Lead in Candy FDA Overview Michael E. Kashtock, Ph.D. U. S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hayward Water System Public Health Goal Report Alex Ameri, Deputy Director of Public Works Utilities Division Department of Public Works.
Advertisements

FDA Import Operations Overview Border Port Operations and Enforcement Vince Iacono, Compliance Officer U.S. Food and Drug Administration Southwest Import.
Atypical Actives PDA-FDA Conference March 9-10, 2011 David R. Schoneker
INC Report to the NANC April 26, 2000 Shawn Murphy INC Moderator.
FDA Efforts: Trans Fat and Salt Julie Moss, PhD, RD Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Office of Nutrition, Labeling.
POULTRY BRINE INJECTION DAFF AND DTI PRESENTATION Dr. NTSHABELE DIRECTOR: FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY.
1 FDA DRAFT GUIDANCE ON CLINICAL TRIAL DATA MONTORING COMMITTEES Susan S. Ellenberg, Ph.D. Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Center for Biologics.
INFLUENCE OF CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON NEW FOOD PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
FDA’s Policy for Evaluating Bioengineered Foods Jeanette Glover Glew Food and Drug Administration Center For Food Safety and Applied Nutrition September,
Food Safety and Inspection Service 1.  In 1993, a small team was tasked to identify information that would be included in a safe handling instruction.
The Role of Biotechnology in a Sustainable Food Supply Section 3 : Risk Assessment Peggy G. Lemaux, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
1 The FDA and Animal Drug Compounding Neal Bataller, DVM FDA/Center for Veterinary Medicine AAVPT 14 th Biennial Symposium, May 16-17, 2005, Rockville,
Classification of HLA Devices FDA Introduction & Background Sheryl A. Kochman CBER/OBRR/DBA.
1 ACPS November 15, Update Nancy B. Sager, Associate Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation & Research Food and.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
The Changing Food Environment The Role and Activities of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue The Changing Food Environment.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) RECALLS.  21 CFR 7.40 provides guidance on the policy, procedures, and industry responsibilities for recalls. 
Cellular Products for Cardiac Diseases Dwaine Rieves, MD Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA Perspective on:
CPSC Lead Program: Regulations, Guidance, and Outreach Frank J. Nava U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission January 26, 2006 These comments are those.
Chapter 24 Consumer Protection and Global Product Safety.
Modernization of Health Canada Food Frameworks Foundations for Change Presentation to the Canadian Health Food Association June
National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) Sector Specific Plan (SSP) AFDO Annual Meeting June 7, 2005 LeeAnne Jackson, Ph.D. Center for Food Safety.
Update on the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act Mike Freiberg & Joelle Lester National Association of Chronic Disease Directors General.
Recycled Plastics in Contact with Food: FDA’s Policy Kristina E. Paquette, Ph.D. U.S. FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Office of Premarket.
Regulation and Labeling Food Technology Ch 26. Regulation and Labeling The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the United States Dept of Agriculture.
NS 440 LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT IN FOOD PRODUCTION SPRING YOUNTS DAHL, MS PHD INSTRUCTOR Unit 5: Policy Considerations in Food Regulation.
Andrew Staniford Commercial Manager GETTING REGULATION BACK ON TRACK Sept 2003.
Community Development Department ULDC CHAPTER 4 AMENDMENT to allow COTTAGE FOOD AS HOME OCCUPATION.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
FDA’s Draft LDT Framework & Personalized Medicine Update
Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United.
1 FDA’s Framework for Reviewing Regulations Leslie Kux Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy U.S. Food and Drug Administration March 10, 2011.
Public Meeting – Product Tracing Systems for Food Washington, D.C. December 9-10, Product Tracing Challenges: FDA Perspective Ellen F. Morrison.
Framing the Issue: FDA Perspective Product Tracing Sherri A. McGarry Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration.
Trans Fat – a case for legislation? Trans Fat – a case for legislation? Jens Therkel Jensen Deputy Head of Nutrition Division, Danish Veterinary & Food.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Community Development Department ULDC CHAPTER 4 AMENDMENT to allow COTTAGE FOOD AS HOME OCCUPATION.
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
Copyright FDA Inspections: Where Do Things Go Wrong? Diana Naser RN, MS, CCRP Executive Director Clinical Research Administration Clinical Research.
NSR and Title V Activities WESTAR Business Meeting May 2005.
Competency-Development Project 08-October MDIC 2 What is the Competency-Development Project? ‏ Purpose: The purpose of this project is to improve.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Regulatory Agencies. Students Will: Be able to identify and describe regulatory agencies in order to analyze the effects they have on the safety of the.
Enforcement Litigation and Compliance Washington, DC December 9-10, 2015 Compliance Central with FDA Center Compliance Directors (Part I) Michael Roosevelt,
5.4 Notes  comparison shopping – accessing information, comparing products, evaluating their benefits, and choosing products that offer the best value.
FDA job description  Regulates about 25% of all consumer purchases  Mission summary: protect and advance public health  Products: food, cosmetics, drugs,
Update: AUL Guidance Revisions Summary of Comments June 23, 2011 Peggy Shaw Workgroup Chair.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Background and Overview of the FSIS Plan to Address Today’s Issues Daniel Engeljohn,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS AND HUMAN SERVICESEVALUATION and RESEARCH AND HUMAN SERVICES EVALUATION and RESEARCH Update on OCTGT Guidance.
GRAS List and Delaney Clause. 2 GRAS List Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) List 1958 Food additives that have a long history of common usage in food.
Evaluating Your Nutritional Supplement – Are You Buying The Right Vitamins?
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 11 ISSUES FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION: E. coli O157:H7 DANIEL ENGELJOHN, Ph.D. Deputy.
Guidance Development Merton V. Smith, Ph.D., J.D. Director International Programs and Product Standards Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA.
Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition: Update
Grade A Dairy Equivalence
Federal Regulation of Business
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Karen Proud, President Consumer Health Products Canada
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
What Is VQIP? FDA required to establish a program to provide for the expedited review of food imported by voluntary participants. Eligibility is limited.
Status of Exceptional Events Implementation Guidance
DRAFT ISO 10007:2017 Revision Overview Quality management – Guidelines for configuration management ISO/TC176 TG 01.
Optimisation in Operational Radiological Protection
Presentation transcript:

Lead in Candy FDA Overview Michael E. Kashtock, Ph.D. U. S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

Early history of the problem In 1994 the state of California found ppm levels of lead in a powdered Mexican candy that had migrated from the wrapper. Findings were f/u to an EBLL investigation. In 1994 the state of California found ppm levels of lead in a powdered Mexican candy that had migrated from the wrapper. Findings were f/u to an EBLL investigation. CA and FDA tested many other Mexican candy products at that time looking for candy contamination from lead ink used on wrappers CA and FDA tested many other Mexican candy products at that time looking for candy contamination from lead ink used on wrappers

Early history of the problem (cont’d) More candy with lead ink on wrappers was found, but none in which the ink (lead) migrated into the food More candy with lead ink on wrappers was found, but none in which the ink (lead) migrated into the food Testing was showing higher levels of lead than expected in the candy proper, 0.05 vs. 0.2 ppm Testing was showing higher levels of lead than expected in the candy proper, 0.05 vs. 0.2 ppm Ultimately we learned that unwashed chili used as an ingredient was the principal source of lead Ultimately we learned that unwashed chili used as an ingredient was the principal source of lead FDA issued 1995 “policy letter” addressing lead in candy and use of lead ink on candy wrappers FDA issued 1995 “policy letter” addressing lead in candy and use of lead ink on candy wrappers

Current Policy Lead from wrapper - FDA will take regulatory action against any candy product with lead based ink on the wrapper if the ink migrates into the candy (1995 letter) Lead from wrapper - FDA will take regulatory action against any candy product with lead based ink on the wrapper if the ink migrates into the candy (1995 letter) Non-wrapper lead - FDA will consider taking regulatory action against any candy product containing 0.5 ppm, or more lead (1995 letter to industry) Non-wrapper lead - FDA will consider taking regulatory action against any candy product containing 0.5 ppm, or more lead (1995 letter to industry) In 2004 FDA revised the 1995 policy to state that it would consider regulatory action if a labeled serving of candy contained 10 or more micrograms of lead. In 2004 FDA revised the 1995 policy to state that it would consider regulatory action if a labeled serving of candy contained 10 or more micrograms of lead.

Current Policy (cont’d) FDA has not found additional Mexican candy products with lead based ink which can migrate into the candy FDA has not found additional Mexican candy products with lead based ink which can migrate into the candy If we find lead based ink on a candy wrapper that doesn’t migrate into the candy, we inform the CPSC If we find lead based ink on a candy wrapper that doesn’t migrate into the candy, we inform the CPSC If we find a candy product that exceeds the current guideline, we would likely remove from the market and place future shipments on DWPE If we find a candy product that exceeds the current guideline, we would likely remove from the market and place future shipments on DWPE

Current guideline, 0.5 ppm When established in 1995, was equivalent to the FCC limit for lead in sucrose and HFCS at the time When established in 1995, was equivalent to the FCC limit for lead in sucrose and HFCS at the time FDA believed at the time that lead levels well below 0.5 ppm were achievable in candy if produced under GMP FDA believed at the time that lead levels well below 0.5 ppm were achievable in candy if produced under GMP Most candy products then and now were/are << 0.5 ppm; currently most are < 0.1 ppm Most candy products then and now were/are << 0.5 ppm; currently most are < 0.1 ppm Seen as an interim level that would be lowered at a future time Seen as an interim level that would be lowered at a future time FCC level for sucrose and HFCS eventually lowered to 0.1 ppm FCC level for sucrose and HFCS eventually lowered to 0.1 ppm

FDA Current Activities FDA stated its intent to lower its guidance level for lead in candy in March 2004 FDA stated its intent to lower its guidance level for lead in candy in March 2004 OCR Series ran in April 2004 OCR Series ran in April 2004 FDA published draft guideline for a 0.1 ppm recommended maximum level for lead in candy in December 2005 FDA published draft guideline for a 0.1 ppm recommended maximum level for lead in candy in December Day comment period to end March Day comment period to end March 13 To be followed by final guidance To be followed by final guidance

Enforcement Considerations FDA has an ongoing monitoring program for Mexican candy at the border; we detain candy with potentially harmful levels of lead. FDA has an ongoing monitoring program for Mexican candy at the border; we detain candy with potentially harmful levels of lead. Focus sampling on high chili, high salt candies Focus sampling on high chili, high salt candies Current enforcement threshold is 10 micrograms per labeled serving of candy, e.g., for 35 g serving ~ 0.3 ppm lead Current enforcement threshold is 10 micrograms per labeled serving of candy, e.g., for 35 g serving ~ 0.3 ppm lead Current enforcement policy will change once the guidance is finalized Current enforcement policy will change once the guidance is finalized

Enforcement Considerations Statement in the guidance that it is not an “enforcement guideline” Statement in the guidance that it is not an “enforcement guideline” Under new guidance we will consider taking enforcement action at levels as low as can be legally substantiated down to 0.1 ppm Under new guidance we will consider taking enforcement action at levels as low as can be legally substantiated down to 0.1 ppm The enforceable level may be higher than 0.1 ppm for candy likely to be consumed in small amounts The enforceable level may be higher than 0.1 ppm for candy likely to be consumed in small amounts