Process & Critical Thinking By: Omaimah Ali Qadhi MSN, RN, BSN King Saud University/School of Nursing.
Foundation of Nursing Documentation in nursing
Health Promotion Model
DR EBTISSAM AL-MADI Consumer Informatics, nursing informatics, public health informatics.
Evaluation and Policy in Transforming Nursing
Welcome to my presentation on Health Literacy in the Community By Sharon Herring.
Documenting Fairness and Equal Opportunity November 18, 2008.
Nursing Process Unit III NURS 2210 Nancy Pares, RN, MSN Metro Community College.
N222Y Health Information Technology Module: Improving Quality in Healthcare and Patient Centered Care Looking to the Future of Health IT.
CHAPTER 11 Episodes, Contexts, and Intercultural Interactions
EPISODES, CONTEXTS, AND INTERCULTURAL INTERACTIONS
National Asthma Educator Examination National Asthma Educator Examination.
DUCS and RATS INTEGRIS Health.
SCHEN SCC-CSI MUSC Walter Limehouse MD MA MUSC Emergency Medicine.
Approach and Key Components. The Goal of Cities for Life: To help community groups and primary care providers create an environment that facilitates and.
Individuals with Lower Literacy Levels: Accessing and Navigating Healthcare Herbert, H. 1, Adams, J. 1, Lowe, W. 1, Leuddeke, J Faculty of Health.
Tracy Tidwell, RN, MSN, CPNP
The Culture of Healthcare Nursing Care Processes Lecture a This material (Comp2_Unit6a) was developed by Oregon Health and Science University, funded by.
Randomized controlled trial to evaluate a focused communication intervention to reduce length of stay for critically ill children in a pediatric intensive.
Monthly Journal article review: Vimmi Kang PGY 2
N222Y Health Information Technology Module: Improving Quality in Healthcare and Patient Centered Care Looking to the Future of Health IT.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
Co-ordination of clinical handover: a contingency approach Manda Broekhuis and Tanja Lips University of Groningen, University Hospital Groningen The Netherlands.
Chapter 17 Documenting, Reporting, and Conferring.
Basic Nursing: Foundations of Skills & Concepts Chapter 9
Communicating the value of the work and the role of caregiver is essential. A caring team works together to promote harmony and healing among themselves.
Nursing Informatics NI.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
Communications Skills Dr. Alex Alexander. Course Introduction Why Communications Now?
Older People’s Services The Single Assessment Process.
Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Using Outcomes and other Assessment Tools to Improve Quality Quality Improvement.
Learning Outcomes Discuss current trends and issues in health care and nursing. Describe the essential elements of quality and safety in nursing and their.
DELEGATION DELEGATION Doing It Right Our Objectives To delegate patient care task safely & appropriately To understand laws & regulations affecting.
VII. COLLABORATION/DELEGA TION A. DEFINED UNIT two: STRATEGIES for PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
Documentation and Reporting
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 39 The Advanced Practice.
Overview of Palliative Care Suzann Bonzo, MD. The Greatest Barrier  The greatest barrier to end of life care is Clinicians  Due to the lack of confidence.
Chapter 4 Nursing Process and Critical Thinking Copyright © 2014, 2009 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLINICAL HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM
EFFECTIVE DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION
CRITICALLY APPRAISING EVIDENCE Lisa Broughton, PhD, RN, CCRN.
Research Problems, Purposes, & Hypotheses The Pennsylvania State University College of Nursing Nursing 200W.
Clinical Quality Improvement: Achieving BP Control
Creating a Positive Learning Environment
Research Problems, Purposes, & Hypotheses
Improving Communication with Families in the ICU
The Nursing Process and Pharmacology Jeanelle F. Jimenez RN, BSN, CCRN
Using Unfolding Case Studies to Teach the QSEN Competencies
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues
Maxim Healthcare Services
Kathy Clodfelter, MSN, MBA, RN, NE-BC
Effects Of Bedside Interdisciplinary Team Rounds
Concepts of Nursing NUR 212
Optum’s Role in Mycare Ohio
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Decision Support Systems Paula Coe MSN, RN, NEA-BC NUR 705 Informatics and Technology for Improving Outcomes in Advanced Practice Nursing Dr. Charlotte Seckman Weber, S. (2007) A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

Objectives  Explain study design and methods  Discuss grounded theory reflections of APN’s  Describe clinical decision support systems and technology  Explore themes derived from interviews  Implications for advanced practice nurses

Background  23 english-speaking, nationally certified APN’s (13-CNS and 10-NP’s)  Urban Medical Centers, Midwest, USA  Qualitative research method with semi structured interview  23 individual (1:1) interviews, approximately 1 hour  19 questions with interview guide  Free time to relate and discuss and relate stories  Pattern and use of clinical decision system in their practice

Clinical decision making systems  Interactive computer based system intended to identify and solve problems and make decisions.  Assist physicians and other healthcare professionals with decision making tasks at the point of care:  Diagnose  Treat  Link health observations with health knowledge  To influence health choices by clinicians for improved health care and patient outcomes

Can you describe any clinical decision making systems that are currently being used in your area?

APACHE III Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation  Measures the severity of disease for adult patients admitted to intensive care units  Point score is calculated from 12 routine physiological measurements such as:  blood pressure, temperature, heart rate  During the first 24 hours after admission, information about previous health status, and some information obtained at admission  Unit standard of practice: completion on admission and every 24 hours in critical care

Purpose of the Study  Grounded theory to reflect the experiences of advanced practice nurses (APN’s) working as critical care (CC) NP’s, CNS using clinical decision making system  How CC APN’s use the APACHE III system?  Degree of system utilization  Factors that enhance/detract from system utilization  Decisions appropriately assisted through technology use  Indicate the utility of system use in healthcare  Enable designers to create systems to be used and benefit all types

Core variable of system use  Forecasting decision outcomes  Voluntary process employed to forecast the outcomes of patient care decisions in critical care prior to actual decision making  Four user constructs identified  Categories described  Relationships identified

Forecasting Decision Outcomes  System learning experiences  Understanding system technology*  Create inferences from system data  Compare system derived data  Levels of trust in data

Subjects understanding of system technology  Positive responses  Clinical signs = system data  Increased clinical experience  Older age  Educated about the technology  Beyond current scope of immediate decisions  Chances of survival  Integrated data into clinical decision making  Negative responses  Less clinical experience  Newer APN’s  Data entry experiences  Patient needs and wants to be considered  Family and support system input  “No need to predict patients response before it occurs”

How do you feel about using a computerized decision support tool to assist you in making decisions about patient care?

Inferences from system data  Participants derived beliefs and values associated with system use, based on style of learning and understanding  Positive responses associated with: Comparing Applying Forecasting  Negative responses associated with: Decreased use of system Data entry only no use at all

Comparing Data  Clinicians observed the correlation to actual vs predicted events  System predicted mortality then clinicians allowed re- evaluation and questioning of decision making  Use data for including in Plan of Care  Collaboration with MD’s  Trust = Use

Trusting Data  Verifying data entry before “believing” data and system predictions  Double checking RN data entry  Decision to share system data with patients and family members  RN and MD developed rapport  Understanding patient preferences  Patient/Family request for objective data  Inappropriate use by third party payors

Factors influencing decision making satisfaction  Technical knowledge of how and why the system is to be used  Patient acuity level  # of times patient experiences aligned with professional clinical judgment  Lack of computer skills/ease of use  Classroom and hands-on experiences

Describe your feelings related to sharing system data with patient and families?

Decision Making  Confirm or substantiate APN clinical judgments  Life sustaining treatments or withdrawal  Level of Care aggressiveness  Transfer out/in to ICU  Mortality  Sharing data with family members  As specifically requested  Aids in objective data and decision making for family in difficult situations  Situations of uncertainty  Ethical Decisions

Summary  Ability to forecast decision outcomes prior to making decisions  Medical treatment  Family members with objective data  Experiences impacting use of the system  Positive experiences led to increased use  Trust  Education

Please share your views about using a clinical decision making system to make decisions about patient care?