Helicity of Neutrinos Contents 1. Introduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLARIMETRY of MeV Photons and Positrons Overview Beam Characterization – undulator photons – positrons Basics of the Transmission Method – for photon.
Advertisements

3224 Nuclear and Particle Physics Ruben Saakyan UCL
Spin order in correlated electron systems
Gabriel González Sprinberg, July Standard Model and beyond: particles & interactions Gabriel González Sprinberg Instituto de Física, Facultad de.
: The mirror did not seem to be operating properly: A guide to CP violation C hris P arkes 12/01/2006.
Photo-Nuclear Physics Experiments by using an Intense Photon Beam Toshiyuki Shizuma Gamma-ray Nondestructive Detection Research Group Japan Atomic Energy.
HL-3 May 2006Kernfysica: quarks, nucleonen en kernen1 Outline lecture (HL-3) Structure of nuclei NN potential exchange force Terra incognita in nuclear.
Measuring the Proton Spin Polarizabilities in Real Compton Scattering Philippe Martel – UMass Amherst Advisor: Rory Miskimen TUNL (Triangle Universities.
Alternating Current Circuits And Electromagnetic Waves Chapter 21.
Department of Electronics Nanoelectronics 05 Atsufumi Hirohata 12:00 Wednesday, 21/January/2015 (P/L 006)
Shu-Yu Ho Date : 2010/9/20 QFT study group
CHAPTER 1 STRUCTURE DETERMINES PROPERTIES. ATOMIC STRUCTURE  number of protons determines the element  combinations are possible, with a constant number.
Varan Satchithanandan Mentor: Dr. Richard Jones.  explains what the world is and what holds it together  consists of:  6 quarks  6 leptons  force.
Standard Model Lagrangian with Electro-Weak Unification The Standard Model assumes that the mass of the neutrino is zero and that it is “left handed” --
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Parity Conservation in the weak (beta decay) interaction
K. LaihemE166 collaboration LCWS06 Bangalore March 12th 2006 The E166 experiment Development of a polarized positron source for the ILC. Karim Laihem on.

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Rainer Pitthan Polarized Positrons A Close Look at Fukuda et al. There is much to be learned from the long effort.
Neutrino Oscillations: a km-scale Quantum Phenomenon
The Development of Particle Physics
Elementary particles atom Hadrons Leptons Baryons Mesons Nucleons
Revelations of the neutrino:
P Spring 2003 L6Richard Kass Parity Let us examine the parity operator (P) and its eigenvalues. The parity operator acting on a wavefunction is defined.
Massive neutrinos Dirac vs. Majorana
Electroweak interaction
Lecture 15: Beta Decay 23/10/2003 Neutron beta decay: light particles or “leptons”, produced in association. Neutrino presence is crucial to explain.
1. THE GHOSTLY NEUTRINOS Hate them or love them, neutrinos do exist. Vector Particle Physics (VPP) automatically gives the correct structures and characteristics.
Shibata lab. Ogoshi Shun P. Amaudruz et al., New Muon Collaboration Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 2712 [Contents] 1.Introduction 2.Deep inelastic scattering.
From Luigi DiLella, Summer Student Program
“Experimental Observation of Isolated Large Transverse Energy Electrons with Associated Missing Energy at = 540 GeV” Okamura Yusuke Shibata lab. G. Arnison.
Incommensurate correlations & mesoscopic spin resonance in YbRh 2 Si 2 * *Supported by U.S. DoE Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences & Engineering.
Lecture Dirac 1927: search for a wave equation, in which the time derivative appears only in the first order ( Klein- Gordon equation:
Neutrino Oscillation Nguyen Thanh Phong Yonsei Univ., May 19, 2008.
Parity violation in electron quasielastic scattering Kyungsik Kim School of Liberal Arts and Science, Korea Aerospace University, Korea 1.Introduction.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
Georgia Performance Standard
Applications of polarized neutrons V.R. Skoy Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
NEUTRINO PHYSICS 1. Historical milestones 2. Neutrinos at accelerators 3. Solar and atmospheric neutrinos 4. Neutrino oscillations 5. Neutrino astronomy.
Measurement of lifetime for muons captured inside nuclei
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
1 FK7003 Lecture 6 ● Isospin ● SU(2) and SU(3) ● Parity.
P Spring 2003 L5 Isospin Richard Kass
Dr. Bill Pezzaglia Particle Physics Updated: 2010May20 Modern Physics Series 1 ROUGH DRAFT.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
Study of the Parity Violation Based on the SLEGS ( ) 范功涛 徐望 Ⅰ Background & Motivation Ⅱ Simulation Ⅲ Summary.
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
Prepared By A.K.M. Moinul Haque Meaze Student ID: Center for High Energy Physics Kyungpook National University Daegu Daegu Republic.
Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions at Medium and Low Energies [contents] 1. Neutrino and weak interaction 2. Cross section for ν-A and e-A reactions 3. EMC effect.
Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2003PHYS 5396, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5396 – Lecture #2 Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.What is a neutrino? 2.History of neutrinos.
Monday, Oct. 9, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #9 Monday, Oct. 9, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Nuclear Radiation Beta Decay & Weak Interactions.
Particle Physics Particle Physics Chris Parkes April/May 2003  Hydrogen atom Quantum numbers Electron intrinsic spin  Other atoms More electrons! Pauli.
The TRI  P programme at KVI Tests of the Standard Model at low energy Hans Wilschut KVI – Groningen Low energy tests e.g. Time reversal violation precision.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and the Majorana Neutrino
Chen-Ning Yang Tsung-Dao Lee Chien-Shiung Wu In 1972, PVDIS result from SLAC E122 was consistent with sin 2 q W =1/4, confirmed the Standard Model prediction;
'Helicity of Neutrinos' Shibata lab. TAMORI Midori Dec 12th, 2006 M. Goldhaber et al. Physical Review 109 (1958) Contents 1. Introduction 2.
Raman Effect The Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by matter with a change of frequency.
J.J. Gómez-Cadenas IFIC-Valencia Summer Student School CERN, July,2006
Design of a High-Precision β Telescope
Electron Polarization effects in Compton X/γ-ray Sources
PHYS 5326 – Lecture #1 Class specifications and plans
Weak probe of the nucleon in electron scattering
Handout 9 : The Weak Interaction and V-A
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
Quark Parton Model (QPM)
一般化されたパートン分布関数:実験の現状
Magnetism from Electricity 18.2
„The T violating phase is only associated to the heavy quark sector, and no T-violation is expected to be seen in low energy nuclear interactions.
Presentation transcript:

Helicity of Neutrinos Contents 1. Introduction ニュートリノのヘリシティ M. Goldhaber, L. Grodzins and A. W. Sunyar Brookhaven National Laboratory Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 1015. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Principle of experiment 3. Experimental method 4. Result 5. Summary Shibata Lab. Akihito Fukuda

1. Introduction History of neutrino Helicity is defined as p σ p σ VA STP 𝑒 − - + 𝑒 + 𝜈 History of neutrino If we can measure the helicity of neutrino, the type is decided. 1903 Rutherford : Discovery of α-ray , β-ray , γ-ray 1904 Chadwick : Discovery of continuous spectrum of β-ray Experiment by Goldhaber, Grodzins and Sunyar 1931 Pauli : Neutrino hypothesis 2 Rutherford : Discovery of α-ray , β-ray , γ-ray 1904 Chadwick : Discovery of continuous spectrum of β-ray 1931 Pauli : Propounding of neutrino hypothesis Fermi : Propounding that β-decay is three-body problem ℎ=±1 1954 Reines : Detection of neutrino     𝑃 𝐸 𝑑𝐸= 2𝜋 ℏ 𝛷 𝑓 𝐻 𝛽 𝛷 𝑖 2 𝑑𝑛 𝑑𝐸 𝐻 𝛽 = 𝐻 𝛽 + 𝐻′ 𝛽 𝐻 𝛽 = 𝑖 𝐶 𝑖 𝜑 † 𝑝 𝑶 𝑖 𝜑 𝑛 𝜑 † 𝑒 𝑶 𝑖 𝜑 𝜈 +ℎ.𝑐. 𝐻′ 𝛽 == 𝑖 𝐶′ 𝑖 𝜑 † 𝑝 𝑶 𝑖 𝜑 𝑛 𝜑 † 𝑒 𝑶 𝑖 𝛾 5 𝜑 𝜈 +ℎ.𝑐. 1956 Yang, Lee : Parity violation in weak interaction Helicity is defined as p ℎ=+1 σ 𝑂 𝑖 Scalar 𝐶 𝑆 1 Vector 𝐶 𝑉 𝛾 𝜇 Tensor 𝐶 𝑇 𝛾 𝜇𝜈 Axial vector 𝐶 𝐴 −𝑖𝛾 𝜇 𝛾 5 Pseudo scalar 𝐶 𝑃 𝛾 5 ℎ= 𝝈∙𝒑 𝝈 ∙ 𝒑 Measurement of the helicity of electron by Frauenfelder p ℎ=−1 σ ℎ 𝑒 − =−1 ℎ 𝑒 + =+1 𝛾-Matrix 𝜇=1,2,3,4 𝛾 5 = 𝛾 1 𝛾 2 𝛾 3 𝛾 4 𝛾 𝜇𝜈 =− 𝑖 2 𝛾 𝜇 𝛾 𝜈 − 𝛾 𝜈 𝛾 𝜇 In this experiment, the helicity of neutrino was measured.

2. Principle of experiment 𝜎 𝑒 =+ 1 2 2. Principle of experiment 𝜎 Sm =+1 𝑡 1 2 =9.3ℎ 0 − 152m Eu 152m Eu+ e − → 152 Sm +ν * 𝑚 𝑒 =± 1 2 , 𝑚 𝛾 =±1 , 𝑚 𝜈 =± 1 2 3 − Electron Capture 152 Eu 152 Sm+γ 1 − 𝑚 𝑒 =± 1 2 152m Eu 𝑒 152m Eu 𝑒 839keV 961keV before 𝜎 𝑒 + 1 2 − 1 2 after 𝜎 𝛾 −1 +1 𝜎 𝜈 2 + 0 + ν 152 Sm * ν 152 Sm * 152 Sm 𝜎 𝑒 =− 1 2 ℎ 𝜈 =+1 ℎ 𝜈 =−1 γ γ 152 Sm 152 Sm 𝜎 𝛾 =∓1 𝜎 Sm =−1 ℎ 𝛾 =−1 γ 𝜎 𝜈 =± 1 2 ℎ 𝛾 =+1 𝜃 If ℎ 𝛾 =+1, ℎ 𝜈 =+1 If ℎ 𝛾 =−1, ℎ 𝜈 =−1 If we measure the helicity of γ-ray, the helicity of neutrino is determined. 152 Sm ν

3. Experimental method ν ・ 152m Eu , the source, was produced in the Brookhaven reactor. The helicity of γ-ray is measured by Compton scattering. ・Electromagnet was alternately magnetized in the up or down direction every 3 minutes. 𝛾 Forward γ-rays are selected by resonant scattering. ・9 runs with length from 3 to 9 hours were carried out. ・As a further check, 3 runs were carried out with a shorter magnet with the source on top of the magnet. I will explain about resonant scattering and measurement of γ-ray helicity with Compton polarimeter.

Resonant scattering of γ-rays In order to select forward γ-ray, resonant scattering was used. (共鳴散乱) 𝐸 0 𝐸 0 𝜀 : recoil energy × 𝜀= 𝐸 0 2 2𝑀 𝑐 2 𝐸 0 −𝜀 152 Sm 152 Sm Energy of γ-ray 𝐸 𝛾 = 𝐸 0 − 𝐸 0 2 2𝑀 𝑐 2 + 𝐸 0 𝐸 𝜈 𝑀 𝑐 2 cos 𝜃 γ 𝜃 γ 𝜀 Doppler shift For resonant scattering ν 152 Sm 𝜃 𝐸 0 = 𝐸 𝛾 −𝜀 𝐸 0 2 𝑀 𝑐 2 = 𝐸 0 𝐸 𝜈 𝑀 𝑐 2 cos 𝜃 𝐸 𝛾 ′ : energy of γ-ray that can be spent for excitation of nucleus ν 152 Sm 𝐸 𝜈 cos 𝜃 = 𝐸 0 Condition of resonant scattering

Measurement of γ-ray helicity with Compton polarimeter 𝐼 0 ・The γ-ray enters into the magnetized iron. Fe 𝑥 ・Cross-section of Compton scattering is larger if electron and γ-ray spins are antiparallel. γ 𝐼 0 𝑒𝑥𝑝 −𝜎𝜌𝑥 𝜎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖 > 𝜎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 ・The counting rate varies depending on the direction of the magnetization by Compton scattering. 𝑁 + : counting rate with the magnetic field pointing up 𝛿≡ 𝑁 − − 𝑁 + 1 2 𝑁 − + 𝑁 + (The spin of electron pointing down) 𝑁 − : counting rate with the magnetic field pointing down (The spin of electron pointing up) ・If the γ-ray are 100% circularly polarized, we expect an effect of 𝛿=±0.025 with an accuracy of 10%. 𝛿+ 𝑁 − ( 𝜎 𝑒 up)> 𝑁 + ( 𝜎 𝑒 down) 𝝈 𝛾 up 𝒉 𝛾 − 𝛿− 𝑁 − 𝜎 𝑒 up < 𝑁 + ( 𝜎 𝑒 down) 𝝈 𝛾 down 𝒉 𝛾 +

4. Result ℎ 𝜈 =−1 ・An effect 𝛿=+0.017±0.003 was observed in channel B. ・In the last 3 runs also a negative helicity was found, the circular polarization being 66±15 %. ・The helicity of γ-ray is negative. ℎ 𝜈 =−1

5. Summary 𝝈 𝜸 𝝈 𝝂 ℎ 𝜈 =−1 ・The helicity of the neutrino was determined by the measurement of γ-ray from the electron capture of 152𝑚 Eu . ・The helicity of neutrinos was necessary to decide the type of the β-interaction. 𝒑 𝜸 𝒑 𝝂 ・A combined analysis of circular polarization and resonant scattering of γ-rays measured the helicity of the neutrino. ・To select forward γ-ray, the resonant scattering was used. ・We had γ-ray Compton-scattered, and Circular polarization of γ-ray was measured by the difference of counting rate. ・The helicity of γ-ray was measured by Compton scattering. VA STP 𝑒 − - + 𝑒 + 𝜈 ・The helicity of forward γ-ray was negative. ・The resonant-scattered γ-ray was detected. ・It indicates that the helicity of neutrino is negative; ℎ 𝜈 =−1 ・That the helicity of γ-ray is negative( ℎ 𝛾 =−1) was found, and that the helicity of neutrinos is negative ( ℎ 𝜈 =−1) was determined.

以下、補足スライド

δ and ℎ 𝛾 δ + δ − 𝜇 𝑒 : magnetic moment electric current 𝜇 𝑒 =2 − 𝑒 𝑚 𝜎 𝑒 𝜇 𝑒 𝜎 𝑒 𝝈 𝛾 + 𝑁 + → 𝜎 𝑒 − → anti 𝑁 + =𝐴𝑒𝑥𝑝 𝜎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖 𝜌𝑥 𝑁 − > 𝑁 + δ + 𝑁 − → 𝜎 𝑒 + → para 𝑁 − =𝐴𝑒𝑥𝑝 𝜎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝜌𝑥 𝒑 𝜸 − 𝝈 𝛾 − 𝑁 + → 𝜎 𝑒 − → para 𝑁 + =𝐴𝑒𝑥𝑝 𝜎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝜌𝑥 𝑁 − < 𝑁 + δ − 𝒑 𝜸 − 𝑁 − → 𝜎 𝑒 + → anti 𝑁 − =𝐴𝑒𝑥𝑝 𝜎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖 𝜌𝑥 Fe peripheral electron : 2 density : 7.09× 10 −6 𝑚 3 /𝑚𝑜𝑙 → 0.141𝑚𝑜𝑙/ 𝑐𝑚 3 𝜌=2×0.141×6.02× 10 23 =1.70× 10 23 𝑐𝑚 −3