Features of the DSU A single and coherent system of rules and procedures for dispute settlement; existence of special rules in some Multilateral Agreements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PUBLISH NOTIFY / TAKE COMMENTS ANSWER ENQUIRIES Notification Obligations 1.Statement on Implementation 2.Notification of Technical Regulations or Conformity.
Advertisements

Settlement of Trade Dispute Dr. Mrs. Vijaya Katti Professor & Chairperson, IIFT New Delhi.
1 Session 9 – Government-to-government dispute settlement procedures WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding Vesile Kulaçoglu, WTO Secretariat Dar es Salaam,
Dispute Settlement in the WTO
WTO Dispute Settlement
Chapter 3 Dispute Settlement System and Trade Policy Review Mechanism 14/21-SEP-2006.
PHILLIP FRENCH DIRECTOR AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR DISABILITY LAW 2012 Asserting human rights under the Optional Protocol.
Univ. - Prof. Dr. Werner Meng, Europa Institut, Saarland University, Germany LEGITIMACY OF WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT 1.
WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION: AN OVERVIEW. BACKGROUND Great Depression, Protectionism and the Consequences Bretton Woods Institutions GATT 1947 and Failure.
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
International Law: Unit 5 Dispute Resolution Mr. Morrison Fall 2005.
WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENTS
 Mediation is a dispute resolution process in which, as an alternative to judicial or administrative decision-making process, the parties are assisted.
SITUATION OF MEDIATION IN LITHUANIA. FIRST STEPS TOWARDS MEDIATION  First initiatives to promote mediation came from the growing non-governmental sector.
WTO Law 4 Dispute Settlement System 1. Historical Development Art. XXII GATT Art. XXIII GATT 1979 Understanding of With Annex: Agreed Description.
Non-governmental Actors in the Compliance with and Monitoring of Multilateral Environmental Decisions.
Introduction to Mediation. Alternative Dispute Resolution Negotiation Negotiation Arbitration Arbitration Mediation Mediation.
By Aidan, Lochie, Curtis. WORKPLACE DISPUTES  Negotiation: Is a method of compromising disputes within a workplace. This easygoing approach usually.
ALBERTAS ŠEKŠTELO, FCIArb 20 March 2014 State-to-State and Private Dispute Resolution Mechanisms under the WTO Documents.
WTO FORUM: ARTICLE 25 OF THE DSU Christian Albanesi Managing Counsel ICC International Court of Arbitration.
Single undertaking Article II “…2.The agreements and associated legal instruments included in Annexes 1, 2 and 3 (hereinafter referred to as "Multilateral.
Dispute Settlement In Trade & Investment Agreements
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Resolution of disputes involving insurance companies in and outside of Russia: A comparative overview of the advantages and disadvantages of various options.
Dispute settlement GATT 1947 provided for a dispute settlement system based on consultations and negotiations between Members. The Contracting Parties.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Third Party Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?  It involves the application of theories, procedures, and skills designed.
Dispute Settlement General Aspects of WTO Dispute Settlement Russian Federation, September 2012 Susan Hainsworth, ITTC, WTO.
Trade Union Training on Social Security and Social Protection INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS Turin, 5 May 2004.
1 Role of Legal Advisors in WTO Proceedings Presentation to Jindal Global Law School, Centre for International Trade and Economics Laws February 10, 2015.
Membership (I) Membership (currently 160 Members): who can be a Member? -States; -separate customs territory (Macao, Hong Kong, Chinese Taipei) -European.
Section 4: International Economics
International Trade Regulations: the Law of the WTO Professor Mohammad F. A. Nsour Class 3 1.
Trade Union Training on Economic and Financial Analyses of Enterprises INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS: PROCEDURES AND SUPERVISION Turin, 9 August 2005.
1994 WTO Understanding On the Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.
STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ)
Sponsored by Supported by Kevin Duffy Chairman, The Labour Court Variable and Personalised Pay Determination Systems.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
CHAPTER 11 AND 12 SUMMARY. Essential Question How does the Constitution define the powers of the federal courts, and how are the various courts related.
THE PROSECUTOR V. SIMIC 27 JULY 1999 TRIAL CHAMBER OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE PROSECUTION OF PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL.
Chapter 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution Pages
WTO Structure Highest level: Ministerial Conference Second level: 1) General Council; 2) Dispute Settlement Body; 3) Trade Policy Review Body Third level:
Trade Policy Review Mechanism Collective appreciation and evaluation of individual trade policies of Member States. It cannot be used for the enforcement.
Disputes settlement procedure (VII) Appellate Body = permanent body (7 members on a four-year term). It must be composed by persons of recognized authority.
Principles of the DSU: 1) principle of good faith: Members must exercise their judgement as to whether action under DSU would be fruitful (art. 3, para.
China — Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Automobiles from the United States WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: DISPUTE DS440 By: Joanna Zaffaroni.
0 Dispute Resolution Case Study: China v. U.S. (A/D on Shrimp) (DS 422) (Panel 2012) October 7, 2015 ITRN 603 – Evan Setzer, Marin Sullivan, Gary Szabo,
Hao Duy Phan (SJD) Centre for International Law (CIL) National University of Singapore UNCLOS DISPUTE SETTLMENT MECHANISMS ON MARITIME BOUNDARIES AND THE.
How Strategic Can Ambiguity Be? The Role of Ambiguity in the Quest for Legal Certainty and the Myth of the Toothless Tiger A presentation for the SLSA.
SPS Workshop Taipei, 5-6/12/2001 WTO Dispute Settlement and the SPS Agreement.
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
Jorge Castro Kaliningrad, March 2014
CHAPTER ONE OBJECTIVE AND GOAL
Amendment procedure Amendment proposal by one Member or a specialised Council; decision adopted by the Ministerial Conference or the General Council by.
Unit I: An overview of WTO law —WTO Dispute Settlement
The WTO The Uruguay Round Trade Liberalization
Alcoholic beverages (1996)
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
Complaints under the DSU
United States — Countervailing and Anti-dumping Measures on Certain Products from China Bijou, Promito, Vasily.
U.S.- China Automotive Countervailing Duty Dispute DS440
UNCITRAL Working Group III on Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform
UN budget Article 17 The General Assembly shall consider and approve the budget of the Organization. The expenses of the Organization shall be borne by.
Essential elements in developing high quality recommendations based on individual appeals: structure and reasoning of the recommendations Jurgita Paužaitė-Kulvinskienė.
NGOS position IN LEGAL PROCEDURES - overview
Chapter 3 Court Systems.
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Presentation transcript:

Features of the DSU A single and coherent system of rules and procedures for dispute settlement; existence of special rules in some Multilateral Agreements. Compulsory jurisdiction for complaining Member and for respondent Member; Exclusive jurisdiction; Contentious jurisdiction.

Access to the dispute settlement system Only Members may accede to the WTO dispute settlement system. Government-to-government dispute settlement system. Private companies often lobby their governments in order to induce them to start proceedings under DSU.

Amicus curiae Faculty to submit written briefs to panels and Appellate Body. Who can submit? 1)Individuals; 2)Private companies; 3)Governmental and non-governmental organisations; 4)Members.

Amicus curiae (II) Appellate Body ruled that panels are entitled to accept and consider amicus curiae briefs (US-Shrimp, EC-Sardines). It adopted an Additional Procedure in order to deal with amicus curiae briefs and set forth requirements for such briefs. Panels are not obliged to consider amicus curiae briefs and private parties have no legal right to be heard.

Amicus curiae (III) Member States strongly dissent from the view of the Appellate Body about amicus curiae briefs, because: 1)Amicus curiae briefs can contribute to the length of proceedings; 2)Developing-country Members feel that amicus curiae briefs are often opposed to their interests. General Council have been unable to adopt clear rules about amicus curiae briefs thus far.

Complaints under the DSU Reference to article XXIII of the GATT 1994 Types of complaints: 1)Violation complaints; 2)Non-violation complaints; 3)Situation complaints. Nullification or impairment of benefits for the complainant Member. Interest in the dispute.

Alternative dispute resolution Consultations before the establishment of a panel During all stages: good offices, conciliation and mediation

Consultations Preference for amicable resolution of disputes. The request for consultation must indicate the measure at issue and the legal basis for the complaint. It is notified to the DSB. Confidentiality of the consultations. Duration 60 days. The agreed solution must be notified to the DSB and must be in conformity with the WTO law.

Disputes settlement procedure When a dispute arises between Member States, they can request the DSB to establish a panel. The request must contain: 1)an indication whether consultations were held; 2)the identification of the specific measures at issue; 3)a brief summary of the legal basis of the complaint. Protection of respondent’s rights.

Disputes settlement procedure (II) Panels: -are ad hoc bodies, established for each different dispute; -are composed by well-qualified members, with a view to ensuring their independence, a different background and wide experience; -do not include nationals of Member States parties to the dispute; -are established by the DSB (reverse consensus).

Disputes settlement procedure (III) After the establishment of the panel the parties will try to reach an agreement on the composition as proposed by the Secretariat. If they are unable to reach an agreement, the designation is made by the Director-General. Multiple complainants: single panel or same composition.

Disputes settlement procedure (IV) Duties of the Panels: -make an objective assessment of the facts; -examine the claims proposed by the parties; -make an objective assessment of the applicability of and conformity with the relevant agreement.

Disputes settlement procedure (V) Panel proceedings (wide discretionary authority): 1)Written submissions; 2)Substantive panel meetings. Duty of the parties to respond promptly and full to requests for information. Submission of evidence; use of experts. Third parties’ rights.

Disputes settlement procedure (V) Panel report is submitted to the parties for an interim review stage. It must indicate the basic rationale for its findings. Where the Panel finds that a violation took place, the report will contain recommendation to bring the measure in conformity with WTO Agreements (binding after approval by the DSB).