ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Types of ADR available Negotiation Mediation / Conciliation Arbitration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding Dispute Resolution Options in the Construction Industry © Copyright 2014 NASBP.
Advertisements

Managing Human Resources, 12e, by Bohlander/Snell/Sherman © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning Managing Human Resources Managing Human Resources.
Last Topic - National Security Measures taken to ensure national security include Pakistan National Security Council (PNSC) Elements of National Security.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
EVALUATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS. Strengths of Mediation  Strengths 1) Mediation is often less expensive. Mediation avoids the costs of a trial,
MODULE 23 CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATION
ALTERNATIVE AND ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COPYRIGHT © 2010 BY JEFFREY PITTMAN.
Business and Its Legal Environment (Mgmt 246) Alternative Dispute Resolution (Chapter 3) Professor Charles H. Smith Fall 2010.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS
Dispute Resolution Methods
Conflict Resolution.
By Aidan, Lochie, Curtis. WORKPLACE DISPUTES  Negotiation: Is a method of compromising disputes within a workplace. This easygoing approach usually.
The U.S. Legal System and Alternative Dispute Resolution
CHAPTER 6 DISPUTE RESOLUTION DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8 th Ed.)
Trends in dispute resolution in Africa
2.7 Employer & Employee Relations
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Ch. 4-1 THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS 1 The Legal Environment of Business A Critical Thinking.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD
ANNUAL CONFERENCE CARRIBEA BAY RESORT, KARIBA 3 OCTOBER 2014.
Alternative Dispute Resolution Duncan Bunce Presentation by Duncan Bunce Read & Précis: Chapter 4, Issue 1, pages
ACC Europe ADR Forum Shopping: What are the options for dispute resolution outside litigation?
© 2006 Prentice Hall Ch. 4-1 THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil.
Dispute Settlement: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Chapter 3.
NIH Office of the Ombudsman Center for Cooperative Resolution NEGOTIATION TRAINING WORKSHOP NIH Office of the Ombudsman/ Center for Cooperative Resolution.
Unit 4 Area of Study 1 Booklet 1.3 Answers. Advantages of ADR ADR (mediation, conciliation, arbitration) is a MUCH LESS FORMAL compared to the adversarial.
Copyright 2010 by South-Western/Cengage Learning Chapter 3 The Court System and Dispute Resolution.
NEGOTIATION/ PREPARATION Aiming for a Negotiated Agreement: Aspiration (Target) Point –Most preferred or ideal settlement Reservation Point (Bottom Line)
Principles of International Commercial Arbitration Allen B. Green McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases. Types of Civil Lawsuits In civil cases the plaintiff – the party bringing the lawsuit – claims to have suffered a loss and usually.
Civil Dispute Resolutions. Judicial Determination  Judicial determination is when a dispute is resolve by a third party Judge. This is done in the Supreme.
PACS 3700/ COMM 3700 ADR – Alternative Dispute Resolution (Third Party Approaches to Conflict)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Pages
Civil Trial Procedure By: Anthony Franco, Luis Bonaparte, Eric Mathiau, & Josue Lecodet.
What is conflict negotiation Communication designed to anticipate, contain, and resolve disputes so that the parties reach mutually acceptable solutions.
1. 2 Introductions Biography 3 Agenda What is Conflict? Role of ADR ADR Continuum Benefits of ADR Case for Mediation Case Studies ADR Institute of Ontario.
ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR). WHY IS ADR NEEDED? Courts expensive Courts time-consuming Courts traumatic Public hearings bring unwelcome.
Resolution of Conflicts, Options under Mexican and Chinese Laws
Alternative Dispute Resolution -. ADR Processes The most common forms are: –negotiation –mediation –arbitration.
Change Orders. CO Proposals Initiated by owner or GC –Owner requests estimate for work proposed –GC CO results from changed site condition or response.
Norma C. Izzo Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, PLC One E. Washington Street, Suite 1900 Phoenix, Arizona (480) Alternative.
NEGOTIATION.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION ARBITRATION AND ADR.
1 How can we deal positively with conflict?  Conflict – A disagreement between people on: Substantive issues regarding goals, allocation of resources,
CONFLICT  The term, conflict refers to a situation of friction or mutually exclusive goals between 2 or more parties, such as employees and employers.
Dispute Resolution Services McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
By Paramita Khisa.  VCAT and court use a range of methods to resolve criminal and civil disputes.  Criminal cases are solved by the judge in courts.
THIRD PARTIES. Negotiation would appear to be the best way to settle a dispute Parties control process Flexible Places responsibility to resolve solely.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 3: Alternative Dispute Resolution.
NEGOTIATION TWO TYPES OF NEGOTIATION 1.Distributive (Competitive)
Settling Disputes. Disadvantages to the Courtroom n There are three main disadvantages in going to court. –1. Court process is time consuming –2. Court.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 3 Alternative and Online Dispute Resolution.
Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012 Class III
MEDIATION and other forms of ADR.
Chapter 3: Alternative and Online Dispute Resolution
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding Dispute Resolution Options in the Construction Industry © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
The role of VCAT.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Mediation - a brief summary
2/25/2019 Breach of Contracts Alternative Disputes Resolutions Legal English Course 2008/09 Prof. Rossana Buzzi.
Civil Pretrial Practice
Chapter 3 Legal Representation and Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Presentation transcript:

ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Types of ADR available Negotiation Mediation / Conciliation Arbitration

Negotiation Parties come together informally. With or without their lawyers. They attempt to resolve their dispute. No neutral third party involved. Often parties must compromise for the negotiation to succeed.

Conciliation Third party assists parties in reconciling differences Conciliators, do no recommend solutions

Mediation Goals: To get the disputants to listen to each other. To get them to arrive at a fair and equitable solution to their dispute. Mediator makes no final decision, but does suggest solutions. A facilitator of communication between the parties. If solution reached, usually reduced to a written contract. What was said at the mediation is confidential. Common uses: Collective bargaining disputes. Insurance claims. Environmental disputes.

Arbitration Resolution of a dispute by a neutral third party(s) Arbitrator not constrained by precedent, as is a judge. Much more likely to reach a compromise solution. Award is legally binding. Cannot be appealed except for: Fraud, corruption, bias. Procedural errors that prejudice the rights of a party The arbitrator exceeding his/her authority.

Advantages of ADR over Litigation  Less expensive  Less time consuming  Parties can choose the person who will preside  Might prevent adverse publicity  Preserve confidentiality  Serves to preserve relationship between the parties

Problems with Arbitration Unpredictable: Not required to follow previous cases Lack of legal training of some arbitrators. Absence of written opinions. No standard rules to follow No Discovery Limited or no appeal Fed. Arb. Act. Sec. 10 (page 111) Corruption, fraud or other undue means Arbitrator exhibited bias or corruption Refusal to postpone hearing, hear evidence Arbitrator exceeded his/her powers

Methods of securing Arbitration Binding arbitration clause in contract. More than 95% of collective bargaining agreements have such clauses. Statute Submission agreement. A written contract Can be entered into at any time. Usually specifies: How the arbitrator will be selected. The nature of the dispute. Constraints on the arbitrator’s authority. Place and time for the arbitration hearing.

Court-annexed ADR Purpose: to reduce the number of litigated cases. Some states make it mandatory. Usually for cases involving less than a set dollar limit. If mandatory, then non-binding. Can still go to court for a full trial. But might have to pay some costs to do so. Rules of evidence usually same as in litigation.

6-11 International Dimensions of ADR ADR is highly favored internationally. New York Convention Makes arbitrators’ awards enforceable in losing party’s country. U.S. policy favors arbitration of international disputes.

NEGOTIATION TWO TYPES OF NEGOTIATION 1.Distributive (Competitive) Parties have different and independent goals fixed-sum win-lose positional

NEGOTIATION Integrative (Collaborative) Parties work together toward common or compatible goal Resolution of conflict Advancement of shared vision Recognize Interdependence Deal constructively with difference Joint ownership of resolution

NEGOTIATION DistributiveIntegrative SoftHardProblem solving Avoid conflictWinSolve the problem FriendsadversariesProfessionals Change easilyDig inFocus on interests Concede easilyConcedeDon’t concede ? stubbornlyInvent options

NEGOTIATION SoftHardProblem Solving Avoid contestWin contest Use standards of will of will Make Demand Separate people concessions concessions and problem Back downMake threats Know others walkaway Commit earlyCommit early Draft as you go draft latedraft late commit at end

Integrative Negotiation Bargain Over Interests Not Positions Separate People From the Problem Generate Options Before Deciding Base Results On Objective Criteria

POSITIONS / INTERESST POSITIONSINTERESTS Things you sayUnderlying you want Motivations Demands Needs and Concerns What you willFears and Aspirations or won’t do

DISCOVERING INTERESTS Look behind positions for underlying reason Put yourself in other person’s shoes Ask : “Why?” Ask “Why not? What would be wrong with…”

PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION AStereotyping Assigning attributes based on membership in a particular group B. Halo effects Generalize on a number of attributes based on knowledge of one attribute. C. Selective perception Accepting information that supports prior belief and filtering out nonconforming information

PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION D. Projection Ascribing to others the characteristics you have Assuming that the other party will respond in the same manner you would respond. E. Framing Subjective evaluation mechanisms to determine whether to pursue or avoid future actions

Framing A large car manufacturer is suffering significant financial losses. As a result plants need to be closed and 6000 employees laid off. Four proposals have been developed. You must select one of the plans. Plan A. This plan will save one of the three plants and 2000 jobs. Plan B. This plan has a 1/3 probability of saving all three plants and all 6,000 jobs, but has a 2/3 probability of saving no plants and no jobs.

Framing A large car manufacturer is suffering significant financial losses. As a result plants need to be closed and 6000 employees laid off. Four proposals have been developed. You must select one of the plans. Plan C. This plan will close 2 of the 3 plants and lose 4000 jobs. Plan D. This plan has a 2/3 probability of closing all three plants and losing all 6000 jobs and a 1/3 probability of closing no plants and losing not jobs.

A large car manufacturer is suffering significant financial losses. As a result plants need to be closed and 6000 employees laid off. Four proposals have been developed. You must select one of the plans. Plan A. This plan will save one of the three plants and 2000 jobs. Plan B. This plan has a 1/3 probability of saving all three plants and all 6,000 jobs, but has a 2/3 probability of saving no plants and no jobs. Plan C. This plan will close 2 of the 3 plants and lose 4000 jobs. Plan D. This plan has a 2/3 probability of closing all three plants and losing all 6000 jobs and a 1/3 probability of closing no plants and losing not jobs.

Relationships A. The norm of reciprocity Duties owned to one another because of prior actions. Reciprocity traps B. The similarity principle We assume others like us act like us