1 Section 6- ISCO DESIGN  Initial Site Evaluation  ISCO Compatibility  ISCO Modeling and Dosage Considerations  Bench Testing  Pilot Testing/Delivery.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Groundwater Mounding and Minnesota ISTS Rules MPCA 2/21/06.
Advertisements

Introduction to Environmental Engineering Lecture 15 Water Supply and Groundwater.
Getahun Wendmkun Adane March 13,2014 Groundwater Modeling and Optimization of Irrigation Water Use Efficiency to sustain Irrigation in Kobo Valley, Ethiopia.
Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination in Texas
Estimation of characteristic relations for unsaturated flow through rock fractures Jerker Jarsjö Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology,
© 2011 COLUMBIA Technologies. Use of MiHpt Systems to Improve Project Outcomes Rapid, Real-Time High Resolution Site Characterization © 2013 COLUMBIA Technologies.
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
Water Contaminants Soluble Contaminants - dissolve in water Particulates/Colloids - carried by the water column Insoluble Contaminants - very low solubility.
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
Chemical Oxidation Treatment Technologies Susan J. Masten, Ph.D., P.E. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing,
Biodegradation of btex
Distribution of Nitrate in Ground Water Under Three Unsewered Subdivisions Erin P. Eid Mike Trojan Jim Stockinger Jennifer Maloney Minnesota Pollution.
Multiphase Extraction for Soil and Groundwater Remediation Nick Swiger Spring 2007.
Clean-up at BP Paulsboro New Jersey (USA) Roxane Fisher and Mark Ferguson.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
1 Soil Vapor Extraction Limitations and Enhancements LeeAnn Racz AgE 558 Semester Project April 2001.
Reactors . ä Reactor: a “container” where a reaction occurs ä Examples: ä Clear well at water treatment plant (chlorine contact) ä Activated sludge tank.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Partitioning of Volatile Organic Carbon Compoundss.
Partitioning of VOCs: Why do we care? ä Determines how best to treat a site ä vapor extraction ä pump and treat ä remove contaminated soil ä Determines.
Get to Know Your Groundwater By Jenny Erickson Sauk County UW-Extension.
Physical & Chemical Treatment Chapter 9. Chemistry Review Chapter 3.
1 In-Situ Treatment of Groundwater with Non-aqueous Phase Liquids December 10-12, 2002, Chicago, IL Scott G. Huling, Ph.D., P.E. USEPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental.
What’s New with In Situ Chemical Oxidation
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
LOGO Feasibility Test of Applying Complex Remediation Technology for Diesel Contamination in Soil and Groundwater 2012 International Conference on Environmental.
Groundwater and the Hydrologic Cycle
1 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION OF A HIGHLY CONTAMINATED BEDROCK SITE - The Oxygen Infusion Phase - J. Morrow D. Side By :
Describing Redoximorphic Features Prepared by: Mr. Brian Oram Wilkes University
Overview of Remedial Approaches at Superfund Fractured Bedrock Sites Edward Gilbert, CPG Technology Assessment Branch Technology Innovation and Field Services.
III. Ground-Water Management Problem Used for the Exercises.
Introduction to NAPLs Review of general concepts
1 Section 5: Limitations. 2 ISCO Limitations  Saturated Zone vs Unsaturated Zone  Chemistry  CoSolvents  Geology /Geochemistry/Hydrogeology  NAPL.
1 Section II: ISCO Technology  Importance of ISCO chemistry  Terminology  Reaction sequences/products/byproducts  Oxidant selection/contaminants 
1 Rapid & Complete In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Using Enhanced Anaerobic Dechlorination (EAD)
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Water Supply and Treatment. Average Precipitation.
1 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPALS OF In Situ THERMAL TREATMENT Professor Kent S. Udell Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental.
19 Basics of Mass Transport
1, 12/2/ Key factors for a successful ISCO application with Permanganate Prepared by: Richard W Lewis CPG Program Manager ERM.
Groundwater Pollution Nanotechnology. Nanotechnology involves the manipulation and understanding of matter at the molecular or atomic level. Due to the.
Donald Pope| IPEC 2015 Conference
DeNovo Constructors, Inc.
1 Section 4- Characterization  Characterization is 95% of the Success of ISCO  Develop a complete and comprehensive Conceptual Site Model  ISCO is a.
FULL - SCALE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PULSED AIR SPARGE AND SVE SYSTEM FOR TREATMENT OF VOCS, SVOCS, AND ARSENIC Authors: Kale Novalis, Nadira Najib, Omer Uppal,
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President.
Groundwater Water Table Recharge Groundwater Hydraulic Gradient
Considerations and operational challenges in choosing Membrane Filtration for a Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Ed Cross Division Manager, Water Supply and.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 21: Groundwater Hydrology Concepts – Part 1 1.
A comparison of numerical and field modeling techniques in tracking contaminant plumes: 1. Analysis of subsurface contaminant migration and remediation.
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (RECAP)
Groundwater. 1. Zone of Aeration 2. Water table.
Groundwater Water that soaks into the ground as it enters tiny air spaces in the soil and rocks.
By Alex Walton Josh Bush Alex Walton, Josh Bush1.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
Groundwater Pollution
1 Source Removal- Policy and Practice in the FDEP Robert C. Cowdery, P.E. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section Division of Waste Management Florida Department.
Expediting Site Remediation By Integrating The Membrane Interface Probe With In-Situ Remediation Injection Design Eliot Cooper,
Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Steve Comfort – University.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
Mark L. Brusseau University of Arizona
Background Professional Geologist - 36 years
Project Modeling ORP-Ph
Groundwater Protection in the Southern Willamette Valley
Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies
Impact of Flowing Formation Water on Residual CO2 Saturations
Deliberate tracer releases in Groundwater
ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION PILOT USING iSOC® TECHNOLOGY AT A FORMER MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT CASE STUDY PREPARED BY: MR. DAVID WORK, PE RETEC GROUP.
System Monitoring/Regulatory Evaluation
MARSOL Demonstrating Managed Aquifer Rescharchge as a Solution to Water Scarcity and Drought Christoph Schüth, Technische Universität Darmstadt.
Presentation transcript:

1 Section 6- ISCO DESIGN  Initial Site Evaluation  ISCO Compatibility  ISCO Modeling and Dosage Considerations  Bench Testing  Pilot Testing/Delivery System Evaluation  Full Scale  Combination Technologies

2 ISCO Design Process Initial Technology Screening Modeling Design Parameter Evaluation and Bench Testing Field Pilot/Initial Application Full Scale Application

3 Example Laboratory Test Oxidation Estimating Tool (OET) is predictive empirical model to estimate overall oxidant demand (OD) Stochiometry is only a small fraction of the actual oxidant required for ISCO Treatability test is run on several formulations to develop an efficiency curve and confirm OD The primary purposes of the OET are: 1. To determine the reactivity of the site media 2. To select the optimum reagent formulation 3. To observe adverse reactions, if any

4 OET Model Site Geochemistry/Geology Well Contaminants-Total Mass Treatment Volume Estimate

5 Site Geochemistry/Geology UnitsValue Range LimitsNotes Porosity%0.3 Permeabilitymd ,000 pHs.u.6.5<8.5 Specific conductanceuS/cm Groundwater temperature 0F0F Groundwater velocityft/day

6 Site Geochemistry/Geology UnitsValue Range LimitsNotes Redox potential (ORP)mV070 - (-70) Grain sizemm % pt. Dissolved oxygen (DO)ppm TDSppm TOC in groundwaterppm4<40 Hydroxyl scavengerppm100<400 Well diameterinch11/2 new SS

7 Contaminant Mass PSH, Sorbed, Dissolved CleanOX Appl. Well Existing MW Number of Wells Total VOCs (average for all Areas)ppm850 Area x7510 TICppm0 Area x130 (includes Area 1)35 TPH/Cosolvents ppm 0Area x Multiply the number of wells times the reagent requirement Total Contaminant Loadppm850

8 Treatment Volume Estimate CleanOX Appl. Well Existing MW Radius of Influenceft20 Area of Influencesft1258 Screen Depth, topft5 Screen Depth, bot.ft30 Total Treatment Volumecft31450 Total Groundwater Volumegal70583 Total Groundwater Weightlb588744

9 Design of Delivery Systems  Sufficient number of wells to provide adequate overlap of “effective zones” Can use trenches  Usually multiple application events  Oxidant transport can be reaction limited Effective radius of treatment will be substantially smaller than hydraulic/pneumatic radius of influence Higher oxidation reaction rates lead to smaller treatment radii  Caution should be used when designing injection / monitoring wells Stainless steel injection points may be needed

10 Pilot Test Design Bench test predicts best oxidant and combination of reagents only Pilot Calibrates Bench Prediction Identifies application parameters for full site design Develops optimal delivery process

11 Conditions that Require Special Delivery Consideration  Low permeable soils  Deep aquifers  LNAPL/DNAPL  Confined formations  Swamps or high organic soils  Old landfills and dumps  River embankments  Under buildings

12 Important Delivery System Considerations  Only treat sites that have been properly characterized  Treat from the perimeter of the target zone  Never treat within or down-gradient of contamination  Perform treatment to address all phases of Contaminant  If rebound occurs, realized that it is an indication of contamination not be contacted (within, above, next to, or below) not that ISCO does not work.

13  Contamination mass exists in four phases in the contaminated zone Soil gas Sorbed Dissolved Non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) or phase-separated  Geochemistry, partitioning coefficient (K ow ) determines the relationship between phases in the saturated zone  Majority of mass (normally >80%) is sorbed and phase-separated Total Mass Evaluation Nature of Contamination Graphic source: Suthersan, 1996

14 Delivery Systems Batch vs. Recirculation Batch Oxidant Injection Oxidant Recirculation Injection wells Extraction wells Contaminant Injection location Radius of treatment

15 Delivery Systems Application Conventional delivery configurations  Direct injection  Horizontal injection  Pulsing  Soil mixing  Density-driven flow  Lance permeation Treated soil columns Bedrock Soil Auger Water table

16 Delivery Systems Enhancement Innovations to increase effectiveness  Recirculation  Pneumatic fracturing  Hydraulic fracturing  Ozone sparging  Unsaturated zone delivery

17 Design Conclusions  Always perform limited Bench Evaluation  Pilot is needed to optimize delivery of Reagents  Mass transfer technologies limited in their effectiveness because they must rely on the natural slow and inefficient desorption of the contaminants of concern from the soil  ISCO enhances mass transfer from soil to groundwater by breaking down natural organic matter (NOM) (and sorption sites) and increasing temperature (peroxide co-addition)  Biological System rebounds effectively after ISCO