BSE: World Situation and USDA Response FDA TSE Advisory Committee Silver Spring, MD October 14, 2004 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BSE Status-Recognition Yoshiyuki OKETANI OIE Deputy Regional Representative for Asia and the Pacific World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) The 30th.
Advertisements

Teaching Workshop Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Specified Risk Materials (SRMs)
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in Canada Pedro Piccardo, MD Division of Emerging and Transfusion-Transmitted Diseases Office of Blood Research.
Proposed SRM Disposal Permitting Process Natalie Bragg, D.V.M., M.Sc., Animal Health and Production Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of New Regulations and Policies to Further Enhance Safeguards Against Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy: An Update Linda A.Detwiler Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS, VS.
Analysis to Inform Decisions: Evaluating BSE Joshua Cohen and George Gray Harvard Center for Risk Analysis Harvard School of Public Health.
Food Safety and Inspection Service. USDA - Food Safety and Inspection Service 2 Meat and Poultry and Egg Products.
BSE outbreaks in the United States and Canada and the Impact on Trade Hyun J. Jin Won W. Koo Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies North Dakota.
Bovine Spongiform Encepalopathy, BSE Should FAO have maintained its silence?
Canadian and U.S. BSE Risk Steven Anderson, Ph.D, MPP Office of Biostatistics & Epidemiology Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research U.S. Food & Drug.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 Proposed BSE Comprehensive Rule: A New Approach to BSE Rulemaking Dr. Christopher Robinson Assistant Director, NCIE BSE Comprehensive.
FSIS Enforcement of Animal Drug Tolerances in Imported Meat and Poultry Products Food Safety and Inspection Service Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee.
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
April 11, 2008 “Who’s Minding the Store? The Current State of Food Safety and How It Can Be Improved” Conference sponsored by Marler Clark and Stoel Rives.
The University of Hong Kong Short-Sales Constraints and Price Discovery: Evidence from the Hong Kong Market Eric C. CHANG and Yinghui YU The University.
1 Harvard Risk Assessment of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Joshua T. Cohen, Ph.D. The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk Institute for.
The FishBase Information System Current coverage of Russian Biodiversity and Opportunities for Collaboration Rainer Froese Institute for.
Meeting of the General Assembly of UEVP Brussels 11 November Jan Vaarten, FVE Executive Director.
Teaching Workshop Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)
Canada’s BSE Story Presentation to the Ontario Association of Bovine Practitioners November 6, 2003.
BSE in the US APHIS Investigation and Response FDA TSE Advisory Committee February 12, 2004 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS,
Bovine-derived Products Used in the Manufacture and Formulation of Vaccines and Allergenic Products: Minimizing TSE Risks William M. Egan, Ph.D. Acting.
Capitalist. Main Points In a capitalist or free-market country, people can own their own businesses and property. People can also buy services for private.
Implementation of the animal slaughter regulation Andrea Gavinelli, Head of Unit Animal Welfare Directorate General for Health and Food Safety European.
BSE/TSE measures – state of play and future work Plenary of the Advisory Group on the Food Chain, Animal and Plant Health 19 December 2008.
January 2002 WHO/CSR/APH Efforts and needs for global control of BSE and vCJD Maura N. Ricketts MD MHSc FRCPC WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH.
Teaching Workshop Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Advanced Meat Recovery (AMR)
STATE OF PLAY : ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION. 2 Overall 2012 ESF Budget Execution on 20/11/2012 Programmin g period 2012 Payment appropriation s mil.€ 2012.
TSE Advisory Committee October 25, 2001 Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration Washington, DC Topic 3.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03J Slaughter Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
BSE: World update FDA TSE Advisory Committee Gaithersburg, MD September 18, 2006 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS, Veterinary.
MAD COW DISEASE Anna Hoffmann. What is it?  Mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), is a transmissible, slowly progressive fatal.
Topic 1: FDA Draft Guidance “Revised Preventive Measures to Reduce the Possible Risk of Transmission of CJD and vCJD by Blood and Blood Products” Dorothy.
David M. Asher, MD Division of Emerging & Transfusion-Transmitted Diseases Office of Blood Research & Review Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Uday Dessai, MS, Ph.D., M.P.H. Director, Microbiology Division Office of Public.
1 A Simulation Model to Quantify the Spread of BSE in the United States Joshua Cohen and George Gray Harvard Center for Risk Analysis Harvard School of.
Country EPS-12 Total (with ICPS) Hungary7979 Germany5559 Romania3841 Ukraine2527 United Kingdom1930 Finland1842 France1616 Italy1616 Poland1313 Switzerland1314.
Figure 1. PARTICIPATING STEM CELL DONOR REGISTRIES Number of registries Year ©BMDW.
The development of slaughterhouse control measures for BSE Elvis Šturbej, DVM Kiev, 4 – 5 April 2011 Workshop on Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)
Official investigation on a case of BSE on the example of a EU member state I Ivan Ambrožič, DVM, MSc Kiev 4. – 5- April 2011.
IEC System of Conformity Assessment Schemes for Electrotechnical Equipment and Components.
IEC System of Conformity Assessment Schemes for Electrotechnical Equipment and Components.
IEC System of Conformity Assessment Schemes for Electrotechnical Equipment and Components.
Legal framework of TSE surveillance Workshop on Prevention, Control and Eradication of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE) Serbian Ministry.
Table 1. Criteria for differentiating acute and chronic hepatitis C Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological.
IEC System of Conformity Assessment Schemes for Electrotechnical Equipment and Components.
European Innovation Scoreboard European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG EPG DGs meeting, May 2008.
Table 1. Number and rate of reported confirmed syphilis cases per population by country and year, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 ASR: age-standardised rate,
Table 1. Number and rate of Legionnaires’ disease cases per population by country and year, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 ASR: age-standardised rate, C: case-based.
Presented By: Manish Gidwani 10 Kapil Israni 16
Best Sustainable Development Practices for Food Security UV-B radiation: A Specific Regulator of Plant Growth and Food Quality in a Changing Climate The.
MEDIA Distribution 26 August 2009 Maud Rouxel - MEDIA Programme-EACEA.
USD billion
NSO data collections of subjective well-being
Table 1. Reported confirmed hepatitis A cases: number and rate per population, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 Source: Country reports. Legend: Y = yes, N =
How Canada Compares Internationally
The 1680 Family’s Reach.
Citi Virtual Card Accounts – Continued Global Expansion
Frequently Asked Questions About BSE
Selection of cities Anastasios Maroudas Eurogramme
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
“GHG Data – 2006” Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Data for 1990–2004
Leaving no-one behind UNAIDS.
European Union Membership
Task force on victimisation 4. Precision requirements
Why a KETs Observatory ? Commission Communication on Key Enabling Technologies (2012) : "There is no validated market data on development and take-up of.
Digital transformation of tax administration
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
Presentation transcript:

BSE: World Situation and USDA Response FDA TSE Advisory Committee Silver Spring, MD October 14, 2004 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS, Veterinary Services

Total BSE cases worldwide Cumulative total – greater than 188,900 cases Cumulative total – greater than 188,900 cases Greater than 96% in United Kingdom Greater than 96% in United Kingdom OIE website lists current reported totals: OIE website lists current reported totals:

Total BSE cases worldwide Austria1 Belgium126 Canada2 Czech14 Denmark13 Finland1 France926 Germany335 Greece1 Ireland1441 Israel1 Italy115Japan13Liecht.2 Luxemb.2 Netherl.76 Poland18 Portugal914 Slovakia18 Slovenia5 Spain479 Switz.454 Total non- UK 4957 UK183,972

EU summary BSE testing in 2003 (EU 15) BSE testing in 2003 (EU 15) Total of 10 million cattle tested (8.7 million healthy) Total of 10 million cattle tested (8.7 million healthy) 1,364 positive 1,364 positive Number of BSE cases and overall prevalence decreased by approximately 35% compared to 2002 Number of BSE cases and overall prevalence decreased by approximately 35% compared to 2002 Demonstrate control measures are having some effect Demonstrate control measures are having some effect

Prevalence: Cases per million adult cattle Adult cattle (mil) Positives Prevalence 2003 Prevalence 2002 Total EU Spain France Ireland Portugal UK

Assessments of country status Geographical BSE-risk Geographical BSE-risk Initial assessments completed in 2000 by SSC Initial assessments completed in 2000 by SSC Level I-IV Level I-IV US considered Level II in 2000 US considered Level II in 2000 EC requested re-assessments, due to additional findings of BSE EC requested re-assessments, due to additional findings of BSE US, Canada, Mexico, South Africa – Level III US, Canada, Mexico, South Africa – Level III Australia – remains Level I Australia – remains Level I OIE recognition of “provisionally free” OIE recognition of “provisionally free” Argentina, Iceland, Singapore, Uruguay Argentina, Iceland, Singapore, Uruguay

USDA-APHIS Import Regulations Title 9 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts Title 9 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts Part – list of countries affected with BSE or that present an undue risk of BSE Part – list of countries affected with BSE or that present an undue risk of BSE November 2003 – proposed rule: November 2003 – proposed rule: Create minimal risk category Create minimal risk category Import conditions for certain animals and products from minimal risk regions Import conditions for certain animals and products from minimal risk regions Place Canada in minimal risk category Place Canada in minimal risk category Reviewing and analyzing comments Reviewing and analyzing comments

Canadian situation 2 indigenous cases identified 2 indigenous cases identified May 2003 – beef cow in Alberta May 2003 – beef cow in Alberta December 2003 – dairy cow in Washington December 2003 – dairy cow in Washington Extensive epi investigations Extensive epi investigations SRM removal – June 2003 SRM removal – June 2003 Feed ban in place since considering additional animal feed restrictions Feed ban in place since considering additional animal feed restrictions Increased surveillance – targeted high-risk Increased surveillance – targeted high-risk Goal – 8,000 in >6300 samples to date Goal – 8,000 in >6300 samples to date Goal – 30,000 in 2005 Goal – 30,000 in 2005

FSIS Actions Federal Register - Jan 12, 2004 Federal Register - Jan 12, 2004 Prohibit non-ambulatory disabled cattle from slaughter for human consumption Prohibit non-ambulatory disabled cattle from slaughter for human consumption SRMs prohibited from human food SRMs prohibited from human food Tonsils, small intestine of cattle of all ages; brain, spinal cord, eyes, dorsal root ganglia, trigeminal ganglia of cattle >30 months Tonsils, small intestine of cattle of all ages; brain, spinal cord, eyes, dorsal root ganglia, trigeminal ganglia of cattle >30 months Mechanically separated meat prohibited from human food; process controls on AMR Mechanically separated meat prohibited from human food; process controls on AMR Carcass of animals sampled not passed for inspection until negative test results received Carcass of animals sampled not passed for inspection until negative test results received

BSE National Surveillance Plan GOAL: Obtain as many samples as possible from the targeted high-risk population in a month period

BSE Surveillance Plan Targeting population where disease is most likely to be diagnosed – most efficient Targeting population where disease is most likely to be diagnosed – most efficient Assumption if we cannot find disease in targeted – or most likely – population, even more unlikely to be found in non-targeted population Assumption if we cannot find disease in targeted – or most likely – population, even more unlikely to be found in non-targeted population Use data obtained to extrapolate information about broader cattle population Use data obtained to extrapolate information about broader cattle population

BSE – Targeted Surveillance Non-ambulatory animals Dead stock Field CNS Cases and on-farm suspects Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory data Public health laboratories Ante-mortem condemns at slaughter

BSE Surveillance – May 1990 – FY2004 ( thru 5/31/2004) 20,543 19, ,

Surveillance: NVSL Bovine Brain Submissions FY (through 5/31/04)

Enhanced BSE Surveillance Total – ELISA and IHC tests conducted since June 1, 2004 – through October 10 Total – ELISA and IHC tests conducted since June 1, 2004 – through October 10 All negative results (2 inconclusives) All negative results (2 inconclusives)81,349 (79,766 ELISA and 1,583 IHC)