The Relational Model1 ER-to-Relational Mapping and Views.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ER to Relational Mapping. Logical DB Design: ER to Relational Entity sets to tables. CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR (11), name CHAR (20), lot INTEGER,
Advertisements

R ELATIONAL M ODEL TO SQL Data Model. 22 C ONCEPTUAL D ESIGN : ER TO R ELATIONAL TO SQL How to represent Entity sets, Relationship sets, Attributes, Key.
Logical DB Design: ER to Relational Entity sets to tables. Employees ssn name lot CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR (11), name CHAR (20), lot INTEGER, PRIMARY.
Relational Database. Relational database: a set of relations Relation: made up of 2 parts: − Schema : specifies the name of relations, plus name and type.
The Entity-Relationship Model
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
Book Chapter 3 (part 2 ) From ER to Relational Model.
1 Key Constraints Consider Works_In: An employee can work in many departments; a dept can have many employees. In contrast, each dept has at most one manager,
The Entity-Relationship (ER) Model
SQL Lecture 10 Inst: Haya Sammaneh. Example Instance of Students Relation  Cardinality = 3, degree = 5, all rows distinct.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke. Edited by Keith Shomper, The Relational Model Chapter 3.
COMP 5138 Relational Database Management Systems Sem2, 2007 Lecture 3 Relational Data Model.
CSC 411/511: DBMS Design 1 1 Dr. Nan WangCSC411_L3_Relational Model 1 The Relational Model (Chapter 3)
Database Management Systems 1 Raghu Ramakrishnan The Relational Model Chapter 3 Instructor: Mirsad Hadzikadic.
CMPT 354, Simon Fraser University, Fall 2008, Martin Ester 176 Database Systems I The Entity-Relationship Model.
1 Translation of ER-diagram into Relational Schema Prof. Sin-Min Lee Department of Computer Science.
SPRING 2004CENG 3521 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
The Relational Model 198:541 Rutgers University. Why Study the Relational Model?  Most widely used model. Vendors: IBM, Informix, Microsoft, Oracle,
Conceptual Design Using the Entity-Relationship (ER) Model
1 Data Modeling Yanlei Diao UMass Amherst Feb 1, 2007 Slides Courtesy of R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke.
1 Data Modeling Yanlei Diao UMass Amherst Feb 1, 2007 Slides Courtesy of R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke.
CHAPTER 3 THE RELATIONAL MODEL
ER continued, and ER to Relational Mappings R&G Chapters 2, 3 Lecture 22.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
ER to Relational Mapping. Logical DB Design: ER to Relational Entity sets to tables. CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR (11), name CHAR (20), lot INTEGER,
1 The Relational Model Chapter 3. 2 Objectives  Representing data using the relational model.  Expressing integrity constraints on data.  Creating,
The Relational Model Chapter 3
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
1 The Relational Model Chapter 3. 2 Why Study the Relational Model?  Most widely used model.  Vendors: IBM, Informix, Microsoft, Oracle, Sybase, etc.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3 Modified by Donghui Zhang.
1 The Relational Model Chapter 3. 2 Why Study the Relational Model?  Most widely used model  Vendors: IBM, Informix, Microsoft, Oracle, Sybase  Recent.
 Relational database: a set of relations.  Relation: made up of 2 parts: › Instance : a table, with rows and columns. #rows = cardinality, #fields =
1 Translation of ER-diagram into Relational Schema Prof. Sin-Min Lee Department of Computer Science.
1 The Relational Model Chapter 3. 2 Why Study the Relational Model?  Most widely used model.  Vendors: IBM, Informix, Microsoft, Oracle, Sybase, etc.
1 The Relational Model Chapter 3. 2 Why Study the Relational Model?  Most widely used model.  Vendors: IBM, Informix, Microsoft, Oracle, Sybase, etc.
ICS 321 Fall 2009 The Relational Model (ii) Asst. Prof. Lipyeow Lim Information and Computer Science Department University of Hawaii at Manoa 9/10/20091Lipyeow.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
Database Management Systems,1 Conceptual Design Using the Entity-Relationship (ER) Model.
Mapping E/R Diagrams to Relational Database Schemas
CMPT 258 Database Systems The Relationship Model PartII (Chapter 3)
Lecture 3 Book Chapter 3 (part 2 ) From ER to Relational.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 Database Management Systems Chapter 3 The Relational Model.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
The Relational Model Jianlin Feng School of Software SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY.
ER & Relational: Digging Deeper R &G - Chapters 2 & 3.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
Mapping E/R to RM, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke with Dr. Eick’s additions 1 Mapping E/R Diagrams to Relational Database Schemas Second Half of Chapter.
Database Management Systems 1 Raghu Ramakrishnan The Relational Model Chapter 3 Instructor: Jianping Fan.
1 The Relational Model Chapter 3. 2 Why Study the Relational Model?  Most widely used model.  Vendors: IBM, Informix, Microsoft, Oracle, Sybase, etc.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
1 CS122A: Introduction to Data Management Lecture #5 (E-R  Relational, Cont.) Instructor: Chen Li.
1 CS122A: Introduction to Data Management Lecture #4 (E-R  Relational Translation) Instructor: Chen Li.
Database Management Systems 1 Raghu Ramakrishnan The Relational Model Chapter 3 Instructor: Xin Zhang.
1 The Relational Model Chapter 3. 2 Why Study the Relational Model?  Most widely used model.  Multi-billion dollar industry, $15+ bill in  Vendors:
Logical DB Design: ER to Relational
COP Introduction to Database Structures
These slides are based on the slides of your text book.
Translation of ER-diagram into Relational Schema
The Relational Model Chapter 3
From ER to Relational Model
The Relational Model Chapter 3
The Relational Model Chapter 3
Translation of ER-diagram into Relational Schema
The Relational Model Chapter 3
CS4222 Principles of Database System
The Relational Model Chapter 3
Presentation transcript:

The Relational Model1 ER-to-Relational Mapping and Views

The Relational Model2 Entity Sets to Tables Each attributes of the entity set becomes an attribute of the table. CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR(11), name CHAR(20), lot INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY (ssn)); Employees ssn name lot

The Relational Model3 Mapping of Relationship Sets Foreign Key approach Combining one of the entity sets and the relationship into a relation and using foreign key to refer to the other entity set(s). Merged relation option Merging the entity sets and the relationship into a single relation. Cross-reference or relationship relation option The third alternative is to set up a relationship relation for the purpose of cross-referencing the primary keys of the other entity sets.

The Relational Model4 Relationship Sets to Tables In translating a relationship set (without constraints) to a relation, attributes of the relation must include: Keys for each participating entity set (as foreign keys). This set of attributes forms a superkey for the relation. All descriptive attributes. Employees ssn name lot Departments did dname budget Works_in2 since Locations address capacity CREATE TABLE Works_In2( ssn CHAR(11), did INTEGER, address CHAR(20), since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (ssn, did, address), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, FOREIGN KEY (address) REFERENCES Locations, FOREIGN KEY (did) REFERENCES Departments);

The Relational Model5 Translating ER Diagrams with Key Constraints Map relationship to a table: did is the key Separate tables for Employees and Departments. Since each department has a unique manager, we could instead combine Manages and Departments. CREATE TABLE Manages( ssn CHAR(11), did INTEGER, since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, FOREIGN KEY (did) REFERENCES Departments); CREATE TABLE Dept_Mgr( did INTEGER, dname CHAR(20), budget REAL, ssn CHAR(11), since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees); Employees ssn name lot Departments did dname budget Manages since

The Relational Model6 Participation Constraints in SQL We can capture total participation constraint involving one entity set in a binary relationship. CREATE TABLE Dept_Mgr( did INTEGER, dname CHAR(20), budget REAL, ssn CHAR(11) NOT NULL, since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, ON DELETE NO ACTION); The Works_In relation contains ssn and did, which are foreign keys referring to Employees and Departments. We cannot enforce the participation constraints on the Works_In relation without using table constraints or assertions. Employees ssn name lot Departments did dname budget Manages since Employees ssn name lot Departments did dname budget Works_In since

The Relational Model7 Translating Weak Entity Sets Weak entity set and identifying relationship set are translated into a single table. When the owner entity is deleted, all owned weak entities must also be deleted. CREATE TABLE Dep_Policy ( pname CHAR(20), birthday DATE, cost REAL, ssn CHAR(11) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (pname, ssn), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees ON DELETE CASCADE); Employees ssn name lot Dependents pname birthday Policy cost

The Relational Model8 Additional Example CREATE TABLE Policies ( policyid INTEGER, cost REAL, ssn CHAR(11) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (policyid). FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, ON DELETE CASCADE); CREATE TABLE Dependents ( pname CHAR(20), age INTEGER, policyid INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY (pname, policyid). FOREIGN KEY (policyid) REFERENCES Policies, ON DELETE CASCADE); Employees ssn name lot Purchaser cost Policies policyid Dependents pname birthday Beneficiary

The Relational Model9 Views A view is just a relation, but we store a definition, rather than a set of tuples. CREATE VIEW YoungActiveStudents (name, grade) AS SELECT S.name, E.grade FROM Students S, Enrolled E WHERE S.sid = E.sid and S.age<21 Views can be dropped using the DROP VIEW command. How to handle DROP TABLE if there’s a view on the table? DROP TABLE command has options to let the user specify this.

The Relational Model10 Views and Security Views can be used to present necessary information (or a summary), while hiding details in underlying relation(s). Given YoungStudents, but not Students or Enrolled, we can find young students who are enrolled, but not the cid’s of the courses they are enrolled in.

The Relational Model11 Materialized Views A view whose tuples are stored in the database is said to be materialized. Provides fast access, like a (very high-level) cache. Need to maintain the view as the underlying tables change. Ideally, we want incremental view maintenance algorithms. What views should we materialize, and what indexes should we build on the precomputed results? Given a query and a set of materialized views, can we use the materialized views to answer the query? How frequently should we refresh materialized views to make them consistent with the underlying tables? (And how can we do this incrementally?)